Steve Descano: Will “Not Prosecute” Harry Jackson

by Asra Nomani

FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. — An attorney from the office of Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney Steve Descano has filed a motion to nolle prosequi, Latin for “not prosecute,” Harry Jackson, a former U.S. Naval intelligence officer and father who has been a strong parent advocate against the war on merit education in this Washington, D.C., suburb.

A judge will hear the motion at a scheduled hearing on Friday, April 8, at 10 a.m. in Fairfax County District Court in Fairfax, Va.

In this truly bizarre case, chronicled fully here, a local woke activist, Jorge Torrico, filed four criminal complaints starting in September 2021 with the local magistrate, alleging that Jackson broke a little-used criminal law against “slander and libel,” by posting a tweet asserting that Torrico had engaged in “‘grooming’ behavior” during a November 2020 Zoom meeting of the PTSA at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. Jackson has a son at the school. Torrico is a 1998 graduate of the school and does not have any children who attend the school.

In one complaint, Torrico made a point of noting that Jackson is a member of the Coalition for TJ and a plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Pacific Legal Foundation against the Fairfax County School Board, raising serious questions about whether these complaints were politically motivated. Torrico is a leader in the TJ Alumni Action Group, which lobbied the school board to remove a race-blind, merit-based test to TJ, as the school is known. The board indeed changed admissions in December 2020. Jackson is a cofounder of Coalition for TJ (with me), arguing that the merit-based admissions process should be returned to TJ. Earlier this year, a federal judge sided with the Coalition for TJ and ruled the new admissions process is illegal, unconstitutional and anti-Asian. Torrico and TJ Alumni Action Group did not return requests for comment.

In the motion, filed Thursday, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney Paul Vitale wrote, “After a review of the facts and evidence for the four claims brought by Mr. Torrico, the Commonwealth does not believe there is sufficient evidence to prosecute the above-mentioned charges.”

But Jackson’s attorney, Marina Medvin, filed an objection, essentially saying not so fast. By simply stating that the prosecutor’s office will not prosecute the case, Descano leaves open the potential to prosecute Jackson in the future. She noted in her objection: “The government’s request is a constitutional copout,” essentially “opening the door to continued harassment of Jackson and any other individual whom the Complainant and others like him find offensive.”

Jackson’s attorney is seeking “dismissal with prejudice, a true closure in a criminal case.” The law that Torrico cited to harass Jackson was written in 1950 to protect the “chastity” of women from smears.

In her objection, Medvin noted that at a Feb. 23, 2022, hearing, the prosecutor’s office dragged the case out. “Instead of moving for a nolle prosequi or agreeing to dismiss the criminal case, the Commonwealth sought to continue the case to ‘investigate.’”

She continued, “It appears that the Commonwealth’s Attorney had done nothing during the five months that this case was pending and needed more time.”

Indeed, the judge granted the prosecutor the continuance, making the threat of prosecution hang over Jackson’s head for weeks.

“About three weeks had passed after the court date — and the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office had still not done anything with this case,” Medvin wrote, noting that on March 14, 2022, Torrico received two additional summons from the Fairfax County Magistrate’s Office against Jackson for the alleged crime (again) of “slander and libel.”

The case of the Commonwealth of Virgina v. Harry R. Jackson has alarmed parents around the country for its clear targeting of a parent who has emerged like so many parents as an accidental activist, calling out his local school board for impropriety. But like Jackson, they are defiant and undeterred in their championing for America’s children.

In the motion, Vitale wrote that “the Commonwealth is requesting the Court grant this motion and the case is removed from the docket on April 8, 2022.”

Medvin noted that Descano’s office has “decided to avoid taking a position on the stifling of free speech by an unconstitutional statute.”

She is correct. Parents — and journalists — should not face the threat of criminal “libel and slander” charges. The law that Torrico used to harass Jackson should be repealed and Descano needs to send a clear message that it is not a law fit for the 21st century.

This column has been republished with permission from Asra Investigates.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

23 responses to “Steve Descano: Will “Not Prosecute” Harry Jackson”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Instead of commending Descano on his decision not to prosecute, which she earlier had argued strongly for, Ms. Nomani continues to criticize him.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      What’s the downside, Dick? None. Besides, around here, it continues to be red meat.

    2. VaNavVet Avatar
      VaNavVet

      After Ms. Nomani finishes patting herself on the back maybe she can come back to reality.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, as Pappy used to say, “Dang boy, you’d probably complain if I beat you with a brand new stick!”

  2. VaNavVet Avatar
    VaNavVet

    There should be consequences for accusing someone of “grooming” in a public forum and Harry Jackson should suffer these consequences. Perhaps he can be the target of a civil suit.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I agree and it clearly is slander. “Grooming” is what some Conservatives are now claiming is going on in the schools. There is zero evidence of any of it but it ain’t stopping the claims. Civil suit – yes.

      Enough of this ass clown behavior. These fools need to
      be held accountable for what they say.

      ” Grooming is defined as the action of developing a relationship with a young person and gaining their trust to manipulate them. A groomer can be anyone – a man or a woman of any age. Contrary to what most people think, it’s not always a stranger either.”

      The public schools and teachers are now accused of this by some Conservatives.

      1. Timothy Watson Avatar
        Timothy Watson

        It’s not slander. The materials being pushed to children clearly meet the definition of “grooming materials” under state law:
        “Grooming video or materials” means a cartoon, animation, image, or series of images depicting a child engaged in the fondling of the sexual or genital parts of another or the fondling of his sexual or genital parts by another, masturbation, sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, anal intercourse, or object sexual penetration. (Va. Code § 18.2-374.4(B))

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Here is an example by a supposedly reputable “newspaper”. If you GOOGLE something like “grooming in public schools”, you’ll get URLs of many “conservative” media.

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3aa3d7c6a02bb93b905176ea92dd5109999dc1d2944f4abdeb20cd9d61339f91.jpg

        https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/15/how-public-schools-groom-kids-for-sexual-predators/

      3. Timothy Watson Avatar
        Timothy Watson

        It’s not slander. The materials being pushed to children clearly meet the definition of “grooming materials” under state law:
        “Grooming video or materials” means a cartoon, animation, image, or series of images depicting a child engaged in the fondling of the sexual or genital parts of another or the fondling of his sexual or genital parts by another, masturbation, sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, anal intercourse, or object sexual penetration. (Va. Code § 18.2-374.4(B))

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          then it does need to go to court to decide if public schools are “grooming” kids for predators, right?

          If true, then the teachers and administrators of the schools need to be charged. right?

          You guys are just over the top. I hope the courts get you good.

          This is what conservatism has come to.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          then it does need to go to court to decide if public schools are “grooming” kids for predators, right?

          If true, then the teachers and administrators of the schools need to be charged. right?

          You guys are just over the top. I hope the courts get you good.

          This is what conservatism has come to.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    As I wrote in response to the first article :

    “Descano is a slippery Soros-funded eel. However, he hasn’t decided to prosecute yet. Seems like we need to wait until he decides what he will do before raising a ruckus.”

    This seems like a non-issue.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      accusing teachers in public schools of ‘grooming” for sexual predation – is not a non-issue….

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      OMG!!! “Soros-funded.” Is the author of this article assisting with such piercing criticism?

  4. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    A “nolle prosequi” in this case is Descano’s attempt to play both sides against the middle. From my experience with Descano, I think he’s a pretty sharp lawyer and, on certain issues, makes reasonable arguments. He’s smart enough to know this is a clear attempt to criminalize dissent and exercising First Amendment rights to petition government for redress of grievances.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Election Day is coming. The voters will have a choice, I’m sure.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I don’t think accusing the schools and/or their employees and/or others engaged in allied school activities (like the PTSA) of “grooming” kids so they can be abused sexually – is First Amendment speech.

      ” alleging that Jackson broke a little-used criminal law against “slander and libel,” by posting a tweet asserting that Torrico had engaged in “‘grooming’ behavior” during a November 2020 Zoom meeting of the PTSA at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology.”

      If you publicly accused me or someone else of engaging in behaviors designed to “groom” children for sexual abuse – would you be slandering and libeling me? Wouldn’t you have to provide credible evidence to substantiate that/

      Do you guys seriously not see this for what it is?

      This is the current Conservative approach to opposing any discussion in the schools of sexuality.

      Their argument is that you can’t mention anything associated with sexuality without it being tantamount to potential “grooming” and their 1st amendment rights allow them to make these accusations in opposition.

      This is a “thing” with Conservatives. This is an overt strategy to stop the schools for dealing with the subject of sexuality. They’re calling such discussions as “grooming” in an effort to deter any teacher and and school from discussing it at all. It started out as a Q-anon conspiracy theory and now it’s becoming fairly mainstream with conservatives.

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d02197e513275cfa2f207d94e4ba8951004eadd8d76821520ee34ce02d3865ca.jpg

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/04/05/teachers-groomers-pedophiles-dont-say-gay/

      “The spokeswoman for Florida’s Republican governor tweeted in early March that anyone who opposes a bill forbidding teachers from talking about gender identity or sexual orientation with students in early grades is “probably a groomer or at least you don’t denounce the grooming of 4-8 year old children.” A few days later, Fox News host Laura Ingraham asked on national television, “When did our public schools, any schools, become what are essentially grooming centers for gender identity radicals?””

      ” In part spurred by the Florida bill, talking points on the right have coalesced around the idea that children will become vulnerable to sex abuse by receiving certain forms of sex education. As Max Eden, a research fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, argued in a Newsweek op-ed, parents are not being told enough about what happens in schools. They must wonder: “Is there anything obscene or immoral that public schools might start doing to my child?”

      RTD published an article this morning on a FOIA to DOE about emails to Conservative think tanks like AEI:

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fbe1ad1daa739a441da73728bd9b9ef8c264a93413de715c101b32cd1b9ba554.jpg

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/921721b10f5b2b14841226bf1acd3b754aba953a07a367dc2bc6d471770207d2.jpg

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I like to learn new things. Could have continued on blissfully ignorant of the concept of “grooming,” though. But now that I have focused on it, it does seem to be the point of what the screamers want to do to the little children, show them and incentivize their “options” but shhhhhh don’t tell your parents! A special place in Hell for those folks. Three R’s and a P for Pederasty.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Agree. There are and have been individuals guilty of predatory actions in various venues including schools.

      It does happen.

      But that is a totally different thing that accusing schools institutionally of fostering such activities as part of their curriculum and what teachers are supposedly being told to do as part of the instruction.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Disagree, sorry. If a local public library is inviting kids in for story hour with drag queens, that is exactly the goal and it is despicable. My wife took the granddaughter into our local library and unknowingly pulled off a child picture book extolling a very young person going trans, clearly aimed at readers about that age. My wife made up a story go to with the pictures. That’s intentional. That’s grooming.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          so this proves the public library is “grooming” kids for sexual abuse? Right?

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Disagree, sorry. If a local public library is inviting kids in for story hour with drag queens, that is exactly the goal and it is despicable. My wife took the granddaughter into our local library and unknowingly pulled off a child picture book extolling a very young person going trans, clearly aimed at readers about that age. My wife made up a story go to with the pictures. That’s intentional. That’s grooming.

  6. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    In my old neighborhood in the Bronx, we named folks like this author s***stirrers. Wait for the next cultural issue to arise in Fairfax to be presented with more such hyperbolic aggression.

Leave a Reply