Statues, Vengeance, and Ritual Humiliation

Jefferson Davis statue at the Valentine Museum.

by James A. Bacon

The movement to expunge Confederate statues from the public realm has reached a tipping point. It started with the proposition that many people, Blacks especially, found sculptures honoring the defenders of a slave nation to be offensive, regardless of the meaning the memorials conveyed to others. But the rhetoric has transmogrified from a cry to respect the sensitivities of Blacks into a vengeful purging of Southern White heritage.

Hundreds of statues and memorials were erected across the South in gratitude to the sacrifices of the Civil War generation and in a spirit of national reconciliation. Statues were not a “Southern” thing. Visit Gettysburg to see the innumerable statues and memorials to Northern generals, military units and soldiers. The veterans of the Civil War could forgive and forget, but for modern-day iconoclasts, history has no statute of limitations. There is is no forgiveness. Indeed, the movement now seems animated by a desire to humiliate.

The vengeful spirit can be seen at Virginia colleges and universities in the systematic expungement of names and memorials of any figure with any connection with the Confederacy — even if someone was conscripted into the Confederate army — regardless of his contributions to the institution or to broader society.

It can be seen in the decision to hand over the City of Richmond’s defenestrated Confederate statues not to the Civil War Museum, the Virginia Historical Society or any of the two dozen other museums, preservation groups, and cultural organizations that asked for them, but to the Black History Museum and Cultural Center of Virginia. Far from treating the statues respectfully, museum leaders have agreed to lend four to the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, where they will be displayed this November along with contemporary art commissioned to “reconsider” the Confederate tributes in the context of Black history.

One can get a sense of how the L.A. exhibit will treat the statues by looking to the Valentine Richmond History Center, where the statue of Jefferson Davis (admittedly, an unsympathetic character) is displayed in its toppled, mutilated, and spray-painted form.

But nowhere can the spirit of vengeance be seen more clearly than in Charlottesville, where the City gave a statue of Robert E. Lee to the Jefferson School African American Heritage Center, which then “disassembled” it. The museum proposes to melt down the pieces and turn them into a new piece of art — undoubtedly one that will be heavily freighted with politically “progressive” symbolism.

That transfer is being disputed in the courts, and the outcome is in doubt, but the message comes through loud and clear: We have the statue now, you can’t have it, and we’re going to stick it to you.

Leftists and progressives have created a narrative that the statues were erected in support of the Lost Cause mythology that upheld White supremacy during the Jim Crow era. Some memorials undoubtedly were put into place for that very reason, and I can understand why it might be justifiable to remove those particular pieces. But not all were. Leftists are creating their own mythology.

The truth is that Southern communities raised many statues to honor the heroism and sacrifices of the men and women who endured the searing conflict of total war. Look at the plaques. Read the testimonials. The memorials weren’t honoring slavery. They weren’t honoring Jim Crow laws. Many were tributes of love and appreciation. The White Southerners who erected them and those who seek to preserve them impart an entirely different meaning than leftists do. We seek to preserve the memorials because they honor the virtues of courage, integrity, martial valor, and shared sacrifice.

Preservationists understand that times change and values change. They acknowledge that there are competing perspectives about the meaning of the statues. And when the statues came down, some of us thought, well, it’s a shame, but maybe such controversial symbols were inappropriate for public places. Maybe it’s better to put them in museums, battlefields or cemeteries. Hopefully, we can just move past this.

But for the Left, there is no moving past it. In cities like Richmond and Charlottesville where they control the municipal machinery, militants aren’t interested in reconciliation. They are carrying out a cultural cleansing and are bent upon inflicting humiliation. And the struggle won’t end until the humiliation is complete.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to “Statues, Vengeance, and Ritual Humiliation”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    If one chooses not to be humiliated, one is not.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Kinda goes with the ol’ who makes a fool of whom.

      Offense, however, is different.

      1. Offense, however, is different.

        Really? How?

        Or were you being facetious?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          The victim.

          1. Let’s see: If one chooses not to be offended, one is not.

            That works. In fact, I think it is easier to choose not to be offended than to choose not to be humiliated.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Kinda goes with the ol’ who makes a fool of whom.

      Offense, however, is different.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Jeff Davis is still dead.

  2. M. Purdy Avatar

    “Leftists and progressives have created a narrative that the statues were erected in support of the Lost Cause mythology that upheld White supremacy during the Jim Crow era.” More than a narrative; linked directly to the Lost Cause movement, imposition of Jim Crow and massive resistance to CR. Are there exceptions? Sure. But you make it sound like the “narrative” is unfounded. It’s completely founded.

    “Some memorials undoubtedly were put into place for that very reason, and I can understand why it might be justifiable to remove those particular pieces. But not all were. Leftists are creating their own mythology.” Can you provide some examples of the latter? My own opinion is that memorials in battlefields and graveyards, esp. those erected before the 1880s, are much more defensible than R.E. Lee on Monument Ave., erected during the reimposition of Jim Crow, 25 years after the war ended.

    1. Philanthropist Paul Goodloe McIntire erected four statues in Charlottesville: Lewis Clark and Sacagewea; George Rogers Clark; Robert E. Lee; and Stonewall Jackson.

      Now gone, all of them.

      Explain if you will how a Revolutionary War hero who wrested the Northwest Territory from the British by forming fighting alliances with the Indians –for which reason we have we have all or part of five states — as well as the leaders of the Lewis and Clark expedition, reflect Jim Crow?

      McIntire’s correspondence is in the Charlottesville Albemarle Historical Society. We know why he bought land, created parks, and erected statues: to beautify the City. He said so. Improving the City he left as a teenager, and where he would retire from New York, with Yankee money.

      The Lee monument is Lee after Appomattox, atop Traveler, walking back hat in hand to tell his troops the war is over. No, we are not going to keep fighting as guerillas (as Lee had been urged). Reconcile. North and South, black and white, we are all Americans now.

      Given to the city in 1918, at the end of WW 1. Which is why when the city accepted the gift, they thanked McIntire for his “vision” to “look beyond war.” To which McIntire replied that Lee was greater in defeat than in victory.

      Jim Crow? We know why McIntire donated monuments of those who he considered heroes. We have it in writing. Anything else is Woke spin, and utterly groundless.

    2. Philanthropist Paul Goodloe McIntire erected four statues in Charlottesville: Lewis Clark and Sacagewea; George Rogers Clark; Robert E. Lee; and Stonewall Jackson.

      Now gone, all of them.

      Explain if you will how a Revolutionary War hero who wrested the Northwest Territory from the British by forming fighting alliances with the Indians –for which reason we have all or part of five states — as well as the leaders of the Lewis and Clark expedition, reflect Jim Crow?

      McIntire’s correspondence is in the Charlottesville Albemarle Historical Society. We know why he bought land, created parks, and erected statues: to beautify the City. He said so. Improving the City he left as a teenager, and where he would retire from New York, with Yankee money.

      The Lee monument is Lee after Appomattox, atop Traveler, walking back hat in hand to tell his troops the war is over. No, we are not going to keep fighting as guerillas (as Lee had been urged). Reconcile. North and South, black and white, we are all Americans now.

      Given to the city in 1918, at the end of WW 1. Which is why when the city accepted the gift, they thanked McIntire for his “vision” to “look beyond war.” To which McIntire replied that Lee was greater in defeat than in victory.

      Jim Crow? We know why McIntire donated monuments of those who he considered heroes. We have it in writing. Anything else is Woke spin, and utterly groundless.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        The association with Jim Crow is only one reason to take these Confed. statues down. There are other reasons, including the fact that R. E. Lee and Stonewall are and were inherent symbols of the Lost Cause. The Cville statues were put in a time when the Lost Cause myth was normalized and nationalized, right after the Birth of a Nation, with a presidential administration devoted to segregation and white supremacy. The R.E. Lee statue was put on border of the white and black parts of CVille. But irrespective of the context at the time, look at the present context. Look at what those symbols still represent and engender in our society! It’s not an accident White supremacists, neo-nazis, and militant thugs chose the R.E. Lee statue for Unite the Right; or that the Jan. 6 thugs waved Confed. flags; or that the 3 percenters chose Stone Mountain for a recent rally. They choose these locations because they symbolize their cause, regardless of whatever the McIntire’s intent may have been, or whatever your interpretation might be. The proof of the pudding is in who comes to taste it, as it were.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          May I assume that you would sign this Change.org petition?

          https://www.change.org/p/state-of-new-york-remove-memorials-statues-of-black-nationalist-malcolm-x

          Racists are racists after all.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            That petition’s an idiotic stunt. In any case, I did a quick Google search and I only see one memorial to Malcolm X, located at a private building in Harlem. Are there hundreds more we should all be concerned about? I know how black nationalism is such a societal scourge and all…

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Interesting that DJ aka “Plantation Elite” makes this point. After more than 100 years of racism and hate towards blacks, if they respond by becoming Black Nationalists – this is equivalent to the Confederacy and Jim Crow?

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            100 years? I would argue more like 300 years of subjugation and slavery. But let’s fret about a few Black Nationalists prominent for a decade or two as opposed to the hundreds of years of entrenched racism…makes sense to me!

        2. And George Rogers Clark? And Lewis and Clark? How do they relate to the “Lost Cause” myth?

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            I didn’t say that Lewis and Clark were part of the Lost Cause myth and I have no insight into that decision. I’m focused on taking down Confed. monuments.

  3. If we are deconstructing entities which in the past are now seen to be despicable……… should we not force the dissolution of the Democratic Party in its entirety? Actually, shouldn’t such a movement come from within the party — or does its history, and those you are members, not count?

    1. Republicans have some shady history too. Frankly, I endorse the abolishment of both parties.

      …and the libertarian party. Just because.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      We did kick out those who did not leave of their own accord…. check….

    3. M. Purdy Avatar

      People in the 1800s thought that slavery , and destroying the union to preserve it, were pretty bad, as it happens. It’s the Lost Cause that lulls us into thinking “this was normal.”

  4. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
    Joe Jeeva Abbate

    Wars & Elections have consequences.

    1. …..and the political party of racism…

  5. Kudos on an excellent summary of the situation.

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “But the rhetoric has transmogrified from a cry to respect the sensitivities of Blacks into a vengeful purging of Southern White Supremacist heritage.

    Fixed it for you…

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      I read that “Southern White heritage” term, lack of respect for ancestors, and attacks by liberals on tradition, and I immediately thought of this speech: https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/speeches-african-american-history/1963-george-wallace-segregation-now-segregation-forever/ Same themes.

  7. Charlie Potatoe Avatar
    Charlie Potatoe

    The Spirit of Reconciliation and mutual respect of those who fought in the Civil War for each other is alien to the haters of today who seek to divide us by distorting and misrepresenting the process of the healing the Nation after a bloody Civil War.

    Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain of the 20th Maine Volunteers, who may have saved the Union at Little Round Top on the second day of the Battle of Gettysburg, recounted accepting the surrender of John B. Gordon, one of Robert E. Lee’s most admired generals, to him at Appomattox:

    “Before us in proud humiliation stood the embodiment of manhood: men whom neither toils and sufferings, nor the fact of death, nor disaster, nor hopelessness could bend from their resolve; standing before us now, thin, worn, and famished, but erect, and with eyes looking level into ours, waking memories that bound us together as no other bond;—was not such manhood to be welcomed back into a Union so tested and assured?

    Instructions had been given; and when the head of each division column comes opposite our group, our bugle sounds the signal and instantly our whole line from right to left, regiment by regiment in succession, gives the soldier’s salutation, from the “order arms” to the old “carry”—the marching salute.

    Gordon at the head of the column, riding with heavy spirit and downcast face, catches the sound of shifting arms, looks up, and, taking the meaning, wheels superbly, making with himself and his horse one uplifted figure, with profound salutation as he drops the point of his sword to the boot toe; then facing to his own command, gives word for his successive brigades to pass us with the same position of the manual,—honor answering honor.

    On our part not a sound of trumpet more, nor roll of drum; not a cheer, nor word nor whisper of vain-glorying, nor motion of man standing again at the order, but an awed stillness rather, and breath-holding, as if it were the passing of the dead!”

    Would we have more of such Men of courage, honor, and mutual respect today.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      Fine, but we don’t have to have them lording over public spaces cast in idealized bronze. It’s a different question. Did Chamberlain speak to that phenomenon?

  8. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    As Douglas Murray said, if you show no respect for my history and my ancestors, I’m under no obligation to show any respect to yours.

    Nicely done, Jim.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      Respecting your ancestors doesn’t mean that the public has to gaze upon bronze statues anytime they walk down the street or into a park. That’s veneration, not respect. And speaking of not having respect for ancestors, it seems that engaging in continued Lost Cause mythology shows a stunning disrespect for the ancestors of African Americans today. Let’s put the statues in museums, battlefields, and cemeteries.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Rough translation: ” We want to venerate OUR WHITE HEROS in public places and we don’t give a rats behind about how black folks feel about memorials to racists who fought to continue to enslave their ancestors.”

        Do this for what, a hundred years or so then whine about “inherently divisive concepts” that “divide” us and spark racial disharmony.

        yepper

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          After the sh*tshow we’ve all seen in Richmond and Charlottesville over the past few years, don’t be surprised if a whole lot of us have concluded that we’re no longer interested in building any “harmony” with Those People we see spraying “ACAB” and “F*ck RPD” on the Lee Monument pedestal. The city of Richmond left those slurs up, in public view, for months. Silence–or inaction in this case—is consent.

          And, when Those People show up in the General Assembly and demand money for fixing their sorry communities and school systems, they should be ready to explain why it was more important to spend local money on statue removal instead of teacher or police salaries.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            Don, you’re walking dangerously close to George Wallace territory with statements like this.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’d say you and like-minded never had interest in “these people” from the get go. For 150 years, folks were content with the disparate treatment and racism then get their nose out of joint when black folks would like the jim crow veneration removed from public spaces.

      2. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        What qualifies you to determine that Confederate statues are only totems to Lost Cause mythology? But, if this is the game we’re going to play, then let’s play.

        We all know that the Black Lives Matter movement after George Floyd’s murder was really an effort to support Marxism and attack the nuclear family—-because those are BLM’s explicitly-stated goals.

        We also know that the people who wanted the statues removed are cop-haters, because they sprayed “ACAB” and “F*CK RPD (Richmond Police Department)” on the pedestal of the Lee Monument…and the city left those insults untouched, for the whole world to see, for months.

        What happens when the Native American soldiers and federal workers on Fort Bliss and Fort Huachuca object to the Buffalo Soldier gate (Bliss) and statue (Huachuca), because they venerate Black soldiers who waged genocide on local Native American tribes and forced them into a life of poverty and misery? To be on the safe side, we can put the Buffalo Soldier statues in a museum. Next to Jackson and Lee.

        1. M. Purdy Avatar

          It’s not me, it’s historical consensus outside of some pretty fringe quarters. There’s been a lot of scholarly work done on it, and several periodicals did articles on the Jim Crow/massive resistance connections since 2017 at least. I don’t want to play the ‘what about them’ game. Let’s stick to Confed. monuments.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Your Overton window is open.

  10. I’m amused by the irony of the museum’s “Please Do Not Touch” sign next to the defaced statue.

  11. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    Richmond’s favorite lolcow having a mental breakdown over the statue:

    https://youtu.be/LnaZAyUsvHo

  12. Armordog99 Avatar
    Armordog99

    “Confederate monuments proved controversial even in an era of sectional rapprochement and reconciliation. When the 2nd Maryland erected the first Confederate regimental monument atop Culp’s Hill, waves of indignation surged through the Union ranks. “I can assure you,” wrote Pennsylvania governor James Beaver, a Union veteran, “that no member of the [Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association] will consent to any individual rebel organization erecting monuments that bear inscriptions likely to follow treason and loyalty within the grounds.” True to form, one Ohio veteran registered his opposition to Confederate markers in dedicatory remarks for his unit’s regimental monument: “I do not believe there is another nation in the civilized world that would permit a rebel monument to stand upon its soil for a single day,” he sighed, “and I can see neither wisdom nor patriotism in building them here.” In a formal resolution, one Pittsburgh Grand Army of the Republic post clarified the position of many northern veterans on the question of Confederate monuments: “We are heartily in favor of marking the Rebel lines,” the ex-soldiers explained, “but we want the Government to do that work, not Rebels…When they erect their monuments it is to honor their dead and vaunt their rebellious acts. We don’t propose to have that.” These veterans jealously protected their role as the self-appointed custodians of the war’s historical memory.”

    https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/civil-war-veterans-and-their-monuments

    Many American veterans at the time of the erection of these rebel monuments were not willing to forgive and forget the treason perpetrated by the confederates.

Leave a Reply