Rep. Abigail Spanberger

By Peter Galuszka

U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-7th District, continues to draw international attention as a “New Look” Democrat from Virginia who is savvy about the intelligence community and global affairs.

The former CIA case officer was featured on CNN criticizing the administration of Donald Trump for ignoring reports that Russian military intelligence had paid bounties to the Taliban in Afghanistan to kill U.S. troops and members of the pro-U.S. coalition there.

Her comments were picked up by the British newspaper, the Guardian. This may be the first time that a woman Member of Congress has gotten so much exposure beyond borders of the Old Dominion.

Neither Dave Brat nor Eric Cantor, her Republican predecessors in the 7th district that includes parts of the once reliably Red Richmond suburbs of Chesterfield and Henrico, has gotten such exposure. The only other woman who has come close is U.S. Rep. Elaine Luria, a Democrat and former Navy officer who represents the 2nd District that includes Virginia Beach, another area that was once reliably Red.

On CNN June 30, Spanberger said that as a former CIA official she has “a lot of questions about who knew what when and what the next steps are.”

The New York Times and The Washington Post have reported that last year, perhaps earlier, U.S. intelligence officials and Special Forces troops had received information that a unit of the Russia GRU (Glavnoye Razvedatelnoye Upravledniye) was making cash payments to the Taliban for each U.S. solider or Marine killed.

The information was sent to defense and intelligence officials in Washington and was placed in the President’s Daily Brief (PDB), a tip sheet of some of the biggest security concerns that the White House needs to know. The White House has claimed the information was too uncertain to be brought to Trump’s attention. There is evidence that it was placed in Trump’s PDF and he did not read it. Some accounts claim that the intelligence was available perhaps as early as February.

Spanberger told CNN: “What concerns me most about these reports is that the Russian government was putting bounties on the heads of U.S. soldiers and our government took no action at the time when the president of the United States was still lobbying for Russia to be included in a G-7 summit, knowing that his government was responsible for the potential deaths of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan . . .”

She said that she knows from her CIA experience that nothing gets put in the PDF unless it is vetted and thought credible. “I am beyond words at times over thisIt’s just shameful and it’s so highly disappointing,” she said.

Spanberger and Luria have grabbed attention in their interviews and letters to newspaper editors. One such letter broke a logjam that was keeping the House of Representatives from considering Trump’s impeachment. The House did impeach Trump but the Senate did not approve removing him from office.

To be sure, the Russians have for years smarted over their decade-long incursion into Afghanistan that cost the lives of 15,000 Soviet soldiers. What turned the tide was the introduction, under President Ronald Reagan, of shoulder-held Stringer missiles that were used to shoot down numerous Soviet helicopters and other aircraft.

Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev ordered the troops withdrawn in January 1989. Working as a U.S. correspondent, I watched the withdrawal across a bridge from Afghanistan into Uzbekistan.

Spanberger, who won her seat in 2018, has been targeted by the state GOP. One possible opponent is Nick Freitas, a former Army Special Forces soldier. Freitas, who has raised $627,078 according to the Virginia Public Access Project, has stumbled since he failed to file certain election documents. He did the same thing in the 2018 race.

Spanberger has been deemed so important to the Democrats that she has raised $4,328,393, according to VPAP.

The Russian bounty matter isn’t going away. The New York Times reported today that U.S. officials have found evidence of bank transfers from the GRU to the Taliban.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

71 responses to “Spanberger Vs. Trump”

  1. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Madams. In general the russians and Americans have refrained from killing each other directly.
    Dick you are absolutely right about trump’s totally chaotic personnel changes. The sooner he is gone the better.

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      Chaotic personnel changes? Absolutely. And everybody who leaves seems to hate the man with a vengeance. Where there’s smoke there’s usually fire. Things will be better when Joe from Scranton installs his loyal cabinet of Ozzie Osborne, Jar Jar Binks, Captain Kangaroo, Lisa Simpson and whatever additional imaginary characters come to his mind.

      It’s hard to imagine a worse option than re-electing Donald Trump until you think about Joe Biden.

      Once again I may have to write in “James A Bacon”.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        If enough people find Biden uninspiring – and the Trumpsters turn out big as expected – it’s gonna be Deja Vu All Over Again.

        don’t believe the polls… they’re just as wrong as they were for Clinton.

      2. WayneS Avatar

        I’d be in favor of Shaggy from Scooby-Doo heading up the DEA.

    2. MAdams Avatar

      “Madams. In general the russians and Americans have refrained from killing each other directly.”

      Of this I’m aware and didn’t state otherwise. If you believe I did, point out where I indicated it hasn’t been a prolonged proxy since FDR and I’ll correct it.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I notice that even now , Cook rates Spanburgers district as R+5.

    and the GOP is planning to take that district back……..

    assuming the GOP can get their act together……

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      115 have resigned, retired, or been defeated since 2018.

      We have had a few Trump-endorsed candidates this year who were primaried from the even further out in nutland than they. That party is showing that, in some districts, the party is running against Trump from both the left side of the party and the right side.

      Gonna be interesting in November.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I notice that even now , Cook rates Spanburgers district as R+5.

    and the GOP is planning to take that district back……..

    assuming the GOP can get their act together……

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      115 have resigned, retired, or been defeated since 2018.

      We have had a few Trump-endorsed candidates this year who were primaried from the even further out in nutland than they. That party is showing that, in some districts, the party is running against Trump from both the left side of the party and the right side.

      Gonna be interesting in November.

  4. MAdams Avatar

    If she’s a former CIA officer and wasn’t aware that the Russia’s have been doing this since they stopped being our “friends” in 1945 she wasn’t very good at her job.

    All she’s doing is riding the outrage train because the public lacks the knowledge about what’s been occurring since FDR was cutting backroom deals with Stalin.

    Learn History.

  5. MAdams Avatar

    If she’s a former CIA officer and wasn’t aware that the Russia’s have been doing this since they stopped being our “friends” in 1945 she wasn’t very good at her job.

    All she’s doing is riding the outrage train because the public lacks the knowledge about what’s been occurring since FDR was cutting backroom deals with Stalin.

    Learn History.

  6. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) is real, and affects many folks on the left equally as many on the right. Some on the right seem to believe he is the second coming of Christ who will lead us to Glory. Some on the left believe he is the Devil himself (or whatever deity equates in the religion of progressivism). At the same time it is funny to watch him playing folks like a fiddle, and sad that so many are so gullible.

    The funniest part of it is that the MSM on the left (NYT, CNN, etc) who seem to be gunning for him to the greatest degree are the ones most responsible for his election. They have alienated so many in middle America (the Deplorables) that their derision of Trump flung middle America straight into his waiting arms.

    I really don’t think he is the root of the problem, but rather a symptom. Hopefully one day we’ll all get over this, but I don’t think it will be soon.

  7. kls59 Avatar

    She said that she knows from her CIA experience that nothing gets put in the PDF unless it is vetted and thought credible. “I am beyond words at times over this…It’s just shameful and it’s so highly disappointing,” she said.

    Then explain WHY Trump was briefed on the so -called unverified, uncorroborated Steele dossier?

    Many sources have stated that the so called ‘bounty’ was not verified and that multiple IC agencies disagreed with its veracity. It was also reported such information first came to US attention in 2015.

    I’ve briefed the PDB; from what I’ve read i doubt it was in the PDB; it might have been verbally briefed as ‘unverified, uncorroborated’.

    I find it interesting that all these politicians are up in arms that ‘intelligence’1 from a single source was not acted upon.

    When was the last time unverified, uncorroborated intelligence from a single source was used for US action?

    Oh that’s right — CURVEBALL which stated the Iraqis has mobile chemical weapons facilities [WMD]……the result was the Iraqi War.

    1 the term intelligence has many meanings in the IC: information from a source, the act of analyzing such information, and the product created for policy makers.

  8. kls59 Avatar

    She said that she knows from her CIA experience that nothing gets put in the PDF unless it is vetted and thought credible. “I am beyond words at times over this…It’s just shameful and it’s so highly disappointing,” she said.

    Then explain WHY Trump was briefed on the so -called unverified, uncorroborated Steele dossier?

    Many sources have stated that the so called ‘bounty’ was not verified and that multiple IC agencies disagreed with its veracity. It was also reported such information first came to US attention in 2015.

    I’ve briefed the PDB; from what I’ve read i doubt it was in the PDB; it might have been verbally briefed as ‘unverified, uncorroborated’.

    I find it interesting that all these politicians are up in arms that ‘intelligence’1 from a single source was not acted upon.

    When was the last time unverified, uncorroborated intelligence from a single source was used for US action?

    Oh that’s right — CURVEBALL which stated the Iraqis has mobile chemical weapons facilities [WMD]……the result was the Iraqi War.

    1 the term intelligence has many meanings in the IC: information from a source, the act of analyzing such information, and the product created for policy makers.

  9. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    “Then explain WHY Trump was briefed on the so -called unverified, uncorroborated Steele dossier?”

    Because he was the subject of the dossier? Professional courtesy.

    1. kls59 Avatar

      The IC does not brief known lies…at the time of Comey’s briefing it was known Steele’s info was made up bar room dribble. The Russian sub-source had admitted such to the FBI. If you know anything about policy maker support [even newly elected ones] you would know this was unacceptable and not within the norm. But, having only 29 years experience doing just this….what do I know about facts and TTP.

  10. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    “Then explain WHY Trump was briefed on the so -called unverified, uncorroborated Steele dossier?”

    Because he was the subject of the dossier? Professional courtesy.

    1. kls59 Avatar

      The IC does not brief known lies…at the time of Comey’s briefing it was known Steele’s info was made up bar room dribble. The Russian sub-source had admitted such to the FBI. If you know anything about policy maker support [even newly elected ones] you would know this was unacceptable and not within the norm. But, having only 29 years experience doing just this….what do I know about facts and TTP.

  11. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Kls59. Can you tell us who you worked for when you handled the PDB? Is that classified? If you won’t say, why should we take your
    word for it? Also, what does the Steele dossier have to do with this?

    1. kls59 Avatar

      CIA.
      I mentioned the dozzier because NN mentioned that Trump was briefed on it… and that action was a political move outside of the norm of policy maker support — one of many such moves by D/FBI Comey, which he admitted on multiple occasions.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        No, I didn’t bring the subject up, you did.
        You asked why he was briefed on what you said was entirely fictitious.
        I suggested perhaps he was briefed only because he was the subject. Had the subject been, oh, I dunno, Romney, he may not have received the brief.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      Mr. Peter I encourage you to write a memoir of your career. I would enjoy an anecdote of your memory of the Soviet’s in retreat across that bridge.

    3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      I believe him Peter. Everyone here is believable. Someone had to carry the unread hard copy of the PDB on the tray with the donuts and coffee.

  12. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Kls59. Can you tell us who you worked for when you handled the PDB? Is that classified? If you won’t say, why should we take your
    word for it? Also, what does the Steele dossier have to do with this?

    1. kls59 Avatar

      CIA.
      I mentioned the dozzier because NN mentioned that Trump was briefed on it… and that action was a political move outside of the norm of policy maker support — one of many such moves by D/FBI Comey, which he admitted on multiple occasions.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        No, I didn’t bring the subject up, you did.
        You asked why he was briefed on what you said was entirely fictitious.
        I suggested perhaps he was briefed only because he was the subject. Had the subject been, oh, I dunno, Romney, he may not have received the brief.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      Mr. Peter I encourage you to write a memoir of your career. I would enjoy an anecdote of your memory of the Soviet’s in retreat across that bridge.

    3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      I believe him Peter. Everyone here is believable. Someone had to carry the unread hard copy of the PDB on the tray with the donuts and coffee.

  13. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    As loathe as I am to do such, I choose Bolton’s account, even with an obvious profit motive, over anything Trump might say. The only indication that Bolton could possibly be lying about anything concerning his time in the WH would be if he and Trump were in factual agreement.

  14. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    As loathe as I am to do such, I choose Bolton’s account, even with an obvious profit motive, over anything Trump might say. The only indication that Bolton could possibly be lying about anything concerning his time in the WH would be if he and Trump were in factual agreement.

  15. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Kls59,
    Interesting. We may know some of the same people

  16. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Kls59,
    Interesting. We may know some of the same people

  17. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I live in the district Spanberger represents. I certainly do not want someone representing me in Congress who is so negligent that he missed election filing deadlines two years in a row.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      She. Abigail.

      1. MAdams Avatar

        He was referring to Nick Freitas.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Teach me… look at search result… the headline and 1st paragraph mismatch.

          ImageRichmond Times-Dispatch › news
          Web results
          Freitas takes responsibility for missing another paperwork filing deadline | Virginia | richmond.com – Richmond Times-Dispatch
          Jun 15, 2020 · Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, took responsibility Monday for missing a deadline to file campaign paperwork for the second straight year. Last year, Freitas, R-Culpeper, was re-elected to …

          1. MAdams Avatar

            “Spanberger, who won her seat in 2018, has been targeted by the state GOP. One possible opponent is Nick Freitas, a former Army Special Forces soldier. Freitas, who has raised $627,078 according to the Virginia Public Access Project, has stumbled since he failed to file certain election documents. He did the same thing in the 2018 race.

            The above text was 3rd to last paragraph in the article you’re comment on, that was what Dick was referring.

            I’ll await your apology.

          2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            Not an RTD subscriber. Couldn’t load the page.

            What I posted is what Google displayed, I.e., search result.

            Sorry you misunderstood again.

          3. MAdams Avatar

            Umm the article you’re commenting on is on BR, the comment that Dick made was on BR. The snip-it of superfluous crap you posted was just that, irrelevant to his comment.

            I quoted the very article from above to which Dick was referring, I wasn’t wrong yesterday and wasn’t wrong today.

            Again, you’re behind you should just stop, less you want to be further embarrassed.

          4. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            (Sighs)

  18. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I live in the district Spanberger represents. I certainly do not want someone representing me in Congress who is so negligent that he missed election filing deadlines two years in a row.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      She. Abigail.

      1. MAdams Avatar

        He was referring to Nick Freitas.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Teach me… look at search result… the headline and 1st paragraph mismatch.

          ImageRichmond Times-Dispatch › news
          Web results
          Freitas takes responsibility for missing another paperwork filing deadline | Virginia | richmond.com – Richmond Times-Dispatch
          Jun 15, 2020 · Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, took responsibility Monday for missing a deadline to file campaign paperwork for the second straight year. Last year, Freitas, R-Culpeper, was re-elected to …

          1. MAdams Avatar

            “Spanberger, who won her seat in 2018, has been targeted by the state GOP. One possible opponent is Nick Freitas, a former Army Special Forces soldier. Freitas, who has raised $627,078 according to the Virginia Public Access Project, has stumbled since he failed to file certain election documents. He did the same thing in the 2018 race.

            The above text was 3rd to last paragraph in the article you’re comment on, that was what Dick was referring.

            I’ll await your apology.

          2. MAdams Avatar

            Umm the article you’re commenting on is on BR, the comment that Dick made was on BR. The snip-it of superfluous crap you posted was just that, irrelevant to his comment.

            I quoted the very article from above to which Dick was referring, I wasn’t wrong yesterday and wasn’t wrong today.

            Again, you’re behind you should just stop, less you want to be further embarrassed.

  19. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    The problem is I no longer believe anything in the New York Times. Its obsession with “getting” Trump has overridden any journalistic integrity. Just because everybody is assuming this is correct doesn’t make it correct. And from my own fairly good source inside that world (who once worked on the USAF contribution to the summaries), this has been an intelligence community coup attempt from the start, it truly has. Now, is Bolton right about the failings of the Current Incumbent? Probably. Were my concerns about his blind eye toward Putin and Xi the principal reasons I voted for an also ran? Yes.

    Did the United States pay Afghans to kill Russians in the past? Absolutely. No question. They happily take money and guns from any and all Western stooges. If this is happening, its sauce for the goose. Reap what you sow.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It seems strained to argue that there is an intelligence community coup attempt afoot. After all, the President’s appointees head up all the intelligence agencies. Don’t they vet whatever goes into the PDB before it is distributed in the White House?

      1. MAdams Avatar

        No, the intel analysts do the vetting, heads are just that they are figureheads for the most part. The bureaucrats who have occupied their offices and desks for any number of years are the ones that run the shows, how they see fit.

        Not to disparage Rep. Spanberger or her service, but most people who tout their employment at the Agency weren’t very important to it and or weren’t what they currently claim to be. The Agency just isn’t going to correct them, they’ll burn them in other ways if they feel it necessary.

      2. Steve Haner Avatar
        Steve Haner

        They don’t vet what some middle level careerist whispers to a NYT reporter from his phone…..

    2. MAdams Avatar

      It’s just another step in the proxy war that started in when Stalin was running the show.

    3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      No longer? That implies that at one time…

  20. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    The problem is I no longer believe anything in the New York Times. Its obsession with “getting” Trump has overridden any journalistic integrity. Just because everybody is assuming this is correct doesn’t make it correct. And from my own fairly good source inside that world (who once worked on the USAF contribution to the summaries), this has been an intelligence community coup attempt from the start, it truly has. Now, is Bolton right about the failings of the Current Incumbent? Probably. Were my concerns about his blind eye toward Putin and Xi the principal reasons I voted for an also ran? Yes.

    Did the United States pay Afghans to kill Russians in the past? Absolutely. No question. They happily take money and guns from any and all Western stooges. If this is happening, its sauce for the goose. Reap what you sow.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It seems strained to argue that there is an intelligence community coup attempt afoot. After all, the President’s appointees head up all the intelligence agencies. Don’t they vet whatever goes into the PDB before it is distributed in the White House?

      1. MAdams Avatar

        No, the intel analysts do the vetting, heads are just that they are figureheads for the most part. The bureaucrats who have occupied their offices and desks for any number of years are the ones that run the shows, how they see fit.

        Not to disparage Rep. Spanberger or her service, but most people who tout their employment at the Agency weren’t very important to it and or weren’t what they currently claim to be. The Agency just isn’t going to correct them, they’ll burn them in other ways if they feel it necessary.

    2. MAdams Avatar

      It’s just another step in the proxy war that started in when Stalin was running the show.

    3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      No longer? That implies that at one time…

  21. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Ripper. Write again? Please do. Miss your wit and clear thinking.
    Jim, I read that Spanberger and other members of House Foreign Affairs were supposed to be briefed in detail either yesterday or today. Don’t know what happened. In any case it us likely classified. Not surprised at NSA report.

  22. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Madams. In general the russians and Americans have refrained from killing each other directly.
    Dick you are absolutely right about trump’s totally chaotic personnel changes. The sooner he is gone the better.

    1. MAdams Avatar

      “Madams. In general the russians and Americans have refrained from killing each other directly.”

      Of this I’m aware and didn’t state otherwise. If you believe I did, point out where I indicated it hasn’t been a prolonged proxy since FDR and I’ll correct it.

    2. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      Chaotic personnel changes? Absolutely. And everybody who leaves seems to hate the man with a vengeance. Where there’s smoke there’s usually fire. Things will be better when Joe from Scranton installs his loyal cabinet of Ozzie Osborne, Jar Jar Binks, Captain Kangaroo, Lisa Simpson and whatever additional imaginary characters come to his mind.

      It’s hard to imagine a worse option than re-electing Donald Trump until you think about Joe Biden.

      Once again I may have to write in “James A Bacon”.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        If enough people find Biden uninspiring – and the Trumpsters turn out big as expected – it’s gonna be Deja Vu All Over Again.

        don’t believe the polls… they’re just as wrong as they were for Clinton.

      2. MAdams Avatar

        I think more of the irony is that Biden is a known. He’s been in DC for 40 years and all the change he’s not promising he didn’t or couldn’t deliver back as a Senator. As a POTUS you have zero legislative power, what exactly do they think he can do.

      3. WayneS Avatar

        I’d be in favor of Shaggy from Scooby-Doo heading up the DEA.

  23. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) is real, and affects many folks on the left equally as many on the right. Some on the right seem to believe he is the second coming of Christ who will lead us to Glory. Some on the left believe he is the Devil himself (or whatever deity equates in the religion of progressivism). At the same time it is funny to watch him playing folks like a fiddle, and sad that so many are so gullible.

    The funniest part of it is that the MSM on the left (NYT, CNN, etc) who seem to be gunning for him to the greatest degree are the ones most responsible for his election. They have alienated so many in middle America (the Deplorables) that their derision of Trump flung middle America straight into his waiting arms.

    I really don’t think he is the root of the problem, but rather a symptom. Hopefully one day we’ll all get over this, but I don’t think it will be soon.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I more or less agree with your assessment with one skepticism – and that’s that Trump supporters like him no matter what CNN/NYT say. They don’t just like Trump because the MSM dislikes him. They support his values including the religious right of all folks… Many of these folks started with the Tea party and were already at odds with even the likes of Bush.

      The fact that Trump also is willing to do battle with the MSM is icing on the cake but he is making massive changes to much of the Federal bureaucracy from the EPA to Voice America, to OSHA, to the CDC, to ObamaCare, wide ranging changes that his supporters want.

  24. The news came out today that the NSA does not share the CIA’s assessment of the intelligence. Personally, I don’t find the Russians-paying-Taliban-to-kill-American-soldiers hard to believe — not that the Taliban needed a monetary incentive to do what they were bent upon doing anyway. As Peter noted, we sent Stinger missiles to the Afghan rebels fighting the Russians. Why wouldn’t the Russians return the favor?

    Let’s assume for a moment that the CIA intelligence assessment is the accurate one. What do we do about it? Does Spanberger go beyond her criticism of Trump to actually proffer a suggestion?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I do not think there is a problem is how to retaliate from the traditional players in the intelligence community – but a lot of it won’t get Trumps support and so it’s blocked before it starts.

      But I agree – that the US did all manner of things to undermine the Soviet Union when they were in Afghanistan, so I’m not sure what all the shock and outrage is now except as anti-Trump.

  25. The news came out today that the NSA does not share the CIA’s assessment of the intelligence. Personally, I don’t find the Russians-paying-Taliban-to-kill-American-soldiers hard to believe — not that the Taliban needed a monetary incentive to do what they were bent upon doing anyway. As Peter noted, we sent Stinger missiles to the Afghan rebels fighting the Russians. Why wouldn’t the Russians return the favor?

    Let’s assume for a moment that the CIA intelligence assessment is the accurate one. What do we do about it? Does Spanberger go beyond her criticism of Trump to actually proffer a suggestion?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I do not think there is a problem is how to retaliate from the traditional players in the intelligence community – but a lot of it won’t get Trumps support and so it’s blocked before it starts.

      But I agree – that the US did all manner of things to undermine the Soviet Union when they were in Afghanistan, so I’m not sure what all the shock and outrage is now except as anti-Trump.

  26. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Ripper. Write again? Please do. Miss your wit and clear thinking.
    Jim, I read that Spanberger and other members of House Foreign Affairs were supposed to be briefed in detail either yesterday or today. Don’t know what happened. In any case it us likely classified. Not surprised at NSA report.

Leave a Reply