by James A. Bacon

Four students who participated in the pro-Gaza encampment protest May 4 are complaining that the University of Virginia is withholding their degrees pending the outcome of University Judiciary Committee hearings into their cases.

Go ahead and berate me for my cold, cold heart but I feel zero sympathy for their plight. When you engage in civil disobedience — the protesters defied repeated orders to break up the encampment — you take the consequences.

In this instance, it appears that the consequences have been exceptionally light: Local lefty prosecutors have declined to press charges against a single protester in the municipal courts. The problem is that school is out and the student judiciary is not in session, and it may not be able to adjudicate university complaints until students return in August.

The Daily Progress article exudes sympathy for the four protesters, among 11 whose fates are in limbo, because they can’t get a sheepskin. It is difficult, the newspaper avers, “to find work in a job market in which employers often require a bachelor’s degree.”

Maybe they should have thought about that when they defied repeated warnings to disperse their gathering. But, no, we live in an era in which vast swaths of the population, especially those on the ideological left, feel entitled to consequence-free conduct.

“I did everything to fulfill my degree,” Cady de la Cruz, told The Daily Progress, which helpfully added that she is a “first-generation college student,” as if her socioeconomic status should make a difference. “The only reason UVA has stalled the process is to make an example out of me.”

It’s good to see that UVA administrators are showing some backbone. Complaints against the students were filed by Donovan Golich and Elizabeth Ortiz, both employees of UVa’s Division of Student Affairs.

“Students would not face trial, and degrees would not be withheld if Ortiz and Golich withdrew their complaints,” states The Daily Progress.

Of course, the students would not face their predicament if they’d dispersed May 4.

I don’t often find myself in agreement with UVA President Jim Ryan, but he made a legitimate point when defending his decision to have police break up the encampment. There is a long tradition in America, he said, of civil disobedience, of breaking the law in order to make a point. Moral authority comes from the fact that protesters are willing to accept punishment as a sign of commitment to their cause.

Today’s protesters want to defy authority and suffer no punishment. 

As for the “dozens of faculty members,” referred to in the article, who urged Student Affairs to drop their complaints against the 11, they have no shame. Not one raised a finger in defense of Morgan Bettinger when she was dragged before the student judiciary on the basis of fabricated allegations, was required to perform community service, was subjected to other acts of penance, and was unable to clear her record until she filed a lawsuit against the University. She couldn’t get on with her life either — for some two years, not one summer. That was a genuine injustice, and not a single faculty member spoke out.

If it weren’t for double standards, as the saying goes, those people would have no standards at all.

James A. Bacon is contributing editor to The Jefferson Council. The views expressed here are his own.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Somebody Call a Waaambulance!”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    TJC: “UVa must never take action to stifle the free and open exercise of First Amendment rights on campus… unless we don’t like what is being said, of course…”

    1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Putting up tents and refusing to remove them from University property is not protected speech. They could have picketed and, with University approval, received a permit to do more. But they didn't and, thus, violated University policy and various laws.

      When action goes beyond protected speech, there are consequences. For example, the DoJ has regularly prosecuted people blocking entrances to abortion clinics under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.

      So, shouldn't we have equal enforcement of these types of laws? Go beyond protected speech and suffer the consequences.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I don't disagree but was curious when the "no encampment" rule was formalized? Was it there already before these protests?

        And yes , equal enforcement of the laws and rules. no question!

      2. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        And…the people protesting the abortion entrances are not threatening, intimidating, yelling at – they are singing hymns. They get years in prison…
        Come on great defenders of free speech – where are you?
        (I mean besides your usual Greek theater role)

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          The Operation Rescue folk physically blockaded access to abortion clinics in direct violation of federal law which made that action unlawful. They weren’t arrested for singing hymns.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            easy search on google about abortion protestors and their tactics… which are not always "peaceful".

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          The Operation Rescue folk physically blockaded access to abortion clinics in direct violation of federal law which made that action unlawful. They weren’t arrested for singing hymns.

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “Putting up tents and refusing to remove them from University property is not protected speech.”

        Ummm… not so sure about that but if it is not, it should result in a misdemeanor criminal trespassing charge (apparently it did not which pretty much says that this was protected speech). What is happening administratively via the University sure smacks of retribution and looks to be designed to stifle the student’s 1st amendment rights. I hope a law firm comes along and files suit for them. Would be a pretty good case to observe.

      4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “Putting up tents and refusing to remove them from University property is not protected speech.”

        Ummm… not so sure about that but if it is not, it should result in a misdemeanor criminal trespassing charge (apparently it did not which pretty much says that this was protected speech). What is happening administratively via the University sure smacks of retribution and looks to be designed to stifle the student’s 1st amendment rights. I hope a law firm comes along and files suit for them. Would be a pretty good case to observe.

    2. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      You can count on the Troll to show up and be wrong, with an upvote from Larry.
      Lemme see- Left Wing Jew hate = free speech and you can break the law with impunity.
      Right wing Jew hate = greatest crime of the century and all must be prosecuted (BTW Nazis were socialists… and whole event seemed agit-propish, including the orchestrated protesters and the law enforcement failure to keep the crowd apart)
      What's the diff great defenders of free speech?
      How come your side likes to break the anti-Klan laws, and your Left wing prosecutors won't enforce it? Which side are you on? (Besides hypocritical, law breaking side)
      WRT OMB, no one is above the law, even our invented laws! WRT favored activists already getting a huge break, waaaah…that's not fair. Just wait until Niemoller's poem comes for you… You'll be pretty soon after the Left achieves total power…of no more use and to be thrown away as the dupes you were…

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        QED

        BTW WRT “break the law with impunity”, it sounds like all charges were dropped which pretty much sounds like this is protected speech. And again, the irony of TJC’s position here is kind of amazing.

Leave a Reply