Solar Farms Trump Environmental Justice in Virginia

Dominion’s Amazon Solar Farm in Pittsylvania County – Courtesy New York Times.

by James C. Sherlock

Virginia is a solar energy boom state.

The Commonwealth ranked 4th in total generating capacity of new solar installations in 2020. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) in 2021 ranked Virginia 6th nationally for projected growth in solar capacity over the next 5 years.

The left is consumed by concern for environmental justice. Except when it isn’t. Like when it wants green energy.

Take the location of utility-scale (>5 MW) solar farms in Virginia. Virtually all of them were sited during the administrations of Democratic governors. Each was subject to environmental reviews by multiple agencies of the state government, coordinated by the Department of Environmental Quality.

And yet let’s look where they have been built and are planned.

Places like Emporia. Places like Essex, Buckingham, Charlotte and Lunenburg Counties where new solar farms are under development.

Environmental justice did not make the cut during the Northam and McAuliffe administrations’ rush for green energy.

Poor, rural Black people, and Republicans, apparently needed to take one for the team.
From the U.S. Department of Energy.

Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Fair treatment means that no population bears a disproportionate share of negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, municipal, and commercial operations or from the execution of federal, state, and local laws; regulations; and policies. [Emphasis added.]

Virginia Background.

Virginia’s Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) is the state proponent of increasing solar energy production to meet the state’s 2050 goal of carbon-free electricity generation.  

That goal was set by Ralph Northam in 2019 and made law by the Virginia Clean Economy Act, passed in 2020 with Democratic control in Richmond.  

Progressives dismiss solar farm impact as 1% of the land in Virginia. True, except in those few places in which they are actually located. Such as Buckingham, Essex, Charlotte, Lunenburg, Halifax, Charles City County and Greensville (Emporia) Counties.

Eight projects covering some 5,500 acres have been approved in Halifax County alone.

By Census Bureau reports, those are six of the poorest counties in Virginia. Each is disproportionately Black compared to the state as a whole.

Emporia is two thirds Black and has a median household income 40% of the state average. Sandler Solar partnered with Dominion Energy for the Emporia project.

Spotsylvania County exception. The Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors and School Board are always good for a laugh.

A massive solar project, at the time the largest on the east coast, was approved by the Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors in 2019 against the recommendation of its own planning commission.

The Livingston District, in which the project is located, is a wealthy area. The citizens were not amused — with the certain exceptions of whoever sold the land and the County Supervisor at the time from that district.

Greg Benton, the Livingston District Supervisor who voted for the project, declined to run for that position again. Benton told The Free Lance-Star that “the solar Power Special Use Permit application process took its toll on him and contributed to the decision not to run.”

No kidding.

Black and Republican Counties. The Northam Administration in its impact assessments may have noted that Spotsylvania County voted for President Trump twice and has a higher proportion of Black residents than the average Virginia jurisdiction. As did nearly every county where solar farms are sited except those where Black people are very highly concentrated as in Southside.

Not one solar installation in the progressive heartlands of Northern Virginia and Charlottesville/Albemarle. Where the money for both Democrats and anti-climate change initiatives originate.

Just worked out that way.

Under Development.

Where in Virginia are solar farms under development?

There are many companies now in the process of developing solar farms, including SolUnesco, Apex and Commonwealth Solar Partners. Dominion Energy is working on Pineside Solar in Buckingham County, SolUnesco is working to develop Randolph Solar in Charlotte County and Apex has two projects in the works: Moody Creek Solar in Charlotte County and Red Brick Solar in Lunenburg County.

Environmental justice?

A developer needs a permit from the state, which involves many state agencies in Virginia, including the Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Natural Resources. The State Corporation Commission is the permitting authority. These agencies also investigate the effects of a solar facility.

What do the host jurisdictions get? A 100-MW facility, like the one in Emporia, produces about $140,000 in revenue to the host jurisdiction annually. That facility adds three permanent jobs to the economy.

What could go wrong?

Solar farm workers are exposed to a variety of serious hazards, according to federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These hazards include arc flashes – causing arc flash burn and blast hazards – electric shock, falls, thermal burn and heat or cold stress.

Solar facilities create land disturbances due to the clearing of the land, according to Solar Energy Development Programmatic EIS. Land clearing can result in soil compaction, drainage of chemicals and increased runoff and erosion.

As solar farms interfere with sunlight, rainfall and drainage, wildlife and vegetation are also affected and ecosystems are disrupted.

Perhaps they beautify the landscape? Apparently not. Ask Spotsylvania County homeowners.

And the jobs in those facilities are no walk in the park. From OSHA:

Workers in the solar energy industry are potentially exposed to a variety of serious hazards, such as arc flashes (which include arc flash burn and blast hazards), electric shock, falls, and thermal burn hazards that can cause injury and death.

Did anyone mention that the panels regularly catch fire? Again, The Farmville Herald:

The Essex Solar Farm located on Tidewater Trail in Dunnsville reported its third fire March 7, according to a Facebook post from the Tappahannock-Essex Volunteer Fire Department. The Tappahannock-Essex Volunteer Fire Department, Upper Middlesex Volunteer Fire Department, Virginia Department of Forestry and Essex Emergency Medical Services worked diligently for several hours to contain about 50 acres of fire.

Dominion Energy also reported two fires at Sadler Solar in March, which are believed to be caused by a failed connector in a solar array and an inverter, according to a March 2022 article in The Rappahannock Times

And then there is the clear-cutting of forests. The New York Times published an article on September 21 about the scarring of one of the most ecologically valuable and intact forests in the Mid Atlantic for the building of the Randolph Solar Project. Because Charlotte County has the dual honor of being home to huge transmission lines.

And Charlotte County is, importantly for the wealthy, white, urban, world-only-has-7-years-to-live fanatics:

  • desperately poor;
  • rural;
  • disproportionately Black; and
  • voted for Donald Trump.

From the Times article, which failed to mention most of that:

Conservationists and farmland advocates argue that the solar gold rush is displacing valuable forests and farms when panels could instead be going on already developed or degraded land, including abandoned industrial sites and landfills. Some even warn that a decades-long push to protect the Chesapeake Bay could be undermined by panel-driven forest loss.

Forests and the Chesapeake Bay, like poor rural people, apparently need to take one for the team.

Bottom line. The McAuliffe and Northam administrations apparently expanded the concept of environmental justice to mean:

  • no anti-climate-change hot spot need host a solar farm. They have given enough;
  • trees and watersheds are over-rated;
  • poor jurisdictions can spend the extra tax money any way they want. Say on a new DEI deputy position in the County Manager’s office;
  • a poor Black person might get one of those three new jobs;
  • poor peoples’ campaign contributions are minimal anyway;
  • if poor Republicans live there, it serves them right; and
  • poor people will be especially glad to contribute to the green energy revolution that will raise their electric bills.

Perhaps they thought no one would notice.

Perhaps the Governor can ask the DEQ bureaucracy what store they were minding when all this was happening.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

52 responses to “Solar Farms Trump Environmental Justice in Virginia”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Solar Farms Trump Trump Environmental Justice in Virginia”

    Fixed.

    You do realize the only community in Charlotte County Fla that did not lose power has their own solar farm, right?

    A direct hit with a Cat2-3 and it ran the whole time. Few lost panels, meh. Plug and Play.

  2. It is remarkable how White environmentalists make an issue of “environmental racism” when it coincides with their own objectives (like defeating the Atlantic Coast Pipeline) but totally ignore “social justice” when it comes to things like, oh, providing manufacturing jobs for African American workers or building the tax base of African-American communities.

    1. Moderate Avatar

      I don’t think that is happening. Not where I’ve been involved. Everyone wants all to thrive economically. But the difference is recognition that too often it has been communities with the least resources who have been saddled with the biggest risks, typically where those who have to live with it don’t share in the benefits of that which causes the risks.

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Manufacturing is icky. They can learn to code.

    3. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
      Joe Jeeva Abbate

      James, could you please give me even one real life example of a “white environmentalist” ignoring social justice for African Americans? Something real? Thank you.

      1. The collective result of anti-carbon policies has been to incentivize the displacement of U.S. manufacturing overseas, reducing opportunities for the working class which is disproportionately African-American. To get more specific and closer to home, the shutdown of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline has effectively capped natural gas consumption in Southeastern Virginia and made it impossible to recruit energy-intensive manufacturing to the region…. again, disproportionately impacting the African-American working class in the region.

        1. William Chambliss Avatar
          William Chambliss

          This is such bullshit, Jim. Offshoring of manufacturing began decades before there was any “anti-carbon” policy. This is the way capitalism works–it seeks out the lowest input costs, mainly labor, in production.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar

          One of the issues with the ACL was the export of ACL gas from Tidewater.

          I also know a person in Nelson County whose objection was literally NIMBY. The proposed pipeline route not only bisected his farm, but put his house in the blast zone if something bad happened. He was not a happy camper.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The thing about the Solar farm in Spotsylvania. It’s a Conservative BOS and there were few “incentives” and they stipulated all the things the opponents wanted – like a bond for cleanup at project end. Mr. Benton quit because the “wealthy” folks from a nearby gated community were all over him about the solar farm – which they cannot see for dense woodland that surrounds the solar farm.

    The land it was built on was previously clear-cut by the prior owner that was his right as a property owner to do. Same property near the gated community, they couldn’t see that either!

    Confusing the right of private property owners to use their land in legal ways to produce income so they can pay their taxes and bills to the govt or pipeline company threatening eminent domain to the property owners that include black property owners really borders on boogeyman gaslighting with a needless racial tint.. which Sherlock thinks he is skilled at but it’s painfully obvious to most as several have also seen it for what it is.

    Mega landfills, coal ash, auto junkyards, poultry/pig CAFOs, biosolid application, are just a few of the far more significant to affected property owners than solar which can easily be shielded with berms and vegetation. You really never know it’s there. Out in Spotsy, you’d have to work hard to catch even a glimpse if at all.

    Conservatives USED to be fierce defenders of private property rights especially if it was white folks expensive real estate involved but not as much for communities of color. Still pretty much that way.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Thanks for the lecture about property rights, Larry. The article is about state permitting. But thanks again.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Last I heard the project was required to meet ALL Federal and State environmental regulations.

        Are you saying that’s not true?

  4. Moderate Avatar

    I know for a fact that the first Dominion solar farms in Buckingham are on property of a middle-income white family. This very conservative couple made several conscious choices to accept solar. They once raised hogs primarily, but after Smithfield took over the industry, have not had that big source of income. The new project may or may not be on Black owned land. I’m not sure.

    However, comparing solar farms with natural gas infrastructure is apples and oranges. Solar farmers get to accept or reject projects and if they accept, get regular income. Gas hosts are “chosen” by the company and have zero choice or ability to influence; they get one time payment that in no way represents their costs/loss, and no help with annual taxes. Safety near solar farms is far more sure than that near gas infrastructure. The list of problems for natural gas is far longer than for solar. When no longer used, solar infrastructure is removed, not so with natural gas. In fact, companies refuse to remove it or do anything to protect the land from sinks caused by deterioration.

    I can’t tell you who owns other land that hosts solar, but your premise is wrong for Buckingham County and the cost/benefit situations of the two fuels are diametrically different.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Smithfield? Aren’t they Chinese owned?

      The next thing they’ll hit you with is rare earth toxins in the dumps where they put old panels. Bet there is more lithium in these…
      https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51B1L2cb5HL._AC_SY350_.jpg

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Smithfield? Aren’t they Chinese owned?

      The next thing they’ll hit you with is rare earth toxins in the dumps where they put old panels. Bet there is more lithium in these…
      https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51B1L2cb5HL._AC_SY350_.jpg

      1. Moderate Avatar

        Yes. But before Smithfield sold to the Chinese it became a vertically integrated monopoly. Many farmers who had provided breeding stock to animals ready for slaughter lost our businesses.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      See my response to Wayne. Not about buyers, sellers and individual property rights. It’s about government enforcement of environmental law. And rank hypocrisy.

  5. Has it occurred to you that perhaps the areas where solar farms are being approved are run by local governments which respect individual property rights? If a farmer wants to sell, or better yet lease, his land to a solar energy company instead of farming it, why would a conservative/Republican-run local government prevent that?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Wait for it…

    2. Moderate Avatar

      Someone owns the land. It is not taken by eminent domain. Either the company buys it or it has a long term lease agreement with the owner. Neighbors tend to be the ones opposed, not owners.

      1. Please read my comment again and then point out to me where I stated, alleged, or even implied that eminent domain was used to construct solar farms. In fact, I made specific reference to “a farmer [who] wants to sell, or better yet lease, his land to a solar energy company”. I think that makes it quite clear that I fully understand that “someone owns the land”.

        My post was about individual property rights, which I favor.

        1. Moderate Avatar

          Wasn’t disagreeing with you. I was simply pointing out the differences – beyond what you said.

          I was responding to JB’s inference that environmental justice is pulled out at will and ignored at will. There’s a lot going on here.

          1. Well then, please accept my apology for misinterpreting your comment.

          2. Well then, please accept my apology for misinterpreting your comment.

        2. Moderate Avatar

          Wasn’t disagreeing with you. I was simply pointing out the differences – beyond what you said.

          I was responding to JB’s inference that environmental justice is pulled out at will and ignored at will. There’s a lot going on here.

        3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Still not about property rights, but about environmental law.

          1. Okay, but how many solar farm applications have been rejected at the state level?

            As far as I know, local governments are the entities which approve or reject solar farms, and most of them do so based on their [perceived] appropriateness as a land use. That makes property rights a factor in where solar farms are constructed.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Not about willing sellers, Wayne, but rather environmental impact reviews. And green hypocrisy. The sellers are happy. It’s their neighbors and the environment that are screwed. Ask the ex-Supervisor of Spotsylvania County.

      1. I am well aware of the environmental damage that has been caused by certain solar farms. I have even posted video and news reports about the disaster in Essex County. I think some state agencies made serious mistakes early on when adopting standards and issuing permits for solar farms. From what I understand they are working to remedy that by adopting new, stricter, and more appropriate standards for estimating/computing storm water runoff volumes and peak flows from land on which solar panels are built.

        My previous question is still on the table, though. How many solar farms have been rejected at the state level?

        As an example, has, say, the Albemarle Board of Supervisors approved a solar farm which was subsequently denied environmental permits at the state level? Or, perhaps, has the Albemarle BOS declined to approve any proposed solar facilities at the local level?

        Your article criticized the Northam Administration for approving solar farms in rural areas and, by implication, not approving them in the “progressive heartlands of Northern Virginia and Charlottesville/Albemarle”. But state agencies cannot issue permits for projects which do not exist, and the state government typically cannot force a local government to approve a particular land use.

        I suspect most rejected solar farms are “dying” at the local level, not the state level. So, it may be the local governments in Northern Virginia and Charlottesville/Albemarle who deserve the bulk of your criticism for being environmental justice hypocrites, not the Northam Administration, or any other state-level entity.

  6. On a related note, do you have any information on how many applications for solar farms have been rejected by state regulators, and the localities from which these rejected applications were received?

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Sorry but compared to oil fields, refineries, gas processing plants, petrochemical complexes, coal processing facilities, coal mines and oil/gas production, storage, transportation, and distribution facilities, these solar farms do not represent a social justice concern.

  8. Warmac9999 Avatar
    Warmac9999

    What we currently know is that these solar farms are sources of heat that can kill animals, birds and insects. What we don’t know is the actual impact on climate conditions if enough of these are built. Specifically, what would be the impact if 20% of state land and houses were suddenly part of the solar grid. How would average temperatures, wind, rain, snow and storms be affected.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      20%? Well, we could power the entire country for one. Probably all of Canada too.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        the insects, oh the horror!

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Think of the air conditioners we could power!!

      3. And if we could keep Dominion’s mitts off it we might end up with the lowest electric rates in the country…

      4. Warmac9999 Avatar
        Warmac9999

        What % of the land in Virginia is covered by solar panels. What % of the power currently comes from solar panels. What will happen if everything is electrically powered and all by solar panels. This ought to be a reasonable question to ask but also ask about impact on resources and climate.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It’s not 20%. If you want to know, at your fingertips lies the greatest repository of human knowledge. However I must warn that next to it and inextricably intertwined with it is also the greatest suppository of human knowledge the world has ever known. Read carefully.

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            What’s a consonant between friends?

          2. Warmac9999 Avatar
            Warmac9999

            My point is simple. Is there a limit and what is it. Frankly, we don’t know.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “Dr.” Warren, if you were paying attention you would know that we already calculated that coverage for 100% solar is some fraction of 1%. Further, there is no scenario where all our power will be generated from solar.

    2. William Chambliss Avatar
      William Chambliss

      I challenge you to cite a source to this assertion–“solar farms.. heat..can kill animals”

  9. Lefty665 Avatar

    Hanover is less than 10% black, not poor, increasingly less rural, more suburban, consistently 2/3+ Repub and has a solar farm. It does not seem like it fits the meme particularly well.

  10. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    There must be many places to put solar and wind in Fairfax and Arlington Counties. On top of government buildings, buildings in Tysons, parking garages, schools, etc. And people would oppose large-scale installations like the coronavirus. It’s one thing to have solar on a neighbor’s house. But large-scale visible installations of solar would be accused of causing cancer, autism in children, rabies in dogs and the like. And no wind turbine would ever be acceptable.

    I remember a community meeting where FCPS had agreed to allow a cellular monopole on the edge of a middle school campus. Parents and neighbors paraded a long list of horribles despite everyone raising his/her hand when asked how many of them have given their middle schoolers cell phones. I suspect similar results would happen in Wake County too.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      utility scale solar needs to feed into a major transmission line and the price of the land can’t be as high as one would see in urbanized areas where even trailer parks are removed for apartments and other.

      But you can bet that if someone wanted to site a small nuclear reactor in NoVa, or a gas plant, the same crowd of nimbies would go ape-s_it the same way as solar.

  11. William Chambliss Avatar
    William Chambliss

    A large component of the cost of a solar project is simply the cost of the land it occupies. Every one of these projects (with perhaps limited exceptions) had to acquire a conditional or special use permit from the LOCAL government, which (without checking) would be composed of LOCAL people black, white, D or R, and they are located where property can be acquired inexpensively. If you want to spout off about environmental justice, Sherlock, you need to dive deeper into the analysis.

    1. Thanks. You made essentially the same point I did, only more effectively and with a lot fewer words.

      🙂

    2. Thanks. You made essentially the same point I did, only more effectively and with a lot fewer words.

      🙂

Leave a Reply