Smart Cities around the World Are Saving Money Now. How about Your Home Town?

readiness_guideby James A. Bacon

Suggested reading for every elected official, senior administrator and department head in Virginia government: “Smart Cities Readiness Guide” published by the Smart Cities Council. This easy-to-read document walks government practitioners (and interested citizens) through the process of using sensor, communications and analytic technologies to collect, communicate and crunch data. Proven smart cities strategies can boost productivity, increase responsiveness and reduce impact on the environment.

The early 21st century is a perilous time for state and local governments, which are overwhelmed by unfunded pension obligations, decaying infrastructure and a slow economy. Yet it is also a time of boundless opportunity as well. The emergence of smart-city technologies present a historic opportunity for local governments to address infrastructure-related problems without debilitating tax cuts. Cities around the world are grasping these opportunities — Virginia cities cannot afford to be left behind.

Implementing smart-city technologies can generate major efficiencies. Hard-pressed local governments often complain they have limited resources to invest, so the Readiness Guide points to eight areas that can yield quick payback.

Smart transportation. The ability to monitor traffic real-time, predict congestion, synchronize traffic signals and suggest alternate routes can yield massive savings by obviating the necessity of investing expensive concrete and asphalt.

Energy efficiency. Building automation systems can generate fast paybacks on HVAC, lighting and general electricity consumption.

Smart grids. Smart grids, which tell power companies were problems are occurring on the electric grid, can reduce outages and improve reliability, especially in areas subject to hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes or floods.

Smart water networks. Worldwide, 30% of all municipal water never reaches its destination. Smart water systems can pinpoint leaks and theft;as a bonus, they can alert customers to unusual consumption patterns that might indicate a problem.

Smart street lights. Smart systems can turn street lights off when not needed and enable remote diagnostics that can reduce maintenance costs.

Digital government services. Municipalities can reduce administrative costs by making manual systems for processing licenses, permits, registrations and other routine interactions accessible online or on smart phones. AT&T has bundled eight popular city applications into a package called Community Central that is hosted on the cloud and can be rolled out in short order.

Smart payments. Cities can generate significant savings by digitizing disbursements and collections.

Public safety. By feeding crime statistics into analytic programs, police departments can predict where crimes are more likely to occur and allocate manpower and resources accordingly. Automated systems also allow police to reduce time spent on paperwork.

These low-risk strategies have generated millions of dollars in savings in cities around the world.  For the most part, Virginia municipalities are in solid financial shape; they can afford to make the investment. Elected officials should press their administrators to explore smart-city options aggressively. If elected officials are asleep at the switch, citizens need to smack them across the face until they wake up.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

4 responses to “Smart Cities around the World Are Saving Money Now. How about Your Home Town?”

  1. DJRippert Avatar

    Unfortunately Jim, despite living in the most populous and twelfth most densely populated of Virginia’s 132 localities, I somehow don’t live in a city. Therefore, virtually all decisions (including the policy for cutting weeds in median strips) falls to the asshats of Virginia’s General Assembly. In what should come as no surprise, the gew gaws, jim cracks, turnip truck operators and assorted charlatans in the General Assembly haven’t put a lot of time into researching them thar electronical doohickeys.

    However, for the ninth consecutive session we do expect a new Personhood Bill.

  2. yeah… I’m trying to see how all the wondrous things don’t all also apply to exurbia….

    and still trying to figure out how NoVa votes blue and liberals hate Smart Growth!

    Exurbia south on I-95 from NoVa votes 65-35 Red by the way and they
    are the American Dream folks.. by and large..

    we gotta get this sorted out.

    I do not think there is any way in HADES that NoVa and the folks in NoVa that support Smart Growth – are Conservatives….

    tell me how I’ve got this screwed up…

  3. reed fawell III Avatar
    reed fawell III

    Larry: “and (I’m) still trying to figure out how NoVa votes blue and liberals hate Smart Growth!”

    Beyond the natural defense of the home, those liberals that I have encountered who so fiercely oppose the building of real (instead of pretend) smart growth communities do so because of their fierce animus towards business generally and evil developers in particular. So they are driven to thwart the very engine around which real smart growth is built and then sustained for everyone’s benefit – a thriving wealth creating business community within the smart growth model.

    In addition those types of liberals who are often called NIMBY’s are also anti-density in the extreme. They hate the idea of things being built that will attract and allow more people to come into and/or live in their neighborhood. Their typical canard here is massive traffic and exploding pollution. This strain of NIMBY most likely is an extreme variant of the late 1960 environmental movement of which I was and am still a part.

    So you’ll find that there is a huge difference between the attitudes of those who live in already built smart growth communities and those who are asked to allow those communities to be build in their neighborhoods. This has been a big problem for liberal smart growth advocates for decades. Hence B/R corridor was built early enough and under special circumstances so that the entire community was able to overcome these forces which had appeared suddenly in the late 60s.

    Fortunately, now smart growth advocates are enjoying increasing success in finding ways to overcome these obstacles. That’s one reason for my respect.

    Conservatives also suffer illusions and prejudices, but of a different sort. In part, they think smart growth is a liberal big government thing, so they oppose it. In fact smart growth done right is no such thing and does good for everybody, including conservatives who believe in the wealth creation of free markets efficiently built and deployed.

    But if conservatives opt out of the movement instead of participating in it there is far greater risk that smart growth will be co-oped by the extreme liberals of the NIMBY sort, including those who ride under the smart growth banner in disguise. If this variant of extremists successfully co-ops the movement, they will kill smart growth at enormous cost to all society, and derail what is otherwise a terrific opportunity for our future.

    In short, if you hate business, or don’t understand business, you are not capable or willing to put together the essential ingredient on which successful smart growth depends. You’ll end up killing the very thing you say you wish for. And if you DO understand business and walk away instead, you’re are killing the very thing that you wish for. And you are doing it by reason of your failure to see clearly what successful smart growth is and what it can do for you, and the society generally.

  4. “Beyond the natural defense of the home, those liberals that I have encountered who so fiercely oppose the building of real (instead of pretend) smart growth communities do so because of their fierce animus towards business generally and evil developers in particular. So they are driven to thwart the very engine around which real smart growth is built and then sustained for everyone’s benefit – a thriving wealth creating business community within the smart growth model.”

    so which organizations and institutions support Smart Growth?

    “In addition those types of liberals who are often called NIMBY’s are also anti-density in the extreme. They hate the idea of things being built that will attract and allow more people to come into and/or live in their neighborhood. Their typical canard here is massive traffic and exploding pollution. This strain of NIMBY most likely is an extreme variant of the late 1960 environmental movement of which I was and am still a part.”

    but Reed – the people who choose to live in dense settlement patterns tend to vote Blue not Red.. how do we explain that?

    “So you’ll find that there is a huge difference between the attitudes of those who live in already built smart growth communities and those who are asked to allow those communities to be build in their neighborhoods. This has been a big problem for liberal smart growth advocates for decades. Hence B/R corridor was built early enough and under special circumstances so that the entire community was able to overcome these forces which had appeared suddenly in the late 60s.”

    so you’re saying that NIMBYs are liberals and conservatives are not NIMBYs? Not trying to put words in your mouth.. I’m truly not following here.

    I understand NIMBY but to be honest with you the most NIMBY I know are people who own significant single-family home assets – not the young singles.. millennials.. Look at where DJ lives.. or TMT… do you consider those folks “liberals”?

    Fortunately, now smart growth advocates are enjoying increasing success in finding ways to overcome these obstacles. That’s one reason for my respect.

    can you give me some examples of who they are? specific to projects and developers or political , etc.. who are they?

    Conservatives also suffer illusions and prejudices, but of a different sort. In part, they think smart growth is a liberal big government thing, so they oppose it. In fact smart growth done right is no such thing and does good for everybody, including conservatives who believe in the wealth creation of free markets efficiently built and deployed.

    okay. who decides density? is it govt? who would be opposed to the govt increasing density? young liberals?

    But if conservatives opt out of the movement instead of participating in it there is far greater risk that smart growth will be co-oped by the extreme liberals of the NIMBY sort, including those who ride under the smart growth banner in disguise. If this variant of extremists successfully co-ops the movement, they will kill smart growth at enormous cost to all society, and derail what is otherwise a terrific opportunity for our future.

    I’m thinking that MOST conservatives are opposed to smart growth unless they are developers … If you say that liberals are also opposed to Smart Growth that does leave me wondering who is in favor of it and more importantly who is enabling it and how?

    In short, if you hate business, or don’t understand business, you are not capable or willing to put together the essential ingredient on which successful smart growth depends. You’ll end up killing the very thing you say you wish for. And if you DO understand business and walk away instead, you’re are killing the very thing that you wish for. And you are doing it by reason of your failure to see clearly what successful smart growth is and what it can do for you, and the society generally.

    Okay.. Do you know where horse country is to the west of NoVa?

    do you think the folks who live in horse country – who are largely successful business types – but live on large parcel estates, favor Smart Growth?

    one more quick one for you –

    do you think there is such a thing as Smart Growth in exurban places like the Fredericksburg region (outside the city limits)?

Leave a Reply