Why is this man smiling?

by James C. Sherlock

Belt and suspenders?

Vaccinations and masks now are both mandatory in Richmond Public Schools. Vaccinations because the school board ordered it last night. Masks because the Governor ordered it last week.

The vaccination order, though many oppose it, has science behind it. Vaccinations work. For the vaccinated, though, the mask wearing mandate is purely political – and political theater. The mask mandate did not presume vaccination mandates.

Cue the squeaking from the “yeah, but” crowd.

Let’s look a these one at a time.

Vaccinations – Richmond

After a vote last night by the school board, nearly all employees of Richmond Public Schools (RPS) must be vaccinated by Oct. 1.

I wish them godspeed.

This policy, with which I agree, is a major experiment with a very short time horizon, an unknown baseline and an unknown outcome.

The latest RPS website “reopening dashboard” data from August 23 are unchanged still shows 21% vaccination among staff. It has not been updated since at least April 12.  So it appears that the district — thus the school board — has no idea how many staff are affected by the order.

Superintendent Kamras made a presentation that showed that only half of the adult population of Richmond is fully vaccinated. He did not have information on school staff or school contractors.

Medical and religious exemptions with a signature from a doctor or faith leader will be accepted “without question.” The number of those will also prove interesting. Anyone granted an exemption will need to provide proof of a negative COVID test on a weekly basis.

From Superintendent Kamras:

“All RPS employees will be required to submit proof of full vaccination to the Talent Office by October 1, 2021.”

“To assist employees who have not yet been vaccinated, RPS is working with the Virginia Department of Health to hold mobile vaccination events in August and September.”

“Employees who do not meet the October 1 deadline (save for those who are granted an exemption) will be subject to progressive discipline, including loss of employment.”

I get it and support the initiative. So they’re good to go, right?

Not so fast. They did not have the option to vote on masks.

Masks in school – Richmond

“Masks will be required for all students, staff, and visitors at all times regardless of vaccination status.”

It is a state mandate. So students and staff who are vaccinated will need to wear masks anyway. I’m pretty sure that will not encourage more students to get vaccinated.

Pre-vaccine medical guidance on masks

Getting students out of masks is crucial to their ability to learn. From an NIH-sponsored report last summer:

Face masks can prevent the spread of the virus SARS-CoV-2, in particular as this spread can occur from people with no symptoms. However, covering the lower half of the face reduces the ability to communicate, interpret, and mimic the expressions of those with whom we interact. Positive emotions become less recognizable, and negative emotions are amplified. Emotional mimicry, contagion, and emotionality in general are reduced and (thereby) bonding between teachers and learners, group cohesion, and learning – of which emotions are a major driver. The benefits and burdens of face masks in schools should be seriously considered and made obvious and clear to teachers and students. The school’s specific situation must also inform any decision regarding face mask use.

That same NIH article from a year ago — pre-vaccine — wrote that masks properly worn (primary school?) can be effective, but goes on the discuss

  • Physical side effects of masks
  • Face masks impair face recognition and face identification.
  • Face masks impair verbal and non-verbal communication
  • Face masks block emotional signaling between teachers and students

Read especially the last two – parts 5 and 6 of the NIH article.

Post-vaccine?

From the government of the United Kingdom:

Face coverings are no longer advised for pupils, staff and visitors either in classrooms or in communal areas.

No longer advised.

So what, exactly, is the thinking in RPS, with mandated vaccinations for school staff, that those same staff should also wear masks?

Answer from the government of Virginia:

“Northam mandates masks inside all K-12 schools in Virginia this fall, even for the vaccinated.”

Not a word from the Governor or the Health Commissioner about the downsides of wearing masks in school so fully described a year ago by the NIH. No consideration of whether the mask mandate makes sense for staff — or kids — in the presence of a staff vaccine mandate.

That order is thus exposed as a political mandate, not a medical one.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Shots and Masks in Richmond Schools”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Generally, I resent having to wear a mask after I have been vaccinated. But the schools are between a rock and a hard place. So far, no vaccination has been approved for kids 12 and under. Vaccinated folks, although largely protected against serious illness, can spread the virus. Therefore, unmasked, vaccinated folks in schools could infect younger children. And, children are more vulnerable to the delta variant than to original COVID. In the end, most parents would probably be very nervous about exposing their young, unvaccinated children to indoor school activities. This is another result of large portions of the population refusing to get vaccinated.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      ” This is another result of large portions of the population refusing to get vaccinated.”

      The variants we are fighting have nothing to do with out population vaccinated or not. It was given birth in India in 2020 before a vaccine was even given an EUA.

      People have access to k the vaccine if the want it in the United States. There are a great deal of other countries who do not have vaccines. No matter how many we vaccinate, variants will exist and travel to our boarders.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      On your logic, Dick, American school children will be wearing masks for the rest of their lives. We will never get to 100% vaccination, so there is no off ramp.

      You don’t ever discuss the evidence of how much harm wearing the masks does them, even when I offered the NIH findings above.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        As soon as there is a vaccine for those 12 and under, and clinical trials are underway and an approved vaccine is expected by the end of the year, children can be vaccinated and masks will not be needed. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/the-next-stage-of-covid-19-vaccine-roll-out-in-united-states-children-under-12/

        I realize that masks in school pose problems, but it is better than not having in-person school at all.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You tell me “children can be vaccinated and masks will not be needed”.

          I note you do not say “children will be vaccinated”, which is an enormous difference; nor do you say “masks will not be mandated”, ditto.

          Read my next piece on the 70,000 disabled children in Virginia public schools.

          Then describe the off-ramp again.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Once again we see the confusion and ineffectiveness of our governments.

    Back when COVID first arrived and for many months thereafter America’s Progressives complained bitterly and with some accuracy about Trump’s handling of the pandemic. They claimed that Trump had no plan and that his lack of a plan would leave the United States with the worst COVID experience in the world. They were wrong on both counts. Trump’s plan was to minimize lockdowns while racing to develop a vaccine. Today, the US is #21 in COVID deaths per capita with fewer deaths per capita than countries like Peru, Hungary, Brazil, Argentina, Belgium, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Chile. Perhaps not a world class result but far from the predictions of “worst in the world”.

    Now we have Biden following Trump’s path. Eight months into his term what new national mandates has he launched?

    If neither Trump nor Biden were / are willing to act at the national level then action must fall to the states.

    Early on, Northam did take decisive action. That action was sometimes ineffective but he was acting.

    Then he stopped.

    Northam closed all the schools but would not reopen them. Closing was a state issue but reopening was local issue.

    He mandates mask wearing in schools but not the vaccination of school employees. How can it make sense for the employees of Richmond public schools to face a vaccine mandate while the employees of other school districts do not face such a mandate? Beyond the public health issues involved in vaccination there are financial issues. School system employees are provided health care in large part through tax dollars. Ditto for state government employees.

    Northam is playing politics not following the science. He does not want to be seen responsible for his party losing the governor’s race. His political calculus? Mandating masks wont sink McAuliffe but mandating vaccines will. So he defers the vaccine decision to individual governmental units.

    He’s no better than Trump in this.

    If he believes in vaccines he should mandate them for all Virginians.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I would venture that whenever the FDA provides full approval if he is still in office he will. However they will have to provide exemptions in compliant with law.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Just a few days ago I read an article by Dick that said the US Supreme Court issued a ruling that leads us to believe that a government entity (in this case a public university) has the legal right to mandate the shot, even in EUA status. If so, is there any reason to believe that Northam couldn’t do the same across the state (with the exemptions required to be compliant)?

        Is a vaccine mandate somehow legal for a state university but illegal for an entire state?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          A mandate imposed by a university is done so as a condition of attending that school. That justification does not apply to the population at large.

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I realize that the university mandate does not apply to the population as a whole. But … if a university can mandate the vaccine why can’t he governor mandate the vaccine for the population as a whole? The state has a mandate that I wear clothes when I go out in public. The state can mandate that I wear a mask when I go out in public. What legal hurdle prevents Northam from mandating the vaccination for anybody out in public in Virginia? I don’t think there is a hurdle.

          2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I suspect that there is no legal hurdle. However, there are practical hurdles, primarily in enforcement. A mask mandate is relatively easy to enforce. After all, one can see if I have a mask or nor. With a vaccination, enforcement is much harder–one cannot readily see the vaccination. It is not a good idea to pass laws or issue policies that you cannot enforce. Northam is doing all he can in a practical sense–requiring state employees to be vaccinated, continually encouraging folks to be vaccinated, making vaccinations available etc. And you are not really sincere in your call for a mandate. The minute he issued such a mandate, arresting people for being out without a vaccine card, hauling folks off to the clinic to get vaccinated, etc,, you would be up in arms.

        2. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          What Mr. Hall-Sizemore wrote about was Indiana University, in which the University prior to suit only held very narrow exemptions. Upon being sued they expanded those exemptions and Justice Coney Barrett denied their injunction because they were rendered moot by the expansion.

          Right, wrong or indifferent it wasn’t ruled on the merits therefore we can’t say for certain how the Court will eventually rule when a suit makes it to them. Justice Coney Barrett didn’t provide us with a reason why it was denied, which she should’ve given Court precedents.

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I understand but Indiana University is free and clear to mandate vaccinations until the case reaches the court. If the court holds it to be unconstitutional there will be no penalty for Indiana University. They just will not be able to continue the mandate. While that might affect booster shots it will be too late for the students getting their first round.

            Northam and the left are convinced that everybody should get the vaccine (with limited exemptions). Fine. Mandate the vaccine. Who would stop him? Not the US Supreme Court apparently. At least, no time soon.

            I want Northam to mandate the vaccine or STFU.

            His approach to handing the problem off to school districts, universities, employers, etc is pure cowardice. As usual, the Byrd Machine throwback wants “the little people” to do his dirty work so he doesn’t take any political heat.

            I think it’s time to add political coward to the long list of negative adjectives used to define Northam.

            Otherwise, I’d like somebody on this board to tell me why he can’t (or, more likely won’t) mandate the vaccine.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            I don’t think he wants to sit through the litigation of mandating a EUA vaccine.

            There is never any penalty for the Government, State or Federal for infringing on peoples rights.

            The law gets bounced and people can finally move one, there is no redress.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      It would be impossible to have a school mask policy that allowed the vaccinated to avoid them. How do you know which is which? Teachers and administrators would do nothing else all day. All or none is the only way it can work in that chaotic environment.

      I agree this is more political then medical, but the majority of parents are with this, based on the polling I’ve seen. Getting the students into the classroom, despite the interference provided by the masks, is still preferable to virtual school, especially the lower grades. And I think there can be times, say when working with speech issues or phonics instruction, when the masks come off for a few minutes.

      Our granddaughter started first grade yesterday in the red and anti-mask mecca of Texas. Plenty with masks in the pics, including her. A voluntary approach would probably achieve surprising compliance here, too.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        The parents would have to sign paperwork, under penalty of law, that the child was vaccinated. Falsify the paperwork, suffer the consequences. Just like filing taxes.

        And if the schools can’t keep track of which students are vaccinated then how do the liberals expect the teachers to keep track of which pronouns the students want to be called?

        The voluntary approach would last about a week unless there is an outbreak in the school.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        That FIRST link was supposed to be…

        https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/16/us/texas-supreme-court-block-mask-mandates-greg-abbott/index.html

        But, given the clowns on that court, Mardi Gras works too.

        Sadly, by the time a 13-year old’s emancipation lawsuit makes it through court so he can obtain a vaccine his parents would deny him, he may have to then rely on those same parents to take him off the ventilator and pull the feeding tube.

  3. Publius Avatar

    At some point, you will all wonder what happened.
    Lawlessness has consequences.
    Try for one minute to not let fear of Covid frame your thinking.
    Prior to March 2020, did anyone care whether anyone else was vaccinated?
    How come America wasn’t wiped out from NCAA basketball and Big 10 football and SEC football with millions of unmasked people while seasonal flus were going around?
    Seasonal flus that are more deadly to kids than Covid?
    Prior to Covid, where vaccine mandates existed, there were always medical and religious exceptions. And, ultimately, if it ever reaches the Supreme Court, a vaccine mandate would not survive a bodily autonomy challenge, and if it did, then abortion will be at risk.
    Meanwhile, the EUA requires informed consent and explicitly says “accept or refuse.” Federal law. Those mandates are currently illegal. Does anyone care about intentional violation of federal law? Oh, it’s OK to make you feel safe, including vaccinating kids who aren’t at risk?
    Do any of you civil libertarian types see the danger of using schools and corporations to force vaccination? So, the CDC issues “guidance” because it can’t legislate, and then all the good leftist schools and corporations enforce the guidance, because they get their money from the government or are licensed by the government or both.
    Second class citizens, HIPAA violations are just the beginning. Maybe one day they’ll do a one child policy like their heroes in China to “Save the Planet.”
    WAKE UP! I would say act like Americans…but Afghanistan humiliation is currently resonating…

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Lawlessness has no consequences when applied to the political class. At least, not for violating the constitution. All that will happen is that the courts will tell the political class to stop. If people like Northam went to jail for taking unconstitutional actions there would be a lot more respect for the constitution. But they don’t.

      “Do any of you civil libertarian types see the danger of using schools and corporations to force vaccination?”

      I think it’s disgraceful. Cowardly. If Northam wants everybody to get vaccinated then he should mandate vaccinations.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Captain Sherlock raises some good points about the masks and all of the politics associated with it. What a confusing mess! 2020 will forever be a generational demarcation line.

Leave a Reply