Senator Warner Embraces Legislative Flim-Flam

U.S. Senator Mark Warner

by Emilio Jaksetic

On August 1, 2021, a bipartisan group of senators, including Senator Mark Warner, D-Va, issued a brief: “Senators’ Statement on the Finalized Bipartisan Infrastructure Agreement Legislative Text.” The statement contains a hypertext link to a draft bill that is 2,702 pages long.

As a matter of common sense, it is not plausible to believe that Warner has been able to read and understand all 2,702 pages. And it is improbable that Warner could give Virginians a reasonable and understandable explanation of the meaning, implications, and consequences of the mind-numbing multitude of provisions in the legislative monstrosity.

Warner has abandoned his responsibility as a Senator to represent Virginians in a reasonable manner. Instead, he has embraced the role of an arrogant, inside wheeler-dealer who (1) relies on secret negotiations by small, self-selected groups of senators, and (2) seeks to get legislation advanced without hearings, without a meaningful opportunity for public comment, and without reasonable legislative deliberation. Instead of being proud, Warner should be ashamed of himself.

Trying to cope with dysfunctional Congressional practices does not justify inflicting legislative flim-flam on the American people. The 2702-page infrastructure bill is not a solution to the current dysfunction on Capitol Hill. It is a stark symptom of the institutional rot that has infected Congress and corrupted the legislative process.

The bill makes is a mockery of representative democracy. Elected representatives are no more than rubber stamps for political deals made by a handful of officials negotiating without any meaningful legislative deliberation. And, it encourages the cynical and manipulative use of “comprehensive” or “emergency” legislation to obscure and camouflage policies, practices, and public expenditures that would be unlikely to be enacted into law or accepted by the American people if considered on their own merits.

Such legislative practices contrary to the basic principles of representative democracy.  There is no excuse for giving our elected representatives and the American people “the bum’s rush” instead of a meaningful opportunity to know what exactly is contained in proposed legislation.

“Hurry up, hurry up, don’t read the document, just trust me and sign it” may be expected of a confidence man, a huckster, or a shady business person; it is not appropriate for our elected representatives. No problem, however urgent, justifies passage of proposed legislation without any meaningful opportunity for Americans and their elected representatives to know, think about, and understand what is being proposed.

Virginians should demand their Congressional representatives refuse to vote for legislative proposals unless they have a meaningful opportunity to read, understand, think about such proposals, and engage in meaningful consultation with their constituents before voting on the proposals. Virginians should demand that their Congressional representatives refuse to quietly acquiesce in sham legislative deliberation, and show that they are able to carry out the duties and responsibilities for which they were elected.

In the Gettysburg Address, President Abraham Lincoln stated “we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”  Warner has turned his back on the idea of government of the people, by the people, for the people.  Warner has embraced government of the politicians, by the politicians, for the politicians — without any decent respect or regard for the right of the American people to have meaningful representative government.

Warner should take no pride in his role in the infrastructure negotiations. Warner should be ashamed of exacerbating the legislative rot on Capitol Hill.  Warner should be ashamed of his wheeling and dealing and participation in legislative flim-flam. Virginians deserve better.

Emilio Jaksetic is a retired attorney living in Northern Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “Senator Warner Embraces Legislative Flim-Flam”

  1. Once again they have to pass it to find out what’s in it.

    1. John Martin Avatar
      John Martin

      not true

      1. Really? Have you read all 2,700 pages?

        I though not, and I can guarantee you no one else has either.

        1. John Martin Avatar
          John Martin

          guarantee? Yeah, sure

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Sorry, is this the federal legislation? Or are we back to the multi billion dollar boodle list the state General Assembly committees have already approved one business day after they were revealed… 🙂 Trust me, state legislators couldn’t list much of it without the cheat sheets.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Sorry, is this the federal legislation? Or are we back to the multi billion dollar boodle list the state General Assembly committees have already approved one business day after they were revealed… 🙂 Trust me, state legislators couldn’t list much of it without the cheat sheets.

  4. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    No matter what, it takes a minimum of 21 steps before any federal bill can become law.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Of course, the federal legislation is too large and unwieldly. But it pales in comparison to the 5,593 pandemic relief bill passed last December. I don’t remember Mr. Jaksetic railing then about Republicans (they were still in charge) abandoning their responsibility and creating a “sham”.

    This is how major legislation is developed–through a long hammering process by a small group of legislators. Trust me, you don’t want to give the members of Congress any more time to mull this monster over–it would only get longer.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Tu quoque fallacy, try again.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Of course, the federal legislation is too large and unwieldly. But it pales in comparison to the 5,593 pandemic relief bill passed last December. I don’t remember Mr. Jaksetic railing then about Republicans (they were still in charge) abandoning their responsibility and creating a “sham”.

    This is how major legislation is developed–through a long hammering process by a small group of legislators. Trust me, you don’t want to give the members of Congress any more time to mull this monster over–it would only get longer.

  7. LesGabriel Avatar
    LesGabriel

    Does this Bill increase any revenues? (I will take a look, but sometimes they get hidden among the 2702 pages) If it does, should it not have originated in the House and not the Senate? Or is there some parliamentarian subterfuge taking place like they did with the “Affordable Care Act”?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Yep. but parliamentarian subterfuge is an equal opportunity norm these days. Whoever can do it , will.

      No norm is safe from change… these days.

      But are the Dems doing anything the GOP wouldn’t do?

      1. And that makes it right?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Nope – but blathering from on high about one side doing it is not exactly a balanced view.

  8. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    Anyone who has followed it knows Warner was one of the architects of the Trump Russia-gate hoax. He totally reneged on his commitments to Richmond businesspeople in his handling of Obamacare. He is the swampiest of the swamp.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Well, he’s the reason Virginians have Obamacare and the the Medicaid Expansion… also, right?

      Russia was no hoax. How many are in prison over their involvement with the Russians?

    2. I also strongly suspect he is an android…

      🙂

  9. LesGabriel Avatar
    LesGabriel

    I did see that this Bill will be partially funded by “revenue generated from higher economic growth as a result of the investments.” How very strange. For many. many years Democrats opposed dynamic scoring, and now they slip it in without so much as acknowledging their hypocrisy.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Well thats what the Trump tax cuts and supply side tax cuts are usually based on so the Dems are spending like they normally do without regard to deficit but the GOP has always claimed they were concerned about deficits – until of course the Trump tax cuts…

      I thought the Dems were after a tax increase on capital gains and other investments that were taxed at lower rates ,no?

      But to properly score it CBO would have to have the final version I would presume, no?

  10. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    I do not think anyone read PL 115-97 before it was passed.

  11. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Warner was inaugurated into the US Senate in January 2009. Like all senators he should face a three term limit. Politicians and diapers must be changed often and for the same reason.

  12. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Sorry, is this the federal legislation? Or are we back to the multi billion dollar boodle list the state General Assembly committees have already approved one business day after they were revealed… 🙂 Trust me, state legislators couldn’t list much of it without the cheat sheets.

  13. Deborah Hommer Avatar
    Deborah Hommer

    John Locke and the Committee of Five who drafted the Declaration of Independence told us what we have a right and a duty to do about this. I think there are more recall petitions of representatives in this country now than in its history; but I have not done an accounting. There’s certainly “a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States,” from our servants, and there’s a long list of Facts that could be enumerated.
    I think the Constitution is the best any country has ever created; however, right from the get-go so many of the clauses were watered down to betray their exact meaning – for instance, commerce clause, necessary and proper clause, and the usurping of powers by the federal government. (James Madison lamented about this a few times).
    I think we need to be speaking out to these servants of ours about our opinions, facts, expectations and keep pushing back. There’s a spirit alive in America now. Glad to see people pushing back. I’d like to see several rollbacks to the Constitution we were given.

  14. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Senators have staff and there are also lobbyists and they know. Not exactly the first time mega bills have become legislation….

    Pretty sure – each Senator has got a good handle on the legislation.

    but the “anti” stuff just keeps on rolling….

    1. Senators have staff and there are also lobbyists and they know.

      What’s the deal? Are you trying your hand at comedy now?

      1. Lobbyist wouldn’t lie to the reps of the people! They only act in the benefit of the people [who pay them]!!!!!

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          totally true but the are lobbyists on both/all sides – often protecting different interests and it’s up to the representatives of the people to know the good, bad and ugly and they do have staff to help them know!

          This has been going on since the beginning of the country – for representatives of both parties …

          It’s how the process works.

          Lobbyists are not inherently evil. They actually ferret out information that others may miss. But it’s up to the elected to listen to all parties and then decide what the right path and not without some smelly compromises at times.

          1. But it’s up to the elected to listen to all parties…

            There you go. Do you honestly think that Sen. Warner listened to anyone who disagreed with this legislation? Be honest, now.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes I do. I’m not near as cynical as some of you. A good elected legislator should WANT to hear from all parties INCLUDING lobbyists as part of due diligence to know the good, bad and ugly as there is zero chance that he/she would like it 100%.

            But yes, I think Warner is a decent politician, he has a track record of legislation he has supported, written himself and a stint as Governor.

            He is a progressive, no question but not far left and is reasonable on national defense and security.

            He may not have read every word but I bet he has a diligent staff that has and keeps him informed and up-to-date on changes.

            And to be honest, I would expect ANY legislator, Dem or GOP to do exactly that.

            I would expect it and it would have to be demonstrated to me that they did not actually do that. To be that remiss would border on malfeasance in my mind.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        you’re laughing – out what side?

        1. I didn’t say I was laughing – hence the phrase “trying your hand at”.

          But based on the ludicrousness of the statement I had to assume you were not being serious.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            only for you… it’s your problem entirely. You can’t seem to help yourself. It’s a flaw.

    2. Packer Fan Avatar
      Packer Fan

      So, we have non-elected, “yes” women and men on staff and “unbiased lobbyists telling our Senators what they should vote for? Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        works exactly the same way no matter the political party of the Senator, right?

        The elected’s job is to use all means to research and investigate the legislation and yes that certainly includes “un-elected” folks who may or may not “tell” the Senator how to vote but any Senator worth their salt KNOWS that their job is to represent the voters best interests AFTER hearing all parties and information.

        I don’t really know what else one would or should expect from ANY elected official – Federal, State or local.

        1. Packer Fan Avatar
          Packer Fan

          I will agree with you on it working the same way with either party, but there is no excuse for crafting legislation that is thousands of pages long. That’s purely for “hiding” stuff that has nothing to do with the original bills. If any Senator or Congressman doesn’t have time to read, in their entirely. the bills that they are voting on, those bills need a rewrite.

  15. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The richest member of the US Senate, Mark Warner, gets to do whatever he wants. It is no wonder that he is out of touch with everyday working Virginians.
    https://moneyinc.com/richest-senators-in-the-u-s/

  16. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Perfect assessment. Lot’s of nonsense in the subsequent commentary. What you recommend by extension of your remarks is “regular order” in the Congress in which bills are originated in the committees and debated and amended there and on the floor. We haven’t had that since Republicans we’re in charge.

    1. William O'Keefe Avatar
      William O’Keefe

      You are spot on. There is a process that for too long has been ignored. Unfortunately, neither party shows any interest in returning to regular order.

Leave a Reply