Senate Committee Votes to Raise Minimum Wage

by Hans Bader

The Virginia Senate’s Commerce and Labor Committee has voted to raise Virginia’s minimum wage. As NPR notes, “business groups maintain that Virginia will lose jobs — and its business-friendly reputation” — as a result. The Virginia chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business estimates that the increase would slash 130,000 jobs in Virginia over 10 years.

(The original version of the bill would have increased the minimum wage to $15. In approving the bill, the committee amended it, but the text of the amended bill is not currently available. One person attending the General Assembly session told me the increase was to only $11.75, but I have not independently confirmed that. I have updated this story to reflect the new information.)

The bill now goes to the Senate Finance Committee. Before voting on the bill, the Finance Committee should study the cost of such a large minimum wage increase to state taxpayers. A big minimum wage increase will increase the cost of products and services purchased by the state government, and the state’s own labor costs.

In 2016, California’s legislative analyst estimated that the gradual increase in California’s minimum wage to $15 an hour would cost taxpayers $3.6 billion more a year in government pay alone.

A $15 minimum wage also increases the cost of the products that everyone purchases. As economist James Sherk notes, “Economists find that businesses pass minimum-wage costs on to their customers by raising prices.” As the Associated Press reported in 2018, “Prices rise as the minimum wage increases.”

As Steve Bakke notes in The Courier, “A large increase like this would be inflationary, with most of the costs passed on to consumers. Consumer price increases would eventually wipe out much of the purchasing power gains intended for low income workers.”

The government also buys products and services, through government contracts, and it, like ordinary consumers, would end up paying higher prices due to a minimum wage increase.

While businesses would pass on much of the cost of a minimum wage increase to consumers and purchasers, some businesses — such as those that compete with businesses in states with lower minimum wages — would not be able to pass along the full cost of an increase. For example, a retailer near the North Carolina border might simply go bankrupt and lay off its workers. That’s because North Carolina’s minimum wage is only $7.25, half of Virginia’s new $15 minimum wage. North Carolina’s lower wages would enable retailers right over the border to charge a lower price than the Virginia retailer, which could not afford to cut its prices to compete. Retailer profit margins are typically only a few percent — for example, grocery stores have a typical profit margin of only 1-3%.

(While virtually all employers in northern Virginia already pay their  workers well over the $7.25 minimum wage, there are areas of Virginia near North Carolina that are so cheap to live in that the median hourly wage is around, or even below, $15 per hour. For example, the Roanoke region has a median hourly wage of $16.76. In these areas, even experienced workers often make less than $15 per hour, including middle-class homeowners — most residents of the counties in Virginia that have median wages below $15 own their own home).

While employers or consumers would pay the full cost of a minimum wage increase, workers would not reap the full benefit. Some would lose their jobs. Others would keep their jobs at an increased hourly wage, but receive less added income than the income their employer (and its customers) effectively lose through lost business profit and higher consumer prices (which reduces consumers disposable income).

That’s because the federal government provides help for the lowest paid workers, help that phases out as their income rises. Those benefits are means-tested. So a state that raises its minimum wage is effectively giving money back to Uncle Sam. Raising a state minimum wage is like giving away free money, or economic unilateral disarmament.

Federal benefits like earned income tax credits get phased out as a minimum wage increase raises the pay of a low-wage worker. As Henry Schmid noted in the Wall Street Journal, “the tax implications of going from a $10- to a $15-an-hour minimum wage” are fiscally “very significant. For a family of four with both spouses making the minimum wage, their federal tax will increase from $4,106 to $7,219, payroll tax will increase from $2,579 to $3,869, their earned-income tax credit (EITC) will be reduced from $596 to zero … and the $2,400 food-stamp credit will be lost. Of the $20,800 increase in income in going from $10 to $15 an hour, $7,778 will be diverted to the government, which doesn’t include loss of other income-dependent government welfare programs and added costs due to the resulting inflation. Over one third of the wage increase will flow to the [federal] government.”

So by raising its minimum wage, Virginia is giving lots of money back to the federal government. It also is increasing costs to state taxpayers, both by driving up the cost of state government contracts, and by increasing the state tax burden.

By wiping out jobs, a large minimum wage increases increases unemployment, and reduces the number of state residents who are employed and paying income taxes. That means that taxes need to rise on state taxpayers who still have a job. They need to pay the costs of state government, such as education and law enforcement, which don’t fall just because some residents have lost their  jobs.

Such job losses are likely to be substantial. An economic study estimated that Maryland, which is richer and better able to handle a minimum wage increase than Virginia, will lose 99,000 jobs as its minimum wage gradually increases to $15 over six years. Virginia has more people and more low-wage jobs, and its job losses will likely be greater.

Hans Bader is an attorney living in Northern Virginia. This post was originally published in Liberty Unyielding.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Senate Committee Votes to Raise Minimum Wage”

  1. matthurt92 Avatar
    matthurt92

    I’m afraid this legislation will hurt those most it is intended to help. Sometimes initiatives that sound great have negative unintended consequences. I don’t have any real world business experience, but I have witnessed such initiatives play our negatively for the lowest paid public school employees.

    For example, several years ago there was a push to enforce overtime regulations. Prior to that, a school custodian would be allowed to drive a bus, get extra hours cleaning up after ballgames, and etc. When the overtime crackdown occurred, the district could not afford to pay this individual overtime for those additional tasks, and had to hire part time help instead. So, this effectively cut the custodian’s take home monthly check.

    Similarly, the Affordable Healthcare Act also decreased the monthly earnings of teacher substitutes and teachers’ aides. That law required employers to provide health insurance to employees who worked 30 or more hours per week. School districts could not afford to put all of these folks on their insurance, so they simply limited these individuals to 29 hours per week.

    If employers are forced to pay employees $15 per hour, they will likely require less employees, especially if those employees can’t provide their employers with more than $15 an hour of benefit. We’re already seeing this with the automated ordering kiosks in McDonald’s, and we’ll likely see burger flipping robots as well.

    One of my first jobs was flipping burgers in McDonald’s, and fortunately I was able to earn valuable experience there which helped me in my career. If we price unskilled labor out of the market, how can our young folks get their foot in the door of the labor market at all? Or will free college for all mitigate this issue (Matt asks facetiously)???

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    If people will “lose” some of their entitlements benefits, doesn’t that mean taxpayers will win also?

    Do these studies take into account how much these minimum wage increases SAVE the government on entitlements?

    I don’t think increased minimum wage increases the unemployment level does it?

    Do we know what the “sweet spot” is between entitlements and minimum wage?

  3. matthurt92 Avatar
    matthurt92

    I’m afraid this legislation will hurt those most it is intended to help. Sometimes initiatives that sound great have negative unintended consequences. I don’t have any real world business experience, but I have witnessed such initiatives play our negatively for the lowest paid public school employees.

    For example, several years ago there was a push to enforce overtime regulations. Prior to that, a school custodian would be allowed to drive a bus, get extra hours cleaning up after ballgames, and etc. When the overtime crackdown occurred, the district could not afford to pay this individual overtime for those additional tasks, and had to hire part time help instead. So, this effectively cut the custodian’s take home monthly check.

    Similarly, the Affordable Healthcare Act also decreased the monthly earnings of teacher substitutes and teachers’ aides. That law required employers to provide health insurance to employees who worked 30 or more hours per week. School districts could not afford to put all of these folks on their insurance, so they simply limited these individuals to 29 hours per week.

    If employers are forced to pay employees $15 per hour, they will likely require less employees, especially if those employees can’t provide their employers with more than $15 an hour of benefit. We’re already seeing this with the automated ordering kiosks in McDonald’s, and we’ll likely see burger flipping robots as well.

    One of my first jobs was flipping burgers in McDonald’s, and fortunately I was able to earn valuable experience there which helped me in my career. If we price unskilled labor out of the market, how can our young folks get their foot in the door of the labor market at all? Or will free college for all mitigate this issue (Matt asks facetiously)???

  4. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Let’s get our facts straight. SB 7 was passed with a committee substitute, which raised the minimum wage to $11.75. Still significant, but it was not $15. If you are not here, if you are not following this process, you get your facts wrong and blow your credibility. Part of the problem is the substitute is not available on the LIS portal yet, a failure on their part. But the $15 figure was reduced.

    1. Duly noted. Hans has updated his post.

      1. Fred Woehrle Avatar
        Fred Woehrle

        $15 is what NPR reports the senate panel raised the minimum wage to. In the news story, “With Democrats In Control, Virginia Rushes To Increase Minimum Wage.” NPR reports:
        “The current version of the legislation gradually raises Virginia’s minimum wage to $15 by 2025, but language introduced by Sen. David Marsden (D-Burke) allows employers to count certain benefits toward the cash wage once the minimum reaches $11.75 in 2022.”
        $15 is too high. $11.75 is reasonable (although the federal tax code rewards states for having ridiculously low minimum wages, as Bader states. It effectively punishes states for having a reasonable or high minimum wage, by subsidizing employees more when their pay is really low).

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: LIS portal – these folks are not serious about keeping it up to date. That’s on them and it does engender misinformed opinions.

      When you have a General Assembly process and only the insiders really know what the status is – it’s not real process for citizens.

      And by the way, some of us knew all along that it would be negotiated and probably reduced – way better than the GOP approach of do nothing and walk away.

      1. djrippert Avatar

        “When you have a General Assembly process and only the insiders really know what the status is – it’s not real process for citizens.”

        Shut up little citizen. You are not a practitioner of The Virginia Way.

  5. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Let’s get our facts straight. SB 7 was passed with a committee substitute, which raised the minimum wage to $11.75. Still significant, but it was not $15. If you are not here, if you are not following this process, you get your facts wrong and blow your credibility. Part of the problem is the substitute is not available on the LIS portal yet, a failure on their part. But the $15 figure was reduced.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    If people will “lose” some of their entitlements benefits, doesn’t that mean taxpayers will win also?

    Do these studies take into account how much these minimum wage increases SAVE the government on entitlements?

    I don’t think increased minimum wage increases the unemployment level does it?

    Do we know what the “sweet spot” is between entitlements and minimum wage?

  7. djrippert Avatar

    Yet another example of the flawed arrogance of a strict implementation of Dillon’s Rule. In Lynchburg, Va the cost of living in 9.5% below the national average. In Reston, Va it is 59.6% above the national average.

    How does a single, state-wide minimum wage possibly make sense?

    Let the federal minimum be the floor and allow localities to raise the minimum wage in their jurisdiction as they see fit. If my General Assembly representatives had any credibility they would admit that they don’t know anything about the economic conditions in mush of Virginia and would abstain from voting on laws that might hurt those least able to bear the harm. But they’re lefties who are often wrong but never in doubt. When economic conditions in rural Virginia turn worse because of this Northern Virginia’s politicians will rush to wring their hands, declare that this couldn’t have been forseen and demand higher taxes to help rural Virginia.

    https://www.salary.com/research/cost-of-living/va

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      Again, the substitute that actually passed the committee — not the original bill — calls on somebody (Virginia Employment Commission?) to document the regional wage variations, and suggest regional level minimums….perhaps moving toward tiered rates. Much discussion in committee yesterday about that point. WHICH PEOPLE WOULD KNOW IF THEY CAME DOWN HERE INSTEAD OF SPOUTING OPINIONS FROM IGNORANCE. Getting tired of this.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Much of what Steve has said was reported in today’s RTD (https://www.richmond.com/eedition/richmond/page-a/page_3e87aff0-5d8d-58df-964b-a4079911c233.html). According to that report, the substitute bill is much less drastic than the original bill. The minimum wage would rise to $9.75, effective Jan. 1, 2021, then $10.75 a year later, and $11.75 a year after that. “At that point, employers would be able to count health insurance benefits toward what they are paying employees.” So, it looks as if the sky is not falling, after all.

        1. Steve Haner Avatar
          Steve Haner

          Oh, that’s quite a major change, and as noted – the substitute is still not posted. That is becoming a major problem as this New Crew bumbles through this session. Read the bill? Read the substitute? Why waste time doing THAT!” An amazing example of that is the big transportation bill, going through variations that nobody is reading. This is when it gets very dangerous.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            This has always been the problem with substitutes. LIS does not post a substitute until after it has been adopted by the full committee. There is a lag between the adoption and posting on LIS because the clerk has to do whatever paperwork clerks do to get the substitute into the system. The same is true of line amendments. What is even more confusing is when there are several substitutes floating around being considered. Sometimes a printed substitute that is already in the system is amended while being considered in committee. That is another factor that the clerk has to take care of–getting with Legislative Services and the agency that prepares the bills to make sure that those amendments are incorporated into the substitute that is posted on line and printed.

      2. djrippert Avatar

        Why not just let the localities set their own minimum wage? The governance structure of our state government is an embarrassing fiasco and watching the clowns at work doesn’t change that.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” WHICH PEOPLE WOULD KNOW IF THEY CAME DOWN HERE INSTEAD OF SPOUTING OPINIONS FROM IGNORANCE. Getting tired of this.”

    Nope. You’d be wrong. It’s the responsibility of the GA to post up-to-date info so that all of us can be informed.

    “LIS does not post a substitute until after it has been adopted by the full committee.”

    The idea that we all have to come to Richmond and actually be present in the Committee room if we really are interested is the talk of scoundrels who would use whatever excuse possible to keep what is actually going on in Richmond from its citizens until after the face.

    And that attitude even more damning coming from lobby folk and other insiders. GEEZE!

    and this attitude has a a related illegitimate brother in the reporting of money – in which if it were not for VPAP – the same “advice” would be given, i.e. “you must come to Richmond and look at the paper at the State Board of Elections if you want to know who donated to whom.

    Surely, Steve will reconsider that comment. I’d love to hear what he
    would advocate to fit this.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar

    This is, without a doubt, the “sausage” of the legislative process.

    We are presented with the bills that are proposed, then we can “follow” through the committee process, then there is silence, then we hear what has been decided. That’s not a transparent process.

Leave a Reply