Schools Say They Teach CRT, Even As Journalists Deny It

by Hans Bader

Schools are teaching critical race theory, even as liberal education reporters deny it is taught anywhere, and falsely claim it is not taught in even a single school system.

Detroit’s school superintendent, Nikolai Vitti, says critical race theory is deeply embedded in his school system: “Our curriculum is deeply using critical race theory, especially in social studies, but you’ll find it in English language arts and the other disciplines. We were very intentional about … embedding critical race theory within our curriculum.”

His school district is not alone. Twenty percent of urban school teachers have discussed or taught critical race theory with K-12 students, as have 8 % of teachers nationally, according to an Education Week survey. The Seattle public schools employed a critical race theorist as part of the district’s efforts to embed the theory in elementary schools.

“Unequivocally, critical race theory is taught in K-12 public schools,” said the Heritage Foundation’s Jonathan Butcher, noting he wrote a research paper detailing numerous instances of school districts openly using the phrase “critical race theory” in curriculum plans.

Seattle Public Schools notes that its “Black Studies” class includes critical race theory. “Critical Race Theory” is also “explicitly included in a course at Ballard High School in Seattle,” reports the conservative Washington Examiner. Seattle is injecting critical race theory into its curriculum, including a mandatory Black Studies course “that will be required for graduation from Seattle Public Schools.”

Yet, education reporters — almost all of whom are progressives — insist that no school system anywhere is teaching critical race theory. America has thousands of school systems, with widely varying curriculums, so reporters can’t possibly know what each and every school district teaches. But they claim that no school system anywhere teaches critical race theory, despite a wealth of evidence to the contrary.

In November, after the teaching of critical race theory in K-12 schools had become a national political issue, Washington Post education reporter Hannah Natanson wrote that critical race theory “is not taught at the K-12 level in Virginia — or anywhere else in the country.”

Education reporters Laura Meckler and Timothy Bella wrote on November 8 that “critical race theory…is not taught by any K-12 systems.”

The Washington Post’s Paul Schwartzman wrote that “it is not part of classroom teaching.”

The Post’s Aaron Blake claimed that schools “don’t actually teach it.”

The Washington Post editorial board wrote that “critical race theory is not part of local school systems’ K-12 curriculum. … There’s scant evidence it’s taught anywhere.”

The Post’s Sarah Pulliam Bailey claimed that critical race theory is “an intellectual movement that examines the way policies and laws perpetuate systemic racism and is not part of the public school curriculum.”

But it is in some schools’ curriculum, and it is not just an “intellectual movement” aimed at addressing racism or discrimination. Critical race theory is a radical ideology that is hostile to the free market economy, equating it with racism: “To love capitalism is to end up loving racism. To love racism is to end up loving capitalism. … Capitalism is essentially racist; racism is essentially capitalist,” says the best-selling book promoting critical race theory, “How to Be An Antiracist.” That book is a “comprehensive introduction to critical race theory,” gushes the leading progressive media organ Slate.

And what does it teach? Not ending discrimination. The “key concept” in Ibram Kendi’s book, “How to Be an Antiracist,” is that discrimination against Whites is the only way to achieve equality: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Kendi is a leading “critical race theorist.”

If state education bureaucracies had their way, critical race theory would become more common in school curriculums. In 2015, Virginia’s Department of Education instructed public schools to “embrace critical race theory” in order to “re-engineer attitudes and belief systems.’”

Virginia’s largest school system, the Fairfax County Public Schools, now encourages teachers to apply critical race theory. The Washington Times reports that a “slide presentation this summer instructed social studies teachers in Fairfax County Public Schools that ‘critical race theory is a frame’ for their work.”

The Arlington County schools have students read books by critical race theorists such as Ibram Kendi. Arlington distributed hundreds of copies of Ibram Kendi’s book Stamped to students at Wakefield High School. The book contains many errors and celebrates a Marxist anti-Semite. It also peddles conspiracy theories and is dismissive about Martin Luther King and Frederick Douglass.

The Loudoun County, Va., public schools paid a contractor to train its staff in critical race theory, giving it $3,125 to conduct “Critical Race Theory Development.”

Virginia’s official “Roadmap to Equity” published by its Department of Education in 2020 thanked critical race theorist “Dr. Ibram X. Kendi” in its acknowledgments section, as having “informed the development of the EdEquityVA Framework.” Kendi says he was “inspired by critical race theory,” and that he cannot “imagine a pathway to” his teachings “that does not engage CRT.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

45 responses to “Schools Say They Teach CRT, Even As Journalists Deny It”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Content of curriculum and design of curriculum are two different things.
    Is CRT being used to evaluate the content of curriculum? Yes.
    Is CRT a subject, i.e., content, of the curriculum? No.

    What is taught is the content.

    As a lawyer, you should know the difference. Now you do.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      “Is CRT being used to evaluate the content of curriculum? Yes. Is CRT a subject, i.e., content, of the curriculum? No.”

      And you know this how? And even if true it makes a difference why?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Actually, NOW it probably is being taught. Any course on current affairs would be remiss…

        But even then, it is being taught “about” not in detail.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        No. And I have SOLID proof!
        Show me one question on the SOLs on CRT.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Oh that’s not fair… it totally ruins their narrative!

          CRT = teaching the truth about our history.

          No can do. it makes people feel “bad”.

          1. DJRippert Avatar

            Read Kendi’s book. It is not just about teaching history. That is just another liberal lie amplified by the useful isiots on the left as their puppet strings are pulled by the elite.

            For example …

            “Critical race theory is a radical ideology that is hostile to the free market economy, equating it with racism: “To love capitalism is to end up loving racism. To love racism is to end up loving capitalism. … Capitalism is essentially racist; racism is essentially capitalist,” says the best-selling book promoting critical race theory, “How to Be An Antiracist.” That book is a “comprehensive introduction to critical race theory,” gushes the leading progressive media organ Slate.”

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: ” a radical ideology that is hostile to the free market economy, equating it with racism”

            where is that being taught?

          3. Merchantseamen Avatar
            Merchantseamen

            Another “expert” in everything.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          We have to ask you:

          What is the difference between
          1. teaching the development of Critical Race Theory as a criminal defense – its original objective – and;
          2. teaching its core assumptions as underlying truths of human affairs?

          I find a difference. Perhaps you do as well..

          Number 1 is valid history.

          Number 2 challenges every fundamental value of the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism in the face of religious dogma. Wokeism is religious dogma.

          Wokeism abandons all three Enlightenment values in favor of dogma.
          – It hates reason, because its fundamental tenets cannot survive reasonable analysis;
          – It hates individualism, because it is founded upon the primacy of group identities;
          – It hates skepticism, because it is a dogmatic religion and skeptics are heretics to be cancelled.

          So your question is self serving. I suspect there are no CRT questions on the SOLs, though the latest series of those questions available to the public is from 2015. You and I both suspect there are many questions on today’s history and social studies SOLs to which the “right” answer depends upon student acceptance of woke instruction.

          As for AP History, it is not possible to pass without woke answers.

          Read the AP History reading list https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/25148.AP_US_History_Reading_List Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States is number 3. Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong is number 5. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West is number 6. The Autobiography of Malcolm X is on the list.

          If you do not think that students are being recruited as social justice warriors, you discount 100% of the writings of your own side. I don’t.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            so you think teaching actual history is “woke’?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Wait for the QED. This iPad is wack when working with Disqus.

            The Enlightenment? Deep dark subject. The Age of Reason, the rebirth of philosophy, the big Slip of Rome’s Grip. I suppose you think it culminated in 1776, and 1789 with Life, Liberty, and Happiness? Or, perhaps with Liberté, égalité, fraternité?

            Of course they didn’t apply to everyone, not even in Jefferson’s work, and there in lies the rub. Jefferson, et al, withheld it from the black man, and the native Americans — a white MALE privilege. A social construct, if you will, called “race”.

            You may find universal acceptance of your “values” of the Enlightenment, but you certainly cannot find universal application. Tough to be a Huguenot in France at the time or a Catholic in Belfast in the, well, today.

            Is this not The Enlightenment? Nor is it over.

            1776 was certainly a milestone. The first successful overthrow of Christian dogma, that government on Earth is as it is in Heaven and to rise against one is to rise against the other. Jefferson really did “pull it off”. The Preamble laid out the truth. The rest was the grievances demonstrating the crown’ withholding of those truths (early CRT?) of which two were true. The rest of the list were questionable — a 1776 leftist blog.

            And that, Boss, is the struggle. Wokeism?

            1861 just more Wokeism. 1918 just more Wokeism.

            It’s just a word for the ongoing awareness — Enlightenment — that some people in EVERY society, even those based on equality, will have some people who are more equal than others.

            But you go with what makes you happy. Sure CRT is a commie plot. The Enlightenment will end, as it has multiple times in history, in the Darkness of believing it has been achieved.

            Better a social justice warrior than a social injustice overseer.

            QED.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            yes, it’s NUTTY but it’s what Conservatives either do believe or it’s what they want their base to think they believe.

            ” Of course they didn’t apply to everyone, not even in Jefferson’s work, and there in lies the rub. Jefferson, et al, withheld it from the black man, and the native Americans — a white privilege. A social construct called “race”.

            so… is it CRT to TEACH the above fact in school or just merely “woke” or what?

            On one level, it’s hard to understand the folks that think this but on the other it’s really duh… they just reject the idea that such ‘history’ should be actually taught … in the first place…

            telling the truth about race in our history is a no-no apparently.

          4. DJRippert Avatar

            Your slobbering comments just prove that you either don’t understand CRT or that you are a willing misinformer.

            Read Kendi’s book!

            *** The “key concept” in Ibram Kendi’s book, “How to Be an Antiracist,” is that discrimination against Whites is the only way to achieve equality: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Kendi is a leading “critical race theorist.” ***

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            “slobbering” comments? coming from you? ha ha… I think you apparently get into your cups from time to time, no?

            re: ” “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”

            WHERE is this being taught?

            If I repeated a white power theory that says ” we will not be replaced” as an example of their beliefs, am I advocating those beliefs?

            It’s a demonstrable lie to say so.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            When you are a member in a privileged class, there are no classes.

            The Cap’n is a member of the most privileged of privileged classes — old white male with income and healthcare costs covered by the Full Faith and Credit Clause.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar

            …..and an insult and an abomination to bring it up especially in front of students…

          8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I read Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee during high school and my wife to this day remembers the impact The Autobiography of Malcom X had on her in high school. I hardly think we were being recruited as social warriors. You want them banned on Youngkin’s first day, eh?

          9. DJRippert Avatar

            Whoever suggested that either of those books be banned?

          10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Claims of “Wokeism” lead to claims of teaching CRT and we all know that on Day 1 Youngkin bans all CRT.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            The demands of privilege. Oh the humanity! The horror of the weighty cross he carries to keep the underlings informed with his truth.

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            ouch!

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      Seattle Public Schools notes that its “Black Studies” class includes critical race theory. “Critical Race Theory” is also “explicitly included in a course at Ballard High School in Seattle,” reports the conservative Washington Examiner. Seattle is injecting critical race theory into its curriculum, including a mandatory Black Studies course “that will be required for graduation from Seattle Public Schools.”

      Explicitly being taught, not just used to evaluate curricula. As a journalist you should understand what words mean. Now you do.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Teaching the theory of Critical Race Theory is NOT supporting it as a theory any more than teaching a history class about the KKK is advocating bringing the KKK back.

        It’s presenting knowledge about a subject, a perspective to understand.

        It’s just not the truth that teaching about CRT is the same as teaching it to implement it.

        It’s a lie, a very effective one politically, but still a lie.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Still, you don’t know to what degree. Current affairs?

        OTOH, taken in its broadest definitions, that “race” is a societal construct, not biological, and that the purpose of CRT is as a tool to evaluate processes (laws, policies, etc.) for advantaged/disadvantaged races, then how bad can it be?

        Consider patients as a “society”. Barring other methods evaluation, can one evalute the insurance policies across statesvfor the healthcare system to identify oppressed groups? Patients in Virginia and Maryland, say, for cost of policies, for example.

        If it could then a valuable tool. Of course, I certainly have no desire to find out personally.

    3. Merchantseamen Avatar
      Merchantseamen

      The expert in everything rears its ugly head.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Is that why your profile picture is grayed out?

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A little more from the “proof” video…

    ““What I find interesting about this whole idea is that if you look at what critical race theory is, by definition, this legislation is probably the best example of it,” Vitti said.

    “You have white Republicans largely outside of Detroit — a community of color — legislating what you can or cannot teach in schools. If that’s not one of the best examples of structural racism, I don’t know what is.”

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    This is demonstrative of how Conservatives deal with issues. What Bader is saying is clearly not the truth. And what Conservatives are saying about CRT is what THEY THINK is being taught – no matter if it is or not – the fact that CRT is discussed is “proof’ they are “teaching” it.

    This is how Conservatives deal with issues these days, not just CRT but a range of issues – like elections and global warming and BLM… and race in general.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Bader provides multiple direct quotes and links to source materials supporting his point. You just continue to blather on about Conservatives this and Conservatives that with no references or support.

      Maybe when Little Red Lyin’ Hood quits her job as Baffled Biden’s Press Secretary you can try out for the position. You’d be a natural.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I think pointing to Bader as an objective source is laughable… Ya’ll complain about WaPo ‘bias’. What Bader writes takes bias to a whole new level – and it’s his typical effort!

        I say once more.

        Teaching about a theory – any theory – is NOT advocating to implement the theory.

        It’s about understanding the theory and why and how it resonates with some.

        To listen to this drivel.. one would think that if a course on the KKK was taught that it means advocating for the KKK.

        Simply not true.

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Honestly, if a student is taking a HS Black Studies class, I would EXPECT that CRT is one of the topic areas. To do otherwise would be the same as teaching a European History class and skipping the February and October Revolutions because… you know… indoctrination….

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Everybody agrees that we would have been a better nation if slavery never existed in US history. White people are making sure slavery doesn’t exist in US History.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Yep. teaching actual history is a bad thing…. because we no longer do racist things and talking about when we did is not good.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Your mindless repetition of the same false concept (CRT is just used to teach actual US history) does not make the lie true.

          What is is that you don’t or can’t understand about this direct quote … ?

          Detroit’s school superintendent, Nikolai Vitti, says critical race theory is deeply embedded in his school system: “Our curriculum is deeply using critical race theory, especially in social studies, but you’ll find it in English language arts and the other disciplines. We were very intentional about … embedding critical race theory within our curriculum.”

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            They’re teaching it so people understand what it is. They’re not advocating it.

            That’s the lie.

            It’s like teaching Buddhism. Teaching it is not advocating it…it’s just to understand it.

            And No words like that have ever been stated in Virginia.

            What it boils down to is that some folks don’t want our history of racism taught in schools which if you think about, has actually been the case until recently and even now they really don’t teach the full dimensions of it. For generations, we taught the Happy Slave version of race and now we can’t tell the truth that, that’s exactly what we did do – because – we don’t do that kind of racism today and it will make kids feel bad if they knew their ancestors did it.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            So sorry, DJ, I was responding to this paragraph about actually TEACHING CRT:

            “Seattle Public Schools notes that its “Black Studies” class includes critical race theory. “Critical Race Theory” is also “explicitly included in a course at Ballard High School in Seattle,” reports the conservative Washington Examiner. Seattle is injecting critical race theory into its curriculum, including a mandatory Black Studies course “that will be required for graduation from Seattle Public Schools.””

            I thought that was self-evident.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Are you saying that is what is being done in Virginia and making such a claim helped to elect Youngkin?

            talk about “mindless repetition’.

            I think it’s time for you to write a full blog post on your thoughts, no?

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      What don’t you understand about the following direct quote … ?

      Detroit’s school superintendent, Nikolai Vitti, says critical race theory is deeply embedded in his school system: “Our curriculum is deeply using critical race theory, especially in social studies, but you’ll find it in English language arts and the other disciplines. We were very intentional about … embedding critical race theory within our curriculum.”

      ” … English language arts …”

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    sniff…sniff… Time for a little FreBreeze on this couch.

    No one here has studied CRT. No one here has a working knowledge of CRT. No one here is an expert in CRT. Not Hans, James 1 or 2, Dick, DJ, Larry, Steve, The Troll, nor Nancy.

    Where we do have expertise is in the ability to seek out opinions, in digital open source, of other persons of dubious qualification and motive, read one or two, take it face value or incorporate them with our biases and homegrown manure, and vomit them on the page with an air of superiority that we hope passes for knowledge to the broadest possible audience — which invariably consists of the same people.

    Of course, it never never hurts to throw in some data pulled from a verifiable source, point at it, and then make assumptions not supported by any analyses save possibly filtering. Meh, graphs always look good. Perhaps a meme or two?

    If all else fails, a dismissive term like “woke” may help.

    ==================

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      See the “Final Report Virginia Commission on African American History Education in the Commonwealth” referenced below. It is nonsense, but official nonsense.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        OTOH, the NY Regent’s isn’t.
        BTW, there’s several papers, one titled something akin to “The Greening of CRT” applied to Ireland. I assume the color swaps are Green is the New White, or — Oh No – Orange in the New Black.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10159005416933924&id=662673923&set=a.373474488923&source=48

  7. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Notes on the comments here.

    Please see the “Final Report Virginia Commission on African American History Education in the Commonwealth” dated August 2020.
    Go to:
    – Page 6, “Membership, Leadership, Organization and Support” and then to
    – page 80, Appendix F: List of Resources, Scholars, and Partner Organizations to Support Implementation .

    The Commission was chaired by
    – Dr. Derrick Alridge, Professor of Education and Director of the Center for Race and Public Education in the South, Curry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia;
    – Dr. Cassandra Newby-Alexander, Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Professor of History, Norfolk State University; and
    – Dr. Rosa Atkins, Superintendent, Charlottesville City Schools.

    Resources to Support Implementation include:
    – Robin DiAngelo, White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism (understanding the impact of white socialization in our culture)
    – Ibram Kendi, How to be an Anti-Racist (provides strategies to deconstruct racism)
    – Bettina Love, “We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom”. See https://abolitionistteachingnetwork.org
    – Glenn Singleton, Courageous Conversation About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools (race identity)
    – University of Virginia School of Education, A Center for Race and Public Education in the South

    Scholars and Partners for Collaboration include:
    – 1619 Project
    – Derrick Alridge (Educational Historian) – (hope he didn’t injure himself patting his own back)
    – Courageous Conversations – Pacific Education Group – Glenn Singleton

    It is entirely acceptable for individuals to think all of this is fine – the way things ought to be.

    Just don’t tell the rest of us that the Virginia public school history curriculum is unaffected by the radical race industry.

    1. No amount of data or documentation will sway those who are intent upon believing what they want to believe. But… this information is illuminating for the rest of us.

      1. Clarity77 Avatar

        Well said Mr. Bacon. When it comes to useful idiot types like Nancy Naive reason is obviously not present and there is little point in engaging. Their minds are governed by anger and hate. Anger always being a defense against truth, and a cover up emotion. Their guilt is what they desperately seek to hide. Pathetic.

Leave a Reply