Image by Free-Photos from Pixabay

by D.J. Rippert

Mom at home. An article from The Center Square summarizes a number of studies relating COVID-19, school policies during the pandemic, and the number of women in the workforce. A study by the journal “Gender & Society” characterized the matter as a “tidal wave of women” leaving the workforce in 2020. Center Square notes that, “Researchers found that women primarily left the workforce (in addition to layoffs and job closures) to help educate their children when schools reverted to virtual learning and children were no longer physically at school.” Statistics indicate that the employment gap between mothers and fathers was less in states where the schools stayed open for in-person instruction, either full-time or part-time. As the article states, “But the gap grew by an average of 5% in states where only virtual learning was offered, such as in California, Delaware and Virginia.”

Fear porn. It now seems obvious that there was never a science-based reason to close the schools to in-person learning over the 2020-2021 academic year. As long ago as last October NPR published an article citing school systems around the world reopening for in-person teaching without adverse effects. School systems in Virginia that were open to full-time and part-time in-person learning did not experience appreciable issues. Yet many of Virginia’s largest school districts remained closed despite the evidence of safety. Beyond the serious, negative impact of school closings on children those policies also had a negative impact on the working mothers of those children. Reopening the schools early would have helped. As Gender & Society reported, “In Canada, for instance, Fuller and Qian investigated the gender gap in employment among parents of young children. They draw on monthly data from Canada’s Labour Force Survey during February through October 2020. They find that gender employment gaps among parents first widened when child care and schools closed but narrowed with reopening of schools and increased availability of child care options.”

The Wizard of Richmond. Ralph Northam’s inept and erratic approach to COVID-19 restrictions left the state far worse off than would have been the case with a competent approach. Northam zig-zagged from extreme restrictions to insisting that he had no power over the schools. Predictably, Northam was more interested in pandering to his grass roots supporters within the teachers’ associations than he was interested in the overall welfare of students or working mothers. As long ago as January the CDC gave plain guidance that schools could safely reopen. By February the CDC was clear — schools could reopen before teachers and staff were vaccinated. Yet in places like Fairfax County, Loudoun County and Arlington County the schools remained almost totally shuttered. For the sake of the children and working mothers those schools should have reopened for full-time, in-person learning. Unfortunately, our governor channeled the heartless tin man, brainless scarecrow and gutless lion as he sat behind the curtain pulling all kinds of restriction levers while leaving the schools closed. Even today, Northam remains confused. The Wizard of Richmond’s proclamations seem to conflict with his own state government’s Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI).

Elections have consequences. The incompetence of the Democratic Governor, General Assembly and School Boards will be on full display as this fall’s elections draw closer. As Pete Snyder, a candidate who lost out to Glenn Younkin, put it, “Richmond liberals want to ‘follow the science’ until the science doesn’t align with their special interests’ partisan games. It’s crystal clear that Terry and all the Democrats running for governor would rather line their campaign pockets than stand up to the special interests and open our schools.”  Younkin himself was equally emphatic, saying, “The Democrat politicians in Virginia are failing parents because they’re too afraid to confront the special interest groups blocking the schoolhouse doors. It’s crazy and it’s shameful.”

For his part, McAuliffe has admitted that the school closings were harmful to children but has been stone silent on whether he would have done more as governor to reopen the schools. It seems there are two gutless lions in this Oz.

By Don Rippert


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

37 responses to “School Closings Negatively Affect Female Employment”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: Europe:

    ” While Biden pushes to reopen schools, Europe moves in the opposite direction”

    ” As President Biden pushes to reopen U.S. schools, much of Europe is moving in the opposite direction.

    From Britain to Portugal to Denmark to Austria, countries that previously prioritized keeping classrooms open at nearly any cost are saying the risks are too high. Some say it may be months before students can again see their teachers in person.

    The changed calculus reflects the arrival of the more contagious coronavirus variant, first identified in Britain, that has created astonishing spikes in cases and put pressure on medical systems across the continent.

    The basic scientific thinking in Europe on schools remains largely the same. When students and teachers wear masks, ventilation is good and mixing between classes is minimized, classrooms are still believed to be relatively safe and to play a small role in fueling outbreaks, compared with places such as nursing homes, prisons, food-processing plants, restaurants and bars.

    But the variant has increased the threat everywhere, including in schools.

    “By themselves, schools are not the main problem, but it makes sense to close them when the numbers are so high that anything can have an impact on the health system as a whole,” said Celso Cunha, director of the medical microbiology unit at Nova University of Lisbon’s Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    Read Biden’s executive order on safely reopening schools

    Portugal, which is seeing the highest daily per capita coronavirus cases and deaths on the continent, is the latest European country to give in on schools.

    Portuguese classrooms had remained open even as the government imposed a strict national lockdown this month. Prime Minister António Costa had said he wanted “to protect and guarantee the education of this generation” and avoid the “social cost” of sending students home.

    But days later, he reversed himself. The variant had expanded from 8 percent to 20 percent of coronavirus cases in Portugal within a week, and the government determined everything had to shut down.”

    DJ often sez – facts are pesky things and then he goes and steps in it himself!

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Did you read what you wrote? What is the source and the date? Funny that you chose not to cite the quotes. But even beyond that …

      “When students and teachers wear masks, ventilation is good and mixing between classes is minimized, classrooms are still believed to be relatively safe and to play a small role in fueling outbreaks, compared with places such as nursing homes, prisons, food-processing plants, restaurants and bars.”

      You are focused on Portugal. Why? From my research it looks like the schools in Portugal reopened. Please provide your link. Here’s one for you …

      https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/countries-and-territories/portugal/

      Portugal is experience 3% of the cases it experienced during the January peak.

      We don’t have a variant problem here Larry. You want to know why? Because President Trump pushed Operation Warp Speed and we got vaccinated in time. Why do you confuse Northern Virginia, Canada and Portugal?

      As for Biden’s reopening plan – who cares? Nobody is listening to anything Biden says. Schools in Southwest Virginia have been open in-person all year. My son’s private school has been open hybrid in-person all year.
      Guess what – everything is fine. They didn’t listen to Biden. Schools in Northern Virginia have been closed all year. They aren’t listening to Biden. Nobody listens to that confused gnome. Nobody.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I’m not focusing on anything – just quoting news reports that contradict what you are claiming:

        Europe’s Schools Are Closing Again on Concerns They Spread Covid-19

        Countries are abandoning pledges to keep classrooms open as concerns mount over children’s capacity to pass on the virus

        https://www.wsj.com/articles/europes-schools-are-closing-again-on-concerns-they-spread-covid-19-11610805601

        There are many reports to this effect that you chose to not provide and instead a false impression of the reality – just to serve a political purpose.

        This is the problem these days. It’s not like you haven’t seen these same reports, either that, or you’d have to claim ignorance , right?

        The TRUTH is that European schools HAVE NOT stayed open while US schools closed.

        The TRUTH is that European schools have also had to close.

        https://www.google.com/search?q=european+schools+have+had+to+close&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS915US915&sxsrf=ALeKk02dfiLOpk4s50vudJAlhyPWooYAww%3A1621896628643&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2021%2Ccd_max%3A5%2F24%2F2021&tbm=

        Facts are pesky thing…

        1. CJBova Avatar

          Yes, they can be. Like the WSJ on Europe’s schools closing again was from Jan 16, 2021. Old out-of-date news.

        2. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          You article was from January. Beyond that, I never once mentioned Europe in what I wrote. But even with all that – some European countries did temporarily close schools around the January – March time frame where countries experienced a very large spike. The schools were open before that and were reopened again after. Remember “two weeks to flatten the curve”? Some countries in Europe did “two months to flatten the curve”. How much better off would the kids in Fairfax, Loudoun and Arlington Counties have been if theri schools were closed for two months instead of a whole year? How many fewer women would have quit their jobs to stay home and teach the kids?

          Frankly, even the European countries that closed their schools panicked. The date of your article – Jan 16 – where it was reported that some countries were considering closing their schools was almost the perfect peak of the third surge. By the time they got the kiddies out the cases were dropping like a stone.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            DJ – what was the date of the NPR article you referenced?

            I pick the Jan date because it was close to the date of the NPR article.

            What you folks don’t acknowledge is that thousands of people with college degrees, professionals in their field and believers of science – made these decisions.

            And you disagree and denigrate them and accuse them of dumb thinking and actively working against the interests of those they serve.

            Then you post narratives that misrepresent the facts.

            This has become the standard in BR with several who post blogs.

            Again – it’s fine to disagree and state your principled disagreements, but to attack the teacher professions relentlessly and then promote narratives that are not the entire truth is bad karma.

            This is just not acceptable.

      2. CJBova Avatar

        Yes, Larry’s first article was published on Jan. 30, 2021 by WaPo at the height of Portugal’s peak and DJ’s from Reuters is today and 3% of the peak. A bit of a difference.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          and this part Carol: ” Fear porn. It now seems obvious that there was never a science-based reason to close the schools to in-person learning over the 2020-2021 academic year. As long ago as last October NPR published an article citing school systems around the world reopening for in-person teaching without adverse effects. ”

          See that word “never” ?

          That’s why I did go back and get a date near to what he was referencing.

          So that narrative was NOT TRUE :

          ” It now seems obvious that there was never a science-based reason to close the schools to in-person learning over the 2020-2021 academic year. ”

          Why do you folks insist on false narratives like this?

          It’s the number one problem with Conservatives these days. The truth no longer matters.. it’s what you want to believe!

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            What does ” … over the 2020 – 2021 academic year.” mean to you? The schools were closed all year. There NEVER was a reason for that. The schools in Virginia that stayed open did not have problems. Not the public schools in southwest and western Virginia nor the private schools in Northern Virginia. The CDC advised to reopen, even if teachers had not yet been vaccinated.

            Some European countries panicked and screwed up. They also NEVER had a reason to close their schools. The countries that kept their schools open did not see the schools become super-spreader events. It didn’t happen.

            Please find us the school system that stayed open and ended up with piles of corpses among the students, staff and teachers. It doesn’t exist.

            Talk about a false narrative. There were plenty of school systems around America and across the world that did follow the science and stayed open. There was no crisis. There was no apocalypse. It didn’t happen, just like the CDC and the American Society of Pediatricians said it wouldn’t happen.

            The biggest lie is that liberals claim they follow the science. Is the CDC not scientific enough for you?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            re: ” Some European countries panicked and screwed up. They also NEVER had a reason to close their schools.”

            So you admit they DID close?

            So did you lie about it DJ?

            The problem here is what you (and others) want to believe – and claim is the truth – when the reality is different.

            If you read that WSJ article you’ll see it was more than a few European schools and you essentially disagree with their policy determinations JUST LIKE you disagree with the US schools policy determination.

            That’s fine to disagree and give your counterarguments. It’s NOT okay to misrepresent the issue as you did to suit your own beliefs.

            It’s the problem with Conservatism these days. The truth is gone and it’s all about what they believe.

      3. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        Hanover was open all year too…. no big news stories of Hanover children laid to waste.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Yep, it was a mixed bag across the country but the ones that stayed open were NOT following CDC guidance.

          “CDC’s classroom guidance would keep 90% of schools at least partially closed

          ” Restrictive metrics
          At the heart of the criticism is the CDC’s decision to tie reopening decisions to how severely the virus is spreading in the surrounding county. The guidance says schools can fully reopen for in-person learning only in counties with low or moderate levels of transmission, which means fewer than 50 new cases per 100,000 residents over seven days or a test-positivity rate lower than 8%. Schools in counties that don’t meet that threshold should shift to hybrid learning, when students spend just some time in the classroom, with the priority on getting elementary students into the classroom, the guidance says.”

          https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/18/cdcs-classroom-guidance-would-keep-90percent-of-schools-at-least-partially-closed.html

          The CDC guidance left it up to the schools and leaders to decide based on community conditions and some had low numbers and others just ignored the numbers and went ahead anyhow.

          For all the grid that Northam as received – he FOLLOWED the CDC Guidance (like other governors did). He did not arbitrarily decide but instead actually delegated the decision to the schools and recommended following CDC guidance.

          Which is totally different from what the critics are claiming.

          A LOT of what the critics are claiming is not true, misinformation, and some of it just bald face lies.

          We can debate – and should – but misrepresenting the truth about the issue seems to be a habit with the critics… lying is “okay” even as they blather about “bias” that prevents them from reading media!

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Yeah, okay. That and 10,000 other reasons including they’re paid 77 cents on the dollar to male counterparts.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      That would be a brilliant observation if not for the fact that the gender gap is larger in states where children were forced into 100% virtual schooling. Do you suggest that states which demand virtual schooling somehow provide equal pay to men and women?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Was it larger before? No. These are the top 10 States by pay gap in 2019. Now which of these 10 States went 100% virtual in 2020?
        1. Louisiana

        2. Utah

        3. West Virginia

        4. Wyoming

        5. North Dakota

        6. Indiana

        7. Montana

        8. Oklahoma

        9. Idaho

        10. Alabama

        https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/02/zippia-this-map-shows-which-states-have-the-biggest-gender-pay-gaps.html

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Try to focus. I know it can be hard. Your argument is that women dropped out of the workforce due to pay inequality with men rather than because of virtual schooling. You have no evidence or facts, you cite no studies but that’s your theory.

          The three states referenced in the article as having larger differences between women and men dropping out of the workforce were California, Delaware and Virginia. All are among the states with the most virtual schooling. None are in your top 10 list of pay differentials. Now, if pay differentials were the real issue why would states like California, Delaware and Virginia be those referenced by the article. According to you they don’t have top 10 level pay differentials.

          By your logic, the states you listed above ought to have the biggest gender gap.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            No, I’m saying you cannot show virtual schooling was the cause.

            Well, it doesn’t matter since all of the statements are undocumented. Read above comment and try following the links. Plus, even if those 3 are true, explain Texas.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I noticed the Keystone State’s governor, Tommy Wolf, has extended his emergency powers despite the state legislature making moves to end the over reach sometime in June. PA might have to pry those powers out Wolf’s hands with a crowbar.

    No chance of reigning in Northam, unless it becomes a threat to McAuliffe’s campaign. 236 days until the end of King Ralph’s reign.
    https://www.mcall.com/news/pennsylvania/capitol-ideas/mc-nws-pa-wolf-lawmakers-disaster-20210520-56fnqfpgtzbltklqysqqm4wvdy-story.html

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Pennsylvania didn’t just approve the restrictions on the governor’s emergency power through an amendment to the state constitution, they approved the amendment by a 53% – 47% vote. And Pennsylvania voted for Biden in 2020. Democrats in Virginia may be in for a rude surprise this fall.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The GOP is going to get SLAUGHTERED in NoVa and other blue parts of Virginia. They’re going to win RoVa hands down. Jump Ball in the suburbs but I’m betting if any GOP has Trump stink on them, they’re done – especially with suburban women.

        The problem with the GOP is they think they can win with their base and a few clueless rubes – and they actually can in some places mostly rural but it’s a tougher slog in the urban and suburban places.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          “The GOP is going to get SLAUGHTERED in NoVa and other blue parts of Virginia. They’re going to win RoVa hands down. Jump Ball in the suburbs …”

          Dear Lord, there you go again!

          NoVa is “the suburbs” of Washington, DC. Are you now one of those members of the Richmond elite who can’t comprehend that the City of Washington, DC is more of a real city than anything found in Virginia?

          The “big city” of Richmond is about the same geographic size as DC but has about 1/3rd the population.

          Where are these urban areas in Virginia?

          And trust me … there are lots of people in Fairfax and Loudoun Counties that are fit to be tied over Coonman Northam’s idiotic school policies – from COVID-19 shutdowns to CRT to dumbing down TJ.

          The Democrats control the House of Delegates by a 55 – 45 margin. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that can’t switch back this fall.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Was not talking about what a “city” is or is not – I know that’s an itch you can’t satisfy!

            No, I’m talking about plain old Virginia politics – not left or right just how regions vote.

            And then I’m looking at how Virginia has voted in the last 3 or 4 elections and what regions made a difference in the vote totals.

            You want to know what areas?

            okay:

            https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/fredericksburg.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/d7/0d77adf1-0fe3-5779-9ed1-e59aae960f7c/5fb5b01eb86a0.image.jpg

            but don’t get too whatacated – here’s is how it really looks politically:

            https://news.virginia.edu/sites/default/files/article_image/map.jpg

            re: ” The Democrats control the House of Delegates by a 55 – 45 margin. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that can’t switch back this fall”

            I agree but just ask you where the GOP is going to pick up seats? They don’t have many in RoVa they don’t already have so where in NoVa and suburban RoVa will they take back seats?

            I think when Kirk Cox went down – it said something about RPV.

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            You’re looking in the rearview mirror. Your assumption is that nothing will change. I think you are dead wrong.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            where will the GOP win seats, take back seats?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      James, if you guys were fully in charge of the pandemic, we’d be like India!

      No masks. No social distancing. No vaccines..restaurants and schools fully open – let it all hang out!

      Thank GOD, SOME people in this country actually did wear masks, socially distant and get vaccinated.

      Now that they did – guess who’s claiming credit for ending the pandemic? Yep!

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Hey James, can you link the actual reseach article that actually had the quote, “tidal wave of women”?

    I realize you didn’t read it and are just taking Center Square verbatim, but the document at Sage Pub says no such thing. I’m kinda beginning to doubt the comment below, too, since CenterSquare cites this article https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08912432211001305
    from SagePub as the source document, and the word “California” isn’t even found in the article. Neither is Delaware, and who the hell cares about Virginia?

    As the article states, “But the gap grew by an average of 5% in states where only virtual learning was offered, such as in California, Delaware and Virginia.”

    So even if the data is REAL, it’s still just Correlation not necessarily causation.

    Yeah, and if the gap in California went up by 5%, it’d still be 10% less than Louisiana and Alabama.

    FWIW, William Scarborough’s paper is https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2378023120947997
    and also does not support his comment to the Washington Examiner (aka CenterSquare), but it is a quote from an interview… sort of… missing the 10% increase in Texas.

    Jesus, this internet is a mess of half truths, selective snippets, and undocumented conjectures. Ya know, fact checking shouldn’t have to rely on anonymous commenters. Or, is it commentor?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Gender&Society is a peer-reviewed academic journal. Here’s what the G&S article said, “Millions of women with children were forced to reduce their paid work (Collins et al. 2020) and leave employment (Alon et al. 2020; Bateman and Ross 2020; Heggeness 2020) as result of school and child care center closures, social distancing measures, and reduced availability of child care provision.”

      ” … school and child care closures …”

      Four references to other studies are provided.

      If you want to criticize peer reviewed work in an academic journal I guess you’ll need to track back all of the referenced studies and let us know where you see the flaws.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Which article? The CS is a mash of a WashExam interview is with Scarborough, not an author on the paper cited. Neither article (cited or Scarborough’s) supports the quote from Scarborough, and Scarborough offers the conflicting datum that Texas, a partial closure rose by 10% — twice that of the other three.

        Try to follow, I am not critcizing the peer reviewed article, but the unsubstaniated statement on the cause of the increase in the employment gap.

        “Fast forward to March, and a new paper published in the journal Gender & Society indicates that the gap between mothers’ and fathers’ labor force participation was smaller in states where students received in-person instruction, either full-time or part-time. But the gap grew by an average of 5% in states where only virtual learning was offered, such as in California, Delaware and Virginia. Texas was an exception, where 10% of women left the workforce even when 55% of schools were providing in-person instruction. Last year, large numbers of families pulled their children out of public schools and a record number began homeschooling.”

        No published peer review article in Gender & Society supports the claims of California, Delaware, and Virginia, nor the claim of a difference between virtual and in-person.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Okay, some clarification is due. The CS article is embellished reporting of an embellished Washington Examiner piece (or vice versa). The WE references its author’s link to CS. The paper in question is NOT by Scarborough, et al, as stated in CS but by Mooi-Reci & Reisman, however they (Mooi-Reci) cite a paper by Collins, Scarborough and others.

    Gender & Society — a refereed journal — HA, refereed my arse! Mooi-Reci totally mischaracterize the study done by Collins, et al, or provide an incorrect reference, to wit:

    “Collins, Ruppanner, Landivar, and Scarborough address this question. They link data from the Elementary School Operating Status database (ESOS) with data from the U.S. Current Population Survey during September through November, in both 2019 and 2020, to evaluate this relationship across 26 states in the United States. They find that the gender gap in parents’ labor force participation grew most in states where schools offered primarily remote or hybrid instruction, and least in states where instruction was offered in person. Collins et al. conclude that in-person school reopening reduces gender gaps in employment by allowing ”

    However, THIS is the reference paper… and the description of the data used…
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.12506

    “In this study, we use panel data from the US Current Population Survey to examine changes in mothers’ and fathers’ work hours from February through April 2020,..”

    It is not a year-over-year study of 26 states, but a 3-month study Feb 2020 to Apr 2020. I suspect that it is merely a mistaken citation and link, but this is the kind of thing a referee SHOULD catch. Since authors tend to collaborate on multiple papers, it might be possible to find the correct paper, but until then the claims of 5% average increase of employment gap in California, Delaware, and Virginia is, well, Bulls#!t.

    This may be the correct cite, I’ll review it tomorrow, but the variance in the samples are significant, plus “yes, there is a difference between 2019 and 2020, wonder what it could be?”: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08912432211001300

  6. Ralph Northam will be remembered as the worst governor in modern Virginia history. The only ones worse are those who ushered in and maintained Jim Crow segregation.

    Northam fiddled as Richmond burned, so to speak. Instead of leading on the COVID-19 crisis and keeping schools open, Northam’s Virginia Department of Education held seminars on Diversity, Equity & Justice and drafted guidelines applying Critical Race Theory to the teaching of math and the evaluation of teachers.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Unlikely…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, as Bogey said, “We’ll always have McDonnell.”

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      talk about living in LA LA Land! This is the difference between hard right perceptions and real world !

  7. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    It’s all about setting up a scheme of mutual corruption and payoffs. Elected Democrats make special concessions to unionized teachers in exchange for campaign contributions & election support. In return, the unions make campaign contributions and provide election support. Then they make further demands (such as collective bargaining), which, in turn, are accommodated, continuing the cycle.

    Meanwhile many schools, both private and public, operated for much of the period on an in-person or hybrid basis.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I think you’re describing a normal relationship between a constituency and their representatives.

      The same thing goes on with gun rights and abortion and businesses. No?

      Conservatives and the GOP could appeal to education and teachers if they wanted to just like they do with the 2A folks and anti abortion folks, no?

      Why can’t Conservatives be supporters of Public Education?

  8. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    McAuliffe has said he will focus on education and women’s pay and equality issues. So that sounds attractive, at least to parents and women. So McAuliffe is already addressing the issue of getting women back into the economy. May be a smart tactic, but OK. Heard a blurb from Youngkin today, appealing to conservative, and religious values. Good luck with that.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Sometimes the GOP seems like all they are gonna do, can do, is appeal to their base. They seem incapable of expanding their vision to include voters beyond their base.

      OR, they think more and more folks will shift right and join their base?

Leave a Reply