School Choice for Poor Still Hard Sell to Democrats

By Chris Braunlich

On being told that peasants were starving for lack of bread, Marie Antoinette is reputed to have said “Let them eat cake.”

Marie Antoinette had nothing on Delegate Suhas Subramanyam.

At a House subcommittee meeting on Wednesday, Delegate Subramanyam was confronted with more than a dozen low-income families and Black community leaders demanding educational choices and opportunities for their children.

His response? “Kids do have a choice right now. Their parents can pay for a private school if they wanted to.”

Easy for Delegate Subramanyam to say. He represents a district with a median household income of $125,000.

But these parents and leaders weren’t from his district. They live in and represent communities facing imploding school systems where Black students – already behind — lost more than two years’ worth of math instruction and more than 1.5 years in reading instruction as a result of the pandemic.

COVID underscored the poor performance of low-income students of color and the inadequate instruction given in a one-size-fits-all environment.

The parents of those students aren’t taking it anymore.

As Shequanna Becot pointed out, it is not just about academics. With two children in Richmond Public Schools, she finally obtained a scholarship for her severely bullied son to attend Anna Julia Cooper School. Her reason for supporting Education Success Accounts? “The bullying in public schools … is the reason why as a parent I should have the choice to send my child anywhere.  I want my child to be in a safe environment.”

Another mother tearfully testified that the bullying had driven her son to suicide, saying, “Maybe if I’d had another option, he could have gone elsewhere and things could be better.” Yet another community leader noted that students attending a summer camp she runs feared going back to the community and the school they are designated to attend because of the zip code they live in.

What made the subcommittee hearing extraordinary is the rarity of Black and brown witnesses lining up to support a bill sponsored by a Republican. Delegate Glenn Davis’ bill would create Education Success Accounts – accounts giving parents who move their children from public school a portion of the funding the state would have spent on their public school, but allowing the parent to spend it on private school tuition, tutoring, fees, books, therapies, and the like. Federal and local funding stays with the local school system.

Lining up with the parents are the community leaders they rely on. Former Richmond School Board member Tichi Pinkney Eppes noted “I support this bill because it provides an option. We all know the condition of our public schools. Some are thriving, some are not. In Richmond, unfortunately, not enough of them are. And parents need options.”

Michael Bailey stepped up as well. After 35 years of experience in public education and with the NCAA, Bailey now works as a Life Skills Coach, working with at-risk children, teaching them the skills they will need not only to survive but to thrive.

“I represent a different culture of people who don’t have opportunity and choice today,” Bailey noted. “And they want to be able to choose a school in which their student may attend. The voters are here. We are represented. And we want to be able to choose which schools our students attend, whether they are in a zip code or out of the zip code. Education is education, it doesn’t have a color.  Either you’re for it or against it.”

Different culture indeed. According to Delegate Schuyler Van Valkenburg, “That’s just not the reality of what we have.” He claims, “Every school system has different course loads, different programs, different methods and models within the schools, have different choices, you have magnet schools, governors schools, CTE programs you can go to.”

Yes … if one lives in Delegate VanValkenburg’s district, where nearly 60 percent of the residents have a post-secondary degree and can agitate for a multitude of programs to serve their children, that no doubt is the case.

But the parents he dismissed were standing before him simply seeking a school where their child would learn skills for life and be safe in the process of doing so. It is a concept alien to those like Mr. VanValkenburg. He turned them down and turned them away.

Repeated studies demonstrate the attributes of choice programs: that they serve less-advantaged students, increase educational attainment, reduce the likelihood of incarceration, and increase academic achievement for students in both private and public schools. All of that makes for better students, better adults, and a better society.

The bill is expected to head to the full Education Committee next week, and both Republicans and Democrats need a call or email of support.

No one understands what is at stake for those parents better than Lt. Governor Winsome Earle-Sears, who initiated the bill and is fighting to see it passed.

That more Republican legislators don’t understand the opening before them to make common cause with these parents, on principles of opportunity they have long advocated, is astounding.

But Dr. Mark James, a former reading teacher and public high school administrator, does understand … and he fired a shot across the bow of those hellbent on blocking the bill: “If you came with a No in your pocket today you’re saying No to the people who campaign and walk for you. No to the students that are going across town to schools where they don’t fit in. No to the opportunity for a student to be able to have a choice. When you have a choice, you have opportunity. What are you trying to gain by stopping something that will give opportunity to people that don’t have it?”

Delegate Subramanyam and his colleagues may well feel equally comfortable offering the 21st century equivalent of “Let them eat cake.”

But they should remember the consequences that came with it for Marie Antoinette.

Chris Braunlich is president of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, which first published this commentary, and is a former president of the Virginia State Board of Education.  


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “School Choice for Poor Still Hard Sell to Democrats”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Please provide the link to the Republican “School Choice” bill? I am assuming it sets income levels and public school deficiency criteria for applicability – I may be swayed by such a bill. If not, your argument is simple grandstanding.

    Btw, these activists parents should be lining up at their local school board meetings demanding charter school alternatives (no new laws required) – where is the Thomas Jefferson Institute call for action (and funding?) for that effort?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep. I’d support a bill that prioritizes/limits “choice” to the kids that are 1. economically disadvantaged , 2. in poorly performing public schools 3. requires the choice school to do SOLs also and 4. provides full scholarship.

      I agree also that there are over 100 school boards across Virginia, most of them elected who could, with voters support, create charter/choice schools per the requirements stated above.

      This is nothing more, at this point, the usual disingenuous proposals from the right for defacto academies for all kids by claiming the poor kids “need” them.

      Do an honest , legitimate, proposal, and win over folks. Otherwise, it’s plain old politics as usual.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=231&typ=bil&val=hb1508

      That’s the Glenn Davis bill. Sorry, should have thought to add the link to Chris’s piece. REALLY interesting that there is no fiscal impact statement posted. Hmmmm.

      “Charter school alternatives…” Well, as to what is now possible under state law, I assume Chris has from time to time been involved in such efforts. But they are still under local school board control. His party more than mine, but my understanding is the tactical decision was to focus on this bill and an increase in the tax credit for the scholarship programs. In other states both have seen bipartisan support.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Thanks for the link. As Dick said below (well, on the other thread), it is not targeted to the economically disadvantaged in poorly performing schools. If it were, it might garner more bipartisan support… then again it wouldn’t work as well as a wedge issue, eh…

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          “Might garner more bipartisan support”?

          I wish that were true. But it is another false flag, of which the comments here are overpopulated.

          “Give Davis’ bill a broader reach into Democratic districts and Democrats “might” vote for it.

          Should be true, but never has been.

          Anything that offers to break the stranglehold of teachers unions in those district schools will be fiercely opposed by those unions, which in turn provide not only money, but also foot soldiers for progressive political campaigns.

          Please point out a shred of evidence that anything that is strongly opposed by teachers’ unions will ever get a Democratic vote in the GA. Just one example will do.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Well, one thing is certain, if Conservatives continue to try to pass legislation that is designed to benefit the rich and claim it is for the poor, they certainly will not get any D votes. Draft something that actually targets assistance to the economically disadvantaged and you might get somewhere. Otherwise, drive that wedge…

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Agree. Totally disingenuous proposals for the “poor” who are being “failed” but in reality the proposals will not help them at all but instead create de-facto taxpayer-funded “academies” for folks who are not poor but want their kids to go to private schools funded by taxpayers.

            Beyond that, almost no true transparency of their academic “success” teaching those “poor failed kids”

            Even for the ones that are in Virginia, which ones accept economically disadvantaged kids and have a track record of success in teaching them?

            Ditto for Md and NC which are touted to have “many” Charters. What is their record of accepting those “poor” kids and successfully teaching them?

            Try finding the results. Ask the proponents here in BR to provide the results.

            crickets.

      2. Eric the half a troll
        (from duplicated post)

        If transportation were a problem for poor parents (agreed this may be an issue) then perhaps a NGO grant or two could be found…? The point, I think, is that there are alternative approaches to school choice for economically disadvantaged students in poorly performing schools that are not also give aways to the rich and do not actively undermine our entire public school system. I also am surprised that tax payer funding
        of religious institutions has not been raised.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      So these are the wrong “kind” of people of color that are supporting Del. Davis’ bill, correct?

      And they should go to school board meetings, not the GA, to support a change in the law?

      You literally told them their place. But, as a true progressive, at least you did not bring firehoses and dogs.

      I’m sure they will be eternally grateful.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “So these are the wrong “kind” of people of color…”

        Never even implied that…

        “And they should go to school board meetings, not the GA, to support a change in the law?”

        No change in law needed for what I suggested they take to the SB… that was the point…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          They’re not restricted in who they can go to. There is no either/or. They can do both.

          The local school board is a lot more accessible and responsive to voters on a locality basis than a larger region.

          Which leads me to believe it’s not about that at all but instead a wider effort to establish a state-level charter school network funded by tax dollars that is not at all targeted to economically-disadvantaged kids in poorly performing schools but more along the lines of tax-funded private school academies.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Your “alternative”, that they ask the Richmond school board for charter schools, is an insult to those parents’ intelligence.

          “No change in law is needed.” Cute.

          That doubles the insult.

          These parents are much smarter than you will ever give them credit for.

          They want their kids to be able to escape the deadly clutches of RPS. They have no interest in approaching that disgraceful school board on bended knee only to be turned away.

          The pea is not under that shell.

          You know it, I know it and they know it.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “They have no interest in approaching that disgraceful school board on bended knee only to be turned away.”

            Far more likely to persuade their locally elected school board than statewide legislators that do not represent them. I get you don’t believe in our system of representative government but it is clear you are once again wrong.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Note to administrator: This article appears twice. It might be a good idea to consolidate the comments.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Since Robin has also started cross-posting from TJI I guess I should stop…Posted it and went to the grocery store and ping, saw it on my phone again.

    2. Gave it a try! Think I got them all…hopefully in the right places!

  3. Wahoo'74 Avatar
    Wahoo’74

    Excellent article. Competition anywhere breeds success, as does increased opportunity. I trust the majority of delegates will figure this out and vote yes.

  4. The pro-school choice advocates quoted in this column provide powerful testimony. It is a tragedy that their children are trapped in a dysfunctional, deteriorating and unreformable school system, and it is shameful that they are prevented the opportunity to pick a better school.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      If I were running this bill, I’d be posting the video from the meeting where those Democrats delivered the “suck it up and count your blessings” message to minority parents.

      Eric, again, not my bill to get passed, but your advice has great merit.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Politicians should learn to think twice before they speak.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Democrats, when in full control in Richmond in 2020 and 2021, changed every Education law they wanted to change and wrote a slew of new ones. All of them are as progressive as the teachers’ unions to which Democrats are beholden.

          GA Republicans are not nearly so single-minded – another word for disciplined. They will need not only majorities, but significant ones, in both houses while Glenn Youngkin is Governor to do any of the things in education that I, and sometimes both of us, favor.

          I can read an electoral map, and that is unlikely.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I am happy that Ms. Becot’s daughter got a scholarship to Anna Julia Cooper School. In fact, every child who goes there gets a full scholarship that the school values at $17,000. The number of students that the school can accept is therefore constrained by the amount of donations and other revenue it receives. There is no doubt that, if there were students who could bring with them $10,000 in ESA funding, the school could make donation money go further, thereby expanding enrollment. Of course, that is assuming that donations would remain steady and would not be dissuaded by the availability of tax resources for these students. In any event, there is a limit to how much it could expand. That would leave a lot of children with poor parents who could not afford the difference between the amount in their ESA and the cost of a private school.

    Chris Braunlich is being a little bit disingenuous when he asserts that choice programs “serve less advantaged students.” That is true about programs like Anna Julia Cooper School which have low income eligibility requirements. That is also true regarding Virginia’s Education Improvement Scholarships Tax Credits Program. However, the proposed ESA program does not have such requirements. A family could have an annual income of half a million dollars and get this money to help pay for their kids to go to private schools. I am surprised that Democrats are not bringing up the subsidization of the wealthy that would result from this bill. (Maybe they did and Braunlich opted not to comment on that.)

    There is a far simpler way to give kids a “choice”: allow them to enroll in any public school in the Commonwealth they wished to. The kids in Richmond could just go across the line and attend Henrico or Chesterfield schools. Those in Norfolk could go to Virginia Beach schools. Those in Fredericksburg could go to Spotsylvania or Stafford schools. And so on..

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      As usual some common sense evaluation of public policy.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      “Chris Braunlich is being a little bit disingenuous when he asserts that choice programs “serve less advantaged students.” That is true about programs like Anna Julia Cooper School which have low income eligibility requirements. That is also true regarding Virginia’s Education Improvement Scholarships Tax Credits Program. However, the proposed ESA program does not have such requirements. A family could have an annual income of half a million dollars and get this money to help pay for their kids to go to private schools”

      Yes. So what is Mr. Braunchlich REALLY advocating?

      When are conservatives going to make a honest proposal that really does do what they say it will?

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I think you are a little free with the word “just” Dick. As in “the kids in Richmond could “just go across the line”.

      Transportation is a very big deal.

      That said, if the Governor and the GA ever got interested, Wisconsin has a law that frees kids in Milwaukee schools to attend schools in the suburbs. It has been in place for a very long time and works very well.

      See https://www.baconsrebellion.com/consider-wisconsins-successful-and-popular-parental-choice-options-for-virginia/

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I realize that transportation is an issue.

        But it would be an issue for private schools as well.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          The Wisconsin inter district school laws and regulations deal with transportation, and it has reportedly worked pretty well.

    4. Eric the half a troll
      We pushed the Loudoun County Public School Board to adopt just such a policy (albeit only for LC) – not sure if it still exists. I could also
      be persuaded to get behind such an effort.

    5. Kathleen Smith5 hours ago

      Interesting thought. I have never really contemplated that idea. Probably would
      require a constitutional amendment. One problem is that poor parents have no way of transporting said student in Richmond to said school in Henrico. They can’t afford to move either. I am sure that localities would then put up housing and zoning barriers.

      1. Eric the half a troll5 hours ago

        If transportation were a problem for poor parents (agreed this may be an
        issue) then perhaps a NGO grant or two could be found…? The point, I
        think, is that there are alternative approaches to school choice for
        economically disadvantaged students in poorly performing schools that
        are not also give always to the rich and do not actively undermine our
        entire public school system. I also am surprised that tax payer funding
        of religious institutions has not been raised.

    6. Kathleen Smith5 hours ago

      Interesting thought. I have never really contemplated that idea. Probably would
      require a constitutional amendment. One problem is that poor parents have no way of transporting said student in Richmond to said school in Henrico. They can’t afford to move either. I am sure that localities would then put up housing and zoning barriers.

    7. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      With Disqus I’m not going to try. Perhaps Robin or Jim could do that.

      And now that you posted it, I’m happy for her, too, since that is the school where I contribute to the scholarship fund!

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        That’s OK. Luckily, I still had the other article open on my computer.

    8. Kathleen Smith5 hours ago

      I wish it were that simple. In the Senate Finance subcommittee where it failed on Thursday, the antagonists said the bill was would lead to segregated schools. If that means like minded parents, then it it by choice, not force. There was also the argument of taking money away from already muffed up public schools. The word overextended comes to mind. Maybe less would be better for some schools. Resources might be less, but in the end, support students better. Has anyone done a cost analysis to see if the per pupil would actually be lower. The SOQ is only one part of the total funding, so how would that make the local effort look like per student?

  6. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Excellent work.

  7. Kathleen Smith5 hours ago

    Great article. I watched the Senate Finance Education Subcommittee as the bills all failed miserably as expected. Very, very sad.

Leave a Reply