Schmucks Pay Taxes, Too

I’m a pro-business kind of guy. I believe in free markets. I celebrate the contribution of entrepreneurs. I believe that capitalism is the greatest wealth-creating system ever created. But I’ve got a big problem — a very big problem — when businesses lobby for tax breaks from government that ordinary citizens could never hope to receive. Here in Virginia, government practitioners appear willing to hand out tax breaks to any special pleader with a story to tell, even as they jack up taxes on everyone else.

Two more straws in the wind…

Volkswagen. Over and above the $6 million in subsidies and incentives that the Commonwealth is paying Volkswagen to relocate its US headquarters to Fairfax County (see “Another Data Point on the VW Deal“), it appears that we will be giving VW employees exemptions on car-related taxes as well. Reports Emily Dooley with the Times-Dispatch:

Known around the General Assembly as the “Volkswagen bill,” the legislation exempts employees at automaker headquarters and their families from paying motor vehicle sales and use taxes if they lease a car built by the automobile manufacturer.

Volkswagen Group of America Inc. announced last fall its plans to move 120 employees and its headquarters from Michigan to Fairfax County in April.

A nonemployee pays $750 in taxes when buying a $25,000 Volkswagen. After July 1, a VW headquarters employee would not. Each employee is allowed to lease up to four cars per year for 12 months. Then the cars are sold.

The tax waiver was a benefit in Michigan.

Qimonda

. Will Jones with the Times-Dispatch reports today that semiconductor manufacturer Qimonda in eastern Henrico County would get an estimated $1.3 million tax cut this year as part of the county’s proposed budget for fiscal 2008-09. The semiconductor company plans to invest $1.5 billion in the plant over the next several years, and the 27 percent reduction in the machine & tool tax, writes Jones, “would help the memory-chip manufacturer weather a depressed market for its products and make Henrico more attractive for investment by the semiconductor industry.”

Of course, those two tax breaks are chicken feed compared to the ginormous incentives that the City of Fredericksburg is offering to the Kalahari Waterpark to locate an indoor waterpark in the Celebrate Virginia project. (See “Kalahari’s $61 Million Waterpark Subsidy.“) Fredericksburg officials hand out goodies to favored businesses like Halloween candy.

What we’re experiencing in Virginia is the slow-motion transformation of the tax code into a two-tier system: one set of rules for special pleaders who wheedle concessions from lawmakers, and a set of rules of the rest of us schmucks. As the special pleaders whittle away at the tax base, government raise taxes on the schmucks to make up the difference.

State and local officials contend that the tax breaks represent a net gain — without them, VW, Qimonda and Kalahari wouldn’t make the investments, create the jobs and generate the taxes that are projected. What the business-welfare apologists don’t acknowledge is that the schmucks create jobs and pay taxes, too. The difference is, our economic activity is invisible to public policy makers: We don’t hire lobbyists and public relations professionals to make our case. When schmucks pay more in taxes, we have less capital to grow our businesses. Thus, we pay less in taxes in the long run.

Maybe I should just stop complaining about unfair tax treatment and join the crowd. Maybe I can make a case that blogs are a critical component of Virginia’s emerging information economy and that they need to be encouraged and subsidized. Think anyone would buy it?


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. Not Ed Risse Avatar
    Not Ed Risse

    Whatever happened to the concept of “equality under the law”?

    It would be fun to see this litigated in Federal court by an ordinary taxpaying citizen.

  2. Growth is Good Avatar
    Growth is Good

    This VW project is big coup for Virginia. The RTD got one big point wrong — all told, there are going to be 400 VW employees in Fairfax with a reported average salary over $125,000 per year. Between payroll, corporate income, BPOL, real estate and sales taxes — this represents a significant revenue stream for Virginia.

    Without projects like VW and Qimonda, schmucks like us would be paying even higher local taxes, for it is us who puts the strain on the local economy, not businesses. If a marginal tax policy change is what’s needed to get this kind of growth in Virginia, then so be it.

  3. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    I’d like to start a farm in Fauquier county that will employ 5 people.

    Where do I sign up?

    RH

  4. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    The latest wrinkle in the Kalahari saga is that the incentives will be implemented via a TIF district (tax increment financing).

    For those not familiar with TIFs – I’d invite you to go to GOOGLE NEWS and put said phrase with quotes around it and you’ll be treated to hundreds of news stories about projects being built with TIF in many, many places outside of Virginia….as well as in Virginia.

    TIF – basically means that the developer/owner does not pay increased taxes on the improvements that they place on the land.

    So they owe the taxes on the land and any improvements BEFORE they built their project – and from that point forward the higher taxes are forgiven all or in part – as an “incentive” to build there – as opposed to building somewhere else or not building at all.

    the basic concept is the same…and yes.. you can bet that a farm in Facquier or a hair salon or tackle shop in Short Pump won’t get the same deal.

    I’m not sure what the legal justification is but perhaps it no more secure that the next legal challenge to it.

  5. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    At least a TIF represents taxes that the locality chooses not to collect, which is different than a direct cash subsidy. Rolls Royce is getting cash. The car license fee thing for VW is just silly.

    This is indeed getting out of hand.

    But Virginia needs allies, needs some other states to also make the decision that they won’t play the game any longer. A federal court decision that this violates the equal protection clause is long overdue. What happened to that Ohio case that was pending a few years ago? But absent a rule that covers the whole United States, companies will continue to game the system and push for the best deal — in fact, don’t they have an obligation to their shareholders to try?

    It is interesting — one requirement for most of the incentive programs in Virginia is that you have to be sure the Governor gets to make the location or expansion announcement. Once you have announced the decision to locate in Virginia, you are no longer eligible for the incentive programs. That is pretty revealing right there — a fact for some court to chew over. The political considerations outweigh the economic ones….

    Imagine how low taxes would be if there were no exemptions — not for churches, non profits, schools, new factories, etc. What a radical idea. Absent the incentive war, Virginia would clean up on new companies because the basic tax rates would be so low.

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “basically means that the developer/owner does not pay increased taxes on the improvements that they place on the land.”

    So, it’s a Henry Georgeian land tax, just as Jim Bacon has proposed we should have.

    What’s the problem this time? You guys get what you want and still complain.

    RH

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “Imagine how low taxes would be if there were no exemptions — not for churches, non profits, schools, new factories, etc. What a radical idea. Absent the incentive war, Virginia would clean up on new companies because the basic tax rates would be so low.”

    Yup. I have an article from a California economist who singles out Fauquier county. He points out that taxes would be much lower without land use taxation – even for many farms, because unlike the Georgian situation they are taxed at full rate on structures and infrastructure.

    Then again, without land use taxation, you might not have so many farms. And housing prices would be much lower, due to increased supply.

    RH

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    We can only hope that Virginia’s generosity with the HQ could help persuade VW to locate a manufacturing plant close by in another region of VA.

    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080317/BUSINESS/803170356/1305/BUSINESS

  9. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Growth is Good — With all due respect, you do not seem to understand the workings of state and local finance in Virgina. Bringing in these jobs sends money to Richmond, but returns only pennies to Fairfax or Loudoun Counties. It keeps real estate taxes low in subsidized Virginia, but does nothing to help defray the added costs of bringing more people to Fairfax County. In fact, we give up some of the otherwise payable sales tax.

    This sounds to me like just one more big giveaway to some REIT than owns empty buildings in Herndon.

    We in Fairfax County would all be better off without tax giveaways. We need low taxes imposed on a broad basis and no loopholes.

    TMT

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Anon 4:52

    My sentiments exactly.

    Failing that, how do we decide when they have exacted so may concessions that we would be better off without them?

    RH

  11. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “We need low taxes imposed on a broad basis and no loopholes. “

    Sounds a lot like the FAIR tax.

    If you don’t want loopholes, then what do you do about unpriced externalities? Government has a responsibility to see that such negative loopholes are plugged. That means higher taxes for some than others.

    For all we KNOW the benefits to VW merely counteract other artificial barriers to entry. What EMR calls “Agency and Enterprise actions.”

    Whatever that is.

    If we are going to complain about the added costs of bringing more citizens and enterprises to Fairfax then, in honesty, we ought to recognize what they bring whne they come.

    I think the New Zealanders have it figured out.

    Economy, Environment, Equality.

    It is no accident that Economy comes first. Without that, the rest is impossible and irrelevant.

    RH

  12. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    “Government has a responsibility to see that such negative loopholes are plugged.”

    In the end.. you have to decide.. for a given business .. whether or not 50, 100, 200 JOBS… that allow folks to pay their bills and afford food and shelter are better than having those same folks receive welfare – i.e. in your parlance “negative loopholes” for the taxpayers whose money is converted into welfare payments.

    so.. if you could get those jobs by not charging the company anything at all in the way of taxes…

    just invite them in.. help them set up shop.. and be thankful for the jobs that keep some of your residents off of welfare…

    is that worth it?

    is there a supply and demand environment for companies that provide jobs?

  13. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    I don’t understand your point.
    “Would you rather have a job and pay a little more in taxes because of the bribe your county paid to your employer, or not have a job.

    If you have a job, would you rather pay additional taxes to contribute to the bribe, or pay it in welfare payment to those that don’t have jobs?

    The whole environmental movement is based on the idea of putting prices on externalities.

    I guess its a question of whose externalities, and whose ox is gored.

  14. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    there’s nothing complicated about the concept.

    is it better to have a company to locate somewhere and to provide 200 jobs or is it better for taxpayers to pay for the welfare benefits for those 200 people?

    If there are 3 localities each having 200 people out of work – and one of those 3 is willing to gain 200 jobs with a tax-free package to the company ….

    who is harmed by that transaction?

  15. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Again, we see Virginia officials telling the same story with opposite endings. We hear that we need tax subsidies to attract jobs. But GMU professor Stephen Fuller tells us that the high-paying jobs are coming regardless, so we need to pay more to support the growth.

    Both cannot be true. Which is it?

    TMT

  16. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    well .. you wouldn’t pay incentives to attract a business to any area that business already willingly locate there.

    The incentives come in when you want to attract a business that you do not have where you might have other businesses…

    .. or in Virginia… you want a business that offers jobs to locate in an area that does not have enough businesses to offer full employment to those citizens.

    Unfortunately, Virginia’s less prosperous places.. especially those that have lost mills and the such are in direct competition with other states who have also lost manufacturing jobs.

    It’s the old zero sum game.

    If you offer a business a tax-free deal for it to locate… and in return you get 200 new taxpayers instead of welfare recipients – is it worth it?

    Obviously it wouldn’t make much sense to offer it incentives to locate in NoVa but perhaps in Danville.. another story…

    besides.. I though you NoVa guys wanted “more places”?

  17. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    If that is what is going on.

    If the State of Virginia or NoVa is paying incentive (taxpayer money) to attract MORE traffic and require MORE publically-funded infrastructure for businesses that would locate in NoVa .. ANYHOW .. without incentives…

    then we do have a problem.

    Incentives need to be targeted .. to where there is a need…

    I’m not sure what kind of sense it makes to pay incentives to businesses that would locate in NoVa ..without incentives..

    isn’t it odd.. that the term “business friendly” means.. we use people’s taxes to sweeten the corporate bottom line..???

  18. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    As a current resident of NOVA, I think it’s crazy for Virginia to be giving so much to VW to locate its North American HQ here. The incentives likely weren’t necessary, and besides I don’t think it’s going to make a big impact on the local economy. (Though, I suppose every house sold now helps!) As a native of SWVA, I think the incentives to VW to locate the HQ in NOVA would maybe be worth it if Governor Kaine said to VW, “Hey, why don’t you locate your new plant a few hours drive away in SWVA/Southside VA.” Of course, I know that would be another round of incentives, but I hope that Governor Kaine and economic development officials have at least mentioned it to VW officials.

    LB

  19. Growth is Good Avatar
    Growth is Good

    Just for the record, the type of exemption that VW got is the exact same kind that auto dealers get on their cars.

    You know the cars with dealer plates that you see driving around town? No local taxes are getting paid on those, either, and I don’t see anyone up in arms.

Leave a Reply