SCC’s Jagdmann Resigns, Leaves December 31

SCC Commissioner Judith Jagdmann

by Steve Haner

The (Very) Honorable Judith Jagdmann has resigned from Virginia’s State Corporation Commission, effective at the end of the year. The 2023 General Assembly now has two seats to fill on that crucial body, having failed through all of 2022 to fill an existing vacancy on the three-judge panel.

Jagdmann, who joined the court in 2006, announced her decision in a letter to the General Assembly leadership. Her current term is not over, and she is years away from any mandatory retirement based on age.

Before joining the court, she served as Attorney General of Virginia for one year after Jerry Kilgore stepped aside to run for governor in 2005. She joined the Office of Attorney General as the Deputy Attorney General for the Civil Division in January of 1998 (the same time this author was also appointed to a post there by former Attorney General Mark Earley).

The SCC is an often under-appreciated regulatory body that is both an administrative agency and a court of record. It usually gets attention for decisions dealing with utility regulation and infrastructure location, but its oversight reaches from corporate registrations and governance to the investment and insurance and telecommunications industries.

Its separation from the Governor’s Office and the hurly-burly of elective politics is intentional. The commissioners are bound by judicial ethics rules.

Jagdmann has risen to national prominence as president of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). And from time to time she has added her own commentary on major Virginia cases with signed dissents or pointed concurrences, betraying sympathy for consumers.

In September 2021, for example, while approving the addition of a charge to Dominion Energy Virginia bills to pay for the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), she pointed to its redundancy, given other and stronger green energy mandates in state law.

She is still likely to have a vote in the major decision facing the SCC over the pending Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project. It was initially approved with a condition Dominion opposed, requiring the utility to take the financial hit if the project fell below promised output and power needed to be purchased outside Dominion to backfill.

Dominion asked for reconsideration and now another approach to consumer protection on the project has been proposed by the utility, Attorney General Jason Miyares, and some environmental advocates. A hearing is set for Monday on whether to retreat from the performance requirement on power output. SCC decisions can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Dozens of other cases are grinding on and will be active in January while the court lacks two judges. Jagdmann has agreed to sit in for a few weeks if needed.  If the divided General Assembly, the Republican House and Democratic Senate, can now split their differences and find two consensus candidates, it could act quickly.

A native of Southwest Virginia and daughter of a federal district judge, Jagdmann was on staff at the SCC when Earley invited her onto his leadership team. A few more details are on her SCC biographical page.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “SCC’s Jagdmann Resigns, Leaves December 31”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Maybe she decided that 16 years of hearing rate cases and poring over all those numbers was enough. If so, I don’t blame her. I don’t follow the SCC closely, but my impression is the same as yours–her departure will be a loss.

    Her departure should make it easy for the General Assembly to fill the vacancies–each party gets a pick.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      Wow yes its hard to imagine reading and understanding all that stuff. Would think years of experience helps, so that is a loss.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        A good staff also helps. 🙂

    2. If both houses have to agree to both picks it might not be that easy. Or Dominion could provide two (sarc).

      If we have to go with one Judge for awhile is that allowed?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Both houses have to agree to both picks, but there could be a deal worked out between the Republican House and the Democratic Senate that each house would support the candidate of the other house. That would not be unusual.

        Here is what the statute says about a quorum:

        “A majority of the commissioners shall
        constitute a quorum for the exercise of judicial, legislative, and discretionary functions of the Commission, whether there be a vacancy in
        the Commission or not, but a quorum shall not be necessary for the exercise of its administrative functions.”

        A previous section provided that the SCC would consist of three members. I interpret the quoted section as requiring that there be at least two Commissioners to exercise any judicial, legislative, or discretionary function. I assume that is why Jagdmann has offered to sit for a few weeks after her proposed resignation date.

        scc

        1. Agree. I think the SCC is dead in the water until there’s at least one additional person.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Measles outbreak in Ohio. Yeah, should be real easy to fill the vacancies. Easy as agreeing to vaccines.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    The SCC is only a “court of record” pursuant to its own description. It is a classic regulatory agency with administrative, legislative, and adjudicatory functions.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Here is the provision of the state constitution designating the SCC as a court of record:

      “In all matters within the jurisdiction of the
      Commission, it shall have the powers of a court of record to administer oaths, to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, to punish for contempt, and to enforce compliance with its lawful orders or requirements by adjudging and enforcing by its own
      appropriate process such fines or other penalties as may be prescribed or authorized by law. “

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Many thanks for the cite. By definition, a court of record means only that the agency is required to document its adjudication activities as are generally all bureaus.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          Virginia law designates district courts as courts not of record and all courts above district courts as courts of record. The law does not really differentiate explicitly what constitutes a court of record. In practical terms, the district courts are limited to trying misdemeanors and civil suits under a certain limit. Circuit courts have a much wider jurisdiction (misdemeanors on appeal and felonies), as well as a broader civil docket. The circuit court also oversees the office in which official legal documents, e.g. wills, deeds, liens, etc. are recorded.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    My apology readers, but this is short and sketchy because I’m trying (and failing) to type due to a splint on an injured finger. No, not that one….

    I will editorialize here. This is a great lady and great American and I’m seeing this as an untimely departure. A loss. Perhaps some new arena for her talents is in sight. Too much to hope she would join Mark Christie on FERC. 🙂

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Could be worse. Could have been your nose. 😉

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Here’s a freebee. Whenever I wound up bandaged, casted, or in the hospital, I loved it when someone looked at me and asked, “Gee, what the Hell happened to you?”

      Joy of Sex, page 116, there’s a misprint.”

      This is especially funny if your spouse is there.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Here’s a freebee. Whenever I wound up bandaged, casted, or in the hospital, I loved it when someone looked at me and asked, “Gee, what the Hell happened to you?”

      Joy of Sex, page 116, there’s a misprint.”

      This is especially funny if your spouse is there.

  4. This is VERY bad news for Virginia!

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I had an issue with my medical insurance company. I filed a complaint with the SCC. Never heard back BUT several weeks later, the company suddenly agreed I was right. Did the SCC do anything? Don’t know, but I like to think so.

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      It used to be, perhaps 20 years ago, you’d file a complaint with any given government agency, and even if they did nothing, they’d at least acknowledge that they received your complaint. Maybe even blow some smoke up your ass about it.

      These days, they don’t even bother to acknowledge your complaint.

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      It used to be, perhaps 20 years ago, you’d file a complaint with any given government agency, and even if they did nothing, they’d at least acknowledge that they received your complaint. Maybe even blow some smoke up your ass about it.

      These days, they don’t even bother to acknowledge your complaint.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    Went to the Va State Fair a couple of years ago and lo and behold the SCC actually had a table there and I HAD to stop and yes their “reach” in Virginia regulation is wide and deep although the average person has not a clue.

    In terms of offshore wind and economic viability. Been reading about Small Modular Nuclear Reactors akin to the kind used on Aircraft Carriers for more than 50 years. They use/generate weapons grade uranium. They’re researching low grade but not there yet. The electricity they generate is estimated to cost 2-3 times what electricity costs right now.
    In other words, they are not economically viable – much, much worse than offshore wind.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Not the same fuel or process at all. The civilian fuel is far less enriched. The Navy fuel runs for 25 years. I knew you were an anti-nuke. Thanks for proving.

      French just cancelled an OSW project with Shell. It was to be the first using floating platforms. Cost blamed. Yeah, it’s so cheap.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        The US has several hundred military base around the globe and all of them connected to local grid.

        As far as I know, not a single one has an SMR.

        The US has two island states and 5 territories. Not a one has a single SMR despite the fact that they burn diesel fuel at 30 cents KWH.

        I’m PRO NUKE – have said so many times and you know it, yet you continue to say otherwise.

        What I’m pointing out in the discussion about costs of OSW and supposed protection of ratepayers in Va is that we have the same issue perhaps even worse with SMRs.

        So we want an SCC standard for the cost of power such that SMRs are ruled out altogether for a long time in the quest for the anti-wind folks t prevail on OSW?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          False flag, Larry. You fly them all the time.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            fits right in with the way the right talks about stuff these days… false flags out the wazoo!

            No. If you want a fair and objective process at the SCC – then you need to consider more than just OSW that you seem to oppose more on climate denial foolishness than real and objective reasons.

            I’m PRO OSW as well as Nuke and whatever SCC process is used – it should be consistent with regard to both, not just an OSW standard.

  7. DJRippert Avatar

    A good UVa grad, Ms. Jadgmann turned 64 on Nov 3. She may have just decided to retire. Given the need for a GA vote her timing means that the decision can be part of the next GA session, I guess.

    Or, maybe she’s gotten tired of the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond handcuffing the SCC so that the largesse from Dominion keeps coming their way.

    Let’s hope Youngkin and the GA leadership can fill these two seats relatively quickly. Now that the mid-terms are over perhaps Glenn can spend more time in Virginia worrying about Virginia issues.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      When last we visited the showdown, the House had a name and the Senate a name. I know both, would personally feel both would do the job by following the law, neither would be a rubber stamp, and if that’s the outcome, we can move on. Meade Browder from the AG’s office and Phil Abraham, long time lawyer-lobbyist with PJM as a client.

Leave a Reply