By Steve Haner

All customers of Dominion Energy Virginia and Appalachian Power in Virginia will begin soon to pay an extra monthly charge related to the coming Percentage of Income Payment Program, the General Assembly’s new electricity cost subsidy for low-income residential customers.

The PIPP was initially created in the 2020 Virginia Clean Economy Act and then revised with a bill in 2021, but just when then bill subsidies begin is still to be determined. The Department of Social Services, which will determine eligibility, still needs to devise the program. No start date is specified in the law.

The bill charges we will be paying in advance are just to raise the $3 million per year that is being allocated to cover that administrative task. The General Assembly has ordered customers to pay that, too, perhaps not being aware that it would soon be sitting on a $2.6 billion surplus.

Here are the July 29 State Corporation Commission orders establishing the charge for Dominion and APCo customers. Dominion customers will provide $2.4 million and APCo customers $600,000 per year. Far larger amounts will be collected when the benefits begin to flow in the future.

Do not confuse PIPP with the amounts ratepayers are also being charged for unpaid Dominion bills during the pandemic, including the $206 million Dominion is seeking to charge off in the pending rate case. The General Assembly convening today has a proposal to extend the moratorium on disconnects for non-payment to March 2022.

The PIPP plan now is to determine eligibility based on 150% of the federal income poverty level, about $40,000 for a family of four. Eligible families will only have to pay 6% of their income for an electric bill that does not include electric heat, and 10% of income for a bill that does include electric heat.  The extra charge, a tax really, added to the bills of others cover the rest if the bill is larger than that.

Additional funds will also be spent on efforts to reduce energy usage by PIPP households, in ways yet to be determined. Some of the more aggressive language (“whole home refits”) considered in the past General Assembly session didn’t survive.

The 2021 legislation capped the program at $100 million in benefits per year for Dominion customers and $25 million for those of APCo in the western parts of the state. Before the 2021 bill, the SCC had been considering initial universal service fees to pay for PIPP of $1.15 per 1,000 kWh for Dominion and $1.80 per 1,000 kWh for APCo. Whenever this really kicks off, those may be close to the final amounts. Initially.

It is called a universal service fee because all customers pay the same amount, and customers in the two monopoly territories who use other suppliers still must pay. It cannot be bypassed. Resistance has proved futile.  Residential, commercial, industrial and government customers all pay the same charge per kilowatt hour, not the case with the rest of their bills.

But until the programs start, the initial charge will be pennies a month, a placeholder for things to come. With the caps established in the Code of Virginia now, it will take General Assembly action to lift them. It is not unreasonable to expect that pressure to do so will rise as the costs of Virginia’s green energy transformation being to spike everybody’s bills. In other states where this exists, natural gas and other utilities also impose surcharges to cover low-income subsidies.

For Dominion customers, another charge in pending, this one substantially larger. The SCC has still not issue a final ruling in its review of the company’s plan to add yet another rate adjustment clause (RAC) for the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. During the case, waiting simply for a final order, the figure of $2.39 per 1,000 kWh was discussed. When that is decided, Bacon’s Rebellion will provide details.

What’s the delay? Dominion has been demanding and some consumer groups  have been resisting the inclusion of financing costs in the special charge added to bills. It is a small amount of the total now, but again, could grow once established.

The average Virginia residential electric bill is not really 1,000 kWh per month but more like 1,100. These two charges for Dominion home customers, totally unrelated to the cost of service for those who pay it, will be another $4 per month or almost $50 per year or more for many households. It will be a substantial annual number for commercial and large industrial users.

The General Assembly likes taxing you indirectly through your electric bill and hopes you never notice. Most Virginians haven’t.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “SCC Hikes Electricity Bills For New PIPP Subsidy”

  1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Are any other states subsidizing electric bills? IN any case it is consistent with my mental model that Virginia is among the friendliest states for lower incomes.

    Virginia does not have the highest cost per kWhr (yet), but we do have among the highest total electric bills, due to more electric use than most states (reliance on heat pumps vs. natural gas). I don’t know if the lower incomes tend to have heat pumps vs. natural gas.

    Is natural gas also subsidized out of fairness to the low income people using natural gas in their homes for heat?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I haven’t been able to find a list lately, but some others, certainly. Ohio’s program has been Dominion’s (oh, I mean Virginia’s) model. (Let slip who is actually driving this train….) Ohio does income transfer for gas, yes.

  2. “The General Assembly likes taxing you indirectly through your electric bill and hopes you never notice. Most Virginians haven’t.”

    Could that be, Steve, because you are the only journalist in Virginia to have explained PIPP to people? Has anyone else written about this measure other than in passing?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      There is no free press anymore. Not in Virginia, not anywhere. Did you see that the asshats at Google banned Sky News Australia from YouTube for a week? Why? Supposedly over COVID-19 misinformation. Apparently the dimbulbs at Google are now not only a private CDC but experts on Australian politics as well. Australia has done one backflip after another with lockdowns, mandates, etc. There are large protests in Sydney on an ongoing basis. But the adolescents at the personal information theft ring known as Google have decided that nobody should see or hear arguments against the fear porn of COVID-19 in Australia.

      “The stance taken by some commentators at this network was that masks are not effective in containing outbreaks, particularly when mandated outside in the fresh air. Some also took issue with the frequency and mechanisms of locking down Australians,” Houghton wrote. “Other commentators vehemently disagreed, and their views were also published.”

      “It is hard not to look at some of these tech giant censorship decisions as being based on one factor, the political persuasion of the person making the comments,” Houghton continued.

      https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/murdochs-sky-news-australia-suspended-190536883.html

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Even Biden is getting fed up with the idiots in the mainstream media and their fear porn coverage of COVID. I guess Slow Joe never read Mary Shelly. Sometimes when you create a monster it comes back to haunt you.

      https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/30/media/variant-media-coverage-white-house/index.html

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The PIPP plan now is to determine eligibility based on 150% of the federal income poverty level, about $40,000 for a family of four.”

    Who exactly in Virginia will benefit from this program…?
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d5052da2f5d97d38e9f7198dd3be60b6b555a1808e3ae4f2d95644ea5bf46bba.jpg

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Isn’t that because the poverty rate doesn’t take the regional cost of living into account?

      The Weldon Cooper Center has developed a Virginia Poverty Measure that does take regional cost of living into account. That measure would drastically change your map.

      https://demographics.coopercenter.org/reports/virginia-poverty-measure

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Not so drastically. The highest rates of poverty (VPM rating that is) are still in rural areas – Southwest, Southside, Western Hampton Roads, and Northern Valley and Piedmont. It does make it a bit more of an equitable program though…

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5453d9caa4d1ab4c04c6667d06dcb7eefd00a95477a3de7adddd8d1fd123fbe7.jpg

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Not so drastically. The highest rates of poverty (VPM rating that is) are still in rural areas – Southwest, Southside, Western Hampton Roads, and Northern Valley and Piedmont. It does make it a bit more of an equitable program though…

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5453d9caa4d1ab4c04c6667d06dcb7eefd00a95477a3de7adddd8d1fd123fbe7.jpg

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Ralph Northam and the liberals in the General Assembly could have done this the right way. They could have added a tier to the state income tax tables of, say … 7% for any family earning more than $200,000 per year. They could have increased the sales tax. But they didn’t. They are genetically predisposed to con artistry and couldn’t help but slip a secret tax onto people’s electric bills. They couldn’t help but fail to conform to federal tax law. They allow UVa (and others) to impose a tax (through overcharging) on the middle class parents of students to subsidize other students.

    This is what Democratic rule in Virginia has brought – shams, cons, lies and a tax regime that more resembles a three card monte game than a democratic process.

    Take one look at Terry McAuliffe, remember the GreenTech sham he pulled with Tony Rodham and then tell me we won’t be in for more of the same if he’s elected governor. More secret taxes, more ridiculous tools, more fiscal con artistry.

  5. […] last week, the SCC approved another electric bill charge growing out of that 2020 legislation, reported only on Bacon’s Rebellion so far:  The new Percentage of Income Payment Program.  This will […]

  6. […] detailed customer cost projections already produced by the State Corporation Commission? To the new electricity tax being imposed on all customers to selectively lower the bills of a favored few? To the other new […]

  7. […] tax increases imposed. Two of the new energy taxes, one a carbon tax and the other to fund a subsidy for low-income electricity users, begin to raise energy prices this […]

Leave a Reply