Say Goodbye to the Old Power Grid. The New One Is So Much Cooler.

When you start talking about electric power grids, peoples’ eyes glaze over. But the shape of the United States electric grid is fast emerging as one of the critical infrastructure issues of the 21st century. As a nation (and a state) we have two broad alternatives. One is to maintain the “Big Grid” paradigm of ginormous power plants connected to population centers through ginormous, high-voltage electric transmission lines. The other is to evolve to a “Distributed Grid” that is more decentralized and capable of accommodating electric power contributed by a host of homeowners, neighborhoods, commercial establishments and electric power entrepreneurs. Intuitively, I think, the idea of a distributed grid appeals to most Americans — as long as the system can be made dependable. Nobody likes blackouts.

As Virginia adopts regulatory policies affecting the electric power industry, lawmakers and regulators must keep those alternative paradigms firmly in mind. Right now, the Distributed Grid model seems a bit impractical because of the difficulty of ensuring system reliability. But new technologies and business models could change the picture very quickly.

The Peak Energy blog draws attention to two interesting articles. One article, “Gridpoint: The Last Green Mile,” highlights a Washington, D.C.-based company, Gridpoint, that is marketing the SmartGrid Platform, an intelligent network of distributed resources that controls load, stores energy and produces power.

With distributed sources of electricity now arriving in new, innovative forms, and capacity increasing exponentially, distributed storage is the final step necessary to completely transform our energy landscape. Wind power is intermittant, solar power peaks between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. – but with distributed storage available, it doesn’t matter. …

There are several benefits to distributed storage. During power outages, stored electricity can be discharged back into the grid beyond the break in the line, maintaining reliable constant power. In markets where energy pricing is tiered, electricity can be stored during low off peak rates and discharged when rates are higher. Flattening the load by pushing power into the grid during peak hours of demand from distributed sources can relieve congestion on the grid. And, of course, distributed renewable energy sources such as wind and solar can be captured during their limited hours of collection, and utilized 24 hours per day from storage systems.

How much might these electricity storage units cost? About $10,000 per customer.

Given the current prices of multi-family dwellings or light commercial buildings, that really doesn’t sound like very much. But as a tool to arbitrage between higher peak demand rates and lower off-peak rates, at $10,000 a pop, the unit has a fairly long payback. As a tool to flatten demand for a utility in order to prevent spot prices from spiking, however, the unit is already economical. It is also already economical for new land developments, where the storage capacity offered by Gridpoint’s products, combined with on-site sources of electricity from (for example) photovoltaics, significantly reduces the need for infrastructure to connect to the existing electrical grid – paying for itself immediately.

The other article, “Creating a 21st Century Grid,” discusses a new technology that could shift the balance back in favor of Big Grid. Researchers are working on electric wire made from carbon nano-tubes one 100,000th the width of a human hair. In theory, nanotubes can conduct 100 million amps of current over thousands of miles without much loss in efficiency, compared to today’s wires, which conduct around 2,000 amps of current over hundreds of miles, losing 6 to 8 percent of the electricity in the form of heat. The nanotubes also will weigh one-sixth the weight of current wires, and they’ll be so strong they won’t need support mechanisms. Say bye-bye to the high-voltage transmission line as we now know it!

New transmission lines would be less conspicuous, vastly diminishing their impact on the landscape, potentially bypassing acrimonioius battles like the one over Dominion’s proposed transmission line in northern Virginia. Dr. Wade Adams of the Richard E. Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology envisions nano-wires carrying electric power “from vast solar farms in the desert to the Northeast, or maybe from wind farms in Montana or North Dakota down to Florida – and in fact, even from continent to continent.”

The technology of electric power transmission hasn’t changed much since the time of Edison and Westinghouse. That’s all changing. This is a very exciting time to be a power grid wonk.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Say Goodbye to the Old Power Grid. The New One Is So Much Cooler.”

  1. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    For those so inclined, you can peruse what mountaintop your electric usage is destroying:

    http://www.ilovemountains.org/myconnection/

    what’s interesting besides “bringing home” where the coal comes from -is the coal-powered plants near where we live.

    I’m not sure exactly what “distributed” means if power is generated locally – from coal brought in from 100 miles away though.

  2. alohasteve Avatar

    Outstanding site you have!

    Would you like a Link Exchange with ‘The Internet Radio Network’? At the IRN you can listen for free to over 50 of America’s top Talk Shows via Free Streaming Audio!!

    http://netradionetwork.com

  3. E M Risse Avatar

    Great post but let us not use more effecient transmission and better storage to offset peak demand as an excuse to minimize the need to cut consumption and to evolve less power hungry settlement patterns.

    I know Jim Bacons does not forget but some readers looking for an excuse to continue Business As Usual may.

    EMR

  4. Jim Bacon Avatar

    Ed, Here was the sentence that really caught my eye: “It is also already economical for new land developments, where the storage capacity offered by Gridpoint’s products, combined with on-site sources of electricity from (for example) photovoltaics, significantly reduces the need for infrastructure to connect to the existing electrical grid – paying for itself immediately.”

    That could move the marketplace in the direction that you envision — of electric power produced and/or managed at the dooryard or neighborhood level. It would be a natural complement to “green” development, which stresses more compact, higher density development patterns.

  5. E M Risse Avatar

    Jim:

    Power generally has not been a limit (as roads, water and sewer have) in R=25 to R=50 locations.

    Power companies “expect” new uses there and have built in the capacity.

    Also transmission lines from remote — inter Regional — sources may “serve a substaion near you.”

    Where the energy supply is a problem is R=2 to R=10 and that is exactly where we need to redevelop.

    Under-designed older grid sectors and resistance to inproving distribution (as opposed to transmission).

    Also in areas close to the Centroid and within the Core, gentrified dwellings can be energy hogs if upgraded unintelligently.

    For that reason new approaches to the gird could be a real positive.

    EMR

  6. Not Ed Risse Avatar
    Not Ed Risse

    This is great news and just one more nail in the coffin of Ed Risse’s dream of remaking American settlement patterns in his image.

    Power will no longer be one of those location variable costs. We will be able to cheaply and unobtrusively stream solar power from desert solar farms to any location on the planet.

    In the future we will consume more and it will cost less.

    Guilt free.

  7. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    fuel – and where that fuel comes from is what defines the “distribution” paradigm – does it not?

    Fuels that are “local” are wind/solar/tidal/hydro – possibly bio/corn/ethanol

    Any fossil fuel (for most folks) has to be either:

    1. burned at the source to produce something that can be “distributed” (usually electricity)

    2. transported (distributed) to the site where is will be burned. Gasoline, fuel oil, natural gas, propane, even hydrogen

    Now some folks are talking about “harvesting” methane from landfills or even reprocessing human waste for methane…

    The day when Hector looks over at Wilma and says.. the lights are dim.. are you constipated again?

    my be just around the corner! 🙂

  8. Jim .. great post. I will share it on our blog this weekend (www.virginiascommitment.org).

    Here’s how reasonable people look at this … Many of the underlying concepts you refer to are in place now. Much more exciting stuff is in development for the medium and long-term. But especially for peak loads, which is the real issue in the Dominion case and most others, the solutions are available now. They’re not theoretical. In fact, the basic idea of generating capacity closer to users, so common to more and more providers, has many of them scratching their heads over why Dominion is so insistent upon the industrial age approach they’re pushing.

  9. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    On several threads below this one, much wailing and gnashing of teeth over the GOP losing it’s way…

    This sounds like an opportunity to take some high ground…

    oops… I forgot… Dominion contributes to many of their campaigns.

    woe is us.

  10. Anonymous Avatar

    In your dreams “Not Ed Risse.”

    You might consider a English as a Second Language program.

    As noted in the earlier post by Dr. Risse this will have the opposite effect, especially if all the costs are fairly allocated.

    We recall Dr. Risse noting that even in R=10 to R=20 projects in the 80s (Fair Lakes) a lot of time and effort buffering distribution lines.

    The big benefit of nano-tubes in this context would be the ability to bury them in R=2 to R=10 locations.

    By the way, who is “Ed” Risse?

    We know E M Risse but not “Ed” Risse.

    Anon Zeus

  11. Anonymous Avatar

    Ah the satisfaction of watching the dissembling…

    Since “Anon Zeus” is Ed Risse this is even funnier.

    https://www.baconsrebellion.com/Wonks_Risse.php

  12. Anonymous Avatar

    “let us not use more effecient transmission and better storage to offset peak demand as an excuse to minimize the need to cut consumption and to evolve less power hungry settlement patterns.”

    While we are at it, let’s not ignore the costs associated with “cutting power consumption”.

    It is one thing to cut consumption and still get the same benefits of using power: it is quite something else to use less power and do without.

    For example, we now are in the habit of using many appliances that that leak power because of their standby or instant on mode. I have seen estimates that as much as 5% of household usage is wasted this way. If that is true, then a signficant savings could be made by waiting a few seconds for things to come on line.

    But, it is also true that electronics don’t like surges in power. We MIGHT wind up sending a lot more stuff to the dump by eliminating the power loss associated with “instant on”.

    Then there are the benefits of timers: for your coffee and VCR for example. You can get up and make your own coffee, but the energy it takes to do it might be more than the LCD coffepot clock uses.

    Can we use less power, sure, but let’s not get crazy about it.

    ——————————

    Why is there more grid distribution need in R-2 to R-10?
    could it be that such places actually use a lot more power?

    RH

  13. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    let’s be clear about the difference between conservation and locational variable costs also.

    Confusing settlement patterns with energy star appliances – essentially splatters rather than focuses the issues.

  14. Anonymous Avatar

    Well, an energy star appliance in a “bad’ location saves more than one in a “good” location because of the power loss in transmission is greater going to the bad place.

    ;-).

    Since we don’t know what direction our power comes from, or which route it travels, it’s hard to know what is “good” or “bad”.

    RH

  15. E M Risse Avatar

    Note of Clarification:

    Anon Zeus is not E M Risse and is not Not Ed Risse.

    Earlier in this string:

    At 11:49 AM, Anonymous said…

    In your dreams “Not Ed Risse.”

    You might consider an English as a Second Language program.

    As noted in the earlier post by Dr. Risse this will have the opposite effect, especially if all the costs are fairly allocated.

    We recall Dr. Risse noting that even in R=10 to R=20 projects in the 80s (Fair Lakes) a lot of time and effort buffering distribution lines.

    The big benefit of nano-tubes in this context would be the ability to bury them in R=2 to R=10 locations.

    By the way, who is “Ed” Risse?

    We know E M Risse but not “Ed” Risse.

    Anon Zeus

    At 12:22 PM, Anonymous said…

    Ah the satisfaction of watching the dissembling…

    Since “Anon Zeus” is Ed Risse this is even funnier.

    https://www.baconsrebellion.com/Wonks_Risse.php

    “Anon Zeus” and other Anon Z’s are not E M Risse.

    They are former students of EMR, readers of EMR’s work, former coworkers and former employees of S/P.

    They own, work for and/or are associated with Agencies, Enterprises and Institutions that do not yet support the need for Fundamental Change.

    Members of the Z Team are conflicted:

    One the one hand they are concerned that EMR spends too much time and energy responding to those who only aim to discredit his work;

    On the other hand they are frustrated that he does not respond to some blatant, unfounded attacks.

    They respect his refusal to respond to those who have intentionally insulted him or those he holds in high regard.

    The Z Team meets from time to time to compare notes on areas of mutual interest and communicate with EMR on a regular basis.

    EMR has given them permission to use his Blogger / Google account and an e-mail account so that their postings are not traceable. Since they sometimes cut and paste work of EMR, there may at times appear to be matches between word choice, misspellings and key-stroking. Since some now or formally worked for intelligence Agencies and high-tech companies and they are intent on covering their tracks, it is doubtful their identities will be known.

    The “Who is Ed Risse?” question was asked because one of the Z Team forgot that E M Risse had given permission to Jim Bacon to use this term. They know about and respect EMR’s attempts to use “E M Risse” for all his writing. This is because if you Google his full name, his signature name, his familiar name, any of the several names he used during his military service, EMR and E M Risse, one gets vastly different profiles and almost no cross referencing.

    This is one of the disassociating factors of the digital world.

    All blog sites that allow anon postings are rife with postings that are intended to result in mis-communication.

    The Z Team activities appears to be a useful and logical extension of the “anon culture.”

    EMR

Leave a Reply