House Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, D-Springfield, could do for the Democrats what former Sen. John Chichester did for the Republicans: Keep them divided and fighting amongst themselves.
Saslaw: The New Chichester?
Share this article
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
Comments
-
Catherine Hammond is not “African American.” Her race would be classified as Caucasian.
-
Thanks for the correction, Anonymous 12:10. I’ve deleted the reference in the original post.
-
Good post.
Only thing is that Chichester was a decent for a republican senator and Saslaw is far from a leader.
Chichester pissed off crazy rightwingers like Cucinelli, Obenshain, and McDougle. They’ll always be mad, so who cares? Saslaw is pissing off reasonable albeit weaker Dems.
But Saslaw has some decent qualities. He’s smart, has a strong institutional memory and is assertive.
He also has a loud mouth, is rude and insulting. He’s wed to developers, dominion, homebuilders and anyone that gives him money.
Its really funny how many worthless members of the general assembly there are.
The Democrats taking the Senate hasn’t changed much. Especially with Saslaw running the show. One of his good qualities is that he knows how to get things done, its really too bad he has no good ideas.
The Dems are so divided on environmental issues, gun issues, and the smoking ban that its hard to get anything accomplished.
A problem is that most Senate Dems are weak. They remain passive in gerrymandered districts and do not have to ‘fight’ or assert themselves in any way in order to keep their seats. A consequence of their weakness is that stronger Senate R’s and Saslaw can go behind their back.
Still, most are wedded to special interests, (especially Saslaw), and will do anything lobbyists like Bill Thomas tell them to.
Look at the SB768 fiasco. No leadership from Saslaw because developers like Till Hazel have bankrolled his entire career. Now the House R’s can take credit for killing that terrible bill.
I don’t know much about the new class of 2008 senate dems. Hopefully some will become good leaders in the GA.
– OGS
-
Man.
These guys (read:GA)seem to be having quite a bad run lately:
1. The feds pulled the funds for the Rail to Dulles package they were all touting. Everybody seemed suprised, which (in itself) is surprising.
2. The passed an abusive drive fee law but couldn’t figure out how to fine out of state drivers. Then they fell over themselves each saying they hated the law more than the next guy.
3. Now we have the regional transportation authorities being declared unconstitutional (or, at least their taxing authority being unconstitutional).
And Saslaw can’t seem to go more than 2 weeks without gratuitously insulting some group or another.
What has the GA done right in the last few years?
-
There’s very little difference in the Virginia Senate since the Ds took over. A little more honesty in labeling, but most mainstream politicians in Virginia are owned and operated by developers.
Say what you about those on the left or the right, but they are generally much more free from control by the real estate industry.
TMT
We need an adequate public facilities law with teeth. Neither a Saslaw nor a Chichester would deliver on that one.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.