Rush Hour Will Never Be the Same

Source: Northern Virginia Transportation Commission, 3rdQ 2021 report

by James A. Bacon

In fiscal 2018, the Commonwealth of Virginia budgeted $582 million to the Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT). Spending on rail, buses and other forms of mass transit soared to $935 million in the current year (fiscal 2022), and is scheduled to recede somewhat to $865 million in the budget submitted by Governor Ralph Northam for fiscal 2023.

Assuming that legislators didn’t alter the numbers much during the recent General Assembly deliberations, DRPT spending will be 49% higher than it was five years previously.

In the chart above, you can see how disconnected spending is from reality. Mass transit ridership in Northern Virginia, which accounts for the vast majority of bus and commuter rail traffic in the state, plummeted between fiscal 2020 and 2021 by 59% overall. Ridership on the Virginia Railway Express dropped an eye-popping 92%.

In what world does it make sense to increase spending on mass transit by nearly 50% even while ridership has crashed by nearly 60%?

Once upon a time, one could mount an intellectually respectable case for bolstering spending on mass transit, especially in Virginia’s major metropolitan areas. In densely populated districts where it is impossible to increase transportation capacity by building new roads, it does, in theory, make sense to increase capacity by providing people the option of traveling by bus or rail. This logic made all the more sense during the 2010s, a period marked by a strong urban revival across Virginia. People were moving back into urban centers, developers were building mid-rises and high-rises, and the influx of affluent riders living in bus and rail corridors could be expected to fill seats and pay fares.

To be sure, there have been signs for some time that the rosy ridership projections would not pan out. Transit ridership plateaued and then began eroding several years ago. Uber and Lyft were widely blamed.

Then came COVID. Riders stayed away from bus and rail for fear of catching the virus. One could reasonably hope that those riders would return when the pandemic receded. But another thing happened. Millions of Americans discovered they liked working at home, and contrary to the fears of supervisors everywhere, they worked more productively than they did at the office. Sure, they’d get momentarily distracted by doing the laundry or feeding the cat, but they didn’t waste time yakking by the coffee machine about the UVa-Tech football game, gossiping about co-workers, or bellyaching with office mates about the boss.

Virginians curtailed their driving during the COVID-induced recession. Total Vehicle Miles Traveled dropped from 86.8 million miles in 2019 to 74.5 million miles in the first COVID year, 2020 — a 14.2% decline (I could not find data for 2021.) But the drop-off for mass transit was far more acute.

The big question is whether driving and ridership will rebound, and by how much. It would be prudent to expect a partial snap-back to pre-COVID habits. At the same time, Virginia policy makers must consider the possibility that transportation patterns have permanently changed: that the locus of work for millions of Americans has shifted from the office to home, and that rush hour will never be the same.

Virginia needs to take a good, hard look at the billions of dollars it spends on transportation. That includes roads and highways. But nowhere is the need for re-evaluation more manifestly evident than for mass transit.

No such re-think is likely to be forthcoming as long as Virginia enjoys a gusher of revenues from COVID stimulus and inflation. But the joy ride can’t last forever, and at some point we’ll have to start making hard choices again. Unless bus and rail ridership surges, the first place to start chopping is mass transit.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

32 responses to “Rush Hour Will Never Be the Same”

  1. Why look rationally at the numbers when NOVA politicians on the campaign stump ignore the millions/billions required to fulfill their campaign “promises”, eg: extension of Metro to Prince William County. It’s only tax dollars right and somebody else will pay for, unless the Fed teat dries up for such projects as recent history portends. Why use the “success” (I would say fiscal failure) of the I495 Hot Lanes as an object lesson before recreating the boondoggle on I66. Why, why, why, because local, state and Federal politicians, candidates and their rabid minions are too short-sighted to look past next Tuesday and too stupid to see the snake-oil peddlers pushing these projects for what they are.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Transurban stock up +15% in the last 5 years. S&P500 up +95%.

      Sky-high tolls are a losing proposition.

      One wonder which company The Imperial Clown Show in Richmond will find to finance the next round of sky-high toll idiocy.

      1. Easy, the next entity willing to give more than the $1,079,510 in Transurban campaign contributions.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      The I95 Express Lanes are a feature. We use them regularly to get to the Beltway from Richmond. If they’d just get them finished down through Frednecksburg life would be better.

      Sailing by parking lots on I95 (either direction) has become ever more common in the last couple of years.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        You’re so right. As it stands it’s not worth staying on the I-95 Express lanes all the way down to 610. You’re just paying a huge toll to sit in traffic, you’re better off getting off around Quantico.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Yeah, coming south that merge back into I95 when there is much traffic sucks. The Express lanes are great, right up until they’re not.

          Virginia has been behind the 8 ball on having enough lanes on 95 north to D.C. and 64 east to Tidewater forever. 81can be exciting. 66 I gather ain’t much better. Guess that’s most of them isn’t it?

          O for the days of yore when we would drag race on the deserted Dulles Access road at night.

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    When gas prices were high in 2008?, I rode the bus between Petersburg and Richmond. I also rode it for three years from 2003-2006. I loved it. I could read my news, check my email, blackberry back then, and sleep. Awesome. Today, for $5 per day, with gas prices high, it’s a steal. The new bus station in Petersburg is adding more parking on a new deck. The MCV crowd has moved to many new apts in Petersburg. It has been a serious economic incentive. MCV folks would often bike to the bus stop, put the bike on the front bike rack, and have transportation when they got to work. Six buses in the morning, 6 in the evening, one at lunch. 28 minutes from Petersburg to first stop at the bottom of Broad near Main. Didn’t have to pay for parking. If I go to the GA now, I can park free at willow lawn and be at the GA in seven minutes????

    There is a stigma to using mass transportation that Americans should get over. My kids call me the mass transportation queen. I rode the Petersburg transit when I worked at an elementary school in Petersburg. It allowed me to get home at 3:30 with a nice 4 block walk. My kids had the car for sports stuff after school. Much more valuable time for me. The parents in the bus with me always said I was a crazy lady.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Very Connecticut-y of you. I always enjoyed landing at WashNat and taking the Metro to my destination. The long ride was to, I want to say, Carrolton(?) and a two dollar cab to Goddard.

    2. Great, using the 2021 annual report that indicates roughly 91% of the operational costs are borne by taxpayer subsidies of one form or another, your $5 ticket cost the taxpayers roughly $51. You’re welcome sweetheart.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “In what world does it make sense to increase spending on mass transit by nearly 50% even while ridership has crashed by nearly 60%?”

    In a world coming out of a pandemic and into $5 / gal gas prices?

    I’m not sure about the permanence of “work from home”. The 1918 Pandemic was supposed to change the world after it ended but it didn’t. A recent drive down the GW Parkway to Reagan Airport during the morning rush hour left me wondering if anybody was working from home. It was as congested as ever.

    Metro has plenty of problems. Running out of capacity in the tunnels under the Potomac, safety issues, etc. However, every fast growing metropolitan area seems to eventually come to a serious reliance on mass transit instead of car-based commuting.

    Maybe this time will be different and COVID-19 will herald a true long-term change in the working and commuting habits of Americans. I doubt it but maybe.

    1. Metro is in a death spiral that is likely to only accelerate until each and every decision making mouth-breather, elected or not, is forced out. It was poorly designed as a system and no longer goes where it needs to serve the jobs base. The only things spiraling down the drain faster are VRE and local commuter bus operations, each one drawing increasing tax dollars to offset the increasing losses. I could make an analogy to the success rate of Stalin’s five year plans but that would be lost on most of the most shrill transit supporters.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        If you’re going to complain about mass transit you might want to discuss the largest offender before going after the little fish.

        Slamtrak is and always will be subsidized to stay in operation at the expense of all citizens.

        Also, what was “poorly” designed about Metro?

        ” It was poorly designed as a system and no longer goes where it needs to serve the jobs base”

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          The lack of parking at Metro stations was a pretty serious design flaw as well as the limited tunnel capacity (although that is more understandable given the cost of those tunnels).

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            The downtown D.C. stations were never supposed to be made for parking. The idea of Metro was to solve the parking issues downtown. Most stations outside of the District have parking garages if not additional ground parking.

            The flaw is that they don’t have 4 tracks like Metro North and the rest of MTA so maintenance time is a premium.

            Yes, I know the price of those tunnels ($26 million).

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Nobody takes the Metro downtown to work from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs because there is nowhere to park at most of the suburban stations.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            I don’t think making statements you can’t prove or quantify works when you end state is just to bash Metro. You’re also wrong, so there is that:

            https://ggwash.org/view/38790/which-metro-parking-lots-fill-up-and-which-dont

          4. This is a pre-pandemic comment, but if you didn’t get to stations along 66 before 9am, there were no spots available. You had to drive into town. Anecdotal, but always true for me.

            And that link is for 2015 data and doesn’t tell you when its full during the day, e.g., peak morning time. Just an average.

          5. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            DJ’s statement was that there was nowhere to park.

            “DJRippert Matt Adams • 5 hours ago
            Nobody takes the Metro downtown to work from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs because there is nowhere to park at most of the suburban stations.”

            That is a false statement, now if you don’t get a Metro before 0900 say New Carrollton and have a job in D.C. you don’t start your job till 1130. I don’t know about you, but I’m unaware of any professional jobs that give hours as such (harsh I’m aware). I was at West Falls Church Station two weeks ago, parking garage empty and the lot next door empty.

            Also, Metro did with what they had and planned accordingly and it is what you’ll see in any other major city with a Metro. People just like to dump on Metro because it’s an easy target.

            Does Metro have its flaws, yes, yes it does. Were there design flaws when it was constructed, yes. They weren’t parking they were the number of tracks. The amount of cash that would be required to add parking lots in the 70’s let alone now would’ve dwarfed the cost to build the system.

        2. It was designed to get commuters from the suburbs into DC for work….. never envisioning the job explosion in/around Dulles/Herndon/Sterling/Fairfax. To get from Springfield to Sterling you have to go IN to Arlington, then out again…….

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Correct the epicenter was and always has been D.C. and Metro Center.

            You’re not going to build a ring around the City. That design aspect isn’t just localized to Metro. CTA doesn’t ring the city, it just loops around Downtown Chicago with the legs running to the suburbs.

            They have tried to remedy with the Silver line but they have never had the ridership to support extended the Orange line.

            https://www.businessinsider.com/metro-maps-of-world-cities-2014-12#its-copenhagen-the-capital-of-denmark-12

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      “A recent drive down the GW Parkway to Reagan Airport during the morning rush hour left me wondering if anybody was working from home. It was as congested as ever.”

      The GW, 495, 267 and 95 are always packed with vehicles even during the pandemic. There has always been a major disparity in time. I recall going into Arlington for a flight at 0530 before tolling and I66E was wide open, but I66W would still be packed during rush hour. It never computed that people spent 8 hours in their office.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Pretty sure the mass transit thing is national – and a direct consequence of the pandemic and then work-from-home which may or may not stick depending on who one talks to.

    Congestion tolls are a free-market concept first advocated for by none other than the Heritage Foundation folks and they do work because fundamentally , we have very limited ability to “expand” roads in urban areas despite calls to do so. Sure you can add lanes to interstates on the fringes but then do what , funnel all that down to the urban roads that cannot be easily expanded?

    This is going on in urban regions across the country and it’s become primarily a way to manage rush hour congestion to provide a way to keep some lanes flowing for important economic activity – and if one does not like the tolls, then carpool or rideshare for free.

    Sooner or later the pandemic will reside and the economy will get back and people will go back to driving with a vengeance and the HOT lanes will prosper as it is purely a supply/demand world.

    We’re no longer building big new roads unless they are tolled. That’s a reality. And the tolls are more than a funding mechanism, they are a congestion management tool.

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Can’t fire those union workers, Jim! (If not yet union they will be soon.) Just another unfunded need….

  6. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    The other good thing we had going in NoVA was a massively successful car pooling system known as “slugging” on I95. My town had lots of slugging. Not hearing much anymore. Officials were hoping to expand slugging over to I66, which was part of the logic of those $50 HOT tolls to force it.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      The park & ride lots down Fredericksburg way , at least the ones I see are about 1/2 full. I see passenger vans parked in those lots on weekends so I assume van pools but probably also some carpools.

      People may not realize it but those Vanpools have state-provided liability insurance, which without, the driver would be at huge personal risk. Liability and insurance is an issue with all shared transportation including mass.

      More than a few folks in Fredericksburg who work in Nova would like to work from home, if not 100% , at least some and I’m of the view that the work-from-home thing is not going to die but some version of it will survive that does not have security issues.

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “At the same time, Virginia policy makers must consider the possibility that transportation patterns have permanently changed: that the locus of work for millions of Americans has shifted from the office to home, and that rush hour will never be the same.”

    You are not asking them to just consider this possibility but to bank (so to speak) on it. That would be terribly naive. Eventually, rush hour WILL return to pre-COVID levels if just through population growth in the region. This is a perfect time to prepare for it and improve our transit system… not when those infrastructure projects will create (expensive) traffic nightmares. Get ahead of the eight ball for once!!

    Btw, why are Conservatives uniformly against mass transit? Do you think it only benefits those inner city humans you love to vilify so…??

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Rush hour never went away, all the major arteries of VA have been just as busy as before COVID. It’s a misnomer that the traffic has died down. The time to improve the transit system was during COVID at this point we are too late to the game. However, it takes a lot longer to action capital projects than just 2 years.

      “Btw, why are Conservatives uniformly against mass transit? Do you think it only benefits those inner city humans you love to vilify so…??”

      They aren’t and using broad brush statements detracts from anything you’re attempting to say.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        This has not been my experience. Traffic is nowhere near what it was before COVID. My commute at times was in excess of 2 hours… those backups are now history. Traffic is creeping back up… that is true… we did likely miss our chance as evidenced by the emergency repair work snarls at the Roosevelt Bridge but even that backup is not as bad as it would have been before COVID.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          I assure you 495, 66 and 95 traffic has never dimished during COVID. I can’t speak for 28 and 267 as I do not traverse those anymore.

          If your commute was 2 hours what time is day were you making it?

      2. It’s a misnomer that the traffic has died down.

        I have to agree with Eric on this one. Pre-Covid it used to take me about 27 minutes to complete my 22 mile commute to work.

        During Covid my average drive time dropped to just a little over 22 minutes – a decrease of almost 18%.

        Now that most people are back to work, my average commute time is back to about 26 or 27 minutes.

        It’s frustrating. Sometimes I even have to drive/ride at or below the speed limit…

        😉

      3. It’s a misnomer that the traffic has died down.

        I have to agree with Eric on this one. Pre-Covid it used to take me about 27 minutes to complete my 22 mile commute to work.

        During Covid my average drive time dropped to just a little over 22 minutes – a decrease of almost 18%.

        Now that most people are back to work, my average commute time is back to about 26 or 27 minutes.

        It’s frustrating. Sometimes I actually have to drive/ride at or below the speed limit…

        😉

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Perhaps it’s route dependent, I know that 95, 66, 395 and 495 didn’t really diminish from COVID, at least in my experience.

Leave a Reply