Rotor Rootering Virginia’s Corroding Corridors

Peter Bacque with the Times-Dispatch provides a solid update on the new highway access regulations that the Virginia Department of Transportation is putting into effect.

A year and a half ago, Bacon’s Rebellion highlighted the challenge of “Corroding Corridors,” the problem created when local governments allow commercial establishments to create too many entrances to state-maintained highways. An excessive number of access points increases the risk of traffic accidents, and it diminishes the volume of traffic the highways can carry. Studies show, Bacque says, that a four-lane highway with good access management can carry as much traffic as a six-lane highway with poor entrance control.

In one of its more important, though little noticed, transportation initiatives, the Kaine administration is re-writing the rules for highway access. A key goal is to increase the carrying capacity of major transportation corridors such as Midlothian Turnpike and Broad Street in the Richmond region, U.S. 29 North in Charlottesville, the Leesburg Pike in Northern Virginia, the Military Highway in Norfolk and countless others. It’s a great example of how it is possible to address traffic congestion by making the existing road network work more efficiently, as opposed to spending billions of dollars on new capacity, with attendant ongoing obligations to maintain that capacity.

According to Bacque, management techniques include:

  • Increasing spacing between signals and interchanges
  • Controls on driveway location, spacing and design
  • Using reserved turning lanes
  • Two-way left-turn lanes from a center lane
  • Raising medians to prevent movements across a roadway
  • Employing service and frontage roads
  • Sharing entrances
  • Providing access across adjoining properties
  • Land use policies limiting access to highways

While these policies seem vastly preferable to the anything-goes practice that reigns now, they may be less than ideal. “Much of the language and the standards are geared to suburban rather than compact, urban forms of development,” says Trip Pollard with the Southern Environmental law Center. “The standards for spacing entrances seem too larger for urban settings where compact development is desired.”

Even so, I regard the new approach to corridor management to be one of the signature achievements of the Kaine administration.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Rotor Rootering Virginia’s Corroding Corridors”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    Here’s a toast to Pierce Homer & Tim Kaine for this one. Too many entrances & lights within a short distance can create a traffic nightmare. This is low-hanging fruit. I’m glad someone is looking at this — even if only on a going-forward basis.

    Case in point — Lewinsville Road between the Beltway and Route 123 in McLean. Here’s a link to a Yahoo map. http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result.php?q1=Lewinsville+Road+22102

    There are four traffic lights in this short stretch of road that I, unfortunately need to drive periodically. There are lights at Lewinsville and its intersections of: 1) PRC Drive (Windy Hill); 2) Farm Credit Drive (Old Maple Drive); 3) Balls Hill Road; and 4) Route 123 a/k/a Dolley Madison Boulevard.

    On a bad night, traffic on Lewinsville Road can back up almost to the Beltway.

    Moreover, either the Department of Homeland Security or the CIA (we aren’t sure) is adding approximately 3000 new jobs to this location, without the landlord making significant road improvements.

    Fairfax County’s response — zip, nada, nothing. Too bad the rezoning occurred long ago, or we could possibly see a mandatory traffic study review by VDOT.

    TMT

  2. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    yes.. I read this also.. and then VDOT’s website has some more words on it.

    KUDOs!

    but let me also point out that the access management ideas being implemented have been standard practice in many other states and was actually started in Colorado of all places back in the late 1970’s.

    North Carolina also is one of the earlier adopters.

    AND.. it actually took LEGISLATION in Virginia to get the policy jump-started…

    AND.. there are rumblings from the development community that such things are a “taking” of their property rights….

    Pollards comments are on target but it’s a nit… fixed with some slight adjustments – ut the danger is that the development community may well use that process to open up tractor-trailer sized loop holes.

    Hey.. and if you don’t think development is on the burner…check this out:

    HB 72 Capital improvements impact fees.
    Robert G. Marshall

    Summary as introduced:
    Capital improvements impact fees. Allows localities to adopt provisions for the assessment of impact fees prior to issuance of a building permit.

    and

    HJ 22 Study; the costs of development; report
    Robert G. Marshall

    Summary as introduced:
    Study; the costs of development; report.� Establishes a joint subcommittee to study the identifiable costs of new residential and commercial development in Virginia and the manner in which those costs are currently borne or would likely be borne.

    I’ve heard that the development community would like to do “something” about proffers and impact fees.

  3. Alternative Viewpoint Avatar
    Alternative Viewpoint

    Jim Bacon:

    There is the law of unintended consequences.

    Removing traffic lights and access points on Route 7 from Ashburn to Tysons would hurt the existing businesses along Route 7 in Sterling while encouraging more 20 mile toll free commuters from Leesburg to Tysons.

    More access points on and off highways make them usable for the local community as well as commuters.

    More access points also allow traffic to bail out when there is an accident and take an alternative route.

    The worst traffic jams are on roads with few access points and no way to bail out for miles.

    Once you pass Hunter Mill Road on the Dulles Toll Road, you cannot bail out for 4 miles, while in Reston, you can bail out every mile or mile and a half.

    There is nothing worse than getting stuck for hours when there is a bad accident.

    Access points are relief valves.

    They also serve to compensate the adjacent businesses and residents for the negatives of having a highway next to them (think noise, pollution, loss of walkability and sense of neighborhood, etc.)

    The real problem is that these roads serve a dual constituency, local and through traffic. Who should have priority?

    Double left turn lanes require you to wait for a left turn arrow. Most Single left turn lanes allow you to turn left on green when there is no opposing traffic. Single lefts are quicker most of the day. It’s those outside of the community commuters all bunched up at one time that like double lefts.

    At Tysons Corner, the triple lefts are even worse in terms of wait time.

  4. E M Risse Avatar

    Before handing out any awards…

    Tripp’s comments and Jim Bacon’s reservations in the note above make clear what should have been obvious before any VDOT “policy” was examined or changed:

    It is the settlement pattern stupid!!!!

    Get the settlement pattern right and then match the mobility system to the pattern.

    As Will Owen stated so well 40 years ago: There are almost no Mobility and Access imporvement that do not involve changes is settlement patterns.

    Transport systems are a service and should not determine settlement patterns via old or new “rules.”

    EMR

  5. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    what is the original/fundamental purpose of a road? hint: it’s not economic development.

    all due respects to Alternative Viewpoint…

    what would have happened to our interstates if we had followed your philosophy?

    If Interstates are nothing else, they are about Access Management – on purpose – to preserve the utility of the road for it’s fundamental purpose – transportation.

    and if FHWA had not maintained a hard-line on this – our interstates would be just like our other crapped-up roads.. to satisfy business interests.

    second question – how many bypasses have been built because the original road was “ruined” by co-opting it for economic development?

    When this happens – WHO should pay for the bypass?

    If it is the same folks who use the original road and were fine with businesses co-opting it then great.. choose your own way of doing things – and pay for the consequences.

    If you want to pay big bucks for a road and then crap it up.. and have to build a new one – go for it.

    this whole idea is PREMISED on the concept that VDOT will build the bypass for ‘free”.. with taxpayer money collected from somewhere else other than the locality that chose to let the original road be degraded.
    have to pay for the bypass needed?

    all due respect to EMR –

    EMR – what do you is the purpose of a primary, major artery or interstate, limited-access road in the context of even optimized/ideal/perfect settlement patterns?

    I assume that you think that interstates, limited-access and primary roads ARE needed and legitimate for moving people OUTSIDE of their settlement patterns…

    INSIDE of a settlement pattern, grid pattern streets, minor arterials, etc – and as Tripp said they might be spaced closer.

    but at some point…. even for the most optimized settlement pattern – you gotta get to an airport or a medical center or grandma’s house 300 miles away a Redskins game or a regional mall or the Smithsonian.

  6. E M Risse Avatar

    First a correction:

    I thought the Alternative Viewpoint ideas were by Jim Bacon, sorry.

    Alt View is right on for the most part with his unintended consequences.

    Larry:

    The first sort is inside the Clear Edge and outside the Clear Edge.

    Benton MacKay called it “roadless towns and townless Countrysides.” (See below on Roadways and Streets.)

    You are right that both inside and outside the Clear Edge there need to be different pavedways and railways for different needs. (Note it is not just asphalt but all modes that have to match the settlement pattern — that is another problem with the VDOT “rules.”)

    We always talk about Roadways vis Streets. See discussion of “Streets and Roads with Dick, Jane and Spot” in “The Shape of the Future.”

    Roadways are for those who are going from where they were to where they want to be and do not care where they are.

    Streets are for those who are moving around but are already where they want to be.

    EMR

  7. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    there is quite a bit of useful information on VDOT’s website that will better inform about the pros/cons of this policy.

    the legislation embodied these goals:

    * Reducing traffic congestion

    * Enhancing public safety by decreasing traffic crash rates

    * Supporting economic development by promoting the efficient movement of people and goods

    * Reducing the need for new highways and road widening by maximizing the performance of the existing state highways

    * Preserving the public investment in new highways

    http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/accessmgt/default.asp

    These are worthy goals IMHO.

    and there is an excellent power-point – concise and easy to understand . 30 slides one can flip thu in mere minutes to gain substantial info on the subject.

    EMR – look at Slide 4 entitled:

    Balance Mobility vs Access

    what do you think?

    EMR – I LIKE the idea of mixing words with graphics in a short slide presentation to help guide one through comprehensive issues.

    Do you have such a thing for folks to reference – and I’m especially interested in your thoughts and views about HOW settlements should be CONNECTED with other settlements and including if one wants to travel from one settlement pattern to another without having to travel through every settlement pattern (a half dozen or more) between the two.

  8. E M Risse Avatar

    Larry:

    Thank you for the citation!

    I do not have a problem with the text or graphics on of the slides. It is what is not said — the context and the reality of the Private Vehicle Mobility Myth that is the problem.

    Slide # 4 and several others are very good if they were placed in context.

    Second, you are very right that words and graphics are much better than just words.

    Since I happen to be working at the cutting edge, it takes a lot of time and effort to just do the words.

    The graphics have to come later.

    I plan another round or graphics and words — primarily in PowerPoint — when TRILO-G is completed.

    In the meantime there are three PowerPoints (and 5 PDFs) on the current “The Shape of the Future” CD ROM.

    In fact the three PowerPoints are a great introduction to the VDOT info slides on Highway Access Management Standards and Regilation.

    They make it clear that the first step to plan a Balanced relationship between functional human settlement patterns and the transport system.

    You cannot take the existing dysfunctional patter (and equally dysfunctional plans for the the future land use and provide them with Mobility and Access.

    The overarching problem is that this VDOT project — and everything else VDOT, other State DOTs and US DOT do — IMPLIES that if you do this or that “traffic congestion will be ‘better’”

    This includes HOT lanes, Toll roads, traffic management, telework, zip cars and every other “improvement.”

    Yes they will be “better” but all the bandaides will not make traffic congestion go away.

    Citizens, Households, Enterprises, Institutions and Agencies all act as if something (anything) will make traffic congestion ‘better’ then I / we can continue to do the same things we have done to create Mobility and Access dysfunction in the first place.

    EMR

  9. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    interesting to me – in the conundrum of settlement patterns – is the hierarchy that VDOT (indeed all DOTs) use for the road system. To wit:

    Freeway
    Major Arterial
    Minor Arterial
    Major Collector
    Minor Collector
    Local Street

    Roads are, in effect, treated analogous to a watershed with a main stem river and many tributaries some major, some minor , their size determined by how many land area they drain.

    So what about the road system and all the “minor” roads serving settlement patterns … flowing towards collectors, then to arterials and finally the interstates.

    this all makes perfect sense – for the way that settlement actually occurs but the thought I had was – is the current paradigm for roads the cause or the effect of dysfunctional settlement patterns?

    and .. how different would the road hierarchy be for balanced communities?

    You’d still have to have Dulles and the Smithsonian, and a way to get to Richmond, Raleigh and Atlanta.

    and on the way there.. each and every community would also have to have similar road connection functionality it would seem to me.

    so would it?

    Would the current road hierarchy be the same even with balanced communities?

    If the answer is no.. what should they be?

    thanks!

  10. E M Risse Avatar

    Larry:

    You are one smart cookie!

    I printed out the VDOT slide show and realize my blanket endorsement was pre-mature.

    There are seven Core Confusing Words. “Urban Local” and Rural Local” use three of the seven.

    Slide five is a primer in confustion. As always the data existes to solve the problem if the right Vocabulary were used.

    Fisrt note the yellow shaded area. The edge of the yellow area is where the logical location of the Clear Edge could have been drawn a decade ago.

    Second the vast majority of the Streets and Roads in the yellow area are called “Urban Local.” That is as silly and naming all ones children “kid.”

    If one identifed the boundaries between the Communites and boundaries of the components within the Communities inside the Clear Edge (Villages, Neighborhoods, Clusters and Dooryards) one could sort out a new classificaton system.

    That system would include Community and Village Principal Arterials and Village and Neighborhood Minor Arterials and Neighborhood and Cluster Collectors and Streets so that all roadways were classified.

    In would not be that hard to do. Every major Planned New Community and Planned New Village had such a system which VDOT and other state agencies just ignored.

    EMR

  11. Anonymous Avatar

    “Get the settlement pattern right and then match the mobility system to the pattern.”

    How do we get around in the meantime (50 to a hundred years, or so.)

    These things have to be done in parallel.

    RH

  12. Anonymous Avatar

    “what is the original/fundamental purpose of a road? hint: it’s not economic development.”

    Oh, Really? You could have fooled me.

    “….preserve the utility of the road for it’s fundamental purpose – transportation.”

    And why do we usually go somewhere: to make or spend money. OK, sometimes we go to Grandma’s house.

    The correlation between the economy and the amount of transportation is almost 100%.

    “…how many bypasses have been built because the original road was “ruined” by co-opting it for economic development?”

    Are you saying that we should limit economic development in some areas, to prevent overloading the roads? What a novel idea!

  13. Anonymous Avatar

    “-Increasing spacing between signals and interchanges
    -Controls on driveway location, spacing and design
    ‘Land use policies limiting access to highways”

    Notice that all three of these involve using MORE space.

    “-Employing service and frontage roads
    -Sharing entrances
    -Providing access across adjoining properties”

    While these three could be construed as using LESS space.

    RH

  14. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Access Management does not say that we limit businesses.

    What it says is that businesses have a responsibility to confide collaboratively with very expensive transportation infrastructure vice screwing it up for their own benefit.

    Read the slides anon 11:32am.

    then come back and comment….

    No one wins – with DUMB growth done in such a way to effectively destroy the utility of a road.

    How many bypasses have had to be built as a result of screwing up the original road?

    How many new “roads” are advocated to “go around” a road that over time has got so many traffic lights that it is no longer usable for folks trying to get THROUGH that area?

    Trying going to Florida on the old US 1 and you’ll get a lesson in this and at the end of the day – what happened to those businesses on Route 1 ..trying to “capture” the traffic?

    Route 1 is NOW primarily a LOCAL road in many areas.. and if we allowed the localities to do to the interstate system what they did to Route 1 – we’d have the same problem all over again.

    In fact, the interstates proved that you COULD separate the “through” traffic from the local traffic without destroying businesses.

    The businesses though DID have to adapt to Access management.

  15. Anonymous Avatar

    “What it says is that businesses have a responsibility to confide collaboratively with very expensive transportation infrastructure vice screwing it up for their own benefit.”

    And isn’t that what I’ve been saying about having far too much business in the center areas?

    “How many bypasses have had to be built as a result of screwing up the original road?” What do you mean by screwing up the original road? The bypass in Warrenton was built because you couldn’t get throeugh downtown, and you couldn’t park there either.

    Just as you say, the bypass was also filled up with businesses, and becomes not useful as a bypass, so they built another one.

    Sure, you have needs for both local and through traffic. What do you do when the local needs outstrip the local capacity?

    You go someplace else.

    RH

  16. Anonymous Avatar

    All I was pointing out was that of the nine road management techniques listed, six of them are actually land management methods.

    RH

  17. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    ……….”And isn’t that what I’ve been saying about having far too much business in the center areas?”

    NO!

    This is about how business ANYWHERE located in such a way as to screw up the main road rather than requiring the business to mitigate it’s impact as much as reasonably possible.

    It’s the difference between Walmart having 4 entrances – one on each side (best for business) verses requiring them to have .. say – a grade-separated entrance – (best for access and mobility).

    I recommend that you do take the time to learn… there are multiple links on the VDOT website that explain what access management IS and is not.

    gowan… give it a shot.. it won’t hurt you..

    http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/accessmgt/default.asp

    try this one..

    “Safe Access if GOOD for Business”

    http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/accessmgt/Safe_Access_Business.pdf

  18. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    EMR – I’m not sure the slide on the VDOT website is anything other than to show the different classification types.

    But what would be FUNCTIONALLY different from their classifications and yours – beyond the vocabulary?

    that was my real question.

    Has VDOT and the other DOTS got it RIGHT on their functional classifications?

    Also, have you heard of TAZs?

    Transportation Analysis Zones.

    These are parcels of land – that can yield a number for the traffic generation by aggregating the existing and planned land-uses and densities and then by aggregating TAZs, one can determine how much daily traffic there is – relative to the roads that serve the TAZs.

    I would see the smallest nodes in your nomenclature as TAZs and balanced communities as aggregated nodes – that exhibit the “balance” that you advocate but which STILL generate traffic external to their boundaries.

    Capishe?

  19. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    ……….”Sure, you have needs for both local and through traffic. What do you do when the local needs outstrip the local capacity?

    You go someplace else.”

    go read the info RH.

    What it clearly states is that your capacity IS REDUCED if you don’t use access management.

    so you build expensive infrastructure that supposedly moves X number of vehicles a day and by the time it gets screwed up it only can move 1/2 X traffic.

    and no.. the businesses don’t go somewhere else.. but you have to go build another expensive road to move people who want to get AROUND the road now clogged with businesses.

    Some localities in Virginia actually have 3 bypasses!

    but my main point is this:

    If that is how a locality wants to deal with land-use AND they’ll be responsible for the consequences of such policies (and the citizens don’t vote them out of office) – then fine -go for it.

    But in the past, the localities would crap up the road – and then expect VDOT to come in and build them a bypass that would cost more than the local people would generate in gas taxes.

    That’s the connection that has been missing.

    VDOT is still going to let localities crap up their own roads (that cost local money) but what Access management says is that the major primary roads that VDOT is responsible for maintaining – that THOSE roads will use Access Management – because it’s those roads that are used by BOTH local citizens AND citizens trying to get from one place to another.

    Anyone who has seen Route 29 north of Charlottesville knows exactly what I’m talking about.

    VDOT made a mistake is allowing the locality to approve businesses on Rt 29 without requiring Access management – and now – everyone -both locals and folks trying to get through are paying the price.

  20. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Here’s the basic concept:

    To understand access management, it is important to know that roads have different primary functions; either to provide access or move traffi c.

    • The main function of minor roads, like neighborhood collectors and local streets, is to provide access. Minor roads must operate at slower speeds so people can enter and exit homes and businesses safely and conveniently.

    • The main function of major roads, like interstate freeways and regional highways, is to move traffi c over long distances at higher speeds. Access to these roads must be carefully managed so requests for new access to development do not contribute to unsafe or congested conditions.

    http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/accessmgt/Safe_Access_Business.pdf

    does anyone disagree with this?

    I’m especially interested in EMR’s response also…

    thanks

  21. Anonymous Avatar

    “your capacity IS REDUCED if you don’t use access management.”

    You are preaching to the choir, Larry, I really do understand.

    But, either access management or increased capacity can only go so far. Times change, requirements change, and costs change. At some point, either heroic transport methods or spartan access control by the book will become the wrong answer.

    My suggestion is only that we cannot make believeable arguments about what costs money and what makes money, what is good for everybody, vs what is subsidies and wealth transfer, until we have a lot more information and a lot less rhetoric and opinion.

    The TAZ’s you mention are one good example of how it ought to work. But getting the data for a TAZ is a lot of work. Same with getting the data for cleaning the Bay.

    Until we get to that point, it is just business as usual, which I read as: “My mind is made up, this is what I want, it is what is good for you, whether you like it or not, and don’t confuse me with facts.”

    We have road users and property users, and the cost of roads needs to be understood in that context, especially if access control is subverted into land use control.

    There is nothing wrong with that, we just need to understand what we are ACTUALLY doing, without muddying the waters with crappy arguments like subsidies and short term profits.

    Of the points mentioned above, three control traffic by increasing use, and three control traffic by decreasing use. But the methods don’t say anything about how to accurately assess and distribute the associated costs or benefits.

    It is too hard to think about, so we’ll just build HOT lanes instead.

    You can write all the manuals you want, with rules of thumb, guidelines, codas, regulations, etc. But at the end of the day, it is the economics that decide if the manuals make sense.

    The way I see it, we have no well understood and generally agreed method to agree on how economic costs and benefits should be measured, applied and distributed. As a result, we continue to “go by the book” long after the book should have been changed for good and valid reasons.

    Think of Jim Crow laws.

    We push people into unfair corners, because that’s the way it is, and then when they fight back we wonder what went wrong.

    RH

  22. E M Risse Avatar

    Earlier Larry asked”

    “But what would be FUNCTIONALLY different from their classifications and yours – beyond the vocabulary?”

    Other than that Mrs. Lincoln…

    What you call it is Fundamenatlly Important.

    “that was my real question.

    Has VDOT and the other DOTS got it RIGHT on their functional classifications?”

    No because they do not refer to organic components of the settlement patterns. Until they do, there is no way to know how many levels you need as I tried to suggest earlier.

    “Also, have you heard of TAZs?”

    Do bears sleep in the woods?

    “Transportation Analysis Zones.

    These are parcels [ALMOST NO TAZs ARE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS] of land – that can yield a number for the traffic generation by aggregating the existing and planned land-uses and densities and then by aggregating TAZs, one can determine how much daily traffic there is – relative to the roads that serve the TAZs.”

    The issue is how you aggregate the TAZs. If you have read our reviews of Lucy and Phillips work you know that the great strength of their work is that they use and reaggregate the smallest units of Census data.

    “I would see the smallest nodes in your nomenclature as TAZs and balanced communities as aggregated nodes – that exhibit the “balance” {Balance] that you advocate but which STILL generate traffic external to their boundaries.”

    That is a good start! The problem is getting them small enough and the method of aggregation.

    EMR

  23. E M Risse Avatar

    At 7:14 PM, Larry Gross said…

    “Here’s the basic concept:

    “To understand access management, it is important to know that roads have different primary functions; either to provide access or move traffic.

    “• The main function of minor roads, like neighborhood collectors and local [NB Core Confusing Word – every street has a scale, what scale are you talking about. “Local” does not cut it.] streets, is to provide access. Minor roads [ARE YOU MIXING UP STREETS AND ROADS] must operate at slower speeds so people can enter and exit homes and businesses safely and conveniently.

    “• The main function of major roads, like interstate freeways and regional highways, is to move traffi c over long distances at higher speeds. Access to these roads must be carefully managed so requests for new access to development do not contribute to unsafe or congested conditions.

    “http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/accessmgt/Safe_Access_Business.pdf

    “does anyone disagree with this?

    “I’m especially interested in EMR’s response also…

    thanks

    Larry:

    I hate to contiue to beat on this but as my notes in the text — which I think you copied directly for VDOT — suggest without the framework of settlement pattern components it is impossible to discuss what service which streets and roads should provide.

    That is why we have gridlock.

    Hope that helps.

    EMR

  24. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    ..”which I think you copied directly for VDOT” from FHWA via a link on the VDOT website – yes

    ” — suggest without the framework of settlement pattern components it is impossible to discuss what service which streets and roads should provide.”

    agree.

    what I’m asking is – what should they be both within balanced communities – AND what should the network look like that CONNECTS balanced communities?

    basically… is the FHWA/VDOT view that CONNECTING roads should be limited-access interstates and access-managed primary/major arteries?

    IF NOT.. then WHAT?

    This is a major Macro CONCEPT question – not one that requires “further study”.

    I’m basically asking how Balanced Communities should be “connected” with each other.

  25. E M Risse Avatar

    Sorry Larry, I have not done a good job responding to you on this issue due to other things I have to get done.

    Here are further thoughts that may help, otherwise it will have to wait until TRILO-G is completed:

    Balanced Communities are inside the Clear Edge around the Core of New Urban Regions.

    (We leave aside for the moment the potential for urban agglomerations in Urban Support Regions being Balanced Communites.

    Also we are not addressing “Balanced But Disaggregated Communities” that exist in the Countryside that makes up the majority of the territory in both NURs and USRs.

    These exclusions include a lot of “places” but leaves out less that 15% of the population if citizens decide to fill in the Swiss Cheese and create Balanced Communities.

    That is a big IF but there may be no choice and the only question will there be resouces left to create those places — especially to make them great places to live, work and play.)

    This is a two fer:

    A way to use TAZs and to create Balanced Communities.

    One way to create Balanced Communities (or Balanced compnents of Balanced Communities) that has already been successfully applied in Fair Lakes and Reston Town Center (One Nieghborhood scale and one Village Scale) is the Cordon Line Concept with we outline in “The Shape of the Future.”

    One creates a TAZ for a new Neighborhood, Village or Community scale project and then limit the number of Large Private Vehicle trips that can cross the Cordon Line.

    Let the project sponsor develop what ever mix of uses he / she wants so long as the trips across the Cordon Line do not exceed X.

    If at any point they do exceed the agreed to limit, the developer stops building or creates new non-Large Private Vehicle capacity.

    This strategy has worked.

    Here is another perspective: The more successful one is in creating Balance, the fewer trips will cross the Boundaries between Balanced Communies.

    I believe with the end is insight for the nearly exclusive use of Large Private Vehicles to achieve Mobility and Access for the citizens in First World nation-states.

    This means much of the interBalanced-Community travel will be on shared-vehicles.

    In this case the issue of roadways between Balanced Communities inside the Clear Edge will be less pressing.

    I just received a book with 2007 system maps for the major shared-vehicle system is the world. I was surprised at how many I already know well from having ridden on them.

    I was even more surprise at how many are undergoing major expansions since I was last in that Region.

    Thnking about long-term use of Large Private vehicles for intraRegional or interRegional travel is a waste of time.

    Now back to work.

    EMR

  26. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    “Thnking about long-term use of Large Private vehicles for intraRegional or interRegional travel is a waste of time.”

    I don’t follow your reasoning on this.

    As long as our transportation policy included a substantial effort towards building and maintaining “connecting” roads – Primaries, Major Arterials and limited access freeways and interstates..

    it IS a KEY ISSUE that directly relates to dysfunctional settlement patterns and all of this will continue no matter what advocacy there is towards balanced communities if THAT part of the vision with respect to balanced communities (connecting them) is dismissed instead of becoming a key and integral part of any balanced community vision.

    As long as you expect Fed Ex or UPS to bring you stuff in your balanced community… or in your balanced community you expect to go the grocery and buy a can of sardines or travel to a regional hospital or airport.. you’ll need to way to do that… in a vehicle…

    so I think it is inadequate to claim that if the community balance is “done right” that the road issue will essentially take care of itself.

Leave a Reply