Rosalyn Dance Can Help Interpret Democratic Election Laws

Rosalyn Dance – courtesy Daily Press

by James C. Sherlock

Governor Youngkin has appointed former state Senator Rosalyn Dance, D-Petersburg, as vice chairman of the state Board of Elections.

As vice-chair, she is the highest ranking Democrat on the board.

She will perform an absolutely vital role.

She will be asked to help interpret the complete overhaul of Virginia’s election laws conducted by Democrats who controlled state government in 2020 and 2021.

While Sen. Dance was not in office for that revolution, interpreting it for the purpose of developing regulations will require experience, a Democratic mindset and a strong stomach.

She qualifies.

Some examples.

Voter Identification – repeal of photo identification requirements:

  • expanded the list of acceptable voter identification documents to include voter confirmation documents, any HAVA-compliant ID documents, and valid higher education student IDs regardless of whether they include a photo or not. If the voter does not present an acceptable ID, he or she [Editor’s note: not enough pronouns] can sign an ID Confirmation Statement confirming his or her identity and vote regularly. Since an ID that includes a photo is no longer required, the bill relieves ELECT’s and registrars’ duty to provide free voter ID cards. [Editor’s note: what could go wrong?]

State Board of Elections:

  • imposed an additional duty to the State Board of Elections to supervise local electoral boards and general registrars and ensure that major risks to election integrity are identified, assessed, and addressed as necessary to promote electoral uniformity, legality and purity. [Editor’s note: purity tests have a checkered past.]

Absentee voting:

  • Permanent establishment of ballot drop-off locations that were emergency measures during COVID;
  • Allows contractors to print, assemble, and mail absentee ballots and required “emergency” provisions to allow that in the 2021 elections;
  • Turned what were temporary absentee voter lists for each election into permanent absentee ballot lists. The voter stays on the permanent list and can only be removed for the following reasons:
    a. the voter requests in writing to be removed;
    b. their registration is cancelled or placed on an inactive status;
    c. a ballot is sent to them and is returned as undeliverable; or
    d. the voter moves to a new address in a different locality.

College students:

  • requires the Department to provide mail voter registration application forms to each public institution of higher education and nonprofit private institution of higher education;  [Editor’s note:  again, what could go wrong?]
  • added valid student IDs issued by institutions of higher learning located outside the state of Virginia to the list of acceptable forms of ID for voting. [Editor’s note: Not sure how that is in the public interest or identifies the holder as an eligible Virginia voter, but then I’m not a Democrat.]

First time voters:

  • Same day registration – extended the period that an otherwise qualified person can register to vote in person up to and through election day, effectively providing for same-day registration in all elections;
  • Removed the requirement for first-time voters in state elections who register by mail to vote in person on Election Day.  [Editor’s note: So a voter in state elections now need not ever present himself to elections officials to be identified. Even if he did, he need not present a photo id.]

Campaigns and Campaign Finance:

  • Removed the requirement for a statewide office holder or member of the General Assembly to report pre-legislative-session contributions on any subsequent campaign finance report after the January 15 filing with the State Board. Previously these needed to be reported in the next regularly scheduled report. [Editor’s note: reducing candidate embarrassment might not have been the first concern of the average citizen.]

Registration of 16-year-olds:

  • Voter preregistration for Virginia citizens who are 16 years of age or older and are otherwise qualified to register to vote.  [Editor’s note: really?]

Out-of-locality registrars:

  • Raised to 50,000 the populations of localities allowed to appoint a general registrar who is a citizen of the Commonwealth instead of a citizen of the locality. The previous limit was 25,000. [Editor’s note: what itch did that scratch?]

Ranked choice voting:

  • granted an option to adopt Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), also known as Instant Runoff Voting (IRV), to all localities for elections for members of a county board of supervisors or city council. [Editor’s note: Tammany Hall would have loved this one. The motivation was clearly to eliminate the effects of candidates not endorsed by the local political parties or other power brokers. That law would make for an interesting constitutional challenge.]

Bottom line. The appointment of Rosalyn Dance was appropriate.

That is true especially because some of the election laws jammed through Democratic majorities in the General Assembly on party line votes and signed by Gov. Northam in 2020-21 make our elections far less secure.

Less “pure” in the words of one piece of their legislation.

She was not there, but served on Privileges and Elections when she was in office and understands the thinking and motivations of those who cast the votes.

But then, so do most Virginians.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

107 responses to “Rosalyn Dance Can Help Interpret Democratic Election Laws”

  1. M. Purdy Avatar

    Serious question–how many instances of voter fraud did we have in the last statewide election?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Depends. The only known fraud was done by Republicans. An example? “Just find me 11,780 votes. That’s one more than…”

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Serious answer. Nobody knows.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        widespread voter fraud? Do we know?
        The courts seem to think we do after no one seems to have real evidence other than conspiracy theories.

        Enough fraud to overturn national or state elections?

        I think we DO know that answer.

      2. M. Purdy Avatar

        I suspect they do know, and this is a “solution” in search of an imaginary problem, just as was the banning of non-existent CRT in K-12.

        1. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          Go find digitalpollwatchers, and find their blog. There’s evidence, along with CRT and SEL/CASEL concepts evidence, but you don’t want to see it.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            No, there’s really nothing compelling. And Dominion wasn’t in on a conspiracy, and Jan. 6 wasn’t a sightseeing tour either.

          2. vicnicholls Avatar
            vicnicholls

            Cognitive dissonance. Thank you for advertising that.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar

          All right, another Jim McCarthy silly walk. Congrats.

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        NC-9

      4. vicnicholls Avatar
        vicnicholls

        EPEC knows a good amount Captain.

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      You wont find the VDoE doing that. You’ll find groups that have a # of probable voter issues. Would you consider Mary Ann Doe Jr to be a correct voter record? How about Joe Lastname and Moe Lastname at the same address? How about 6 registered voters at a 2 bedroom home? Senior citizens in adult homes told they HAD to vote. How about voters registered in 2 different cities? The # of registered voters and the # of ballots cast being different. There’s more. A lot more. Just the VDoE doesn’t do any that. Btw, when I challenged back to give us evidence of people who truly are registered to vote but can’t, I hear crickets. When I hear the cries of folks mad because someone else voted in their name(s), you don’t think that’s kosher do you?

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Even assuming your version of events is true, would it be enough to steal a national election, which would require tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of fake votes? How about statewide? Answer is hell no. You’re engaging in conspiracy theories.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          It would be almost impossible to have zero fraud. It will happen. But as you point out, would it happen as a coordinated effort to move all votes to one candidate in a national election?

          That’s where the conspiracy theory folks are on this issue.

          Some believe it and others want to “prove” that if there is SOME fraud, it means there could potentially be massive fraud and all of it for votes for one candidates – across hundred/thousands of polls across dozens of states.

          That’s wacadoodle territory and not my words:

          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/538d7f5e51466a5e5bf266dce71b94b47de41ad067f00f39d225e6dca681ba06.jpg

          https://www.npr.org/2023/02/20/1158223099/fox-news-dominion-wackadoodle-election-fraud-claim

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The “single instance “ theory is being employed by Tucker Carlson to impugn the Jan 6 arrests and prosecutions. It’s a favorite of the conspiracy clan.

        2. LesGabriel Avatar
          LesGabriel

          Our concerns about voter fraud should not be restricted to instances where the proven fraud is enough to overturn elections. Private persons and public officials should be charged with violating election laws regardless of how many votes are involved. Why? Justice and deterrence are just 2 reasons that come to mind. Most prosecutors have never charged anyone with an election-related crime, but that doesn’t mean they are not happening.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            Well, you’re not wrong that voter fraud is a bad thing. But the idea that it’s widespread is just not valid. There is a really big problem with making too much out of voter fraud, namely that it perpetuates conspiracy theory lies that undermine the republic. It’s vey much like turning the non-existent teaching of CRT in K-12 into a campaign issue. It’s fact-free misdirection, and a dog whistle, but it gets people riled up for elections. So excuse me if I don’t think Miyares and Youngkin’s motives are in good faith.

          2. LesGabriel Avatar
            LesGabriel

            The fact is we don’t know how widespread it is. How do we deter it if we ignore it? Democrats were not hesitant to undermine the integrity of our elections in November 2016, but I guess that was too long ago for anyone to remember.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            They catch individual voting fraud. Wouldn’t they also detect massive conspiracy fraud?

            Why would anyone believe there is or could be if there is zero evidence of it?

          4. M. Purdy Avatar

            We do know that there’s very little evidence that it’s widespread. Every conspiratorial theory about stolen this or that falls apart. Because it lacks evidence. There are isolated cases, that’s it.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Totally agree. But when that does happen, and it does, does it indicate a massive fraud conspiracy that could overturn an election?

            and they ARE prosecuted – even Heritage says so:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69de6fe611c7361c53b64fad572a551a2dd4311f821ef5ea08c6764bd1cd6c5a.jpg

            https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search?state=VA

          6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Yes, they should be prosecuted. And if accusations were made with sufficient, and credible, evidence, I am sure prosecutors would investigate and prosecute if they thought the cases were valid.

        3. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          Actually no I’m not. You have no clue what I have access to. I would also indicate that “conspiracy” theories have proven true over the last few years.

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        You were captured by Purdy’s change of subject, Vic. I did not bring up illegal voting, Purdy did. My observations are about what is now legal.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          you did very much mention “secure” –

          ” Bottom line. The appointment of Rosalyn Dance was appropriate.

          That is true especially because some of the election laws jammed through Democratic majorities in the General Assembly on party line votes and signed by Gov. Northam in 2020-21 make our elections far less secure.”

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            I report on what the Democrats have now made legal. It is by design harder to monitor.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            and “election laws jammed through….. that are far less secure”, an implication that “work” needs to be done about it.

            no?

        2. M. Purdy Avatar

          The old “who me?” defense.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            No, Purdy, read it again. It is entirely about what is now legal. “Who me? Indeed.

          2. M. Purdy Avatar

            “Now legal” because you believe the current law threatens election “integrity” and “security,” isn’t that right?

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            It does. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

          4. M. Purdy Avatar

            So that’s what they call a “Perry Mason” cross-examination. You admitted the thing that you previously denied. Thank you, good day.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You note that I did not allege voter fraud, Purdy, you brought it up, not me. All I did was point out and ask a few questions about the changes to the law.

      My article is not about what is illegal, but rather entirely about what is now legal.

      And now your pals will amplify the subject change. It is something to talk about other than Democratic changes to the voter laws.

      Utterly predictable.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Oh please…spare me.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          I don’t plan to.

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Couldn’t agree more.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      The readers do know what the Republicans in the GA wanted to do regarding elections which was to restrict the number of citizens voting by all means possible. They were against anything that made it easier to vote.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        That’s pretty much what the GOP seems to want to do in most states and it’s history is all the way back to Jim Crow.

        Is a compromise possible? Look at what is happening to ERIC.

        How about picture+ID in exchange for super-easy voting ?

        deal?

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I don’t understand the importance placed on Roslyn Dance by the author of this piece. It is said that she will be asked to interpret and make regulations. The regulations have already been developed to implement the 2020 and 2021 changes. Furthermore, most of the article seems to be not about Dance but about the author’s opposition to the changes made.

    One major correction needs to be noted. The author complains, ” Note that the death of a voter is not a reason for removal from the permanent absentee ballot list.” That is not accurate. The section dealing with a permanent absentee list (24.2-703.1) directs that “a voter shall be removed from the permanent absentee voter list if…(ii)the voter’s registration is canceled pursuant to Sec. 24.2-427….” Section 24.2-427 requires the general registrar to cancel the registration of anyone known to him to be deceased. Sections 24.2-404 and 24.2-408 require the State Registrar of Vital Records to send to the Dept of Elections, on a weekly basis, a list of persons who have died subsequent to the last list sent. Finally, it is the duty of the Dept. of Elections to notify the local general registrars of the names of deceased persons.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You got me. Her appointment provides a reason to review those changes for readers. Many either did not pay attention at the time or have forgotten.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      But couldn’t dead voters be just considered a special case of absentee? They are after all guaranteed to be absent from the polls.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        “Dead voters” is an oxymoron. It’s the election integrity folk who fear those who would vote in their stead and, as alleged in GA, prove that election results are not reliable. The ERIC project was designed, in part, to reduce the rolls of registered dead.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          and those that move… right?

          seems like a good and necessary function.

          How is it done without ERIC?

          How do Republicans want to do it if not with ERIC?

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            There is seat of the pants procedures. States not members of ERIC would assume the task.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            so, without a central clearinghouse, each state would have to coordinate with every other state individually?

            or does the GOP have some other clearinghouse approach?

          3. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Sherlock and the Shadow may know the answer.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            another blog post….

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Actually not. People have cast absentee ballots and then died. The vote counts. Happened in 2020, and was cited as an example of fraud until the dates were checked.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Yes, there were some instances of votes cast before death. Mea culpa.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            so , how would such things be found out?

            The logistics of doing this sound challenging.

            Not hard to imagine at every election that there may be some of this but can it be found out BEFORE the final vote tally is certified?

          3. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The technical capacity to ID deceased is generally gleaned from SS data as well as state data sources. The myth of the voting dead arose in the JFK era in Illinois. Unless a large number die and votes cast in their stead, it’s difficult to conceive significant impact on results. The same may be said for the use of fake ID. The Gov’s underage son attempted twice to cast a ballot for Dad, demonstrating effective local procedures. Dead, fake ID, and o/wise unqualified votes would require a massive, well-organized effort to affect an election. Of course, some elections may be that narrow to be affected. SOPs for verification are essential for that reason.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            right. I can see , catching someone actively trying to vote twice or more and/or trying to
            impersonate … and getting caught in real time and/or doubts send that vote to provisional
            status to be adjudicated. But dead voters seems entirely the responsibility of the election
            board to properly “scrub” their active voter list with the proviso that some will not be actually
            known dead before the votes are tallied and certified. It also means whoever might try to
            “harvest” dead folks votes for nefarious purposes would have one hell of a job getting the
            data , more than one or two, dozens, hundreds , how?

            The big issues is those that purposely sow doubt and play whataboutism and outright conspiracy theories and those dumb enough to believe it and then go threaten election officials or storm the Capitol.

          5. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Offering so much reason frightens the integrity folk.

          6. Lefty665 Avatar

            Don’t ‘ya suppose all votes are supposed to be cast before death?

          7. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            As a matter of irrefutable fact, yes. That supposition failed to deter the allegations of 2020 election results deniers.

        3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          “Dead voters” are a Chicago tradition. Does oxymoron live, if that’s the word of art, in the Windy City?

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The Oxymoron virus is believed to have originated in a Chinese research laboratory as an antidote to election and vaccine denial.

    3. VaNavVet Avatar

      Agree as some folks will never stop beating a dead horse.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Providently, the rolls do not have to be scrubbed of the names of dead horses.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Mr. Ed is dead?

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            I don’t know the exact date he last ran as a GOP candidate.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Only his back half.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well, more than a few impersonators…

          4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            We gladly claim Mr. Ed as one of our own. The blue team gets Francis the Talking Mule.
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU9vIvpBBd8

          5. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            What’ll ya do with the elephant? To the graveyard with BR comment and article deletions?

          6. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            You will have to ask political cartoonist Thomas Nast. It was his pet starting in 1877.
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6dd3c5f75b080dd2cfecab3b5b983e150c7a0e5cc514a6b845548eb1749b0f38.jpg

          7. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Have Nast, Ed, Francis, and Elle voted since they crossed the rainbow bridge?

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Francis came first. With Donald O’Connor if I recall.

          9. Lefty665 Avatar

            It wasn’t ’20, he’d have beat Biden/Ha ha ha harris.

          10. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Deader than a rundover polecat. Died in 1970. Horse tranquilizer overdose. Unkown burial location.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            PCP addict, eh? Too bad Narcan wasn’t readily available.

            Probable burial location is a stew pot in Paris.

          12. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Could have been the new fentanyl hit “Tranq”. I think that is the one that causes the flesh to rot.

          13. Lefty665 Avatar

            “Unkown burial location.”

            I’d check with McDonalds. The new Mr Ed burger to go with the Big Mac is suspicious. I recall they were caught using horse meat in France a couple of decades ago. The Paris p(l)ot thickens.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Thanks. Correction made.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        So two “Editor Notes” shot down… how many more if we had the energy to check what you write…?

    5. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You got me. Her appointment provides a reason to review those changes for readers. Many either did not pay attention at the time or have forgotten.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    How do you know if a college ID is valid? There are so many college ID card templates to choose from. Downloads are free too!

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      I happen to know a number of college students who have false IDs. In fact, every college student I know (under the age of 21) has a false ID. However, those false IDs are used to access bars, not polling places.

      I assume you still have to be registered and on the voter rolls for the precinct where you vote. The student ID is just a means of trying to prove that you are, in fact, the person on the roll.

      Seems like a small risk to me.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Why use it? There are so many better forms of ID to select from.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The IRS requires some form of picture ID to set up an account. The AARP Taxaide program requires a driver license or equivalent to do taxes.

        I don’t ave a problem with it.

        I don’t know why it’s such an issue.

      3. LesGabriel Avatar
        LesGabriel

        With same-day registration, one does not need to appear on the voter rolls.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          If they register, they get put on the voter rolls,

          Can’t vote unless you are on them. They have to prove who they are when they register, right?

          Is your objection to same-day voting? Why?

      4. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Have they voted using them? Have you turned them in for doing so?

        I would as would most everyone I know.

        You’re right. No risks.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      All this proves is “We have enough gun election laws already; we need only enforce them”

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        I am going to use my Marsteller Jr. High library card from 1982 next time around. Cool picture of me with an Alfalfa callick.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I’d like to see that James.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I’d accept it after all, you are a man of your word.

    3. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Not to mention cartels use fictitious students to launder money.

      I don’t think they care about voting, but there is always that possibility as the person doesn’t exist except on paper.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      You may recall the BR article and discussion of ERIC a few weeks ago. Sadly, its purposes and function have become subject to ignorance, denial of merit, and conspiracy theory, much like the attack on Dominion voting machines.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I might have missed it… for some reason or just forgot it. possible to get a link?

        Yes, when the GOP talks about “elections” and safeguarding them these days… it’s all over the map and I’m not convinced at all that they’re really after “good” elections unless they win.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          BR 2/25/2023; Forget Waldo; Where is ERIC?

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Becker bailed out of ERIC.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Bailed? David Becker’s experience in elections brought him from DOJ to Pew to ERIC and now to the Center for Election Innovation and Research. He was succeeded at ERIC a couple of years ago by Shane Hamlin.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Announced last week he is leaving the board of ERIC. Now two vacancies on that board.

          2. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Still not a bail. His new role at CEIR overlaps in function and purpose that of ERIC. New board posts from member states would strengthen the commitment of participants. Makes sense.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Editor’s note: Not sure how that is in the public interest or identifies the holder as an eligible Virginia voter, but then I’m not a Democrat)”

    It is not the ID that establishes eligibility of the voter. The ID establishes the identity of the voter. One of the many flawed “Editor’s notes” in this piece… unsurprisingly…

    Btw… isn’t the “editor” also the “author” for this article…?🤷‍♂️

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Yup!! He is one of a few whose articles are placed directly on BR without editorial review. It’s why errors can be corrected.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Tom Sawyer type stuff? 😉

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And usually NEED to be…

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Occasionally, if pressed hard enough. O/wise all such screeds are error-free.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Incisive.

  6. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    I report on Democratic laws, using Democratic characterizations of those laws, ask a few parenthetical questions and Democrats go nuts. Mostly without ever answering the questions. What could that possibly mean?

    1. It’s really not a Sherlock article until we get the defensive “People are objecting to my comments, makes you think, hmmmmm?” response from the man himself.

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Removed the requirement for first-time voters in state elections who register by mail to vote in person on Election Day. [Editor’s note: So a voter in state elections now need not ever present himself to elections officials to be identified…”

    According to the link you provided: “Unless explicitly exempted, voters who register to vote by mail-in application in a jurisdiction where they have never voted before are required to vote in person for their first election, either at the polls on Election Day or in-person absentee….”

    In-person absentee or at the polls on Election Day… so your “Editor’s Note” seems to not be quite right…

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…requires the Department to provide mail voter registration application forms to each public institution of higher education and nonprofit private institution of higher education; [Editor’s note: again, what could go wrong?]”

    Not sure exactly what the “mail voter registration application form” is but based on my read of the regulations it looks like you are referring to this document:

    https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/Federal_Voter_Registration_ENG.pdf

    Seeing as how it is already fully available to anybody on line, I don’t see how providing them in printed form to universities creates any additional issues. So… nothing… 🤷‍♂️.

    Btw, do you have the same anxiety about distributing them to “each agent of the Department of Wildlife Resources authorized to sell hunting or fishing licenses in Virginia”…? I mean what could go wrong… right…?

Leave a Reply