Right Decision, Terrible Reason

Jack Del Rio talks to reporters after practice Wednesday. Photo credit: The Washington Post.

by James A. Bacon

The decision to spike a deal to lure the Washington Commanders football team to Virginia has fallen apart. Commanders CEO Daniel Snyder had enlisted some bipartisan support for a proposal to create a Football Stadium Authority to finance construction of a stadium and a “mini city” around it in Loudoun County, but the legislation was floundering over the issue of how much of the tax revenue generated by the project would be rebated to the team.

Yesterday, reports The Washington Post, Senate Majority Leader Richard L. Saslaw, D-Fairfax, pulled the plug on the legislation because of a controversial social-media post made by Defensive Coordinator Jack Del Rio about the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

There is no evidence that Del Rio was speaking for the Commanders organization. And he later apologized for part of his comment that caused the most problem — calling the riot a “dust up” compared to the George Floyd riots of 2020.

But Saslaw said the comment was the last straw after controversies over sexual harassment and financial mismanagement plaguing the Commanders organization. “This obviously was not very helpful, to put it mildly, but there’s so many other things out there,” he said. “A lot of people are saying, ‘Saslaw, this thing needs to wait.’”

I feel no angst over the deal getting scuttled, and I’m not defending Del Rio’s choice of words — the Jan. 6 riot was a lot worse than a “dust up.” But I am concerned about the precedent being set here. This is not a repeat of the skewering given Chick-Fil-A CEO Dan Cathy after he privately expressed opposition to gay marriage. It’s worse. The deal isn’t dead because of any opinions expressed by Commanders owner Dan Snyder. The Commanders are effectively being punished for views of an employee of the company expressed as his private opinions.

The new standard, it appears, is that all employees — or at least all employees in the public eye — must conform to the political views deemed acceptable by the political class or keep their mouths shut all the times, or their organizations are subject to being punished.

I watched last night as Congresswoman Liz Cheney, R-Wyoming, presented her indictment of President Trump for his words and actions before, during and after Jan. 6. If the case she presented stands up to scrutiny, his behavior was appalling and disqualifying. My only caveat is that everyone is entitled to present a defense, which Trump will not have an opportunity to do unless he is indicted and the case goes to trial. Whatever Trump’s level of culpability, it is beyond question that the riot, in which some participants attempted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, was bigger than a “dust up.” Del Rio’s words, as he has since conceded, were poorly chosen.

On the other hand, Del Rio was perfectly reasonable to want, as he put it, to “understand the whole story” about why the summer of riots, looting, burning and the destruction of personal property is never discussed. Leftists repeatedly and violently assaulted federal courthouses and other facilities in Portland, Oregon, effectively shutting them down for weeks. Who was responsible for that? Will anyone seek to punish those transgressions against the rule of law?

Whatever. Del Rio should have known that his comments would be controversial. He’s a big boy, and he should not be surprised if those comments generated blowback. But how much blowback is reasonable? What do his thoughts, expressed in a non-official capacity, have to do with the conduct of his job as defensive coordinator of a football team, much less to do with the merits of the tax-authority proposal? Nothing. Nothing whatsoever.

The lesson I take away from this incident is that everyone must pay obeisance to the Lords of the Political Class or they could subject not only themselves to retribution, but those around them.

The message: submit. We have the power, and you don’t. Not only will we punish you for your thought crimes, we will punish your employer.

Step by creeping step, the sanctions against those who say the “wrong” thing are getting tighter and tighter. And as government extends its writ into every sphere of human existence, it has limitless power to punish. This should terrify everyone, but it won’t. Those who are most outraged by others’ speech can never imagine the outrage being turned on them. But history has shown repeatedly that it can and will be.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

53 responses to “Right Decision, Terrible Reason”

  1. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    It’s becoming increasingly clear that free speech isn’t free if you are well known and make comments that are not politically correct.
    On the other hand, I’m glad that Virginia taxpayers are not going to subsidize the construction of a new stadium.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Oh, the speech was clearly free without restraint.

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        But not without consequences and they represent a cost.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          There is no such thing as consequence-free speech…

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            oh, but there SHOULD BE! 😉

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I don’t know why Democrats insist on shooting themselves in the foot. That was a stupid statement by Saslaw, who is known for rash statements. There had been multiple signs that the deal was coming apart. So, why make a statement like this? Of course, a major economic development deal should not be scuttled because of a ridiculous statement by someone who, in effect, is in middle management of the business.

    Of course, you have to bring up the Portland business and ask, “Will anyone seek to punish those transgressions against the rule of law?” The answer is, simply, yes. Numerous persons have been arrested and charged with serious crimes. https://nypost.com/2021/06/06/more-than-two-dozen-antifa-rioters-charged-for-portland-mayhem/

    1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      Why hasn’t Snyder moved his team to Birmingham or San Antonio? He’d get a new covered stadium in a red state. The Raiders were moved to Los Angeles and, later, to Las Vegas, and the anti-competition NFL was powerless to stop it. What is Snyder waiting for?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        If you are asking me, I have no idea what the answer is. And, frankly, I don’t give a damn what he does, so long as the Virginia taxpayers are not subsidizing it.

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Mr. H-S, I wasn’t really asking you. Sorry for that impression. I’m with you on this. Our team is not moving, but we (the taxpayers) are being asked to front for most of the cost of a domed stadium. I say no.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Hey, in a red state they can revert back to the old name. Would be very symbolic move actually. Instead of treating the Native American population decently, just ship them west and continue to screw them over. Manifest destiny!!

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          You are one sick puppy.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Makes as much sense as rejecting the old name as a slur then naming the team for the people who used the slur and moved the ones they didn’t murder west.

        3. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Makes as much sense as rejecting the old name as a slur then naming the team for the people who used the slur and moved the sluree’s they didn’t murder west.

  3. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    “I watched last night as Congresswoman Lynn Cheney, R-Wyoming, presented her indictment of President Trump for his words and actions before, during and after Jan. 6. If the case she presented stands up to scrutiny, his behavior was appalling and disqualifying.”

    Jim, you must be kidding. Does suggestig Pence be hanged qualify?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      That’s a tough one. Kinda like watching your mother-in-law drive your new Mercedes off a cliff.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        That’s like a joke from the Reagan years. Good news: a bus full of supply side economists drove off a cliff. Bad news: there were 4 empty seats.

    2. Trump’s statement about Pence was damning. But Cheney made an argument with many components. She sounded persuasive to me. But the prosecutor often sounds persuasive before you hear the defense. We’ll know the House is serious and the “hearings” aren’t just a propaganda show if DOJ sees enough evidence to file charges against Trump. If charges are filed, Trump deserves his day in court like anybody else.

      Clearly, Trump was in denial about losing the election. But did he orchestrate a “coup d’etat”? I’ve seen so many lies told about him — from Russian collusion to “many great people” among the White supremacists — that I don’t believe a single thing coming out of the House or its media mouthpieces. They tell the truth only when it suits their purposes to do so. The only hope of getting a semblance of the truth is in court when both sides get to present their evidence and make their best arguments.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        you don’t have to listen to the prosecutor or media. Just listen to Trumps own words and the words of his collaborators and supporters.

        re: ” Clearly, Trump was in denial about losing the election. But did he orchestrate a “coup d’etat”

        don’t believe the media. Do doubt the prosecutors. But Trumps actual words and his supporters actual words and those in his administration like Barr and Milley – direct quotes from these folks – you don’t believe them either and still blame the media anyhow?

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Trump was not in denial. As Liz Cheney related, he was told by his Attorney General and his campaign staff that there was no widespread fraud. He knew that he had lost, but he peddled the lie in order to try to overturn the results.

        This is not just my opinion or those of liberal “media mouthpieces”. The Main Street conservative “media mouthpiece” shares the same belief. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-evidence-of-the-jan-6-committee-donald-trump-2020-election-mike-pence-11654896141?mod=opinion_lead_pos1

        There will be no trial of Trump. In the first place, for DOJ to bring charges would tear the country apart. In the second place, conspiracy is hard to prove. Unless the committee has a recording or transcript of Trump talking directly to the leader of the Proud Boys and planning for the assault on the Capitol, it can’t be done. Trump was probably smart enough to use enough code words to make it clear what he wanted and also to make sure that the trail did not lead directly to him. But, in the words of the Wall Street Journal editorial board, “The person who owns Jan. 6 is Donald Trump.”

        1. That’s the big question, isn’t it? Was Trump in denial, or was he lying outright?

          Never under-estimate the capacity of people to grasp at straws and believe what they want to believe. There were plenty of writers on right-wing blogs throwing up a lot of chaff regarding the stolen elections. It is known that Trump reads those blogs. He also had Giuliani and Powell telling him what he wanted to hear. And he had a persecution complex (somewhat justified) after two-and-a-half years of the media and Democrats peddling the Russia-collusion hoax.

          Perhaps Trump did knowingly disseminate falsehoods. I’m waiting to full array of evidence presented, not just the prosecutorial highlights, before rendering judgment.

          In either case — lying or self-delusion — Trump’s behavior disqualifies him from holding office again.

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “We’ll know the House is serious and the “hearings” aren’t just a propaganda show if DOJ sees enough evidence to file charges against Trump. If charges are filed, Trump deserves his day in court like anybody else.”

        I.e., Nixon was innocent.

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    To one who has followed the continuously unfolding story of Jan 6, the Committee’s presentation was akin to being a juror witnessing a cogent summary by counsel.

    Trump is not entitled to a defense unless and until legal charges are made against him. Certainly, if he demanded to speak before the committee, it would likely be welcomed. Interested folk can read his comments on his new media platform.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The committee interviewed two of Trump’s kid and numerous members of his administration. If he had wanted to appear for a deposition, I am sure the committee would have been glad to accommodate him.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I dunno. Accommodating Trump usually involves staying at one of his hotels.

  5. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
    YellowstoneBound1948

    If it is “wrong” to describe the January 6 events as a “dust up,” isn’t it equally wrong to describe them as an “insurrection”? The actions amounted to criminal trespass and rioting, but no government was threatened, let alone overthrown. The events on January 6 were reprehensible and indefensible, but unless the hooligans in their hundreds were prepared to hijack the nation’s armed forces, could we please try to maintain some perspective?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Oh, so if I drop the loot before leaving the bank, it’s not robbery?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        An angry mob breaks into the US Capitol while it is in session and preparing to certify the election. That mob is shouting “Hang Mike Pence” , the VP who is supposed to certify the election – and it’s not an insurrection? wow!

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Not even sedition.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            dust-up…

          2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            Ask him to define it. Don’t read his mind. Aren’t you the least bit concerned that speech in this country is getting crushed?

          3. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
            YellowstoneBound1948

            Not looking up the words for a definition, are you? Business as usual for Miss Nancy.

        2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          What do get out of insurrection that you don’t get out of riot? A more painful execution?

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Depends on the race of the bank robber, apparently…

        1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
          YellowstoneBound1948

          Sick, but typical or your replies here.

      3. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
        YellowstoneBound1948

        It is robbery. “Robbery” is a defined term. Look it up. It might even be an armed robbery, if a weapon were used.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      If it actually had been an insurrection all those guys would have been armed. In reality several of the geezers were charged with assaulting capitol police with their canes. Some insurrection.

      So yeah, charge them with rioting, but insurrection no way. As you say, a little perspective please.

      Long ago, thanks to the Church Committee, we learned that many of the loudest and most violent of the anti-war protesters were paid FBI plants. I’m not holding my breath waiting for the 1/6 committee to provide the nation that same service.

      We do know that one of the Proud Boys founders has been on the FBI payroll as an informant since 2012. Makes one wonder if the whole operation was an FBI proud boy honey trap from the get go. That’s certainly the way they worked also long ago when they were infiltrating the KKK and entire Klaverns were FBI plants. Recently in the Whitmer kidnap plot in Wisconsin there were 6 indictments and 12 FBI plants. The MO does not seem to change.

      This is the first bipartisan Congressional committee in American history where the minority party was denied the right to choose its own members. That created a profound partisan bias that corrupts everything the committee produces, including findings that might otherwise have objective value.

      1. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
        YellowstoneBound1948

        You are correct, sir. The rioters were not armed. It could not be an insurrection.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          The Minutemen along the road to Lexington and Concord on the other hand were insurrectionists.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          The Minutemen along the road to Lexington and Concord on the other hand were insurrectionists.

          It does not seem hard to tell the difference, but it is clearly beyond the cognitive abilities of many, including some here at BR.

  6. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
    YellowstoneBound1948

    If it is “wrong” to describe the January 6 events as a “dust up,” isn’t it equally wrong to describe them as an “insurrection”? The actions amounted to criminal trespass and rioting, but no government was threatened, let alone overthrown. The events on January 6 were reprehensible and indefensible, but unless the hooligans in their hundreds were prepared to hijack the nation’s armed forces, could we please try to maintain some perspective?

  7. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Saslaw is another one who is past his expiration date. He should have gone after he rolled over on Senate redistricting after the 2010 census and handed it to the Repubs.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It has been reported that he has told folks he plans to retire after this term.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Great, but not quick enough by a decade, not that I’d hold a grudge.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It has been reported that he has told folks he plans to retire after this term.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The deal isn’t dead because of any opinions expressed by Commanders owner Dan Snyder. The Commanders are effectively being punished for views of an employee of the company expressed as his private opinions.”

    Yes, companies are impacted by the actions and statements of their employees. Nothing new here… sounds like just another case of Conservatives moaning about not having the right to consequence-free speech.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Because having a right means it can’t be wrong.

      “The Tree of Liberty must, from time to time, be refreshed with the blood of patriots.”

      If your Top’s grocery store doesn’t carry patriots, you may substitue schoolchildren at a ratio of 3 to 1 owing to the difference in size.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wow. I thought for sure she had died from her burns at the time. It is a strangely wonderful feeling to know she survived, and thrived.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/06/opinion/kim-phuc-vietnam-napalm-girl-photograph.html

  10. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    The deal has fallen apart for 2022, not forever. The Gov still supports it.
    The first version of the stadium assistance even had player state income tax being diverted to the deal.

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    And for your listening delight…
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2ylTs7ykSrE

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    And for your listening delight…
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2ylTs7ykSrE

  13. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Fight For Schools alleged that two teachers were assaulted by special education students and LCPS failed to act. These two teachers have previous ties to FFS and other sister organization such as Loudoun County Moms and Army of Parents.

    LCPS states the teachers received additional training and the student was moved to a new classroom. Breaching confidentiality, tthe teachers then proceeded to share classified student records publicly and as a result, were dismissed.”

    Leaving this here in response to a buried story JAB “reported” on earlier this week. Maybe dig a little deeper next time…🤷‍♂️

  14. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Dave LaRock must be disappointed…

Leave a Reply