Richmond’s First Bicycle Martyr

Lanie Kruszewski

by James A. Bacon

Authorities recorded 92 fatal bicycle accidents in Virginia between 2004 and 2011, but it wasn’t until Lanie Kruszewski died in a hit-and-run a week ago that bicyclists displayed what could be construed as a political consciousness. For the first time in my memory, large numbers of cyclists are getting assertive, insisting upon the right to ride safely on Virginia’s streets and roads.

Riding home from work around 10:30 p.m., the 24-year-old Kruszewski was struck near the Huguenot Bridge on River Road. She was wearing appropriate night-riding reflectors and lights at the time. Roughly 100 friends and cycling enthusiasts gathered last night to ride through the City of Richmond in her honor.

“Lanie was doing everything right,” Steve Carter-Lovejoy, who also commutes to and from work along River Road, told the Times-Dispatch. “When you’re doing it right, you should be able to expect that people see you and drive appropriately.”

The event in Kruszewski’s honor was not overtly political. But the banding together of cyclists to protest a needless fatality is essentially a political act. The number of cyclists in the region seems to be increasing exponentially. A decade ago, it was rare to see one on River Road, a narrow road with no shoulders that should be every cyclist’s worst nightmare. Today, you see one or more almost every day. Cyclists are a more common sight in the City of Richmond, where the streets are far safer.

Tom Bowden, chairman of Bike Virginia (and recently profiled on this blog) told the Times-Dispatch that he hopes the General Assembly will pass a law to require motorists at least three feet of clearance when passing cyclists. He plans to call it Lanie’s Law.

Virginians have lived so long in an auto-centric society, in which streets have been designed for the movement of automobiles, that it’s hard to imagine any other way of doing things. But there once was a time, in the 19th century, when bicycles and pedestrians predominated. The width of streets, the number and width of lanes, the presence of bike lanes, rights of way, crosswalks, the curvature of street corners, driving rules and regulations and dozens of other features embedded in zoning codes and state law reflect the victory of automobile drivers over cars, pedestrians and bicycles over the years.

But as cyclists grow in numbers, they are demanding more respect. They are developing a group consciousness. Mark my words, Kruszewski’s death marks a turning point in that endless tug of war between bikes and cars.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. How sad and unfortunate.

    Wasn’t the 19th Century dominated by horses and horse-drawn vehicles, rather than bikes and walkers? Or at least, horses, horse-drawn vehicles and walkers?

    1. The late 19th century saw a boom in bicycles. The first move to pave roads came in response to bicycles, not cars. Remember what Wilbur and Orville Wright did before they invented the airplane?

  2. FreeDem Avatar

    The House of Delegates voted down a proposal in 2010 that would make it illegal to follow a bicycle “more closely than is reasonable.”

    http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+HB1048

    And in 2012 it died in Committee:

    http://hamptonroads.com/2012/02/va-house-panel-rejects-bid-outlaw-tailgating-bikes

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    God post but theword “Maertyr” is so pegoative and inappropriate.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Many roads just don’t seem safe for both bicycles and cars. Many of the roads in Great Falls are incredibly dangerous when cars and bikes are both present. I would quickly support a program to widen the roads and/or build more bike lanes. I have been many places where bikes and cars coexist (from Amsterdam to San Francisco). However, this co-existence is not accidental and is not simply the result of some lawmaking body legislating coexistence. It is the result of careful planning, intelligent road design and (cover your ears, Jim Bacon) money being spent to make the roads safe for both bicycles and cars.

    Let’s go back to the roads in Great Falls …. narrow, no shoulder, ditches on both sides. Many of these roads have speed limits of 35 or 45 mph.

    What’s Virginia’s laws with regard to motor vehicles and minimum speed?

    ” Minimum Speed Limit: No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic. �46.2-877 (�1) “.

    The problem comes when the bicyclist can’t go fast enough to keep up with the legal speed limit (or thereabouts). People slow down, give the biker room and then … pass. This passing requires the driver to cross the center line and proceed down the oncoming lane for some distance. Most of the roads are marked with double yellow lines since the people who designed the roads saw no good reason to allow motorists to pass other motorists on such dangerous roads.

    What’s the right answer if you are driving behind a bicyclist going 25 mph on a road with a 45 mph speed limit and a double yellow line?

    I assume you wait until it’s safe and then pass although (I must confess) that I am not completely sure. I assume that you pass even if the road has a double yellow line. That’s what I do and that’s what everybody seems to do. However, every time I pass a bicyclist on one of those narrow roads it scares me to death. I really don’t want to hurt them or scare them or see them go into one of those ditches.

    I ride my own bike all the time when I am in Talbot County, MD. The roads are made to be safe for bicycles and cars. No doubt making the roads that way cost more. However, there are always bikers on the bike shoulder of the Easton – Oxford Road so I guess people are getting use from the extra expense.

    As for riding a bicycle in Great Falls? No way.

    The bottom line is that I’d rather widen the roads and provide a bike riding shoulder than ask bikers and motorists to share narrow and dangerous roads that are more or less unsafe for motorists alone.

    Of course, that would require that land be taken on the side of the road from private owners (in some cases), trees cut down, ditches filled in and more pavement laid. I’d support that and I’d be willing to pay more in taxes to get it. The question is whether many others would do the same. If not , the roads in Great Falls are going to be too dangerous for bikers and drivers to share in my opinion.

    1. reed fawell Avatar
      reed fawell

      Good analysis Don. For me, Biking is best exercise ever – What’s most needed for Health and Life? Short Answer: Heart and Lungs powered by long lasting pain free joints – Translated as Ride Your Damn Bike!

      Area’s worst Biking Place – Right again. Those Narrow Up Down Wind Around Double Yellow Lined Great Falls Roads are – akin to trying to fly Harriers off Flattops at Flank Speed in a Typhoon – I’m not even close.

      Area’s Best Biking Place – Right Again. Talbot County Md. And so do I.

      In that regard – May I suggest as a daily sampler: Miles River Rd to Marengo Road to Gregory Road to end of Bruffs Island Road and back again to Point of Origin, via Copper Field and Tunis Mill. That, or variant, done daily, is close to Heaven.

      For that – Heaven done daily – gotta go to South Island, NZ.

  5. cars and bikes and narrow roads do not mix no matter how much bikers want to assert their “right” to push that envelope.

    DJ covered it quite well. If you think the occasional bike on such roads is “unsafe”, consider dozens of them – each day – and at night.

    what kind of sense does that make?

    and yet – according to the law, they can do that and if you hit one – it’s gonna be your butt in a legal action.

    I’ve actually take a bike out on the roads and I’ve tried it several times over the years – and the answer always comes back the same – it’s a really dumb life risking idea – no matter the law and no matter your “right”.

    Would you, for instance, advise you kids to do that or your spouse?

    Nope – most sane people would never encourage the “innocent” to engage in that behavior – because when they do it – they are making a statement – at a risk to their own life.

    I’m very sorry the lady got killed. I’m sad every time a biker or a pedestrian gets killed and I want to see better facilities for both.

    Finally, let me point out something.

    From an economic development perspective – if you want high tech to come to Va – high tech wants young educated workers and young educated workers want bike and ped facilities.

    consider bike/ped facilities to be well worth the “investment”.

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “consider bike/ped facilities to be well worth the “investment”.”.

    Hallelujah!

    Every dwelling being built in Fairfax County ought to have a “bike/ped” proffer attached for the single purpose of retrofitting existing roads to be more biker / pedestrian friendly.

    My bet is that the value of the homes would rise by more than the cost of the proffer if this plan were followed for 10 years.

  7. Fairfax County is aggressively expanding bike trails and lanes where it can be done safely. The County’s home page has a like to “bike trails,” which, in turn, has links to maps. Much of the county is covered.
    Fairfax County often seeks bike trail expansion in rezoning cases and has greatly expanded bike trail access in Tysons and other big projects. Moreover, VDOT generally includes bike access in all of its road projects.
    Of course, as DJR and Larry note, not every road is safe for use by bikes. Heck, there are roads in Great Falls that aren’t safe for commuter traffic.

  8. ericthered Avatar
    ericthered

    What seems to be under-reported in coverage of this story is the fact that the driver who struck and killed her has a laundry list of recent moving violations, including multiple reckless driving charges, and almost all were knocked down to ridiculously minor charges in court due to his father’s legal and political ties. The man shouldn’t have been legal to drive the SUV that killed her in the first place.

  9. reed fawell Avatar
    reed fawell

    So she is a Martyr.

  10. The situation DJ reports in Falls church is the same in Fauquier. Here there are multiple herds of cyclists: 20 to 100 or more per herd, so it is not a question of passing just one slow moving cyclist.

    I have a vision of the Harley or Porsche club hurtling around a blind curve or over a blind hill and mowing down a dozen cyclists. It is just a question of time. 20 years ago I suggested to my Supervisor that the county start planing for bike facilities. He laughed and said “Cyclists don’t spend money”

    Since then the winery business has sprung up and the county is fillied with Limos and tour busses that do spend money. The county does not want them, either.

  11. […] given wall-to-wall coverage of the bicycling fatality of Lanie Kruszewski (see “Richmond’s First Bicycle Martyr“), the Richmond Times-Dispatch has ratcheted up to top gear on its coverage of bicycle issues. […]

  12. I am posting this comment at the request of a reader who prefers to remain anonymous. — JAB

    It will pain me when this tagline,
    And the face of this lovely young woman,
    Slip from view, off the home page of this website.

    Although someone I never met her, I will not forget her,
    And it’s my sense that many many people in Richmond and elsewhere,
    Will long remember Lanie Kruszewski, too.
    And how her short life was taken from her,
    And will work to to insure her remembrance in many ways,
    So that other bikers have a far better chance to gain more protection against her fate.

Leave a Reply