Richmond Tax Assessments: Through the Roof

by Jon Baliles

One story you will be hearing about and living through in the next week or so (if you live in the City) is that the new assessment notifications are arriving in people’s mailboxes. And they are literally though the roof.

Some areas are up from 18% in the Westover Hills area and Scott’s Addition to 20% increases in the East End, to 41% in the Fan. Sales of homes in the last year are running super high which is driving valuations.

Richie McKeithen, Richmond City Assessor, says:

Richmond is seeing an influx of people moving here from New York, DC and Philadelphia. The normal vacancy rate for homes in the city is usually between 15% and 20%. Right now, it’s around 1%.

And they’re coming here, and they’re buying property, and they have resources to buy properties at a higher value than what we have them assessed for.

Some ideas the City is looking at (or say they are looking at) are a homestead exemption, a scalable tax rate instead of a fixed one, different tax rates for residential versus business, and taxing the land value separately from the building or improvements on it. Some residents are suggesting limits on how much the assessor can raise it from year to year.

Realtor Scott Garnett said he was “perplexed as he compared the 2023 reassessments among all his properties and other neighbors around the city. Seeing the variations and the different numbers and talking to other people, there’s no rhyme or reason as to where the pricing came in at,” he said. His rental properties in the Fan District both went up by more than 20%, but his property in the Arts District didn’t change at all from the previous year.

Assessor McKeithen said each block and street are different and not all properties are the same size, etc. “He pointed to an overall 13.04% increase in taxable real property citywide, comparable to last year’s 13.35% increase. We have very low inventory compared with a high degree of actual individuals who are in the market to purchase properties, with inflation kicking in as well.”
It’s one thing for your property to go up 5% one year, 9% the next, and then 21% the next. The worry starts when your property goes up double-digits every year. Then people get quickly priced out of being able to pay taxes and are forced to sell and move or they go into arrears because they are on a fixed income. I hope those ideas the city is thinking about turn into action sooner rather than later.

Garnett sums it up best when he says he is ok with paying more, but it would also help residents to know more about where the money is going and that it is well spent to help improve the City for everyone.

“It’s a good thing. It’s a sign the city is growing. My question is, where’s the money going? You’re talking about a lot of money. When you’re adding 15-20% assessments across the board, where’s the money going? I’m fine paying more, but show me how it’s being spent, and show me how some efficiencies can be done downtown,” Garnett said.

P.S. — CBS6 also ran a good reminder that if your house has skyrocketed in assessed value in recent years, it’s a good idea to make sure your insurance is up to date and for full replacement cost. One agent said now is a good time to review coverage and while premiums may go up a bit, the cost of having work done on homes in the current market and with inflation is literally, through the roof.

P.S.S. – Of course, you can always file an appeal with the assessor’s office and compare recent sales in your neighborhood to your home’s value (more on this in a week or two), and the City also offers tax relief for the elderly and disabled.

Jon Baliles is a former Richmond City Councilman. This column has been republished with permission from RVA 5X5.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

66 responses to “Richmond Tax Assessments: Through the Roof”

  1. The real problem is that it’s all downhill from here. They left behind the areas they screwed up, but not the attitudes that screwed them up. A friend, who retired to Spokane, WA 20+ years ago, lived through the same migration of CA residents fleeing the mess they made there. Then they repeated the same mistakes. They claimed to have all the answers and viewed the original population as dumb hicks. Natives call them Californicators.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Have you been watching CA property values over the last 20+ years… 🤷‍♂️

      1. Are the dems planning to give our sovereignty over home prices to CA like they did auto sales?

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          My intention has always been to sell my house for north of $1million and move to a saner state.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Well, if you move to Spotsy don’t have a late model car… 😉

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Last new car I bought was in 2006. Oldest car I own is 1984, and isn’t even taxed anymore.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            You’re good in Spotsy then. You could own a 500k house for what the tax on a new car would be! 😉

          4. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            The next time I buy a new car, I won’t be living in Virginia.

        2. We’ll played, sir.

        3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Not possible… the Reps already gave our sovereignty to their developer campaign contributors…

          1. I beg to differ. The Dems have no problem giving away someone else’s money, rights, and sovereignty.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Republicans have been giving away my tax dollars to their rich developers friends for decades. It is Conservative wealth redistribution.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Republicans have been giving away my tax dollars to their rich developers friends for decades. It is Conservative wealth redistribution.

          4. I live in Fairfax Co. Trust me, the dems who run Fx have NO problem giving away tax dollars to developers. No problem at all.

          5. DJRippert Avatar

            Exactly. And it was Dem US Senator who insisted that the reversal of that loophole be taken out of the legislation in the ridiculously named Inflation Reduction Act.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    What might also be interesting is a map of Richmond that shows the assessment values. I suspect some parts of Richmond did not go up much on assessments.

    I do concur, more than a few cities have already seen folks leave for less expensive locales and when they leave, business that survives serving them, also leave and you end up with a hollowed out city. We’ve got more than a few already.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Localities are required by the Virginia constitution to assess real property at fair market value. They are required by law to tax 100 percent of the assessed value. This is one of the major drawbacks of the property tax. Your home’s market value may be increasing, but, for you to realize that increase in value, you have to sell. If you have no interest in selling, that increase in value does you no good. In fact, it is a disadvantage because it increases your tax bill.

    Local governments can offset increases in tax bills resulting from rising assessments by lowering the tax rate. Some skeptics on this blog will claim that will not happen, but Henrico did it this year. Even the city of Richmond has done it. In 2000, the rate was $1.40. And in 2004, city council reduced it five cents from $1.379. From there, it has been reduced to the current $1.20. As a former member of city, Jon Baliles certainly knows this. He should have mentioned that as a potential source of some relief from increasing assessments.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Spotsylvania BOS spends an ample amount of time alluding to the “equalized tax rate” when they set the tax rates.

      Spotsy “targets” vehicles. If you have a new and/or pricey vehicle, it’s considered de facto proof of your “wealth”. I would say that 1/2 our county tax bill is for the vehicles. We have a 2006, a 2017 and a 2021. The 2021 gets taxed at dang near a thousand if I recall correctly.

      Folks ought to pay attention to BOTH the real estate rate AND the personal property/car tax rate.

      1/2 or more of our taxes go to schools and another 1/3 to public safety.

      I suspect Richmond is similar and I also suspect that cutting back on either is a no go.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        “Folks ought to pay attention to BOTH the real estate rate AND the personal property/car tax rate.”

        And when you do, you just learned why Virginia real estate taxes are so “low”.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Yes. I suspect the ones that are low are like Spotsy where the car tax is positively obscene…

          1. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Helps to fool newcomers who aren’t familiar with the personal property tax, because most states do not have one.

            I recall my dad complaining about it when we moved to Manassas.

            Should’ve done your research, dad!

          2. 26 states have a personal property tax.

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            True. Virginia’s is the highest among all of them.

            Between the car tax, the radar detector ban, the reckless driving laws, the HOT tolls, and the lack of road infrastructure..

            I just get the impression that they really don’t like cars in this state.

          4. And they definitely don’t like motorcycles.

          5. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Several years ago one of my coworkers was riding his motorcycle and hit a patch of oil and spun out. A cop saw it.

            I told him, “I’m surprised that the cop didn’t write you a reckless driving ticket!”

            I was only half kidding.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            The really outrageous thing is that almost none of that car tax money goes for transportation.

            Virginia is one of but 4 states where the counties ARE responsible for local roads.

            In those states, a substantial road tax is imposed at the local level to pay for local roads.

            In Virginia, counties ARE responsible for secondary roads beyond what VDOT will do. It’s totally up to the county to put more money into improving Byrd era roads.

          7. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            It IS outrageous that the car tax doesn’t go for roads.

            One thing I’ve never read any good explanation about: You’ve heard, I’m sure, that the state took over maintenance of the roads because the counties didn’t have the money.

            Unexplained is how the state had the money to maintain these roads when the counties were too broke to do it.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            They instituted a gas tax, no?

            https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/byrd.cfm

          9. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Did they? Why couldn’t the counties have instituted a gas tax, if that was all it took to fix the funding problem?

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            Dillon Rule state…

          11. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Oh yea, that. Byrd sure took full advantage, didn’t he?

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            The way that Byrd did it, all counties folks had to pay gas taxes , they could not “opt out”.

            Then the state was using the collected money to address the roads in those counties.

            A similar thing has been done with schools and public safety and other “Constitutional officers”.

            This is not an issue unique to Virginia. Virtually every state has to deal with how to get it’s poorer rural counties to provide infrastructure and services.

          13. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Sure, but Byrd didn’t allow cities to transfer maintenance responsibility for their roads to the state.

            This whole thing was a calculated move by Byrd to increase the power of his political machine.

            And very few if any other states have DOTs that are responsible for practically every road in the state save for those in cities, some towns, and some counties.

          14. LarrytheG Avatar

            Not sure, but I think both counties and cities can choose to take over local roads or let VDOT.

            Much has changed since Byrd and the GA has always had the option of changing the rules and has chosen not.

            I will also point out that in places with growth of subdivisions – everyone and their dog seems to “like” the idea of VDOT maintaining them instead of HOA or county.

          15. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Nope, cities have NEVER had the option of letting VDOT maintain their roads.

            And it’s asinine that VDOT funds are used to maintain subdivision streets that don’t serve as through streets.

          16. LarrytheG Avatar

            yep. The folks that live in subdivisions end up having their gas tax money split for their subdivision road and general public surface streets. Folks that live in apartments or gated communities , all of their gas taxes go for public streets.

          17. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Townhouse communities too, almost all of them have streets maintained by the HOA.

          18. LarrytheG Avatar

            In Spotsy, we have dozens of older subdivisions that we not built to VDOT standards and not taken into the State System. The owners did not pay the extra required to do that – but now they come in front of the BOS claiming that they pay their gas taxes and are “entitled” to VDOT-maintained streets for their subdivision streets.

            Over time, the county and VDOT have established rules and priorities.

            Last I heard, the roads had to be brought up to VDOT standards and it was paid for by cost sharing between the owners, the county and VDOT.

            All owners had to participate.

            And it is not inexpensive, Building a road , even a subdivision road to modern VDOT standards is expensive. It can be hundreds of thousands of dollars per mile.

            An individual landowner might owe 10, 20K as his share to do the work.

            Now days, in most urban/suburban counties, the roads must be built to state standards and it adds substantially to the cost of the homes.

            Even then, after built, the maintenance is essentially “free” a heck of a deal!

            This is very different from what is done in most states where most subdivision roads are HOA and “county roads” are paid for with local taxes even as people still pay gas taxes for state-maintained roads.

            When folks “compare” Virginia gas taxes with other states that also have gas taxes PLUS local county road taxes, it’s not really an apples-to-apples comparison.

          19. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            There were some single-family homes in Manassas City where the HOA was supposed to maintain the road. But the HOA was mismanaged and did not set aside any funds for maintenance.

            Last I heard the HOA and the City came to some sort of agreement, if I recall correctly, the City agreed to maintain the road and funded that maintenance by charging an additional road maintenance assessment on the property taxes.

            I think even in the states where counties maintain “county roads” they get some funding from the state via gas taxes, just like cities in Virginia do.

            And of course you have Virginia counties taking out revenue bonds to build or improve roads, because they can’t wait for VDOT to do it.

          20. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Spotsy, $5.42 per $100
            Prince william, $3.70 per $100

            Yea, it’s a little high, isn’t it…

            EDIT: They also tax boats at ridiculous levels, too. $6.52 per $100 compared to PWC’s $0.00001 per $100.

          21. LarrytheG Avatar

            yep. And I point out that it’s a “conservative” BOS that seems to focus on the real estate “equalized rate”.

            $5.42 is $542.00 per 10K of car value, right?

            See, Gilmore was trying to stop this – at the state level , rather than stay out of it and let local voters weigh in on it. All Gilmore did was help “hide” the abuse.

          22. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Well, I can offer this:

            You get two plates in Virginia.

            Cops don’t seem to care when the front one is missing.

            Figure it out from there…

          23. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I once saw “FARM USE” tags on a Honda Civic. It looked like such a piece of junk I figured they were avoiding the safety inspection, not the car tax.

          24. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’ve seen a couple “parked” on a shoulder of late. I figure troopers might have had a role

          25. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            As I recall “farm use” tags will soon have to be issued by the DMV, and you’ll have to state where your farm is when you apply for one.

          26. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hadn’t heard that but how does DMV know you actually live on a farm? And even if you do, what justifies it on most surface streets anyhow?

          27. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Not sure, but it’s certainly an improvement over what we have now, which are basically unregistered (and likely uninsured) vehicles sporting untraceable “farm use” tags.

          28. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            The justification is the need to move between fields separated by some distance, go into town to get supplies or equipment, or haul crops or livestock to market. For example, my late father-in -law had an old flat bed truck he used to haul tobacco from his farm to the warehouse for sale. That was the only time he used the truck and he had “farm use” plates on it.

            Beginning next July, anyone desiring “Farm Use” exemption must fill out an application with DMV naming the farm, acreage, and commodities, etc. https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?221+ful+CHAP0051&221+ful+CHAP0051

          29. LarrytheG Avatar

            My grandad had such a truck and used it for similar things. I am not sure that he had to get it inspected.

            I might also wonder how such vehicles deal with DMV insurance requirements.

  4. john b harvie Avatar
    john b harvie

    Would love to know what my old house at 1523 Hanover (just east of Lombardy) would be assessed at now. Or my aunt’s at 1110 Grove just above Harrison.

    These types of houses had withstood the depression era and were well kept up. My dad was a WWI Vet mid-level city official (having worked in the CCC in the depths after Army discharge) and my mom was an English teacher at Binford JHS. Things were tight but families pulled together to make it. Don’t know how we’d have survived a huge tax burden.

  5. The City of Richmond also has one of the highest real estate tax rates in the Commonwealth, at $1.200 per $100.

    There are only a few localities with higher rates (none of them counties):

    Falls Church – $1.355
    Hampton – $1.240
    Manassas – $1.460 (or higher depending upon district levies)
    Manassas Park – $1.550
    Newport News – $1.220
    Norfolk – $1.250
    Petersburg – $1.350
    Portsmouth – $$1.300
    Roanoke – $1.220

    The highest County rate appears to be Fairfax at $1.15 per $100.

    And no offense intended to anyone, but I would not want to live in any of those places.

    PS – The above are 2018 (FY 2019) rates, which was the latest year for which I could find all localities in Virginia compiled in one document. A lot of Towns have their own real estates tax which is tacked onto the County rate.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      It would be interesting to plot the tax rate (per $100 of value) by locality against the percentage of people who voted for Terry McAuliffe (or Biden). I strongly suspect that there would be a strong correlation. Then, it would be interesting to plot the tax rate (per $100) against the SOL scores in the locality. With a few exceptions, I strongly suspect a strong negative correlation.

      1. I just plotted a graph of SOL Score Rankings (1-132) vs localities’ tax rates for the 132 school districts. There does not appear to be any correlation at all. The graph looks like an EKG of a person with an irregular heartbeat.

        It surprised me a bit.

      2. I think you are probably correct on both counts.

        RE: SOL Scores – Rankings among 132 Virginia School Districts:

        Petersburg – #132
        Richmond – #131
        Roanoke – #120
        Norfolk – #118
        Newport News – #117
        Portsmouth – #115
        Manassas – #105
        Manassas Park – #102

        Hampton is not as bad at #60 – at least they are in the top half.

        Falls Church (#1) would be the ‘exception that proves the rule’, as they say.

      3. I just plotted a graph of SOL Score Rankings (1-132) vs localities’ tax rates for the 132 school districts. There does not appear to be any correlation at all. The graph looks like an EKG of a person with an irregular heartbeat.

        It surprised me a bit.

          1. This should still be [barely] readable when you zoom in on it:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b4e54701af854c3333bbf7c5535c282be4ff674f18243b11aa77fbe58bdadba9.jpg

            PS – Mr. Bacon, I can email you the Spreadsheet if you’d like.

          2. This is a jpg file made from a pdf file which was made from an Excel Spreadsheet. I hope it’s readable.

            The SOL Rankings are from the scores included the table posted by Capt. Sherlock a few days ago (from #1=Falls Church to #132=Richmond).

            Capt. Sherlock’s table did not include numerical rankings, but I copied the scores into a Spreadsheet and added a column to rank the the localities by score.

            I’ll try to post my spreadsheet next.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/700f629fdc7bf106ac3dfd5f00a12d07968f3007c9abc34bdd561e1457ed396e.jpg

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Since property values vary widely depending on the location, I wonder if it might show a correlation using the average tax revenue per dwelling (if such a figure is available), or school spending per student, instead of the tax rate.

          4. Interesting. I might play around with that. It’ll probably be easier to determine average tax revenue per capital, but I’ll see what I can find.

            Spending per student should be easy to find.

          5. Interesting. I might play around with that. It’ll probably be easier to determine average tax revenue per capita, but I’ll see what I can find.

            Spending per student should be easy to find.

          6. This should still be [barely] readable when you zoom in on it:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b4e54701af854c3333bbf7c5535c282be4ff674f18243b11aa77fbe58bdadba9.jpg

            PS – Mr. Bacon, I can email you the Spreadsheet if you’d like.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Interesting. Maybe money isn’t the major driver of educational success.

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    The first question is, would you sell it for that? Would you buy it for that? Often the answer is yes, making it per se fair market value. Then the only issue left is consistency, where the holes often do appear. On that basis I’ve filed some successful appeals.

    Then there is this fascinating report done by the state Tax Department: https://www.tax.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/2020-assessment-sales-ratio-study.pdf

    It tells us that Richmond City’s assessed values lag its actual sales prices substantially, more than 13%, and thus its “effective” tax rate on true value was $1.04. Great report, too often ignored. Mr. Baliles might want to keep this report earmarked….

Leave a Reply