by James C. Sherlock

Richmond residents should note that:

The number of employees at City of Richmond in year 2020 was 4,140.

Average annual salary was $56,410 and median salary was $50,001. City of Richmond average salary is 20 percent higher than USA average and median salary is 15 percent higher than USA median.

Median per capita income in Richmond in 2020 dollars was $35,862. Median household income was $51,421. Approximately 21% of Richmond citizens live below the poverty level.

The City of Richmond’s FY 2023 total General Fund budget is estimated to be $836,015,828, an 8.18% increase when compared to the FY 2022.

The increases in spending represent a projected balanced budget based on estimated increases in revenues. Those in turn are driven by a projected increase in General Property Taxes – notably a 13.13% increase in real estate tax collections; increases in Sales Tax (9.27%); and increases in Prepared Meals Taxes (15.95%).

Those increases in tax collections are largely from Richmond taxpayers. How many got double-digit increases in income in 2022? Just asking.

Now the Richmond City Council is about to approve negotiations with its unions on pay and benefits. The RPS, of course has gone much further than the City Council in putting everything on the table.

Those costs are not in the budget.

The Board of Richmond Public Schools (RPS) has gone even further. RPS projects 3,408 employees in FY 23, more than 1,2o0 of whom will be administrators. Eighty-three percent of RPS FY 23 expenditures will go to pay, benefits and other compensation.

RPS General Fund Expenditure by Category – FY 23

The School Board committed ritual suicide with its December resolution that opens the day-to-day operations of the schools to union negotiations.

The city’s General Fund must pay for those increased costs. It can only do that by increasing local taxes and fees. The City Council will be on the hook to pay for the School’s Board’s profligacy as well as its own.

Both inflation and union negotiations over pay, benefits and, in the schools, much else can be projected to have outsized effects on Richmond taxpayers.

Solidarity Forever indeed.

RPS Budget Basics. We will focus now on RPS, realizing that the city will negotiate with its own unions but that RPS will be the cost driver.

RPS has two budgets: an Operating Budget and a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Budget.

The RPS Operating Budget covers all the day-to-day costs of running the school division: teacher salaries, curricular materials, transportation, and so on. In FY23, the RPS Operating Budget is projected by the Superintendent to be $554.4 million.

The RPS Operating Budget has a General Fund portion and a Special Revenue Fund portion. In FY23, the Superintendent’s Budget (not yet approved by the School Board) has about $362.6 million budgeted in the General Fund and about $191.8 million in the Special Revenue Fund.

The RPS General Fund covers most of the school division’s day-to-day operations. It is resourced nearly entirely by revenues from the Commonwealth and the City of Richmond.

The Superintendent’s Budget anticipates the City General Fund will provide 57% ($207 million) to the RPS General Fund and State Revenue will contribute 42%.

RPS General Fund – Superintendent’s Budget
RPS City Appropriation – Superintendent’s Budget

The Mayor’s budget currently has a $185 million placeholder for those funds, level with the previous year.   There is a $15 million reserve in that budget.

State revenue for Richmond schools is forecast to decline year-over-year relative to the rest of the state because of a flat ADM and a significant increase in Richmond’s state-calculated ability-to-pay relative to other jurisdictions.

RPS Union Negotiation Variables. Consider the fiscal impact of changes negotiated with teachers unions to hours and scheduling, work rules and “quality of life” issues. Let’s say the work rules change shorten daily student-teacher contact hours to NYC’s current 3.75 hours.

How many more teachers will that require? And, revenue aside, where are they going to come from?

Richmond City Council, which must write the checks that result from School Board negotiations, is moving towards a much more conservative policy that puts only pay and benefits on the table.

But even those cost increases must be paid for.

Revenues. Tax proceeds are the primary source of revenue for the City’s General Fund.

  • The bulk of tax revenue consists of general property taxes, which include real, personal, and business property. Tax proceeds are divided into general property taxes and other local taxes. The official real property tax rate is $1.20 per $100 assessed valuation. In 2019, only 42.6% of housing units were owner occupied. The national average was 64.1%.  Rising taxes are passed on as rent increases to renters.
  • How about citizen ability to pay? Net and comparative real estate tax information from tax rates.org:

Richmond City collects, on average, 1.05% of a property’s assessed fair market value as (real) property tax. Richmond City has one of the highest median property taxes in the United States, and is ranked 394th of the 3143 counties in order of median property taxes. The average yearly property tax paid by Richmond City residents amounts to about 3.46% of their yearly income. Richmond City is ranked 387th of the 3143 counties for property taxes as a percentage of median income.

  • Personal property taxes includes delinquent personal property tax collections. Personal property taxes are levied on the tangible property of individuals and businesses. For individuals, this tax is primarily on automobiles and recreational vehicles.
  • Business personal property includes motor vehicles, furniture, computers, and fixtures. Business machinery and tools are taxed separately, as permitted by law. The tax rate on all personal property is $3.70 per $100 assessed value.
  • Other property taxes primarily consist of machinery and tools tax, with minimal revenue added by the mobile home title tax.
  • Other local taxes include consumer taxes (such as local option sales tax and prepared food tax), utility taxes on electric and gas consumption, state distributed taxes (i,e. communications tax), and business and other taxes.
  • Intergovernmental revenue is composed primarily of payments from the Commonwealth. They include:

• State Payment for Social Services
• State House Bill 599 (Public Safety Revenue)
• Reimbursement for State Shared Expenses (incl. state share of educational revenue)
• All Other Intergovernmental Revenue

  • Fines and forfeits.

Ability to pay and trends.

The Commonwealth calculates ability to pay for each school district each year.  The formulas are controversial, but the data generated in support of the calculations are useful in this discussion.

So, ADM went down and every thing else used to calculate ability-to-pay went up relative to the rest of the state. The change in the ability-to-pay composite index from .4688 to .5139 ensures Richmond a smaller share of the pot of state revenue, whatever that may turn out to be.

The increases in population, true value of property, AGI and taxable retail sales are already reflected in the city’s FY 23 budget.

So the citizens of Richmond and its visitors (sales taxes) are on the hook for union contract negotiations.

As I said, not a pretty picture. But Richmond citizens voted for the members of the City Council and School Board.

As ye sow, so shall you reap.

If reap is the word I am looking for.

Updated May 19 at 10:40 AM


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

21 responses to “Richmond, Its Unions and Taxes”

  1. Lefty665 Avatar

    Could it be an anagram of “reap” you’re looking for? 🙂

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Pear? Nice fruit, like in “nice pear you have there.”

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        It would have taken a lot of different letters to get to melons, and fruits is fruits:)

  2. John Martin Avatar
    John Martin

    makes sense to me……..schools have been underfunded for years

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Richmond schools?

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Yeah okay, but more important, Daylight Savings Time, make it permanent, or get rid of it completely?

    Personally, I’m for abolishing time zones. What with GPS in just about everything, there’s no reason not to have Absolute Sun Time. So, if it’s 12:00 noon in Norfolk, it’s 11:57:30 AM in Richmond. Since most people don’t wander more than 25 miles, the seconds won’t matter.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Oh boy, making what time it is another variable, what could go wrong? But I like the idea of going to Norfolk to get a 2 1/2 minute jump on the opening bell over stock traders in Richmond:)

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, we could do the smart thing and set the western boundary of each time zone at 7.5W + n*15 degrees and then redraw State lines based on lines of longitude, respecting the time zone boundaries. Then use Standard Time.

  4. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    If federal contractors cannot make contributions to federal candidates, what policy reason would permit labor union PACs or officials make campaign contributions to local officials that will need to approve collective bargaining agreement?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Three words: The, Virginia, Way. Rearrange at will.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Virginia law has no restrictions on campaign donations to state and local candidates.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is a fair synopsis of Richmond finances. Your article is based on the assumption that city council will have to provide the funds to pay for any contract negotiated between the school board and its employees. That is not necessarily the case. As I pointed out in a comment to one of your earlier installments, the answer to the question of what happens if a city council or board of supervisors refuses to provide the funds to pay for provisions negotiated by a school board with its union has not been tested yet. For example, for the upcoming fiscal year, the Richmond mayor has proposed providing the school system with less than it asked for and has proposed that the increase put into a contingency fund, with the school system forced to request specific amounts. https://richmond.com/news/local/stoneys-budget-proposal-includes-15m-more-for-schools-raises-for-all-employees/article_cae31a6a-4dfd-5d65-87b6-99f5904edd08.html

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      Dick, that is a fascinating question. I would assume that ultimate authority over any contract, absent a specific delegation to an executive, is the city council or board of supervisors. Assuming that the contract recognizes that, it should not be approved and final until the elected body approve and funds it and the union membership ratifies it.

      What makes no sense would be for the management bargaining team not to know what the elected officials will and will not accept. If, for example, the elected board made it clear that it would not approve wage increases that exceeded 3% per year over three years, it would be irresponsible to reach an agreement that called for 4% raises per year for three years. Indeed, if I were the union bargainer, I’d be hesitant to reach agreement for an amount that I knew would not be approved by the loacl government.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      In the legislation that authorized local public employee bargaining, school boards are set separately from counties, cities, and towns. Last fall, when I did some research regarding the status of public employee bargaining, upon inquiry, I was told that the local governing bodies and school districts would be negotiating with unions separately. School boards have general authority to oversee the schools. Sec. 22.1-71 declares school boards to be corporate bodies and to have, among other powers, the power to contract and be contracted with.

      My assumption is the opposite of yours (tmt and Sherlock). I assume that schools can enter into a negotiated contract with unions without the participation of the council or board of supervisors or approval of them. That assumption has not been put to the test, of course, and it may be wrong. I agree that it would be foolish or irresponsible for a school district not to involve the governing body, at least informally, but that has not stopped governing bodies in the past. I predict some real showdowns and, perhaps, trips to the courthouse. It will not happen this year, but it could come to a hear next spring when local government budgets are being developed.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        “The school boards have authority to contract or be contracted with.” The corollary is “if it is within their budgets”.

        As long as school divisions do not have taxing authority, they are not at liberty to sign a contract raising costs without county, city or town council approval of the budget for that contract unless they already have the obligatory authority in the current year municipal budget.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          I don’t think that is accurate. If the school board enters into a contractual arrangement that was not contemplated in its existing budget, it is still obligated to make any payments required under that arrangement. It can request city council to provide additional funding to cover those payments, but if the city council refuses, the school board is still obligated. After all, it has funding that the city has provided and the city has no control over how it spends the money it has provided. Therefore, it must “find” the funding for the new contractual arrangement within its current funding. In other words, it may have to give up some discretionary spending in order to meet its new obligations.

          The only case law I could find in this respect does directly address the relationship between the city and the school board. In Bacon v. City of Richmond, the Fourth Circuit of Appeals dealt with a case in which the city was being sued because it would not provide additional funds to fully fund the terms of an ADA settlement reached by the school board. The city contended that it was the school board’s fault that the schools were out of compliance and that the schools had not notified the city of the noncompliance. The circuit court found for the city. After noting, “To impose funding liability thus places the City between a rock and a hard place,” the court concluded, “As with any contract, settlement agreements are generally enforceable against any signatory, including school boards. Thus the settlement terms ultimately reached by plaintiffs and the School Board as a result of arms-length negotiations are obligations of the School Board.” https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1219458.html

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      My assumption is that the City Council will be represented in any negotiations with School Board unions. And that the City Council will approve the funding before any contract is signed.

      As I wrote, I can’t find any indication of how the negotiating teams will be selected. If mine is a bad assumption, then the City Council and the School Board will be making a fundamental mistake.

      I am also fearful that the government negotiators might not take the time to research the true costs of labor rules changes that are not directly pegged as increases in pay and benefits. The example that I offered:

      “Let’s say the work rules change shorten daily student-teacher contact hours to NYC’s current 3.75 hours. How many more teachers will that require? And, revenue aside, where are they going to come from?”

      The “revenue aside” comment was there to point out that work rule changes will be very costly. Figuring out exactly how costly before signing the contract will take expertise that there is no reason to believe the City or School Board possess since they have not faced it before.

  6. The people running Richmond city schools are convinced that they’re doing nothing wrong, that all their problems are the fault of somebody else, and that there’s no problem that more taxpayer money can’t solve. That’s before teachers unions get foothold.

    It’s hard to imagine that Richmond schools could get any worse. But it looks like… things are about to get worse.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      It truly does look like a death spiral. For the kids as well as the taxpayers.

    2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      We will soon see the birth of Detroit upon the James. And they have adamantly demanded it. I’m happy they’ll get exactly what they have wanted and voted for.
      Know when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em if you own property in the RVA.

  7. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Things have really sunk. It wasn’t that many years ago, when then-BOS-Chairman Gerry Connolly singularly stopped Fairfax County Public Schools from buying and remodeling a second HQ building. And there was always a back and forth with the School Board on the rest of the budget. Now, the proposal is to fund everything requested. And that includes about $100 million more with 10,000 fewer students.

    Reagan was right – Government is the enemy.

Leave a Reply