Richmond, Get Your Act Together

by James A. Bacon

The Richmond region has never been an “it” Sunbelt metropolis like Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte or Raleigh-Durham, but it did plug away pretty consistently, racking up better-than-average economic growth year after year. That was fine by most of us natives who enjoyed the fruits of moderate prosperity without the hassles of super-heated growth. But the time for complacency is over. We need to get our act together.

Two new reports drive the message home.

First, the Brookings Institution’s Metro Monitor shows that Richmond ranked in the bottom quintile for economic performance among the nation’s largest metropolitan areas in the 3rd quarter of 2011.

A longer-term measure of economic potential, “Best Performing Cities of 2011,” published by the Milken Institute, measures “where America’s jobs are created and sustained.” Richmond ranked among the Top 25 losers, diving from a 79th ranking last year to 119.

What’s going on? There are many transient reasons but one enduring one: insufficient innovation. The Richmond economy has given birth to relatively few fast-growth “gazelles,” the midsized companies that create the most jobs and wealth in the U.S. economy. Why would that be? Part  of the answer is that we have no dominant industry clusters that spark innovation. But the problem, I think, runs deeper. Richmond is late to the game in talking about innovation ta all. The conversation about how to breed creativity has finally begun in earnest, but we’re 10 or 20 years behind more progressive communities.

When I left Virginia Business magazine in 2002, I helped create the program and line up speakers for a conference, “Virginia 2020,” which highlighted strategies for creating economic prosperity through innovation and productivity. We had great, cutting-edge topics and an excellent line-up of speakers. And the event was a total flop. It was embarrassing — no, humiliating. There were a number of reasons for the fiasco. It didn’t help to hold the event on the first anniversary of 9/11. It didn’t help that the event organizer had credibility issues relating to a previous business failure. (Close-knit Richmonders are less forgiving of failure than inhabitants of other regions.) But I’m also convinced that a lot of people just didn’t “get” it. Innovation? Productivity? In an era before Richard Florida warmed up the audience with his brilliant thesis about the rise of the creative class, people simply didn’t understand what we were driving at.

Times have changed, and so has the conversation. Slowly — painfully slowly — but surely, we’re getting some things right. People are moving back downtown into the region’s creative core. The City of Richmond is fostering the creation of a vibrant arts district. Cool development is taking place along the downtown Canal. The Virginia Biotechnology Research Park is gaining critical mass. The region is finally coalescing around a vision for the James River as an incredible recreation and entertainment asset. We have vibrant cultural events, from the French Film Festival (the largest outside France) to the Folk Festival to the James River Writer’s Festival.

As Richmond slowly morphs into the kind of community the creative class will find attractive, the next generation of corporate leaders is emerging. Health Diagnostics Laboratory, which identifies risk factors and biomarkers for personalized health, is a phenomenal success story. So is Bostwick Laboratories, which provides world-class clinical pathology laboratory services. And so is Tridium, whose Niagara Framework has become the global-standard software platform for building automation systems. Those are my favorites; there are others. We just need a few more.

I am confident that Richmond eventually will reinvent itself. The renaissance will not come from city elites acting on recommendations reflecting conventional thinking and packaged in some highly paid consultant’s report. It won’t come from building a new baseball stadium or establishing a (semi) high-speed rail link to Washington, D.C., or trying to copy some other city’s success story. It will bubble from the ground up and the results will surprise us all.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Richmond, Get Your Act Together”

  1. I think way too much is being made of the reverse migration into downtown areas. While it is certainly happening, I think it is more of a demographic quirk than a structural change.

    The Baby Boomers’ babies are known by many names. I prefer the Echo Boomers. While precise birth date ranges are unavailable I see the period from about 1975 to 2000 as the range of Echo Boomer birthdays.

    Just as the Baby Boomers were a population “bulge” which changed many things in American society, so too are the Echo Boomers. For one thing, the increased applications to colleges and universities occasioned by these Echo Boomers has made once obtainable admissions to Virginia colleges and universities much more difficult to get. However, this too will change. My understanding is that last Spring was the predicted peak of applications to American four year colleges. The number of applications, as I’ve heard it, will start to decrease and continue to decrease for some time to come.

    If you accept the 1975 to 2000 birth date range, then the Echo Boomers are between 11 and 36 years old now. The arithmetic center of the range is at age 24. I believe that this population bulge is what’s driving the renewed interest in people living in downtown locales. From San Francisco to Washington, DC , downtown neighborhoods have never been more vibrant.

    However, what the Gods of demographic giveth they also taketh away. As these 24 years olds get older, get married and have kids the attractions of downtown neighborhoods will become less obvious. From an awareness of weak schools to having less free time for the local music scene, new parents throughout history have found that parenthood changes their world.

    I expect the Renaissance of downtown living to continue for a few more years. Then, I expect it to wane. First, the near suburbs and then the more distant suburbs will take the baton of Echo Boomer tastes.

  2. Groveton, well said. Ask most parents who are residents of Fairfax or Arlington Counties why they moved where they did. Quite often, the answer is “because of the schools.” And, needless to say, parenthood consumes virtually all non-work time, most especially in the first 10-to-15 years. There is just is no more time for taking in the urban culture when their kid’s soccer, basketball, music, scouts, etc., start filing the days and evenings.

  3. TMT:

    Wouldn’t it be nice for a region to think in terms of “life cycle” settlement patterns?

    Accept that the young adults will want to live in an urban locale. Young parents in nearby suburbs. Older parents in bigger houses with more space. Empty nesters back in the nearby suburbs or back downtown. Retirees in small, comfortable, affordable places well off the beaten path of jobs but still accessible to the kids and grandkids.

    You could almost imagine it working in the DC area with:

    1. Chinatown / DuPont Circle / Adams Morgan
    2. Arlington / Bethesda / Reston
    3. Springfield / Rockville / McLean / Sterling
    4. Poolsville / Leesburg / Stafford

    Maybe the idea of mixed use communities is wrong. Maybe the idea should be “age relevant” communities connected to each other with reliable transportation.

    People are going to move as their lives change. Pretending that won’t happen is folly.

    Different generations has different ideas of good living. The loud music from the baars at 2:00 AM is a plus for the twenty-somethings but anathema for the retired set.

    Let each community allocate some of their taxes to what they want. The retirees want more for health care and police and less for schools – fine. The older parents want more for parks and schools and less for underwriting the arts – fine.

    Age based settlement patterns.

    I like it.

  4. one of the most “creative” places I’ve ever been to was Taos, NM. The town is full of ‘creative’ people.. actually INFESTED is a better word.

    The primary grocery store makes Whole Foods look like kind of processed and adulterated foods store…

    I could hardly find something to eat that I recognized!

    I’m not sure that Mr. Florida’s treatise carried to it’s logical conclusion will yield an economically vibrant area …. most “creative” people values their creations more than they value money.

    You want to “create” things that are more commodity than art.

    Charlotte, Raleigh, Atlanta don’t attract the young because they are “artsy-fartsy”… they come for 21 century jobs… and the companies that locate there are looking for smart and talented young people – as a workforce not artists in residence.

    we need to “re-work” what is intended by the word “creative” because it’s not the kind of creative that is in Taos (IMHO).

  5. Larry, by “creative” people, Florida is not referring only to artists. He is referring also to scientists, educators, researchers, engineers, entrepreneurs and business people with the skills to solve complex problems. As I recall, the creative class comprises roughly 30% of the workforce.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Jim,
    Richmond has several serious problems that make it a laggard, despite what its self-appointed pooh-bahs say:
    (1) There is no strong research univesity here. VCU has some but doesn’t make the elite list. U of Richmond doesn’t do any. Austin has U of T, RDU has Duke, Chapel Hill and NC State, Atlanta has Georgia Tech, Emory and other schools. All are head and shoulders above VCU.
    (2) The Biotech Park is a joke It is really an office park masquerading as a research center and a way to give old time bureaucrats sinecures.
    (3) The institution with the most patents is Philip Morris and the vast major have nothing to do with the betterment of mankind, just keeping the addicts addicted and the cancer wards filled.
    (4) Richmond is too close to DC.

    Despite all the promotional bullshit from the chamber of commerce (like I.E.** “we are really innovative if we say so three times), the city might be better accepting itself for what it is.

  7. re: “creative”…. it’s a bit of a misnomer….

    I used to work at a Navy R&D lab with hundreds of math/physics/hard science folks who while “creative” would be perceived as nothing like those who create non-science art.

    the folks who “create” are those who produce … who innovate… who change the way the world works – as opposed to those who “create” art which is important but not so much as a creator of jobs… a multiplier of technology… moving the economic ball forward.

    it would be a somewhat sterile world with only the technocrats and no artists but Florida’s vision of what makes a city “work” is off the mark…indicates he really does not understand that scientists / engineers are not “creative” in the same way that artists are.

    Just one for instance… toll road technology is not “art” by any stretch of the imagination.. and I would suspect if you had a “team” of technologists and artists that the “big” issue for the toll gantries would be their ugliness..and we’d have months/years of delays while the artists argued about how to make them pretty…

    we need art… but it’s an amenity not a economic force…that vitalizes urban areas.

  8. Peter’s points are well taken – especially the point about the lack of a research university.

    However, these issues can be overcome.

    First, build a place where educated young people want to live and play. Richmond is bigger than Austin and it doesn’t take an MIT student to appreciate music. Cram all the youth – oriented bars onto a single street. It should look something like this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz3BGfUJGg8

    Second, you need a base of “angel” investors. Generally wealthy people willing to make relatively small investments in risky start-ups. A city-supported incubator downtown would be useful. An incubator is a set of common offices which are given to very early stage start-ups of leased at low prices. Sometimes, the incubator takes a small share of every company in the incubator and hopes for a home run or two to pay the expenses.

    Recruit Richmond natives at non-Richmond schools. Find the brightest kids from Richmond high schools who are getting technical degrees in college. Give them summer jobs in the incubator. Once they graduate, place them with the companies in the incubator. Hint: the incubator needs to be near affordable housing and the street with the music and the bars.

    Go to DC, NY or Boston and bring down some VC executives to speak at the incubator and to look at the companies. Get that first round funded.

    Keep this up until one of these start-ups hits it big. That’s the seed. AOL was a seed in NoVa. Now, Living Social is going great guns and will be the next seed. Meanwhile Ted Leonosis has put together a $450M venture fund with explicit favoritism to DC start-ups.

    This is the kind of thing that can take 10 years to take hold. And it may always be a minor part of the Richmond economy. However, it will eventually work and it might become a fairly strong center of innovation.

    However, having said all that, I’d put my money on Charlottesville if I had to pick a place in Central Virginia for innovation.

  9. okay.. okay.. I’ve had enough.

    are you folks talking about the Government doing these things?

    or are you saying the private sector has to?

    what is the role of government here?

    what specific things should Richmond / Va be doing … ??

    specific things…. now…

  10. Something like this … but for Richmond …

    http://www.iqt.org/about-iqt/history.html

  11. Groveton, I like the “migratory” paths you set out. The only thing I would add is for those retirees who decide to move from this very expensive and crowded place to other areas of the U.S. The people I bought each of my three Washington-area homes each did this.
    Peter, call it a dumb hunch, but I can see renewed interest in tobacco as research proves it has the potential to be used in medicines and other products.

Leave a Reply