Richmond Biking Gains Momentum

Bike lane on Lombardy Street in Richmond. Photo credit: Urban Richmond.

Having given wall-to-wall coverage of the bicycling fatality of Lanie Kruszewski (see “Richmond’s First Bicycle Martyr“), the Richmond Times-Dispatch has ratcheted up to top gear on its coverage of bicycle issues. Publisher Thomas Silvestri has been plugging bicycle-friendly policies in the weekend op-ed pages for some time, and now even the newsroom is treating it as a serious issue.

It’s about time, considering that 2.2% of all commuting trips — purportedly the highest percentage in the state — occur on bicycles, often under hostile riding conditions. The most visible project is the Virginia Capital Trail running along the James River and linking Richmond with Williamsburg. While that undoubtedly will become a great recreational resource, it won’t alter the transportation picture. The real change will come from making streets and roads hospitable to utility travel — people using bikes instead of cars to ride to work or run errands.

We are seeing the opening salvos in what will become a long-running conflict to redefine the rights of bikers on streets and roads. There will be two main fronts: cultural and infrastructure. As the Kruszewski tragedy made painfully clear, bikes and vehicle drivers have to get accustomed to sharing the road.

Local governments also need to build a network of safe bike trails and bike lanes. The real action is taking place in the City of Richmond. The city, which created a commission to study cycling mobility, is expanding shared-lane markings on city streets following pilot implementations on Meadow, Harrison and Leigh streets. One route would run north-south along U.S. Bike Route 1, while an east-west route would run from the University of Richmond through the Fan, skirting downtown and ending at the Henrico County line on the east.

According to the T-D article, other regional initiatives include:

  •  Chesterfield County is looking at connecting county parks with a bicycle and pedestrian trail, and they are planning to add bicycle lanes to some roads when they are widened are improved.
  • Henrico County, once described as the most bicycle-hostile county in the United States, is adding a lane for bicycles and pedestrians to parts of the North Gayton Road extension.
  • The University of Richmond is considering making a 1,500-foot abandoned road more accessible to bicycles.

It’s great to see bits and pieces of bicycle infrastructure emerge. But we won’t reach critical mass until the pieces connect, creating a network of bicycle-friendly lanes and paths that where people can travel safely without fear of becoming the next Lanie Kruszewski. It will be the task of a generation to create that network. If you’d asked me a year ago, I would have called it a fool’s errand. But the movement seems to be gaining serious momentum.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “Local governments also need to build a network of safe bike trails and bike lanes.”.

    You got it.

    Bicycles and cars will never safely co-exist on 45 mph roads with no shoulders. The key is to build safe bike lanes.

    “The University of Virginia is considering making a 1,500-foot abandoned road more accessible to bicycles.”.

    Well, that’s a start although 1,500 feet is just over a quarter mile. Seems like a lot more could be done in and around Charlottesville.

  2. Neil Haner Avatar
    Neil Haner

    A large problem is that bike lanes are always one of the first things cut from a roadway project when budgets (inevitably) become an issue. All too easy for planners to say “we can save 5-10% off the cost by eliminating 3′ of roadway width on both sides of the roads… we’ll just do that down the line.” That “down the line,” of course, never happens.

    If the GA wants to make this an issue, they’ll pass a resolution effectively handcuffing a bike lane requirement to any project receiving VDOT funds that meets certain criteria (roadway classification, max speed limit, current and projected vehicle count, etc), so that when costs get tight, bike lanes are spared from the chopping block.

  3. adarwinian Avatar
    adarwinian

    That would be the University of Richmond that is making plans for a 1,500 foot roadway.

    1. Thanks for pointing out that careless typo. Correction made.

  4. we do need a separate or separated facility for bike in areas (beyond urban) where there is a significant different in speed – (where the vehicle speed limit far exceeds the typical bike speed).

    It’s one thing to have a bike in traffic in a urban area where speeds are comparable, it’s quite another to put a bike on a roadway where vehicular traffic is 3, 4, 5 times the speed of the bike. I think it’s just plain dumb to assert that the bike “has a right” to be there. All due respect, “right” but “dead” is not a rational policy and encouraging people to ride their bikes in that kind of “share the road” environment is wrong.

    We need to recognize that the speed differential cannot be overcome by “education” or bikers “asserting their rights”.

    We need to treat biking itself as a valuable and legitimate mobility choice and to provide the facilities needed to support its use; we need to make that the focus.

  5. … and we need to have an honest conversation on how to fund that infrastructure – and to recognize that it’s likely not going to come from vehicle fuels taxes.

    This is particularly important in Va because unlike 46 other states, VDOT does roads in the counties whereas in most other states – roads – and bike lanes – are funded at the local level with local property (and other) taxes.

    A local community has to agree as to the value of bike infrastructure. It cannot be imposed on them – at least not without downstream negative consequences.

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    The TD piece is very naive since the vast majority of roads would require massive remodeling costing lots of money no one has. There are some good projects, such as bike trails from downtown Richmond to Williamsburg but the financial need facing.

  7. TheWalkman Avatar
    TheWalkman

    Peter,
    Beg to differ: many streets (like Hermitage Road, Grove Ave, Patterson, Brooklyn Park Blvd, Riverside Dr, etc.) wouldn’t require any, “massive remodeling”; some paint and signage would create a safe, welcoming bike infrastructure for nominal amounts.

    As Jim points out well in his commentary, a big part of the equation to increasing safety is educating drivers and cyclists to respect each other and focus on their actions and share the roads (and stop texting, etc.)

    People need to realize that over time, preferences change and people want choices in how they get around. I’m old enough to remember when it was o.k. to have a drink in your hand and drive down the road with a blood alcohol level of .014. My how times change!

    The, “bikeability/ walkability” of a city are great indicators of the livability of a city. Cities that are friendly to non-motorized users are the places where people seem to want to work, live and play. (Take a trip to places like Boulder, Davis, CA, and Portland if you have doubts.)

    The twenty-something shakers and movers of tomorrow don’t seem to care about living in the suburbs in McMansions; the Gen Y’ers I speak to want to live in hip-urban localities where they can ride their bikes, have access to great recreation (rafting the James River, perhaps?) and experiencing great nightlife, music and culture. Richmond has many of the building blocks we need to package and market these types of assets and we need to get our product out to market quickly or we can watch towns like Asheville, Cary and Baltimore eat our lunch.

    We’re competing in a national market for talent and business opportunities. Bike infrastructure, done properly, is a cheap investment that pays massive dividends on many levels.

  8. I’m totally supportive and in favor of bike infrastructure but I’m also totally skeptically to the idea that bikes should share the same exact road with vehicles that are going 3, 4, 5 times as fast.

    Not only is it dangerous, it’s more dangerous than just about anything else a sane person might do in their everyday life but some continue the fiction that this is the right path towards more bike mobility and that all that is needed is more “driver education”.

    When the speed limit on a limited-width road says 45mph – people are going to drive 45 mph (and higher) and no amount of “education” is going to convince them to go 15 mph unless they are held up by an “obstruction”.

    bikes are viewed the same way as a slow moving farm tractor – something that has a “right” but thank god there are not “herds” of them.

    there’s a reason why there are minimum speeds on freeways and certain slow vehicles are prohibited.

  9. shaunalex Avatar
    shaunalex

    Couple other things Richmond has going for it bike-related: Richmond is the premier capital city in the country for recreational mountain biking along the James River Park system. The professionally built trail systems and new Skills Park on Belle Isle bring out-of-towners and locals in droves to ride the technical and challenging features (and to compete in race events). No other state capital has this type of recreational trail network in it’s core downtown. Nor do Boulder, Davis, or Portland.

    I am an IT professional in NoVa, actively looking to relocate to downtown Richmond with my family, so we can grow up using the recreational infrastructure. These dirt trails and safer roads will make any commute a pleasure for me.

    The other thing going on is the UCI World Championships coming to Richmonds roads. Now is very good time to put the pedals to the metal and push for all things bike-related in Richmond.

    1. Shaunalex, I have first-hand familiarity with the Belle Isle “skills park.” My son and I tested it a couple of weeks ago. I made it almost all the way through before I wiped out. I have to say, I didn’t realize there was anything special about it. But I’m glad to hear that you’re thinking about relocating to Richmond. If you like the river, check out the white water rafting, the two crew clubs and the open-water swimming!

  10. Hi, all. First, I want to say that it’s great to see this conversation here. I was just recently clued into it, and appreciate the respectful exchange of perspectives.

    While I know it’s usually unhelpful to lead off any conversation in Virginia with “Well, here in Arlington . . . “, I can’t help but do that here. Arlington’s got a number advantages that make transportation cycling not just a reasonable, but often preferable, means of getting around. Compact geography, generally mid/low speed roads, and a good mix of on and off road facilities all play a role in making this a silver level “Bicycling Friendly Community” (and hopefully gold, within the year).

    I can already hear the “But yeah, that’s Arlington, it just wouldn’t work here . . . “. Sure, there are some differences (for example, we don’t have to deal with VDOT nearly as much as most jurisdictions – and that removes a huge obstacle). But lots of things can transfer quite easily. When streets are repaved here, they’re always looked at to determine whether or not new cycling facilities (e.g., bike lanes, wider shoulders, etc.) would make sense. And if they do, they’re included as a matter of course.

    Further, we’ve dropped the speed limits on a number of roads, even narrowing our main east-west (non-freeway) artery. When the County first started that project (more than a decade ago), I rolled my eyes and thought it would create traffic jams. Now I’m thankful that they’ve done it – it doesn’t take any longer to move along Wilson Boulevard in a car and it’s a *far* more pleasant place to walk and ride.

    Finally, there are lots of other things the County does that helps improve the environment for cycling. They make sure there are plenty of places to safely lock up your bike. They facilitate great safety campaigns like this – http://www.bikearlington.com/pages/pal-safety-on-our-streets/ And – perhaps most importantly – they have planners and engineers on staff who actually believe that it’s possible to get around on foot or with a bike.

    Is Arlington a model for the rest of the Commonwealth? No. At least, it certainly doesn’t provide a *complete* set of solutions (outside of other urbanized areas). But there are a lot of pieces that *any* area could successfully and effectively adopt.

    Looking forward to more of the conversation. And James, I’d be happy to facilitate a tour of our bike facilities the next time you’re in town.

    1. As a matter of fact, Blacknell, I’ve been in contact with Arlington County about coming to visit in the next month or two to see how Arlington does bicycles! Contact me at jabacon@baconsrebellion.com, and let’s get in touch. Jim

  11. shaunalex Avatar
    shaunalex

    JAB, to be clearer about what is “special”; it’s the Buttermilk Trail and North Bank trails (as well as Forest Hills) that are so unique for a core downtown. The Skills Park may very well become a premier spot when it is fully finished. I was last there as it was being built and haven’t seen the partial product yet.

Leave a Reply