Revamping Virginia History as Oppression Studies

My beef with the teaching of Virginia history — not enough attention to Bacon’s Rebellion!

Virginia schools do a poor job of teaching the history of African-Americans in the United States and Virginia, says Governor Ralph Northam. Black history is “difficult, complex and often untold,” he said yesterday when addressing the Virginia Commission on African American History Education, a body he created 10 months ago in the wake of his blackface scandal. Black history in schools is often “inadequate” and “inaccurate,” he said.

Reports the Virginia Mercury:

Northam said one of the most pressing issues he hopes the commission will address is casting the end of slavery as the end of oppression for black people. The Jim Crow Era, Massive Resistance and mass incarceration have followed, he said.

“My perception is that when we talk about black oppression, I think a lot of us need to understand that concept a lot better and this needs to start with the education of our children,” Northam said. “Black oppression is alive and well today, it’s just in a different form.”

After reading Northam’s critique of how Virginia schools teach state history, I thought I’d see for myself: What do the schools teach? What are students expected to master for their Standards of Learning exams? What I found surprised me. Northam’s description might have been an accurate representation of how history was taught when he was a pupil, but it bears no resemblance to what’s taught today.

The history of African-Americans is woven throughout the curriculum. Virginia students learn “Virginia Studies” in Grade 4, “U.S. History to 1865” in Grade 5, “U.S. History 1865 to Present” in Grade 6, and “Virginia & U.S. History” in Grade 11.

The following are excerpts from the Standards of Learning and Curriculum Framework documents on the Virginia Department of Education website.

Virginia Studies — Grade 5

  • Explain the importance of agriculture and its influence on the institution of slavery.
  • Describe how the culture of colonial Virginia reflected the origins of American Indians, Europeans (English, Scots-Irish, Germans), and Africans.
  • Identify the various roles in the American Revolution of American Indians, whites, enslaved African Americans, and free African Americans in the Revolutionary War.
  • In understanding the issues that led to the Civil War, describe the the roles of American Indians, whites, enslaved African Americans and free African Americans.
  • In understanding the post-Civil War era, identify the effects of Reconstruction on life in Virginia.
  • Identify the effects of segregation and “Jim Crow” on life in Virginia for American Indians, whites and African Americans.
  • In understanding 20th-century Virginia, describe the social and political events in Virginia linked to desegregation and Massive Resistance and their relationship to national history.
  • Describe the political, social, or economic impact made by Maggie L. Walker; Harry F. Byrd, Sr.; Oliver W. Hill, Sr.; Arthur R. Ashe, Jr.; A. Linwood Holton, Jr.; and L. Douglas Wilder.

United States History to 1865 — Grade 6

  • Describe colonial life in America from the perspectives of large landowners, farmers, artisans, merchants, women, free African Americans, indentured servants, and enslaved African Americans.
  • Explain how the issues of states’ rights and slavery increased sectional tensions.
  • Describe the roles of Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, and Frederick Douglass in events leading to and during the war.
  • Describe the effects of war from the perspectives of Union and Confederate soldiers (including African American soldiers), women, and enslaved African Americans.

United States History: 1865 to the Present — Grade 7

  • Analyze the impact of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and how they changed the meaning of citizenship.
  • Describe the impact of Reconstruction policies on the South and North.
  • Describe the legacies of Abraham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee, and Frederick Douglass.
  • Describe racial segregation, the rise of of “Jim Crow,” and other constraints faced by African Americans and other groups in the post-Reconstruction South.
  • Examine art, literature, and music from the 1920s and 1930s, with emphasis on Langston Hughes, Duke Ellington, Georgia O’Keeffe, and the Harlem Renaissance.
  • Describe the changing patterns of society, including expanded educational and economic opportunities for military veterans, women, and minorities.
  • Examine the impact of the Civil Rights Movement, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the changing role of women on all Americans.

Virginia and United States History — Grade 11

  • Analyze the cultural interactions among American Indians, Europeans, and Africans.
  • Explain the impact of the development of indentured servitude and slavery in the colonies.
  • Evaluate the cultural, economic, and political issues that divided the nation, including tariffs, slavery, the abolitionist and women’s suffrage movements, and the role of the states in the Union.
  • Evaluate and explain the multiple causes and compromises leading to the Civil War, including the role of the institution of slavery.
  • Describe major events and the roles of key leaders of the Civil War era, with emphasis on Jefferson David, Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and Frederick Douglass.
  • Evaluate and explain the impact of the war on Americans, with emphasis on Virginians, African Americans, the common soldier, and the home front.
  • Evaluate and explain the political and economic impact of the war and Reconstruction, including the adoption of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
  • Analyze the impact of prejudice and discrimination, including “Jim Crow” laws, the responses of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois, and the practice of eugenics in Virginia.
  • Evaluate and explain the impact of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the roles of Thurgood Marshal and Oliver W. Hill, Sr., and how Virginia responded to the decision.
  • Explain how the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the 1963 March on Washington, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) had an impact on all Americans.
  • Assess the development of and changes in domestic policies, with emphasis on the impact of the role the United States Supreme Court played in defining a constitutional right to privacy, affirming equal rights, and upholding the rule of law.

If you subscribe to the New York Times view of American history, in which the nation’s history began not in 1607 when Jamestown was settled but in 1619 when the first slaves arrived in Virginia, and in which slavery, Jim Crow, racism and discrimination were the animating forces that drove the nation’s history and constitute the prism through which everything must be viewed, then, yes, Virginia’s curriculum is indeed inadequate.

But if you believe that U.S. and Virginia history were animated by many other factors — such as, to mention a few, territorial expansion, entrepreneurship and invention, industrialization, interactions with foreign powers, and above all the development of democracy and individual rights, the Virginia curriculum does a pretty good job.

Bacon’s bottom line: There are basically two approaches to teaching Virginia and U.S. history. One approach — the New York Times approach, the Ralph Northam approach — subordinates history to a branch of Oppression Studies. The history of Virginia and the U.S. is a study of oppression — of Indians, of women, of African Americans, of minorities of all sorts. The other approach teaches the animating ideals of the American Revolution and explores the long, painful struggle to apply them to universally.

At its root, the controversy centers on whether we teach our children that our nation was conceived in sin and oppression or whether we have ideals and institutions worth preserving.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Revamping Virginia History as Oppression Studies”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” At its root, the controversy centers on whether we teach our children that our nation was conceived in sin and oppression or whether we have ideals and institutions worth preserving.”

    well no… the reality was that while we were teaching “ideals” – we continued to oppress those we were telling were “equal” only “ideally”.

    There’s a lot of differing views but trying to paper-over what happened and claim it’s all fixed now, is only for those who had blinders on all along and talked about a “post racial” world, resent them being taken off.

    We don’t need to wallow in it… but we do need to tell the truth honestly and forthrightly AND admit – we still have issues..not yet fully “fixed”.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I think Jim is overreacting. In the first place, the Standards of Learning and Curriculum Framework documents that he cites were adopted in 2015, not that long ago. I do not know what preceded them, but it takes awhile for such standards to get folded into teacher lesson plans and teaching. More importantly, I do not interpret Northam’s comments as advocating the teaching of all Virginia history through the “prism of black oppression,” just one aspect of its history.

    I think he is correctly advocating that students be made aware that government and social policies and practices adversely affecting blacks did not end with the conclusion of the Civil War or even with Reconstruction. School segregation and other Jim Crow laws had effects that are still being felt today. There are many black people still living today that had to go to segregated schools and more whose parents had to go to such schools. Housing patterns were shaped by restrictive covenants, legal and otherwise. To understand the present day, we must understand the practices, events, and policies that led up to today.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    I believe the really nasty textbooks circulate until the 1970s and 1980s. Presenting false history is common everywhere.
    I went to grades 5 to 9 in West Virginia in the 1960s. Our textbooks left out the fact that in 1920-21 there was a huge war over labor unions and coal operators which involved thousands of armed combatants and Army biplanes that ran strafing and bombing missions. My town was a hotbed of Mother Jones activism and she was imprisoned there. No mention.

  4. warrenhollowbooks Avatar
    warrenhollowbooks

    “More importantly, I do not interpret Northam’s comments as advocating the teaching of all Virginia history through the “prism of black oppression,” just one aspect of its history.”

    You do realize it is Ralph Northam we’re talking about, right?

  5. Here’s the key Northam quote: “My perception is that when we talk about black oppression, I think a lot of us need to understand that concept a lot better and this needs to start with the education of our children. Black oppression is alive and well today, it’s just in a different form.”

    For context on how to interpret this quote, please refer to my previous posts on the racial-equity policies he is applying to K-12 education and to the reading list that was made public a few months back.

  6. J. Abbate Avatar

    How about teaching the historical facts, the underlying justifications, and letting the students and scholars come to their conclusions without spinning it. There has been a struggle for freedom in the history of the U.S., as well as the fact that there has been oppression and exploitation of the indigenous people and the historical fact of slavery underlying a culture and an economy. There was a complex and robust indigenous civilization here before the European arrival which is often ignored or not studied in context. The European settlement of America, with its subsequent development of the American Revolution and the Founding of America are key but not complete without the historical context. We need not ignore the struggles of all involved with the evolution of America to love our country and appreciate the principles of democracy.

  7. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    How can a white racist doctor of medicine, who advocates for allowing unwanted infants to be made comfortable while they die, speak as to the content of black history in Virginia? Virtue-signaling again. The man makes Nixon-Trump and Clintons admirable.

  8. Jane Twitmyer Avatar
    Jane Twitmyer

    “There are basically two approaches to teaching Virginia and U.S. history. One approach — the New York Times approach, the Ralph Northam approach — subordinates history to a branch of Oppression Studies. The history of Virginia and the U.S. is a study of oppression.”

    Oh dear … We have argued about Civil War history before. My research after the Charlottesville riot led me to the deliberate attempt by Jubal Early and others to write the history of the war from a southern point of view, which was unchallenged by historians. Both the Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy carried forward the project of the Historical Society.

    The field of Southern history underwent a revolution at the university level in the 1940s and 1950s, but that did not change the view of history depicted in the 1950’s textbook rewrite, initiated by Senator Byrd. It was said that “A central theme of the (1950’s) books was the Lost Cause, a narrative – considered mostly mythical by historians – that holds that slaves were content and that Virginia could have dealt with slavery on its own if not for meddling Northerners whose actions led to the Civil War.”

    “As late as the 1970s, neither textbooks nor curricula veered far from Lost Cause interpretations,” says University of Virginia historian Edward Ayers. One longtime publishing executive said that when he got into the business in the 1960s, it was common to see two different versions of school history textbooks—one for in the Deep South and one for everywhere else,“ and the difference was how you treated the Civil War.” There, Jim, are your 2 versions.

    Is there something still to correct? Certainly those old texts live on. In the spring of 2011, in recognition of the 150th anniversary of the start of the Civil War, pollsters at the Pew Research Center asked southerners: “What is your impression of the main cause of the Civil War?” Thirty-eight percent of the respondents said the main cause was the South’s defense of an economic system based on slavery, while nearly half—48 percent—said the nation sacrificed some 650,000 of its fathers, sons, and brothers over a difference of interpretation in constitutional law.”

    What I read is that today’s texts just try not to offend … like…“For the South, the primary aim of the war was to win recognition as an independent nation. Independence would allow Southerners to preserve their traditional way of life—a way of life that included slavery.” The sentence sits halfway between the ‘states rights’ and ‘slavery;’ view about the cause of the Civil War and if it’s true more ‘fixing’ is required.

    I can’t say history will become “oppression studies”. What is wrong with knowing the Wrongs of the past? Consider it part of our struggle for a “more perfect union … dedicated to…”

  9. “What is wrong with knowing the Wrongs of the past?”

    Nothing is wrong with knowing the wrongs of the past. Americans need to know the wrongs of the past in order to appreciate the struggle for individual rights over the past 200 years. What I fear — perhaps needlessly, but I’m waving the warning flag — is that Northam’s commission will tilt too far the other way, portraying the history of Virginia and the U.S. as one of unremitting oppression. We’ll see what the commission recommends. You can count on me reporting back to Bacon’s Rebellion readers!

  10. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Let us all reflect on this: How pathetic is it that we assume the American history they (barely) learn in school ends their education on the subject. What I know and the opinions I have on the Civil War come from ten thousand of pages of independent reading (Yankee and Rebel POV), and from battlefield visits all over Virginia, Pennsylvania and Maryland. My kids didn’t always want to go, but go they did on some of those! Colonial Williamsburg was a big part of their education, too. Their grandfather was their teacher about WWII. I don’t really sweat the textbooks, and all human history is the history of conquest and oppression. Duh.

  11. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Very forward looking assessment.

Leave a Reply