Reframing the Debate: Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion

Angela Sailor

by James A. Bacon

With his latest cabinet pick of Angela Sailor as director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Governor Glenn Youngkin has reframed the debate about race in Virginia. Sailor runs the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Feulner Institute, which was founded in 2019 to help Americans “understand the uniqueness of this nation’s founding, reinstill in Americans a love for their country, and help them understand why it’s all worth preserving,”

In the same announcement, Youngkin said he updated the office’s mission to focus on promoting economic opportunity for disadvantaged Virginians. And he proposes renaming the office to Diversity, Opportunity and Inclusion.

The name change is emblematic of Youngkin’s approach to poverty and race relations. The old formulation of “equity” in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion called for social engineering to create equal racial/ethnic group outcomes. It concentrated power in the hands of political elites. And it has proven spectacularly ineffective. “Opportunity,” by contrast, calls for providing individuals the means to build better lives for themselves.

“The people of Virginia elected the most diverse leadership in the Commonwealth’s history,” Youngkin said in a press release. “Virginia is big enough for the hopes and dreams of a diverse people. Angela Sailor’s experience in government, nonprofits and the private sector will guide us as we ensure that the government is working for all Virginians across our diverse Commonwealth, especially when it comes to economic opportunity for all Virginians.”

Sailor has 20 years experience in government and the nonprofit sectors, in addition to stints in the private sector. Her most recent positions include vice president of The Feulner Institute at the Heritage Foundation and chief of staff to then-Heritage President Kay Cole James. After retiring from Heritage, James now serves as Secretary of the Commonwealth. It is not unreasonable to suggest that she played a key role in Sailor’s selection.

Executive Order 10 lays out Youngkin’s thinking.

Since the first settlers arrived little more than 400 years ago, we’ve been an imperfect people on the course to a more perfect union…. We acknowledge that too many of our citizens have not received the equal opportunity they deserve, and we recognize that diversity when genuinely embraced strengthens our Commonwealth. Every Virginian deserves dignity and respect, deserves the opportunity to pursue their dreams, and deserves inclusion in the Virginia family.

To that end, the Chief Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion Officer will promote initiatives in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce and Trade to expand entrepreneurship and economic opportunities for disadvantaged Virginians, including the disabled.

The order alludes to a faith component. Sailor will “facilitate bringing Virginians of different faiths together in service to their communities and the Commonwealth.”

And she will work to “promote free speech and civil discourse in civic life, including viewpoint diversity in higher education in coordination with the Secretary of Education.”

Other responsibilities in her portfolio:

  • address disparities in pre-natal care and be “an ambassador for unborn children.”
  • “be responsive to” the rights of parents in educational and curricular decision making.
  • ensure, in coordination with the Secretary of Education, that the teaching of Virginia and U.S. history is “honest, objective, and complete.”

Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

41 responses to “Reframing the Debate: Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion”

  1. Office of Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion.

    I like that.

    1. Rob Austin Avatar
      Rob Austin

      Dig it.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Department of Redundancy Department.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Are there actual measureable goals that we can judge as successful or not?

    this is an interesting frame: ” We acknowledge that too many of our citizens have not received the equal opportunity they deserve”

    so if only 2% of low income can get into TJ – that’s an issue of opportunity?

    gonna be interesting to see how much of what Youngkin says is real with real goals and real outcomes.

    1. Rob Austin Avatar
      Rob Austin

      Like the last admin’s real goals and outcomes?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        yep. He did accomplish quite a bit, you gotta admit but not what some folks wanted done.

        So yes… talk-the-talk and walk-the-walk.

        Northam DID promise changes and he DID deliver what he promised to the angst of those who did not want what he delivered.

        I think Youngkin is “overpromising” myself. It’s common when political newcomers get elected. They invariably underestimate the difficulty as well as understanding how govt works including the politics – even in his own camp.

    2. NOW you’re looking for measurable metrics — that’s so Right-wingish!

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        No, I’m asking because I do suspect we’re off on a PR wild goose chase on some of this stuff.

        He’s way, way overpromising, and I have a prediction. If Youngkin does not deliver, the right wing is going to go ape crap. Mark my words.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I was assuming that he would abolish that office altogether. Northam created it by Executive Order, so there was no legal reason Youngkin could not have abolished it. PerhapsI he was concerned about political fallout from abolishing it. I, for one, would not have criticized him. I always thought office was one of those superfluous, symbolic ones that did not really do anything. As a conservative who believes in limited government (I assume that is his position), Youngkin missed a golden opportunity to cut some fat out of state government.

    I don’t see much difference, if any, between “equity” and “opportunity”. Providing someone a fair opportunity to achieve something or do something is assuring that person equity. No matter how often Jim Bacon and others say it, “equity” is not the same as “equal”. Merriam-Webster defines “equity” as “fairness or justice in the way people are treated.”

    1. C’mon, Dick, we have demonstrated repeatedly that in political practice, “equity” is defined as equal group outcomes…. or to be more precise, a situation in which it is impossible to predict outcomes by race/ethnicity.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        you’ve made the claim repeatedly, never demonstrated it because it’s not equal outcomes – it’s each demographic group share of the outcomes.

        There is no reason on Gods green earth that there should be such demographic disparities in things like education unless one believes that the different demographics have different IQs or cultures, that preclude them from achieving similar demographic outcomes.

        For instance, how black coaches in the NFL?

        How many black generals in the military?

        How many black kids in TJ?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Psst. Disparate treatment… disparate impact.

          If P then Q does not mean if not P then not Q.

        2. Packer Fan Avatar
          Packer Fan

          How many white guys in the NBA? You know, demographic disparities.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            how many black coaches and owners?

          2. Packer Fan Avatar
            Packer Fan

            My bad. When you said demographic disparities I thought you were referring to racial percentages in various fields as a proportion to representation in the population as a whole. Sort of like the argument about black students being disciplined at higher rates than white students being bad, while there are no concerns about black athletes being “overly” represented in the NBA or NFL.

            Can’t disagree with you regarding coaches. It does seem that statistics would bear out that black coaches have a much smaller margin for error than white coaches (more so in the NFL than NBA).

            The ownership thing is a little different. Kind of hard to make a team owner sell if they don’t want to.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I know that you have claimed that. I apologize, but please refresh my memory where you “demonstrated” that. Just to be clear, if there is anyone, in addition to conservatives, that claims that “equity” means “equal”, I disagree with them, as well.

        By the way, “impossible to predict outcomes by race/ethnicity” is not the same thing as “equal group outcomes.”

        1. Here’s a discussion about the difference between “equality” and “equity” on the Milken Institute School of Public Health.

          “Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.”

          https://onlinepublichealth.gwu.edu/resources/equity-vs-equality/

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: ” Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.”

            nope. how would you even know how much resource to allocate to achieve an “equal outcome”.

            You’re confusing outcomes of individuals with outcomes of a demographic group.

            If one group, only 2% achieve the same outcome as 98% of another group – what does that mean?

            why would two demographic groups be so widely divergent in outcomes?

            LIKE – why are only 2% of blacks generals in the military? Would you assert that – that is “normal” and to be expected .. and that’s just the way the two demographic groups shake out?

            do you REALLY think those who advocate equity want an EQUAL number of black generals , just do whatever it takes to get there?

          2. …why are only 2% of blacks generals in the military?

            There are about 49 million people in the U.S. who identify as black. Assuming you are correct that means there are 980,000 black generals in our military.

            Now, I don’t see how that can be the case but since you are never wrong about anything, I guess it must be true…

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Here I thought the actually 653 GOs we have was way too many compared to the force and other ranks.

          4. The USMIL has 43 four-stars on active duty. during WWII it had 13…. what does that tell you?

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            Explain to me why this is – if there actually IS “equal opportunity”?


            The rarity of blacks in the top ranks is apparent in one startling statistic: Only one of the 38 four-star generals or admirals serving as of May was black. And just 10 black men have ever gained four-star rank – five in the Army, four in the Air Force and one in the Navy, according to the Pentagon”

            ” The military as a whole is about 20 percent Black, Milley said, yet only two of 41 four-star generals and admirals are Black. “Opportunity in our military must be reflective of the diverse talent in order for us to remain strong,” Milley said.”

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            That there are 43 additional Politicians on the Federal Pay roll.

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Here’s the difference between equity and equality…
            https://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/bugs-bunny-florida-gif-5.gif

          8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I have seen that article and definition. It does not say what you contend it says; rather, it is in agreement with my argument. It plainly does not say that “equity” means “equal outcomes”. It says that “equity” means having the resources and opportunities “needed to reach an equal outcome.” That equal outcome is not guaranteed.

            In the illustration used for the article, both kids have the resources and opportunity to pick the same number of apples. If one kid decides not try at all, gets tired and quits after an hour or so, or picks apple slowly or in a lackadaisical manner while the other kid continues to pick apples constantly, the kid that did not try as hard is not guaranteed to have as many apples in the end as the other kid does. He had his opportunity, but did not take advantage of it.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            A key distinction is the idea that the outcomes be viewed in terms of individuals as opposed to demographic groups.

            Why are there such disparities between demographic groups – for instance on how many went to college, accumulated family wealth, home ownership, etc?

            Some seem to argue that fewer blacks achieved than whites for various reasons, but not because of their disparate treatment in the past that had generational impacts that are present today.

            For instance, lower income blacks cannot afford to get extra school help for their kids, so they can compete for higher education opportunities like TJ where only 2% of blacks attend and only 2% of low income attend.

            “Equity” for those low income kids in Fairfax might be to provide them with equivalent resources that richer kids receive from their higher income parents.

            It does not guarantee “equal” outcomes at all. Not all kids who are provided with extra resources, excel academically, even kids of rich parents.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      The military sees it your way also:

      ” Department of Defense Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Statement

      “We are committed to making the DoD a workplace of choice that is characterized by diversity, equality, and inclusion. We remain steadfast in our commitment to promote an environment free from barriers that may prevent personnel from realizing their potential and rising to the highest levels of responsibility within the Department. To that end, the Department continues to strengthen policies and procedures that promulgate the Diversity and Inclusion and Equal Opportunity missions. We continue to enhance diversity and ensure equality across our entire workforce. We believe diversity is the key to innovation, inclusion is imperative for cohesive teamwork, and equality is critical to Total Force readiness.”

      https://diversity.defense.gov/DoD-Diversity-and-Inclusion-Initiatives/

      As much as JAB has attacked the concept in the schools, never seen him take DOD to task over the same thing.

      1. but DoD is stating ‘eQUALity’ NOT eQUity’….. different words, different meanings — the beauty of the English language.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          You are correct. Good point.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, you could be really, really cynical — like me — and assume that the plan is to eff it up royally, and then claim that “even we can’t make DEO&I work, therefore it’s a waste.”

      Sacrificial zinc.

  4. Jim Loving Avatar
    Jim Loving

    Sounds like a Democratic platform to me and I support it. So the left has done well to move libertarian/conservative Youngkin to focus on this, assuming there is follow up on all of this.

  5. George  Walton Avatar
    George Walton

    God bless Gov. Youngkin—he had the courage to excise “equity!” And he call for “viewpoint diversity” in higher education. Boy, our Gov is off to a great start!

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    ” We acknowledge that too many of our citizens have not received the equal opportunity they deserve”

    So under the “equal opportunity” approach in place in Virginia in the recent past, some certain groups of citizens did not actually receive equal opportunity. Let’s not address the resulting inequity but instead double down on the failed concept…. replacing “equity” with “opportunity” should do the trick….

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      as in… “we’ve provided EQUAL OPPORTUNITY to ALL kids in Fairfax county and it’s become clear, the economically disadvantaged just don’t achieve like the high income kids do”…..

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “Next, by giving huge tax breaks to the wealthiest Virginians, we will create massive numbers of minimum wage jobs…. we’ll call it “dribble down” economics.”

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        clearly, the economically disadvantaged have a gene or genes that leads to their lack of achievement…………

    3. VaNavVet Avatar

      It was also nice to see that Governor Youngkin also embraced diversity. The EO did appear to include a bit more virtue signaling but I would agree that it was a good move to keep the office. Also good to move away from CRT and towards D(E or O)I. Perhaps shows his acceptance of CRT as a mere law school theory.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Clearly though the “DEI is CRT” folks in BR don’t interpret it the same way…….

        1. VaNavVet Avatar

          CRT has lost all meaning and is now merely a distraction.

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I’ve always thought ju-jitsu was the perfect training for politics. You use the force of the attacker against him. This is a classic ju-jitsu move. Take the DEI movement, rebrand it to your purposes and dare the other side to whine about it. That said, the real story keeps getting missed, and that is the wholesale transfer of the Heritage Foundation over to state employment. 🙂

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: ” Take the DEI movement, rebrand it to your purposes and dare the other side to whine about it”

      rebrand it as CRT?

Leave a Reply