Redefining Richmond: Arts! Culture! Food!

ICTby James A. Bacon

Richmonders berate themselves (and outsiders mock them) for their inability to decide where and how to build a baseball stadium for a AA baseball team. If the region’s political and civic leadership can’t pull off this most basic of regional tasks, one might legitimately wonder if they can accomplish anything useful at all. But it turns out that Richmonders can mobilize behind civic projects — it just has to be the right kind.

A case in point is Virginia Commonwealth University’s Institute for Contemporary Art, which has raised $33 million of its $37 million funding goal. Construction of the facility, designed by an award-winning New York architect, is located at Belvidere and Broad, one of the region’s busiest intersections and a gateway to downtown. This project, which will showcase art from VCU, one of the nation’s leading art schools, has not been controversial at all. Funds were raised through contributions by local philanthropists. With help from a construction loan from the VCU Foundation, construction began in June.

A city and region define themselves by the long-term investments they make in civic infrastructure. To pick a very different example: Buffalo, N.Y., a region of comparable size to Richmond, has poured money into a pro football complex downtown more magnificent than anything than Richmonders could conceive of erecting in their own city — and locals still aren’t satisfied. Buffalo groups are exploring an even more grandiose facility. Richmond has nothing to compare. But it does have arts and culture out the wazoo. And we locals like it that way.

Speaking to the Richmond chapter of Commercial Real Estate Women, Institute Director Lisa Freiman outlined the vision. As reported by Virginia Business, the institute will  showcase a changing array of exhibitions not only by VCU artists “but the best of contemporary art from around the world.” Freiman predicts that the facility “will create opportunities for cultural tourism and community revitalization.”

The tie-in between contemporary art and economic development is stronger in Richmond than it would be in many other regions. The advertising industry is remarkably vibrant for a region Richmond’s size. Local companies serve national clients, and they employ artists, graphic artists, videographers and the like. There is a easy, natural cross-over between the art world and the advertising world. Supporting one supports the other.

rappahannock
Travis Croxton (left) and Ryan Croxton, owners of the Rappahannock restaurant. Photo credit: Times-Dispatch.

Meanwhile Richmond — and Virginia as a whole — is developing the reputation as an up-and-coming foodie region. Esquire Magazine has just named Virginia “The Food Region of 2014” in its 2014 Food and Drink Awards. “The Old Dominion has seemingly overnight exploded into one of the country’s greatest gastro regions,” writes the magazine, as reported in the Times-Dispatch. While the recognition goes to Virginia as a whole, Richmond is a vibrant part of the state’s foodie scene. Rappahannock restaurant won recognition as one of the 12 “Best New Restaurants” in the country.

The article cited Virginia’s diverse geography and the ability to source fresh, locally grown produce and artisinal food products from the mountains to the Chesapeake Bay as a big plus for restaurants aspiring to national quality. I’m sure that’s a factor, but I think the story is bigger than that. Richmond and Virginia produce great restaurants because the local marketplace supports them. People are willing to pay premium prices that restaurants must charge in order to recruit and pay chefs of national caliber.

New Yorkers and Washingtonians may laugh at Richmond’s pretensions in the worlds of art and cuisine — to many we’re still a hicksville backwater still fighting the Civil War. What they don’t see is how the region is steadily reinventing itself. Once the city prided itself on being a regional center of corporate headquarters. That prop to the economy suffered heavy damage during the recession of 2007-2008 and has been slow to recover. But there has been tremendous activity beneath the surface. Redevelopment along the downtown canal. The Richmond Folk Festival. Converting the James River into the region’s “Central Park.” The boom in downtown living. The French Film Festival. The gentrification of Church Hill and Scotts Addition. The creation of a fantastic network of mountain biking trails. The rise of the foodie movement and the renaissance of locally grown food.

Unconsciously, Richmond has been building the foundations of the “creative class” economy. It’s becoming the kind of place where creatives want to live, work and play. When creatives settle here, they start new businesses. In time, some of those businesses become success stories and economic dynamos that will propel regional growth. VCU’s Institute for Contemporary Art symbolizes how Richmond is redefining itself as something very different and very new.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Redefining Richmond: Arts! Culture! Food!”

  1. I wonder what LOTFL or Richard thinks!

    😉

    but I am curious – why the “philanthropists” didn’t want to put their money into a craft beer brewery!

    why does govt do the stadiums and craft beer breweries and the philanthropists do arts and Lewis Ginter and all that folderol?

    bonus question – in terms of jobs creation how do the arts and botanical gardens do compared to stadiums and craft breweries?

    honest question.

    1. LifeOnTheFallLine Avatar
      LifeOnTheFallLine

      Can’t get a tax write-off for giving money to a brewery. Although, now I wonder if you could get non-profit status for one…

      The rich tend to – when they do donate – donate to universities, museums, operas, etc. In other words, things that will enrich they and their children (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/04/why-the-rich-dont-give/309254/).

      “why does govt do the stadiums and craft beer breweries”

      Most cynical answer? Because it’s what the people they actually interact with – lobbyists and wealthy donors – want them to do. Slightly less cynical answer? Those are things people enjoy and are tangible projects a politician can point to and say “I got that done.”

      To use a transportation analogy: no one does a ribbon cutting for a pothole repair (even though I totally would if I were mayor), but new highways are huge projects with plenty of opportunities for photo ops.

  2. also .. why do we expect a return on investment for stadiums and craft breweries and not for arts and botanical gardens?

    seriously – I presume people who provide the money made it by doing a good job of running a business or investing, etc and the needs of the community are huge – with unemployment and kid in need of more/better education than the govt seems to provide so why not put that money towards helping others in need?

    VCU could create a school of education like UVA has the Curry School and focus on the same types of things that BIll and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (and his sister Doris Buffet and the Sunshine Foundation)?

    VCU could actually make a tremendous impact on Richmond beyond just providing “arts” to the well-heeled.

    1. LifeOnTheFallLine Avatar
      LifeOnTheFallLine

      VCU DOES make a tremendous impact on Richmond beyond just providing art. As much as I think the university’s leaders are making a mistake trying to turn it into a destination school by bulking up on student housing and paying a silly amount of money for a basketball coach instead of making it a regional learning center by focusing on commuter amenities and evening classes, all the construction they’ve done in the past decade has been very good for the city. Not only has it provided construction jobs, it has also taken areas that were essentially empty lots and put something there.

      In addition, they have an entire department called the Division of Community Engagement that is devoted to outreach, volunteer efforts, etc. http://www.community.vcu.edu/

      1. was not aware. thanks for the link – I LIKE IT!

        why doesn’t Bacon report on this equally with the artsy fartsy stuff?’

        1. LifeOnTheFallLine Avatar
          LifeOnTheFallLine

          To be fair to Bacon, a lot of this stuff at VCU isn’t really new and doesn’t get a lot of attention in the news. If you don’t know it exists already it’s kind of hard to talk about it.

          He also curiously gives the city of Richmond rather than VCU credit for The French Film Festival, which has been happening at the Byrd since 1993.

    2. LifeOnTheFallLine Avatar
      LifeOnTheFallLine

      Also, the university works very closely with the neighborhood directly to its north. After being blocked in its efforts twice to move South/East into Oregon Hill, the university leaders realized they would have to move North across Broad instead, and having learned they can’t just exert their will on the neighborhoods that border the university worked to make the expansion beneficial to everyone.
      http://www.community.vcu.edu/outreach/carver-vcu-partnership/

  3. A lot of cities seem to be cleaning up their acts. Washington, DC, Richmond and Lynchburg are 3 examples I have read about on the blog (or, seen in person). I have also seen progress in Atlanta, Louisville, Nashville, White Plains (NY), Indianapolis, etc. The last 5 – 10 years have made the renaissance of the American city obvious.

    The question of sports vs arts seems to bring out some elitist tendencies in people. Anybody who thinks sports can’t galvanize a city has never been to Pittsburgh on NFL game day. Optimism drives progress. Pride creates optimism. If the good people of Buffalo take pride in the Bills and turn that pride into optimism and progress – why is that a problem?

    1. I don’t want to harp on the education thing but why do we seem to have this conundrum with cities – arts, sports and failed or bolloxed public education systems that – in some respects drive folks to the suburbs and exurbs and leaving the cities to be empty shells at night and when events are not being held?

      I went to the Farmers Market in Richmond a year or so back to see the massing of the Purple Martins and parking right around the farmers market was tight so I went out a block and was amazed to find unlimited parking available and that got me wondering why and then I started to notice the other aspects namely folks hanging around that if you found your car broken into later on – you’d not be surprised. Obviously I was not alone in my assessment because one block over – people were double parking and do everything they could to leave their car in a safer location.

      I’ve found this in many cities I visited. There is LOTs of sidewalks and walking available but if you are not a native you better not be doing any walking at night far from where the museums and stadiums are …sorry .. that’s the reality and that’s the reason why people live in the suburbs – not those phony “restricted zoning” policies Bacon blathers about often.

      City folks “know” where not to be … especially at night.. folks visiting are more or less clueless except they inherently know to stick to where the lights and the crowds are.

      so we have all this money going to build Arts and Sports but they are essentially islands surrounded pockets of places you just don’t want to be by yourself or at night. you leave your money and other valuables at home and just take pocket money and one ID .. etc…

      It’s a paradox for me.. and I’ll admit.. maybe it’s as much me as other things but I don’t find cities to be friendly and inviting but rather more an adventure and a place to be alert and on your guard.. rather than a place you’d want to live 24/7.

      I know a friend who built their dream home in Portsmouth .. 30 years later they had been broke into several times and hookers stood on the street corner 20 steps away doing business. They ended up with bars on the windows and barricades on their doors. They basically sold the house for cheap and for all intent and purposes – fled to the suburbs.

      so for every “fine arts” museum I see in a city – I automatically think about how may blocks away before you don’t want to be.

      I’m not so naive as to think a “good” K-12 system will fix this – some is apparently inherent to cities – but I’m also realistic enough to know that if kids do not receive enough education to grow up and get a job – they have time on their hands and need money.

      and so this is this dichotomy… this conflict… that some of us apparently ignore and others decide that cities are places you don’t live but instead visit…

      so let’s hear some other perspectives …

      1. I suspect that a look at the statistics of demographics and wealth in DC would be instructive. My guess is that most of the more expensive housing is being taken up by DINKs (Double Income No Kids) and empty nesters. A large percentage of K-12 kids come from economically disadvantaged families. I think the suburbs have a more even distribution of wealth among families with kids and families without kids. So, a lower percentage of K-12 kids come from economically disadvantaged homes. The cities appear to be getting wealthier but it’s not the families with kids who are gaining.

        There are a lot of different statistics about income inequality by city. In this chart – Richmond is #14 in America with DC as #15. I have seen other statistical analyses where DC is #1 (although that may have been wealth instead of income). FWIW – City of Richmond Ginni = .5347, Fairfax County = .4229, Loudoun county = .3670.

        http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/best-and-worst//most-income-inequality-us-cities

        Now, if I take away the city residents without children and only look at the distribution of wealth and income for residents with children I suspect that I’ll find a curve with two peaks – on on the high end and one on the low end. I’ll further speculate that the families on the high end send their children to private schools at a disproportionate rate.

        I’ll post an analysis of private school attendance by area in Washington DC as a reply (to get around the one un-moderated comment rule). The differences are pretty stark. The wealthiest parts of DC are 50+% non-public. The poorest parts are 5%. I don’t know the details across Virginia but the statewide average for private school enrollments is said to be 10%.

        All of which brings up what I call “Bacon’s Paradox”. Bacon’s Paradox states that the migration of relatively wealthy couples without children into the urban core precipitates an economic divide that will ultimately render the cities unattractive to the people who moved there.

        People who believe that extremes of economic inequality cause tension must believe that America’s urban cores are getting more tense by the day.

          1. More economic statistics for Richmond (these statistics are not available from the source for DC):

            http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/best-and-worst/p/us-cities/richmond-va

        1. Richmond worst in 10 biggest Virginia cities for income inequality. By far the worst …

          http://rvanews.com/news/richmond-ranks-high-income-inequality/107293

          Keep building those art museums and sushi shops. I understand they burn particularly well during riots.

          Seriously – as much as Richmond may be progressing, this is a fundamental problem.

          1. as we talk about “density” and recognize in the geography that overall density is not the accurate picture of any jurisdiction – as there are patchworks of higher – and lower density.

            so a geographic depiction of “density” will provide a much more informed perspective than looking at “averages”. (much in the same way we manage to screw up looking at school performance data – aggregately ….

            but it’s only a matter of time if not done already – where for a given city -it will depict the geography where crime is more frequent… and in understanding that – we are forced to confront the reality that cities are not “more” dense because the cities “restrict” zoning – they are not more “dense” because there are societal and demographic factors that essentially make parts of cities – places where – even the best condos will fail because they are surrounded by high crime real estate…

            and it’s no small coincidence that in those areas – that K-12 education has high-priced teachers and terrible results. They have to high prices just to get people willing to work in those conditions and it does not attract your higher qualified applicants but rather those who are willing to take risks to boost their income.

            Yet – we won’t pay according to people who have the qualifications needed – not even in the suburbs… there are no at-risk teaching specialities where stipends are paid for that skill – even as we do pay stipends for coaches and AP teachers.

            to a certain extend, we’ve abandoned the K-12 schools in the cities.

            DINKs or not – people who are not jobless, who do have kids, are going to do the best they can for their kids – either send them to a private school or – leave for the suburbs – and pay the daily commute price for a decent education for their kids… even as many of those same schools will do the same thing to the disadvantaged kids that is done in cities.

            so …both cities and suburbs – there is a patchwork of poverty or low income demographics… where public education for the kids in poverty circumstances – basically is not very good or pretty much sucks and so we have art museums and stadiums and swathes of the city in between where you just don’t go at night or even during the day…

            “New Urbanism” has never really addressed this as they keep talking about “density” and “walkability” and we already have it in many cities – and it’s not a place to live or walk – nor send your kids to school!

            We say we don’t want to spend more money to deal with this issue – at the same time we spend millions on new art museums and stadiums.

            No one could blame the Mayor of Richmond for being a ardent and even obnoxious supporter of more and better schools – to fix the crumbling infrastructure.. to reach out to the rich to help.. but instead he pursues stadiums and craft breweries… and art museums..

            Sometimes I think – we’re not really serious about these problems.. we just pursue other things.. and ignore them but when you step back and look at the bigger context – it becomes a head scratcher.

    2. Speaking for myself, I’m not dissing sports as a way to create civic pride. The point of my post is to emphasize that there are other paths to civic pride. Richmond and Hampton Roads may be the two largest metro regions in the country without a professional sports team. I’m arguing that that really doesn’t matter.

      1. But don’t you think art galleries and fancy gastropubs are part of an elitist trend that emphasizes the desires of the wealthy while failing to meet the desires of the economically disadvantaged?

        The things you describe all sound very fru fru.

        I like dive bars. I always have. Walk into any dive bar on a Sunday and what’s on the TV? Sushi preparation shows? This week in fine art? No. Sports.

        What does Richmond have to offer people who didn’t get their Master’s Degree from Johns Hopkins?

        Put three rich guys next to three working stiffs at a DMV and you know what they are going to talk about? Sports.

        Say what you want about professional sports (or serious college sports for that matter) – those sports tend to cross socio-economic boundaries better than just about anything else I can think of. And given the big Ginni coefficients in Richmond I’d suggest that you think long and hard about civic investments that will appeal to people of all economic means.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Don The Ripper makes good points about Richmond’s income inequality. Twenty-six percent of the city in poverty isn’t exactly a braggable stat no matter how many five stars you get in a national slick.

    I love oysters, but from what I understand the restaurant that got the kudos isn’t exactly cheap. You can’t praise attributes that can be enjoyed only by the monied classes while ignoring the rest.

    The point about Buffalo is off the mark. Unlike Richmond, Buffalo was, and to some extent, still is, a major industrial town, a much more diverse population and a location far
    from other major cities. The nearest are Cleveland and New York and Pittsburgh. It is a natural for an NFL team. No way Richmond could be with the unmentionable team so close in DC and the Ravens a little farther north. What’s more, at 1.25 million, Richmond is just too small.

    I enjoy some of what Richmond has to offer but I do despair the enforced provincialism of the place.

    1. I don’t think Richmond should aspire to have an NFL team. I’d start with a AAA Baseball team and then think about an NBA franchise – maybe sharing between Tidewater and Richmond like the old Virginia Squires of the ABA.

      You also could make a statement by inviting high school football teams from Indian reservations to come play against Richmond high schools.

      Red Mesa High School (on Navajo land) is 99% Native American. Their high school team was 9-2 last year. You could start the outreach program with them.

      Here’s a picture of their team name and logo:

      http://bourebicycleclothing.blogspot.com/2010/03/red-mesa-redskins.html

      Hey! Where have I seen that logo before?

      1. Somebody forgot to tell the Navajo that “Redskins” is a racist name. They must be self-loathing Indians.

        1. My guess is that 25 – 30% of Americans find the name sufficiently insulting to want the team to change the name.

          I don’t know what the percentage is within the Native American community. I’ve certainly heard Native Americans say that it’s racist. I’ve heard Native Americans say that it’s irrelevant. I’ve heard some say that they think it’s a good name.

          Few people realize that the logo was designed by a full blooded Native American. The Redskins were using a simple spear with feathers as their logo. The Native American drew the current logo and sent it to the team’s management saying that the spear looked stupid.

          Personally, I think the team needs a change. I’d prefer to change owners but that doesn’t seem likely. Change the name? If there’s a 10% chance that it will throw out the bad karma that been haunting this team for almost 20 years – good by me. I like the Washington Wild Weasels. DC Dynamos.

    2. As I’ve blogged in the past, the East End of Richmond is one of the biggest pockets of concentrated poverty south of New York City. That pocket of poverty is the historic result of slavery, Jim Crow, desegregation and black middle-class flight, the concentration of public housing in a small geographic area, erosion of the traditional family structure, the movement of urban jobs to the burbs, welfare dependency, the maladministration of Richmond City schools, and more. Dissolving that mass of poverty will take two or three generations…. if we succeed in dissolving it all. The city will be marked by inequality of wealth for a long time.

      But is the answer to scapegoat affluent people moving into the city? Of course not. Affluent households shore up the tax base so the city has the resources to do something about poverty (if only it will).

      1. I don’t scapegoat the rich. It’s their money and they can do with it what they wish.

        having said that – when we say “civic pride” or pride in one’s community – and what you as an individual see – as a need in the community – does say something.

        but the bigger point is – you can’t have more density and more walkability if you have a city pock-marked with unsafe areas of decay and poverty and bad schools – at least not at the same time you’re arguing that it’s govt rules that roadblock it.

        if you want more/better density and walkability – then you have to also acknowledge and take responsibility for what the govt is NOT doing OR you have to admit that the private sector is also not going to do anything about it – you have to have an answer …rather than pretending it’s a different issue.

        this is the problem with Conservatives these days. it’s like they’re purposely blind to the issues that are – NOT going to be resolved by the free market.

        They want art museums and sports stadiums but not safer cities and opportunities and equity for kids born into poverty.

        take some guidance from Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet and others who also have money and also have choices on what to spend it on – and not.

        it’s a

        1. “[Conservatives] want art museums and sports stadiums but not safer cities and opportunities and equity for kids born into poverty.”

          That’s not all, Larry. Conservatives beat their wives, bugger sheep and eat grilled puppy dogs in their fancy backyard barbecues.

          1. bugger sheep? Good LORD!

            that sounds perverted as all get out – but actually no worse than some of the Conservative positions these days when it comes to education, health care, marriage, birth control, immigration , climate, etc.

            Ronald Reagan himself would be pronounced an unprincipled RINO much like John Chichester was in Virginia. There are no heroes on the right anymore… unless you go back to Jefferson and even then a mythical Jefferson who is recorded as speaking “right wing” things he never spoke.

            there’s actually a website trying to set things straight:

            http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/11/opinion/jefferson-fake-gun-quotation/

            this is what has happened to the right these days.

            no they’re not buggering sheep or eating puppies – they’re buggering Jefferson’s legacy and eating goofball pablum…

            you can’t even have contagion without it being the fault of liberals!

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Scapegoating? Most of the monied people left the city limits long ago. I don’t see the ones moving in as having a lot of money — they are too young. The fancy condos on the river are too small to be much of a factor. If anything, you are seeing the poor of Richmond moving out to the counties while a sizable population remains.

    1. RIchmond has a case of the same thing Detroit has . Detroit itself is bankrupt while the adjacent suburban-scale counties within a few hundred feet are just fine.

      One DOES wonder where the Mayor of Richmond is getting all that money to build stadiums and craft breweries…

Leave a Reply