VMI, Recognize Binnie Peay’s Distinguished Service

J.H. Binford Peay III. Official portrait as vice chief of staff.

Here follows a letter from Salvatore J. Vitale, class agent of the Virginia Military Institute class of 1961. — JAB

I am a graduate, and proud to be one, of the Virginia Military Institute’s Class of 1961. Since last summer, I and others of the VMI alumni have been pleased to note that Bacon’s Rebellion has published a substantial number of articles concerning the events at VMI climaxing with the publication and fallout from the now infamous Barnes & Thornburg report commissioned by the administration of Governor Ralph Northam. The articles you published have done a great service to VMI and its alumni by, among other things, pushing back against the findings of that report and the libel of VMI in public media, principally in the “news “section of the Washington Post. That libel is that VMI is a systemically racist and sexist institution. …

The attack directed at VMI has no doubt caused injury to many. The reputations of alumni in general have been impugned because of being branded as the product of a systemically racist and sexist institution. The attack certainly raises the question whether young women and minorities in uniform will, rightly or wrongly, fear that VMI officers of higher rank lack respect for them and, perhaps equally unfortunate, transmit that fear into lack of respect for the superior
officer. There is also rightful fear that in this current political environment that VMI’s sullied reputation could harm their opportunities for advancement, particularly for young officers? If this false narrative diminishes the ranks of women and minorities who seek admission to VMI, it will be unfortunate for VMI and for those who are deterred from applying due to this distorted
depiction.

Some may say that the foregoing is merely speculative. There has, however, been one injury that is beyond dispute to VMI alumni — the reputational damage to former superintendent General J. H. Binford Peay III, VMI class of 1962, following his resignation after receiving public rebuke from Governor Northam through a “lost confidence” communication.
Since then the public posture of VMI and the Northam administration, in our collective view, has been to relegate General Peay to the dust bin of history. Their actions do no credit to VMI or the Commonwealth in failing to rise above petty politics to accord General Peay the public recognition he so clearly and richly deserves.

I am the class agent of the VMI Class of 1961. In that capacity I am proud to inform the readers of your blog that, in view of the official silence of VMI since General Peay stepped down, my VMI classmates have taken a step to address the wrongs done to his reputation. The action is, I believe, unprecedented. The class has unanimously adopted at our recent 60th class reunion two resolutions advanced by our 1961 class president, former member of the Virginia House of Delegates and prestigious member of the Virginia Bar, the Honorable Wyatt B.
Durrette.

The first resolution proposes that the VMI Alumni Agencies and The VMI Board of Visitors take actions to honor General Peay for his long and distinguished service to our country, our State and to VMI. How they do that we leave to them.

Our second resolution is more direct. We have nominated General Peay to receive the VMI Distinguished Service Award, the highest award conferred by the VMI Foundation and the New Market Medal, the highest award that can be bestowed by the Institute’s Board of Visitors.

General Peay’s career demonstrates why he deserves recognition. He served in the United States Army for 35 years, beginning as a young lieutenant in Vietnam and subsequently as the commander of the 101st Division in Operation Desert Storm. In the following years in uniform he continued to advance, eventually becoming Vice Chief of Staff of the Army and then to Commander of United States Central Command. In my opinion, except for Gen George C. Marshall, Gen Peay’s record of combined service to the Nation and VMI is unparalleled,
reflecting the values of the Institute.

After retirement from active army service, General Peay contributed his talents to a number of civilian entities often serving as a member of their boards of directors. In 2003 he accepted an invitation from VMI’s Board of Visitors to become its 14th superintendent. In the ensuing years under his leadership, VMI underwent unprecedented growth as an academic institution and in physical plant improvements. The Institute’s endowment contributions increased dramatically. His accomplishments in these areas were acknowledged in 2017 when the Board of Visitors created the Peay Endowment for Academic Excellence.

On the occasion of its creation then President of the Board of Visitors, Mr. William Boland ’73, stated that naming the endowment for General Peay recognized “the exemplary qualities of character and leadership he demonstrated during a lifetime of leadership.” Mr. Boland rhetorically asked
“Who better to exemplify the traits of well rounded, high achieving cadets.”

I share his opinion and know of no finer accolade given General Peay. It rang just as true then as when he was rebuked by the Governor and it rings true even louder today. The Class of 1961 is convinced beyond any doubt that General Peay is eminently qualified to be awarded the VMI Distinguished Service Award and the New Market Medal. He passes muster under the most rigorous application of selection criteria; leadership, duty, honor and devotion. Those qualities of character and ability that already mark him as one whose contributions in public service will be of enduring significance.

VMI’s failure to honor General Peay is a stain on VMI’s reputation and honor, which can be redeemed only by acknowledging his contributions to our Country, State and VMI. The Distinguished Service Award and the New Market Medal were created to recognize the very kind of contributions General Peay made.

Somehow those in the key alumni positions who could initiate the efforts to properly recognize General Peay’s service seem hesitant. The efforts of my
class, now being joined by others, will hopefully create a wave of support they will not be able to ignore.

I have attached a copy of our resolutions. I am pleased to note that, since we adopted these resolutions, individual alumni, and other alumni classes have expressed unreserved approval.

Salvatore J. Vitale
Class Agent
VMI Class of 1961.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

4 responses to “VMI, Recognize Binnie Peay’s Distinguished Service”

  1. Carmen Villani Jr Avatar
    Carmen Villani Jr

    I have gotten to know Sal over the past year or so and he epitomizes the VMI graduate. He is a man of honor, perseveres, and is willing to take a stand for what he believes in. He and other VMI graduates before me set the bar very high for what it means to be a VMI graduate. We have become friends and I am grateful to have him as a part of my life. Thank you Jim for posting this.

    Carmen Villani
    VMI, Class of 1976

  2. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    I’ll bet that “Governor” Northam, some of his cronies and the Washington Post, figured they could take advantage of a man as honorable as General Peay.

    When Ian Shapira dropped his Fred Hechinger Prize-winning “bombshell” articles, I suspect that Ian and his editors at the Washington Post—who are “surely”, as Marc Antony would say, honorable men and women—figured that Ralph Northam would use that bombshell to full advantage. They gave Ralph a ‘gift’ they expected him to grab, as a progressive/SJW receiving a lateral, and run with it.

    He did!

    When Northam had a minion tell General Peay that he no longer had the governor’s confidence—instead of doing it himself, like an honorable leader would have—I’m sure Team Progressive not only expected, but hoped, that Peay would do the honorable thing and fall on his sword. Which, it appears that General Peay has done.

    General Peay, apparently, has agreed to accept damage to his personal reputation, in order to protect VMI from progressives who would otherwise have destroyed, out of spite if nothing else, an institution that General Peay was devoted to.

    Unfortunately for the Northam progressives (and the Washington Post), there are some of us who realized that this is is not an honorable approach. We are not fooled. We are disgusted by those progressives who would treat Lee and Jackson and Peay this way. And, we represent many, many Virginians.

    No matter what MSNBC or NPR says.

  3. .
    Well played and eminently deserved. Bravo, Salvatore J. Vitale.

    Gen Peay was a transformational leader and a builder of an enormous legacy. His VMI was the best VMI in its illustrious history.

    Let’s get off our collective duffs and make this happen.

    Minch, JL ’73
    Austin By God Texas

    http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com

  4. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
    YellowstoneBound1948

    It will take a Youngkin victory to achieve justice for Gen. Peay. As Governor, he would get three or four appointments to the VMI Board of Visitors every year, and would eventually have a working majority. Or, he could “pull a Northam” and send word through a flunky that he has lost confidence in certain members of the Board, the idea being that they would be forced out as Gen. Peay was forced out. A McAuliffe victory will irreparably damage VMI (that is, what is left to damage). The current Board is comprised of sycophants. There is nothing in the record to suggest that will change if “Merry Sue Terry” McAuliffe is elected. VMI can take only so much.

Leave a Reply