Rare SCC Deadlock Sinks Dominion’s Energy Plan

By Steve Haner

The year long debate over Dominion Energy Virginia’s proposed integrated resource plan, which threw climate catastrophe activists into a frenzy because it added a new natural gas plant, is ending with no decision.  Two State Corporation Commission judges split on whether to approve it, basically a win for the anti-fossil fuel forces.

In December, a hearing officer assigned to study the case had ruled that Dominion’s plan should be rejected because it included the expansion of gas generation, when the anti-natural gas forces in the General Assembly had passed laws against that 2020 and 2021.  Those laws did include provisions for maintaining or adding fossil fuel generation on the basis of a threat to reliability, but only under limited circumstances.

The hearing officer’s report was just a recommendation to the actual commissioners, and noted the final opinion could go the other way.  It didn’t.

On February 1, two brief notifications appeared on the case file.  One was from retired SCC member James C. Dimitri, who was sitting in to create a quorum on the case.  He wrote: “In this proceeding I would have found that the 2023 Integrated Resource Plan is reasonable and in the public interest for the purpose of a general planning document…”

The other notice was unsigned and reported: “The State Corporation Commission, having not reached a majority decision in this matter, will not “make a determination within nine months after the date of filing” as set forth in Code § 56-599.”

Unstated but implied is that Commissioner Jehmal Hudson, who is the only active member of the panel until two new members just elected are sworn in, disagreed with Dimitri and agreed with the hearing examiner.  That resulted in a 1-1 tie, and no final order.  But if and when these issues rise again, and if Dominion files an actual application to build the proposed combustion turbine gas plant, Hudson will be on the case and Dimitri will not.

The unusual (but not unprecedented) warmth this winter should not let Virginians forget the bitter cold snap of December 2022.  In a final filing responding to the hearing officer’s opinion, Dominion put it front and center as its justification for planning additional use of natural gas:

Dual-fuel CTs (combustion turbines), like those included in Alternative Plans B and D, are currently the most cost-effective and reliable resource to meet a future long-duration winter event or storage shortage. The significant increase in the load forecast, coupled with events like Winter Storm Elliott, have highlighted the need for always available, dispatchable generation to serve the Company’s customers and ensure grid reliability.

The Company’s fleet performed well during the peak demand of Winter Storm Elliott, with the Company’s thermal resources and market purchases contributing almost all of the Company’s generation while existing renewable resources contributed very little. In fact, out of an existing 2,300 MW of renewable resources on the Company’s system, only 12 MW of wind contributed to the Company’s needs during Winter Storm Elliott’s peak, which occurred between 7:00 and 8:00 am on December 24, 2022.

Obviously, the 12 megawatts of wind mentioned are the two “demonstration” turbines already in the water off Virginia Beach.  And True Believers in the Cult of Net Zero will point out many more such turbines are coming.  But the fickle weather gods are in control, they delight in frustrating the Net Zero cult, and 5,200 MW of wind is worthless on a windless day.  In the Virginia economy the Net Zeros are rapidly building, no wind, no sun = no juice.  (Or at least not enough.)

Since it was first announced by two senior Democrats in the Virginia Senate that they planned a summit on the clean energy laws later this year, there have been subsequent signs they are serious. They keep bringing it up.  But whether they have sufficiently awakened to the very real danger now facing Virginia is not clear.  Even a symbolic finding from the SCC that Dominion is pointing to a real risk would have helped immensely.

When the summit comes, expect huge pressure to make those clean energy laws tighter, to remove even the hint of a loophole for natural gas that allowed Dominion to think it might build such a new plant.  As bad as things are, never underestimate the power of government to make it much worse.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

52 responses to “Rare SCC Deadlock Sinks Dominion’s Energy Plan”

  1. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    There needs to be a well organized campaign to demonstrate that the assumptions behind the VCEA and related energy distorting actions are invalid. The experience in Europe combined with our growing and unsustainable national debt should be used to convince members of the GA and citizens of the Commonwealth that this anti-fossil fuel campaign is truly a March of Folly.
    The US has been reducing CO2 emissions for decades while China, India, and other developing countries have been increasing theirs.
    The net effect of the Commonwealth’s emission reduction actions/mandate will be trivial at best.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The unusual (but not unprecedented) warmth this winter should not let Virginian’s forget the bitter cold snap of December 2022”

    Wasn’t that when power was cut in NC because of the failure of fossil fuel generators…?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I think that was Texas. Gas turbine failure, but not all windmills failed, generating enough though to gouge.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        The Texas fossil fuel generator failure was the year before.

        https://www.newsobserver.com/news/weather-news/article283008093.html

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          So many of them, it’s easy to confuse them. Add in pipeline and well explosions and we’re talking unreliable energy sources.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            then this: ” One of the largest issues impacting gas-fired generation was the curtailment or interruption of fuel supply. Unlike other fuel sources, natural gas is not typically stored on‐site. Generators rely on real‐time delivery of natural gas from their suppliers. When units are not confident that they will be dispatched, the fuel is often obtained on the spot-market on a non-firm, interruptible basis. Therefore, if firm contracts are honored before interruptible contracts, if the firm customers require more gas, and the capacity of the gas transportation is based on firm contracts, less capacity is available for interruptible supply. This can result in generating units becoming unavailable as there is no pipeline capacity to supply interruptible gas.”

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3a9b3aea5f6944438248d3c2cef3de62a302bfd9b94ab5e33f99d4bfeb112d35.png

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So, NG blows like the wind? Need 200 cuft/min, but get only 100… oh well.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Need to get Steve to tell the “whole” story about NG. So far, he just fawns on it and hates solar/wind cuz they’re not “reliable”… real world ain’t like that.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            It’s tough to get a man to look at the whole picture when his job is just painting one color.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            trained professional lobbyist, right?
            😉

            that’s one of the differences in BR from before. There used to be able to having wide ranging discussions with varied points of views without lining up on one side or the other.

            I TRY.

            I say that I support Nukes.

            I say that I support gas when there is no choice.

            I say I support wind/solar when they are the economic choice.

            just like before but now.. I’m in the “lefty” group!

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            then this: ” One of the largest issues impacting gas-fired generation was the curtailment or interruption of fuel supply. Unlike other fuel sources, natural gas is not typically stored on‐site. Generators rely on real‐time delivery of natural gas from their suppliers. When units are not confident that they will be dispatched, the fuel is often obtained on the spot-market on a non-firm, interruptible basis. Therefore, if firm contracts are honored before interruptible contracts, if the firm customers require more gas, and the capacity of the gas transportation is based on firm contracts, less capacity is available for interruptible supply. This can result in generating units becoming unavailable as there is no pipeline capacity to supply interruptible gas.”

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3a9b3aea5f6944438248d3c2cef3de62a302bfd9b94ab5e33f99d4bfeb112d35.png

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    Natural gas to replace coal – yes, no brainer, not only in US but Europe and Asia but if it becomes more expensive, I’ll not be surprised. It’s world demand for it now.

    But we’d not use solar and wind if cheaper than natural gas when we can? We’d just burn more expensive fuel for the heck of it?

    Lucky for us, saner heads prevail in the real world economy.

    wind and solar will never replace gas 100%. Only real zealots and cultists believe that but then again, only real zealots and cultists refuse to see solar and wind as legitimate fuels.

    It’s sorta like saying that hydro is not reliable because it can’t provide power 24/7. It can’t. It’s limited also but when it can provide power why in the world would we CHOOSE to burn more expensive fuel. It’s the same with wind and solar.

  4. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Unfortunately, when zealots and cultists make poor choices on energy policy everyone freezes except the uneducated hicks in the hills that burn sustainable firewood, eat organic vegetables from their own gardens, and harvest delicious turkeys from their poultry yards.
    Who’s the dumb A$$ now city boy?

  5. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    This is easy. On days when there isn’t enough electricity being generator, Dominion smart meters cut power to Democrats. Problem solved.

  6. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    be prepared to freeze

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Texans froze, right? all that natural gas froze up as well and the wind turbines couldn’t keep up.

      ” Data showed that failure to winterize power sources, principally natural gas infrastructure but also to a lesser extent wind turbines, had caused the grid failure,[15][16] with a drop in power production from natural gas more than five times greater than that from wind turbines”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Texas_power_crisis#:~:text=Data%20showed%20that%20failure%20to,than%20that%20from%20wind%20turbines.

      THe problem we got in BR is selective history by the pro fossil fuel folks so some of us have to keep bringing up “the rest of the story” to keep them honest.

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        President Obama, 2/23/2012.

        “You know there are no quick fixes to this problem. You know we can’t just drill our way to lower gas prices. If we’re going to take control of our energy future and can start avoiding these annual gas price spikes that happen every year — when the economy starts getting better, world demand starts increasing, turmoil in the Middle East or some other parts of the world — if we’re going to avoid being at the mercy of these world events, we’ve got to have a sustained, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy. Yes, oil and gas, but also wind and solar and nuclear and biofuels, and more.”

        Twelve years old, but hardly out of date.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Possums and hognose snakes.

    “The unusual (but not unprecedented and upward trending) warmth this winter…”. Fixed

  8. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Unfortunately, when zealots and cultists make poor choices on energy policy everyone freezes except the uneducated hicks in the hills that burn sustainable firewood, eat organic vegetables from their own gardens, and harvest delicious turkeys from their poultry yards.
    Who’s the dumb A$$ now city boy?

  9. DJRippert Avatar

    California shows a glimpse of the future for Virginia under the Virginia Democrats’ plans.

    Electrical companies in California are being asked to calculate an income-based surcharge to cover the additional costs of going green.

    “Electric prices in California are among the highest in the nation, with residents paying in March an average of 27.15 cents per kilowatt hour compared with the nation’s average of 15.85 cents, according to the Energy Information Administration. “And the cost to move to net zero as well as upgrade the state’s grid will be very high …”

    Beyond the already sky-high energy prices already being charged in California, a San Diego family making $70,000 per year will pay a surcharge of $876 per year while a family making $190,000 per year will pay $1,536 per year. That’s over and above the extremely high costs of electricity already being charged.

    As energy prices skyrocket in California, major employers will leave the state (see: Hewlitt-Packard, Tesla, Oracle). As the cost of living skyrockets for middle and upper middle class families, those families will leave for other states.

    And who will move?

    The San Francisco Chronicle studied recent movements into and out of San Francisco. The newspaper found that 39,000 San Franciscans who had filed federal tax returns for 2018 had moved out of the city before filing 2019 returns. Collectively, they took $10.6 billion in income with them while people who moved to the city during that period reported just $3.8 billion in income.

    Virginia’s Dems ought to keep a watchful eye on California as they virtue signal with the shutdown of affordable natural gas and rush into the uncharted waters of being among the most green of US states.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2023/06/20/california-electricity-bills-income-based/70331875007/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      When I read the article, I get the impression this is NOT for electricity but for upgrading the system:

      “The lowest income users would pay the smallest fixed charge while the highest earners would pay the largest to cover the upgrade, maintenance and transitioning of the electric grid

      ” San Diego Gas & Electric says income limits will vary by the number of people in households but, basically, those with an annual household income of:

      ◾ Less than $28,000* would pay a $24 fixed charge

      ◾ $28,000 to about $69,000* would pay $34

      ◾ $69,000 to $180,000 would pay $73

      ◾ $180,000 or more would pay $128 ”

      Means-testing for some things is not new.

      But think about what California is doing:

      ” The plans are in response to a new state law (AB 205) requiring utilities to adopt a fixed price – based on household income – to help fund the wires, poles, meters, and customer service that will drive the state’s transition to renewable energy”

      It’s not for electricity itself. It’s to modernize
      the grid.

      It’s something that both PJM and Dominion say needs to be done in Virginia also but
      we have not got to how to pay for it.

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        Right. The electricity costs are already sky-high and likely to go higher. Then, there’s upgrades to the grid to help “drive the state’s transition to renewable energy”

        It seems to me that Virginia will soon be in the same spot. Fast escalating electricity prices along with a grid upgrade tab that will seem shocking.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Right now , many in Va pay about 25 cents an hour to power our homes. It’s that’s not a bargain, I don’t know what is!

          and the thing is , we waste electricity hand over fist… IMO whereas in California, people are much more aware
          of not wasting electricity. THey us far less than we do.

          But we too need to upgrade the grid , even PJM says that. There are no free lunches. It will cost to do it and
          we need to get to it and stop whining about California.

  10. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    The public thinks they understand that it is “open season” for incredibly expensive energy options such as off-shore wind and nuclear. Elected officials and Dominion profit from that approach. Add in the increasing need to absolve lower incomes of contributing to the cost, then, what’s not to like? But the burden assumes we do not need to attract growth in Virginia, and we hope Bacon’s Boomergeddon does not materialize, which looks like it’s now a concern. Dems basically giving a $million+ deferred tax bill to each and every taxpayer who can afford it at some future date.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      The average person probably does not know the LCOE for the various options. They probably think Nukes and wind/solar are cheap(er).

      We save money and energy in the future if we upgrade the grid now IMO.

      Boomergeddon is Grade A Libertarian Boogeyman Blather IMO.

      It’s a totally pessimistic doom & gloom view of the future when it’s not warranted at all. We got issues and challenges. We always have. We manage to muddle on.

      Have you looked at WHO is trying to come across the border to get to the USA these days. It AIN’T “poor” Mexicans. THey’re from all over the world and they buy plane tickets to Mexico!

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        The terrorism budgets in their home countries pay the travel costs. 🙂 I did see a story on CNN about the Chinese nationals and how much they were spending (still paying the cartels, of course.)

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        The terrorism budgets in their home countries pay the travel costs. 🙂 I did see a story on CNN about the Chinese nationals and how much they were spending (still paying the cartels, of course.)

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          The thing that grabbed me is that they’re NOT “poor” and they STILL want to come to the USA that is said to
          be going to hell in a handbasket in a wide variety of ways. Still WAY BETTER than where they are. And many
          other countries also. They come here. They get “registered” and set up for a hearing and disappear into the country. They do not become “homeless” like our folks do. THey don’t have a problem with “affordable” housing like we do. And they don’t need “entitlements” or “means-tested” stuff.. they’re just happy to be here except how some of us
          treat them because of our “politics”.

          1. And they don’t need “entitlements” or “means-tested” stuff.

            Says who?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Gotta have an SS or green card for most of that. There may be some “free” stuff like at Food Banks but no TANF or Medicaid, or SSI, or Section 8 housing, etc. The kids DO receive an education.

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Who needs section 8 housing when you can split a 3-bedroom house 10 ways? Prop the screen door open to find more people to share the house.

          4. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Who needs section 8 housing when you can split a 3-bedroom house 10 ways? Prop the screen door open to find more people to share the house.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            Yep. not the best but way better than whining about “affordable housing”, or living on the streets, living in cars, and panhandling.

          6. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            It’s not the best at all, when the neighborhood starts looking like a slum.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar

            I don’t disagree but they’re doing the best they can do apparently and I’d ask is that better or worse than if
            they set up tent cities under bridges , power line rights of way, Prince William Park? I’d also point out there are
            Asian immigrants which don’t do what the Hispanics do and are somewhat invisible except their kids seem
            to beat the pants off the other non-Asian kids.

          8. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            How do you know they aren’t setting up tent cities in those locations?

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            well, if it was mostly undocumented Hispanic tent cities, I imagine it would be all over the news. No? What
            happens with many immigrants is that they “know” someone who is already here and they take them in, ergo
            many in one house. THey tell them: “if you can get into the USA, come to where I am and you can start to
            make a life here until you get your feet on the ground financially”. That’s all most of them want, just a place
            to get started.

          10. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            The very presence of the “tent cities” in PWC is hardly reported by the news.

          11. LarrytheG Avatar

            They would be if it were a bunch of undocumented immigrants. Not so much if it is good old American folk.

            I think it’s a bit of a miracle all these thousands coming in and most of the seem to just melt into the fabric.

          12. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            The perps with “no fixed address” in the local police reports seem to be pretty well mixed.

          13. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hispanic and Asian undocumenteds?

          14. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I have no idea if they’re “undocumented”, the police report doesn’t say.

            Few Asians, but I think there are few Asians in PWC compared to the others.

          15. LarrytheG Avatar

            Oh I’m pretty sure if they were those on the right would make a deal about it.

          16. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            The few people saying anything about the homeless camps in PWC are on the right. They aren’t bringing race, documented status, or national origin into it, probably because they know that the people on the left would call them racist if they did.

          17. LarrytheG Avatar

            Oh but FOX and the Daily Wire and other media WOULD! The undocumented know this and stay out of sight. We
            have panhandlers on the medians down this way and they are largely of the white variety not hispanics who would
            become targets for some.

          18. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I’ve seen a few hispanic panhandlers in PWC. Gonna guess that there are more hispanics in PWC, as a percentage of the population, than there are down your way.

          19. LarrytheG Avatar

            Yes. Maybe. A lot of them are now in the “tree” business judging from how many I see. THey’re scouting for gringos
            who don’t know what the right price is for taking down a tree…

          20. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I just do what Dominion Power does. If the tree needs to come down, God will send a big strong gust of wind and it’ll come down for free.

          21. LarrytheG Avatar

            on the car or house?

          22. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            That’s what insurance is for, isn’t it?

          23. LarrytheG Avatar

            mine says live trees -yes, dead trees – on you

          24. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I’ve seen a few hispanic panhandlers in PWC. Gonna guess that there are more hispanics in PWC, as a percentage of the population, than there are down your way.

Leave a Reply