Racism Investigators Report Use of the N-Word at VMI

by James A. Bacon

After interviews with 46 Virginia Military Institute alumni, ten members of the Board of Visitors, 14 current and past faculty members, five cadets and four parents, Barnes & Thornburg, the law firm appointed by the Northam administration to probe racism at the military academy, has identified eight individuals who said they either were called the n-word or overheard the use of the n-word over the past 25 years.

On the other hand, “many” cadets and recent alumni told the investigative team they “never heard racial slurs such as the n-word or saw or experienced racial intolerance,” states the interim report of the equity audit and investigation.

Moreover, the report notes that when VMI administrators were alerted to racial incidents, they investigated them and often meted out punishments. An internal VMI document cited in the report described 17 incidents between 2014 and 2020 that had a racial component, most of which entailed use of racial slurs, including the n-word. Thirteen allegations were substantiated, and in each case, offending cadets were punished. Punishments ranged from five to 50 “penalty tours” (an hour’s worth of supervised marching while carrying a rifle), to confinement to barracks, cultural awareness training, written apologies, and loss of rank.

The VMI investigation has a long way to go, as Barnes and Thornburg has many more people to interview and surveys to compile. Evidence of more extensive racism may turn up. But the findings of episodic incidents over 25 years are thin gruel for Governor Ralph Northam, who in launching the investigation condemned what he called “the clear and appalling culture of ongoing structural racism” at VMI, and the Washington Post, whose reporting sparked the investigation, which described “relentless racism” at the academy.

The investigators acknowledge the limitations of their findings. Many of the early interviews occurred with individuals who reached out to the Team and “may be those who feel the most strongly about the underlying issues and are the most vocal.” Also it is important to recognize that authors of the report made no effort to ascertain the veracity of the complaints; they are simply reporting the allegations. But the investigation is still early, and Barnes & Thornburg may turn up more information supporting the racism charges. The investigative team is reaching out to current cadets who might feel intimidated about speaking out. Surveys may turn up unflattering perceptions. And a probe into the role of race in Honor Code trials could turn up evidence of bias.

There were at least two surprising twists to the findings. One is that the treatment of females may be a bigger issue than the treatment of minorities. “A number of interviewees have stated that they thought the real issue at VMI is the treatment of women, including incidents of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and other disparate treatment and harassment based on gender,” stated the report.

According to a July 2020 survey, 8% of female cadets responded that they had experienced some sort of sexual assault — a category of offenses that can range from rape to unwanted touching. (Unstated in the report: More than 26% of college women nationally report being victims of sexual assault, which makes VMI a relative safe haven.) Also, the report noted, female cadets experienced “sexism.” By way of example, the report notes that male cadets sometimes called women “she-dets” or “sheeds,” which is understood to be a derogatory term.

The other twist was the acknowledgement of a divide between cadets, who are predominantly white, and athletes, who are disproportionately black.

One source of tension among the cadets is perhaps not a direct issue of race, but appears to be intertwined with race: the divide between those cadets who participate in NCAA athletics and those who do not. While some alumni observed that “every cadet is an athlete,” alumni and current cadets often refer to this divide as a clear one between “athletes” and “cadets.” VMI’s student body is roughly 6% African-American. However, roughly 60% of African-American cadets are athletes.

Freshmen cadets undergo the “Rat Line” for six months, a harrowing experience similar to basic training, with freshmen as the “rats” and upperclassmen as the cadre. Rats participate in parades, inspections and other military events during the year. Athletes are excused from many of these obligations, exempting them from many rigors of the rat line. Cadets often refer to athletes as “permits,” a disparaging term that alludes to their perceived privileged status.

One mixed-race graduate told Barnes & Thornburg he thought that athletes did not take VMI’s regimental system as seriously and were resented by other cadets as a result. He also believed that athletes were less likely to follow the Honor Code. An African-American graduate, a former athlete, interviewed by investigators reported that athletes were perceived as slackers who attended VMI for the athletics.

“When majority black athletes refuse to conform to the military system at VMI,” said one cadet, “it causes an issue between athletes and non athletes who came to VMI for the military system. … When the majority of those athletes are black, it creates unconscious bias within the corps against black cadets. which is the reason for the issues with race at VMI.”

Some athletes, said another cadet, “get here and do not respect the rules or ratline, and this builds resentment against them. Some of these athletes with this attitude are of color and interpret this resentment as racism. It isn’t. It is due to their attitude, or perceived attitude, of believing they are outside the rules.”

Investigators found that VMI administrators were forthright in official policies and statements that racism would not be tolerated, and the report documented the fact that the administration frequently punished cadets for race-related offenses. However, the Barnes & Thornburg team quoted a handful of alumni and faculty who said that there was a “culture of silence” and that not all racial incidents were investigated.

The final report is due in June.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Racism Investigators Report Use of the N-Word at VMI”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Funny. The WaPo version on this reads very differently. Wonder why….

    Can somebody give me the inside skinny on why the Governor is so eager to destroy his alma mater? “Change” is not going to the outcome of this — the school is going to be so tainted it will simply go away if this keeps up.

    1. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      A shame with so much History.

      As in my grandfather J. Harvie and his cousin both at Newmarket. (Yes actually my grandfather, not my great grandfather!)

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        My third great grand uncle was there. General Imboden. It was hard luck to be married to this man. 5 wives. Courageous in battle.
        https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Gen._J.D._Imboden%2C_C.S.A_-_NARA_-_529238.jpg

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        My third great grand uncle was there. General Imboden. It was hard luck to be married to this man. 5 wives. Courageous in battle.
        https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Gen._J.D._Imboden%2C_C.S.A_-_NARA_-_529238.jpg

    2. owen dunlap Avatar
      owen dunlap

      Its a mystery at this point … He has made no statement to the VMI alumni that i am aware of about why he signed a letter with the legislative black caucus that tagged VMI as a racist school when he called for this investigation. He has also never made any statement to the VMI alumni on why he was not at a medical school party in blackface in the early 80’s ( until he was of course )- as a ex honor court president at VMI who ran for office on that – i feel at some point he owes the alumni an explanation about how he handled that.

    3. I do not see where VMI has yet been tainted. Scholarship athletes are held to the same high academic and ethics standards. One third the sexual assaults. Reports are investigated and punishment is rendered. FYI, VMI applications up 8%, where overall college applications are down 7%.

  2. A VMI grad who asks to remain anonymous contacted me by email and asked the following questions. I repeat those questions here with his permission.

    I’m a VMI grad, and I’ve been very vocal about having VMI change for the better. I was sent your blog post from today, and I had some questions:
    • You imply that the preliminary findings are statistically insignificant. From a legal point of view, this type of finding would constitute prima facie evidence that something is indeed wrong at VMI. Do you believe that the investigation is warranted at all into the culture of VMI?
    • You imply that respondents have an axe to grind. More to the point, do you believe that the respondents are lying? In my view, having an axe to grind because you’ve been called racial epithets is a pretty reasonable reaction.
    • On the 8% of VMI women vs. 26% nationally who say they’ve been victims of sexual assault, do you have any additional color on either of those statistics? If 26% of women nationally report abuse, does that mean abuse while at school or at the hands of fellow students? Ditto for the 8% of VMI women. It might actually be an apples to oranges comparison you’ve made, depending on what was asked.
    • As to your baseline, do you believe that racism is inevitable at college and that VMI is within the norm? From my own experience, I can say that I heard and saw more racism at VMI than the rest of my academic and professional life combined. So I wonder what your alma mater may have been like.

    1. I love this one: “From my own experience, I can say that I heard and saw more racism at
      VMI than the rest of my academic and professional life combined.”
      REALLY — YOUR WORK PLACE HAS BEEN DIFFERENT FROM COLLEGE? Shocker! I saw much more drug use in college than in my professional life. I saw much more drinking in college than in my professional life. I saw much more poorly dressed in college than in my professional life. Who in their right mind would compare the two?

      Regarding the sexual assault issue – if you knew anything about Title IX under Obama [and probably soon to be Biden] — you would know that a mere glance could be defined as ‘sexual assault’. And that those reporting numbers are both for on campus and off actions— but is counted as college-centric because it involved a college student.

      1. sam elias Avatar
        sam elias

        kls, to be fair, I don’t think that more drinking, drugs and sloppy clothes are the same things as racism. Should we expect a lot more racism in college? Is that what you’re arguing?

        1. i didn’t say they were the same, just that people act differently in the workplace than they did in college – across the board. to compare the two environments is crazy.

          1. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            I think you ought to re-read what s/he said. It didn’t make a comparison between work and school. It said that he heard and saw more racism at VMI (presumably four years) than everything else (school and professional life) afterward. It’s a comparison of lengths of time, as I read it, not between professional/academic life. Assuming this person is an older professional, that’s pretty disturbing.

    2. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      It would be instructive, for context to know the grad’s ethnicity and year of graduation.

    3. owen dunlap Avatar
      owen dunlap

      This VMI alumni is obviously so ” woke” that he not only wants VMI to be labeled as a “racist” but also as unsafe for anyone to send a daughter there. You note an area that the investigation shows that VMI actually is better in comparison on % sexual assaults than the nation average and so his take is that this ” might actually be a apples to oranges comparison” . He questions the 26% number you used and said ” does that mean abuse while at school or by fellow students” . This just in – college students party/ drink together – not with locals for the most part – and my guess is the very high % of this 26% is student on student accusations.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Jim, I am so disappointed with you. I saw the Ira Schapira study when I picked up my WaPo on my driveway at 6 a.m. It took you more than two and a half hours to come up with your blog post. Are you slowing down?

    1. I know, I know, I let him get the jump on me. I’m mortified.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Not like VMI hasn’t been a bad actor in the past.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Not a bad actor in the past. How about VPI? College president has time to warn his family of an active shooter but not the campus?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Institutional, James. Institutional.
        Maybe they just think, “This is how a military behaves.”

    2. owen dunlap Avatar
      owen dunlap

      Nancy – examples or is snark your only play?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        How about early 2000s coercing prayers? Ya know proselytizing.

        1. owen dunlap Avatar
          owen dunlap

          so pursuing a position on a legal matter thru the court system is “bad acting”- try again

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So I get successfully sued for violating separation of Church and State, and the plaintiffs are the bad actor?

          2. owen dunlap Avatar
            owen dunlap

            i guess your definition of ” bad actors” and mine are not the same – mine is a party that acts in bad faith or outside the normal processes – i guess your is folks you dont agree with or who lose court cases — in the case you mention – neither party is a bad actor to me – both have a position and work it out in court

          3. owen dunlap Avatar
            owen dunlap

            i guess your definition of ” bad actors” and mine are not the same – mine is a party that acts in bad faith or outside the normal processes – i guess your is folks you dont agree with or who lose court cases — in the case you mention – neither party is a bad actor to me – both have a position and work it out in court

          4. sam elias Avatar
            sam elias

            I’ll tell you what’s acting in bad faith…having B&T explain to you in excruciating detail that they are not asking for VMI to suspend the honor code, and instead only asking that the report not be used to punish investigation participants, but then ten days later (!) sending a blast email accusing the law firm of wanting VMI to “suspend the honor code.” That’s bad faith.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            If it had been 1970, then yes… maybe, but this was 2001 and the issue of prayer in a State school had been long resolved. But then, if you believe its true then it’s not a lie, eh George?

Leave a Reply