Martin Luther King Middle School Richmond. Credit RCPS.

by James C. Sherlock

I have crafted and will share what I believe to be an epitaph for public education in Virginia.

All of the evidence we see is that Virginia’s public school system, counseled and cheered on by its disgraceful publicly funded schools of education, is crumbling at its foundations.

We start children in school at ever younger ages to give them a head start. We have moved supervision of child care to the Department of Education, thus rearranging the deck chairs.

Many of the adults in the system, and quite possibly many of the students, have given up on education in actual facts. Adults argue about the teaching of history as if, evidence aside, kids were going to learn it.

Displacing traditional course time, teachers are directed to spend dedicated hours to try to instill social-emotional learning that kids traditionally learned at home.

Those kids who already have those skills sit wondering what they have done wrong.

The lessons plans, unfortunately, will tell them soon enough.

But that is just the beginning.

Many school divisions will not remove troublemakers from the classroom or school lest they seem unfair, thus being overwhelmingly unfair to those kids who want to learn and teachers who want to teach.

Self-described “sensitive” divisions do that to try to give the troublemakers self-esteem. Many of those kids wind up in the criminal justice system anyway, but presumably feeling better about themselves. Hopefully before they wound or kill a teacher or another student or deal fentanyl to a classmate.

A singular goal of some less ambitious adults is, apparently, that their kids just not be arrested at school — that they not become part of what “advocates” have named a “school-to-prison pipeline.”

They can’t deem it a “home-to-prison pipeline.” That would harm the fragile self-esteem of the caregivers. And of school board members for whom the caregivers vote.

As was noted recently with seeming wry amusement by city of Richmond school board members, daytime crime surges when children of a local middle school they named are not in school.

The dismal data and trends on state and federal achievement tests are testimony to collapse.

So, as a solution, “advocates” are working to get achievement tests cancelled. In doing so they carry water for the adults in the system. Who, under the burning spotlight of horrible student achievement results, surrender self esteem.

Some schools will survive, but not nearly all of them.

Southwest Virginia schools have students who are overwhelmingly poor, but also maintain orderly classrooms staffed by willing and skilled teachers with excellent leadership. They remain under pressure by shrinking populations.

Loudoun, Fairfax and other wealthy divisions have some identifiably good schools and some bad schools. Loudoun and Fairfax school divisions are badly led, and have been publicly exposed to be so, but generally stay afloat on world-class resources — and far more Asian kids — than less well-resourced divisions. Kids in their low performing schools suffer nonetheless.

Something else entirely will need to be built from the rubble of many of Virginia’s public schools.

But first we have to admit the problem. Most of the loudest voices are in denial. So we “slouch towards Armageddon in the schools, as in much else.

There are honorable exceptions, but not enough.

I desperately wish it were not true, but I cannot find a single path forward that has any chance of being adopted before near-total collapse. The adults in the system are too vested in the current structure (they use the word “scaffolding” to signal ed-speak sophistication) of public education they have assembled.

Parents object, but cannot get enough control to make a difference.

So, the system drifts onto well-charted shoals with fewer and fewer teachers and students, sustained only by the poverty and the rigidly enforced lack of choices of those students who remain.

Those students in turn are increasingly unwillingly to be there as demonstrated by unimaginable rates of chronic absenteeism.

Critiques like this one from people who have been trying for many years to right things so that poor kids can get an education are deemed racist — sort of an all- encompassing term for people who put at risk the self esteem of the architects of the failing system we have.

Self-esteem such as that, however misplaced, has become intolerably expensive.

Meanwhile, parents who both care and can afford to do so are educating their kids elsewhere. Many of those who will not or cannot change to a different system sentence kids to go down with the ship.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

70 responses to “R.I.P. Virginia Public Schools”

  1. This seems a bit strange to me. Securely funded and well established social systems do not normally collapse. In fact there is typically no way to make them do so. Thus I cannot imagine how the public education system might do so. Can you describe how it might actually happen? The schools are not going to simply close.

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      They will stay open, the schools won’t teach anything useful. That is what he means by collapse. When the boomer generation dies off the United states will cease to exist as a Republic.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        What absolute, baseless nonsense. Frankly, the schools remain the best hope for kids coming out of dire situations. They have to deal with social media and screen-fried brains and parents who won’t enforce any work ethic, and yes, too many ideological battlers from both sides. The crime and worst behavior comes in from outside and is not the fault of the schools themselves. Enough students succeed in enough places to prove it is still possible.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        What absolute, baseless nonsense. Frankly, the schools remain the best hope for kids coming out of dire situations. They have to deal with social media and screen-fried brains and parents who won’t enforce any work ethic, and yes, too many ideological battlers from both sides. The crime and worst behavior comes in from outside and is not the fault of the schools themselves. Enough students succeed in enough places to prove it is still possible. Agreed they are struggling.

        1. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          If you think that enough of these “kids” will work so the rest can get goodies from Uncle Sugar guess again. Govt says that there are 1.8 jobs available for every unemployed person in the country. Crime is exploding and no one goes to jail. Especially killers. The media keeps telling kids that “men” can have children and that women can become men. The govt is talking about regulating farms out of business Inflation is running at 10% for food alone.The US population is in a mass psychosis. Shall I go on?

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Not. The. Schools’. Fault. Not. Things. Schools. Can. Fix.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Without minimum standards of behavior and reward of merit, the schools reflect the worst of their micro societies.

            They reflect in Virginia the unfiltered wishes of those micro societies organized as school divisions. Because the Virginia constitution offers no filter.

            Thus they endlessly replicate the lowest common denominator of those populations, lowering the social standards of each generation.

            They have been doing it so long in many areas of the state that some divisions are past the tipping point. They have produced so many graduates without standards that the populations of some of them no longer understand the meaning of merit or decorum.

            The schools must stop adjusting to accommodate social dysfunction. They must be again meritocratic systems supporting achievement, not failure.

            I do not see that happening anytime soon.

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            “Thus they endlessly replicate the lowest common denominator of those populations, lowering the social standards of each generation.” Ummm, can you give an example? This is loaded language…

          4. M. Purdy Avatar

            Here’s something: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/virginia-school-district-6-year-old-allegedly-shot-teacher-three-schoo-rcna64638 Maybe if we did something about guns, we could spend less time of mass shooter drills and more time on school and discipline. As a parent of three Virginia public school students, I assure you that I’m more concerned with random shootings than DEI.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            the “governing” philosophy is certainly different… It WILL be interesting to see if Youngkin and the GOP propose new “hardening” for elementary schools… they all get Magnetometers and money for staff to
            maintain and operate?

          6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            … and not actually happening to boot…

          7. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            Like Fairfax county public schools did by system wide banning of notification of students receiving National Merit commendations? Is this the “fixing” you are referring too?

      3. Teddy007 Avatar

        As if the public schools did that well during the boomer generation. Remember, 1954 was the first year that more than 50% of 19 y/o had completed college. The average graduate in the 1960’s had no foreign language, barely took algebra, and barely covered any history except the history of whites in the U.S. and Great Britain.

          1. Teddy007 Avatar

            The GDP accelerated in the 1970’s after the push for more STEM classes in colleges and the debt from World War II was paid off. And the GDP is more driven by population growth. That is why the pr-open borders, replacement progressives use as an excuse for their plan to make the U.S. a one party state and make a patron class for themselves.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            GDP per capita, as opposed to GDP? So no real connection between GDP and education attainment/literacy?

            Or perhaps what’s a good, better way to judge the benefits of public education?

            My impression is that there is a connection between education/literacy attainment levels and economic performance.

            That, that is a core purpose of public education, versus the govt staying out of it and letting it be what parents choose to do and/or can afford to.

            So, if we think our education system in the US is “failing”, it’s a big deal – if it’s actually true.

            So what is the truth?

            Is this country going downhill on education and as a result we will also go downhill in GDP and economic performance?

            Or we need to become the only developed country in the world that transitions to publically-funed private school and only for the kids that behave and are not disruptive?

          3. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            I was with you until the one party state and permanent underclass bit, lol.

          4. Teddy007 Avatar

            Look at California. Due to demographic changes, California is a functional one party state where the general election is pointless is virtually every Democratic incumbent gets automatically re-elected.
            In addition, California has a much bigger wealth gap than most other states.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            Don’t forget who the speaker of the House is these days and where he comes from! 😉

          6. Teddy007 Avatar

            From one of the few Republican district left. Look up the last time a Republican won a statewide race in California. And the top two primary systems reinforces the one party nature of California. Also, the middle class has been moving out of California as it has become a state of the wealthy, immigrants, and servants.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar

            I thought there were several GOP congressmen from California and one might presume that the districts
            they are from, that elected them also vote GOP in other elections especially local ones both govt and schools, no?

          8. Teddy007 Avatar

            12 out of 52 Congressional districts. The state senate is 32 to 8. The state house is 62 to 18. The Republicans in California are irrelevant and have zero effect on governance or policy inside California.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            They have relevance in the districts that do vote GOP including the local governance and the schools, no?

          10. Teddy007 Avatar

            Here is a referene. https://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-political-geography/ There are a few sparely populated conties where the Republicans are the majority. However, they have zero influence on statewide policy or governance. And the schools in California are separate from other local governments.

          11. LarrytheG Avatar

            but they are “GOP” enough to elect Congressmen, no? And if a district is that much GOP , it means their scools are likely also run by GOP-elected who DO have the ability to influence how the schools are operated locally.

            right?

          12. Teddy007 Avatar

            In a state where Trump received 32% of the the Republicans hold less than 30% of the Congressional seats and well below 30% of the statehouse seats. That is a sign of being irrelevant. There is a huge difference between being irrelevant and not exist at all. A Republican Party exist in California. It is irrelevant. And one would have to investigate who schools operate in California to see how much the locals can do.

          13. LarrytheG Avatar

            I don’t think they are irrelevant in the counties when they are the elected majority and make decisions involving local issues including local taxes, local services and local schools. They have a lot of control on how the schools are operated, just like in Virginia where Region 7 rural schools are operated not the same way
            as other schools in other regions.

          14. Teddy007 Avatar

            One again, one needs to show that the really operate their school differently. There are state cirriculum requirements and requirements for getting students admitted to state universities. At best those local politicians have control over hiring, firing, and spending money. But then every local government has that. However, they are almost no control over textbooks, curriculum, or graduation requirements.

          15. LarrytheG Avatar

            The elected school boards DO have control over how the school are operated, not everything agreed, but quite a lot including stricter standards if they want.

            Used to be people would say the best governance was the one closest to the people because it’s
            more accountable. Still True. If you want better schools, you CAN do it!

            We blame local school boards in Va for their policies – policies they vote for that others outside those
            districts disagree with and want the state to override them which in my mind is corrupting the entire
            premise of local accountable governance.

          16. Not Today Avatar

            The higher wealth gap is because red states don’t have many high incomes at all. There’s a balance to be struck between allowing big wealth accumulation while still maintaining a living wage floor. Despite high taxes, CA remains an economic engine for the nation, contributing billions annually to the federal coffers that are redistributed to states that use it to subsidize businesses at the expense of education and wages and healthcare and on and on. I believe it recently switched to a top two electoral system as well. It’s not California dems’ fault that Pete Wilson (Trump before Trump) destroyed the Republican brand with prop 187. 🤷‍♀️ It has many excesses/extremes, true, but it is not a failed state by any measure.

          17. Teddy007 Avatar

            The biggest economic driver in California is silicon valley which actually does not employ that many people along with shipping. And the Democrats were in the majority before prop 187. The Republicans failed to understand that their pursuit for cheap labor for construction and real estate would eventually kill the Republican Party.

          18. Not Today Avatar

            Republicans and Democrats often traded power before prop 187. Reagan is a CA creature after all. Pete Wilson did as much to kill the brand in California as a Trump and his congressional clowns are doing to kill it in congress. They’re a party without ideas to help real people and the few ideas they do have (like slashing defense spending and social security) are disfavored by huge majorities. From a long-term electoral perspective, like Pete Wilson’s gambit, it makes zero sense.

          19. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            I just wonder how much of that is due to how much value we produce compared to the fact the the US dollar is the world’s dominant reserve currency? It seems that our country has been riding this coat tail for sometime, not unlike Virginia benefits disproportionately from the location of the national capital.

            https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11707#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20dollar%20is%20the,central%20banks%20in%20significant%20quantities.

        1. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          Amazing what was accomplished by that generation and the generation before.

        2. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          hmm guess you better look all those invention you use today that were designed by those generations.

          1. Teddy007 Avatar

            One may want to go back to the science and math push in the U.S. after the Russians put a man in orbit.

          2. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            there was a lot of science and math pushed before WW2, a lot of it self learned.

          3. Teddy007 Avatar

            Very few Americans had studied calculus until college before the 1950’s.

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Have we built a system that can no longer continue to add layers and layers of requirements to meet the needs of all? I am perplexed at how schooling as it is now was never intended to do what it is expected to do.

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      Teachers have told me that this is one of the reasons that their peers are leaving the profession in droves.

  3. Teddy007 Avatar

    The issue with schools (public or private) is that they can either ensure that all graduates function at the 12th grade level while failing a large number of student or the schools can graduate virtually everyone while having some of those graduate be functional illiterates. The problem, on both the left and right, is the belief that every student can function at the 12th grade level if the schools just follow a certain program/process.

    1. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      I don’t think anyone is confused about this. I think they’re unwilling to accept that the ‘subpars’ might also want/get higher education access.

      1. Teddy007 Avatar

        Many people are confused about this. Most citizens will throw a fit if a school fails a large number of students or if the school graduates students who cannot function as the high school level.

        1. Not Today Avatar
          Not Today

          Nothing about the output of schools has changed tho. They’ve always failed large swaths of kids.

          1. Teddy007 Avatar

            The schools do not fail many students any more. See the recent issues about the Baltimore City Schools.

          2. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            They do fail them in prepping them for life. The HS diploma has been thoroughly devalued in practice.

          3. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            Public high school diplomas are completely devalued. We have much higher graduation rates than years past but graduate increasing numbers of functional illiterates (all of whom have passed the precious SOL’s). It’s a shame that Virginia schools didn’t stay focused on just producing the best graduates at every level. I think the system has already collapsed. The public just doesn’t know it.

          4. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            I don’t find the graduates functionally illiterate. I simply think too few are prepared to succeed in post secondary education programs that lead to jobs/careers with living wages and good benefits.

          5. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            Certainly not all of them. We graduate some truly amazing kids. I wish everyone could meet some of them. They’re inspiring. It’s a great part of my job to meet so many good kids.
            You are correct, too few prepared to succeed.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            As bad as it seems, and I agree, it’s not wonderful, Virginia, despite dropping in the NAEP rankings is still better than half the other states.

            Further, we seem to have a love/hate relationship with performance metrics like the SOLs.

            Do we, should we, measure academic performance and progress?

            Virginia is but one of 50 states that uses standardized testing to ascertain academic progress and performance.

            NAEP is a standardized test as is PISA used to compare countries.

            Our educsation system has not “collapsed”.

            We have one of the strongest economies in the world with one of the highest GDP per capita in the world.

            This is in the 21st century where literacy is key to the things necessary to power the economy.

            But we have also chosen to abandon things like Common Core which is more like how Europe and Asia do education.

            And we’re not going to “fix” the problem by going to non-public schools where we academic standards and performance are not even reported publically for the most part. We just don’t see private schools really touting their superior academics with actual numbers.

          7. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            I’m a math guy. I love metrics. Testing is one way to get some data on where we are as an educational system. What I dislike is how Virginia tests. I wish I were a good enough writer to explain how destructive SOLs are. We easily lose 10% of the instructional year to testing. I would argue it’s more, but 10% is easy to see. We definitely could and should measure academic performance. Unfortunately we don’t. There must be a better way.
            I have some familiarity with private schools. They have standardized tests to measure progress. They just don’t make it the centerpiece of the curriculum like Virginia.
            What’s a good measurement of educational achievement?
            If you have the ability, I would encourage you to get hired as a substitute in a high school. Try to work a few days per month to get to know some kids. Offer to tutor if you can. It will blow your mind.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            Mr. Chips. Va’s SOLs are called high-stakes testing which few care for and more than a few detest. If
            we want a better way, I’m all for it but to argue that we should get rid of SOLs with no replacement makes
            me ask do we want to know our academic performance. You mention private schools and standardized testing. I’m fine with that if that works and we still publish it so we know but I do find it a little ironic
            that most private schools do not actually make that data available to the public so we KNOW they do
            a good job at academic performance. My only question is – “Do we want to measure”? IF we say we do,
            find a way we do like and do it as opposed to arguing against what we do now and not argue for a replacement at the same time.

          9. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            In spite of what the public thinks, we don’t measure now. Well, we do, but it’s pointless in its inaccuracy. We have a lot of graduates, and not a small percentage of them, who pass our measuring stick (SOL) but are severely lacking in education. What’s the point? It misleads students, parents, colleges, and employers about the quality of our average graduate. The one accurate part of SOL testing is that if you fail the ones you need to graduate, you really shouldn’t graduate.
            I mentioned a replacement idea to you months ago so I don’t think I’m arguing to scrap SOLs with no alternative in mind. We could administer something like the PSAT 10 test in tenth grade on one school day to all students and have a good measurement of student progress as well as overall school performance. Follow up with another test in 12th grade for an additional quality assurance check before they graduate. Done.
            If you hire good teachers (and fire bad ones) and stop wasting more than 10% of the school year on SOLs you will find that teachers can identify and remediate learning deficits on the fly. I don’t need SOL Performance Detail by Question reports to know how little Larry is doing. I can talk to him about math for 10 minutes and answer that question.

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            How would you measure K-5 for reading and math? Wouldn’t you want/need to do that rather than
            wait until the 10th grade where remediation is much more difficult and problematical?

            You say hire good teachers and fire bad ones. How do you know which is which if you don’t measure
            and have metrics?

            Are you opposed to measuring?

          11. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            I love measuring. I’m sorry I give the impression that I don’t want to measure students or teachers. My opposition to SOL testing is rooted in my experience that SOL testing in Virginia is really expensive and really wasteful of time in addition to changing the focus of schools from education to test passing.

            I’m a high school teacher so I gave an example that could work for high schools. I see no reason why it couldn’t work in lower grades too.

            I’m not sure you can easily measure good teachers and bad teachers. It’s very subjective to evaluate a teacher for the ability to connect with students, to be a master of the content area, to handle discipline, etc. A good principal can do it. We have a ridiculously complicated evaluation system that is supposed to measure and quantify teaching competence but I’m not sure it accomplishes anything other than checking boxes. Parents and students seem to be able to tell good teachers from bad teachers. I use a personal evaluation system to try and stay on track and make it easy on the administrators. At the end of the school year I speak to my principal and offer to transfer without needing any explanation. So far my work has been good enough that all 5 of my principals have rejected my offer. I must have been an ok teacher

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            Do you have a view of NAEP or PISA?

          13. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            I had never heard of PISA so I checked out their website. Seems reasonable. I think NAEP is good for tracking national trends but not necessarily for individual student metrics. NAEP should remain and we should also have some other test that is part of the assessment of each student. Exactly what SOLs are advertised to do only less wasteful of time and billions of dollars cheaper.

          14. LarrytheG Avatar

            So Gov. Youngkin says the NAEP scores for Va kids constitutes an honest gap – that the NAEP is a more accurate reflection of proficiency than the SOLs are. Would you agree?

  4. Not Today Avatar
    Not Today

    Can we put this in a time capsule and open it in 25 yrs? Pls. And thank you. 😂

  5. “The adults in the system are too vested in the current structure . . . of public education they have assembled” — a structure which is “overwhelmingly unfair to those kids who want to learn and teachers who want to teach.” And therefore, “I cannot find a single path forward that has any chance of being adopted before near-total collapse.”

    Wow. Let’s suppose you are correct, Jim — what is wrong with all those elected school boards? What is wrong with the process by which our elected officials appoint our education establishment?

    Could it be that Virginia voters (1) want this result, or (2) don’t know any better? Either way, why?

    I, too, am worried by any governmental function that exists to serve a constituency that walks away (because participating is a waste of time), administered with a self-serving bias towards its own bureaucracy, and actively subverting all measures of accountability.

    But who are we to substitute our judgment for those elected to give them?

    Yes, I know, local elections are often swayed by emotions not well grounded in the facts. And we should all pay more attention to those elections, and provide more support for local press coverage of their meetings, etc. — in short, pay more attention.

    Your coverage of these issues, here, undoubtedly helps shine a light on the problem.

    But what, institutionally, will fix it??

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      A constitutional amendment that we won’t get until it is too late for many schools and kids.

    2. MisterChips Avatar
      MisterChips

      I think 1 and 2 are both correct. The public got the public schools it wanted and unfortunately didn’t know any better. It’s also an example of a comment Mr. Sherlock made above about subsequent generations; each generation gets farther and farther from the traditions of meaningful education. The parents today were my students 20 years and in many cases they just don’t know what a good education looks like and therefore can’t demand it for their children. Over my 30 year career as a teacher I feel like we used to get closer to the target. It wasn’t great but better.
      It’s a rotten boat with too many holes. I don’t think it can be fixed. However, public education is too important to society to let it disappear. We need a revolution to rebuild a more robust system of free public education.

  6. If this educational system is so successful why do colleges have remedial courses?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      They DO. What percentage? Does it matter if the larger enrollment does not need but even a small number is “proof” that education is “failing”?

      way too much anecdotal on our judgements.

    2. Robert L. Maronic Avatar
      Robert L. Maronic

      In the 2010-11 academic year at Virginia Western Community College in Roanoke, an English professor once told me that there was unbelievably “remediation for remediation” in both math and English. I wonder what it is like in 2023?

    3. Not Today Avatar
      Not Today

      SOME colleges have remedial classes, not all. Not sure if you know this or not but most colleges in America are scrambling to fill seats because there aren’t enough high school graduates, let alone superior ones, to fill the seats. Birth rates in the U.S. have been declining for a long, long time.

  7. beachguy Avatar

    This article is spot on and perfectly articulates the current sorry state of public education. I went to public school here in Virginia. I was always a proponent of public education, recognizing only minor beneficial outcomes from private schools vs public education. That changed. I’m 70 now and the current educational landscape is unrecognizable.

  8. Not Today Avatar
    Not Today

    The problems you’re describing with mandated testing are NCLB-related. I didn’t like it when it started and neither did most educators but it was part and parcel of bringing business ethos/accountability to bear on public endeavors like education and governance.

    I wholly and completely disagree with your assessment of the reason(s) schools are the way they are tho. I think 80s/90s parents/grandparents failed the nation by refusing to restrict access to guns, by advocating whole language reading instruction, and setting teachers up as enemies of the state. Kids follow adult leads and use the tools they see advocated/touted everyday to solve problems: guns and violence.

    1. kathy blanchard Avatar
      kathy blanchard

      So you think the fight with the NRA, gun rights and restrictions are new and didn’t exist then? Granted there weren’t mass shootings, then. However there was still a cry for gun advocacy. I suppose you think the people you fault had a better chance defeating the NRAs, and gun advocates alike. Why stop there? Why not blame the parents/grandparents of the rest of yesteryear? Wars were fought, cowboys and Indians was played, there were cap guns, dart guns, water pistols, all leading up to where we are today. Everyone concerned about “their rights” , to own a gun, not wear a mask, not take a vaccine. Women want equal pay, equal rights. Yet they don’t have to sign up for the draft as their equal the man, who they want to be treated so equally. This time is full of me me me and the losers are all of us when these uneducated children rule the world.

      1. Not Today Avatar
        Not Today

        Oh no, I think it existed. I think the fight existed but the NRAs arguments prevailed because, at the time, the bogeyman was inner city violence. Guns didn’t affect everyone equally. That’s not the case today and it’s too late to undo the damage.

        I’m equally critical of the financial system ‘deregulation’ they ushered through, the higher education ‘reforms’ they advocated, and the (now) attempts to dismantle social security and Medicaid.

        I have critiques for my grandparents (silent gen) too, mostly that its white members were, on the whole, rabid racists that allowed their bigotry to bankrupt large swaths of the country. The primary origin of family breakups, violence, and poor educational outcomes is the lack of wealth and income – something the silent gen worked to systematically withhold from some and hoard for their kids. 🤷‍♀️

Leave a Reply