by Kerry Dougherty

Imagine for a moment that you are the victim of a violent crime. The perpetrator has been arrested and you thought he was about to go on trial when you learn that your local prosecutor — one of those squishy soft-on-crime types who was bankrolled by George Soros — already entered into a sweet plea deal with your attacker. You were never notified, so the judge signed off on it.

Now this predator is back on the streets.

It happens. And Virginia has several prosecutors who fall into the criminals-first-victims-second camp.

Well, thanks to bipartisan efforts by the General Assembly, this sort of chicanery is over.

SB 989, a bill that just passed both houses of the state legislature and is certain to be signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin, requires prosecutors to contact crime victims BEFORE they enter into plea agreements.

Commonwealth’s attorneys are not obligated to do what the victim wants, but they have to listen. Current Virginia law only requires prosecutors to notify victims if the victims ask to be notified.

The best part of this bill? It passed with overwhelming majorities in both houses. Introduced by Sen. Mark J. Peake, a Republican from Lynchburg at the behest of Attorney General Jason Miyares, the measure sailed through the House of Delegates 79-20 and the Senate by a vote of 30 to 10.

Shoot, even Louise “Brick Wall” Lucas voted for it.

Who would vote against such a common-sense, pro-victim bill?

Newly elected Sen. Aaron Rouse, who represents the 7th District that includes part of Virginia Beach and Norfolk, that’s who.

Congratulations, voters of the 7th. You replaced tough-on-crime Jen Kiggans with someone who doesn’t even want prosecutors to speak with crime victims before entering into deals that are favorable to the criminals who hurt them.

What were you thinking?

Republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed and Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

10 responses to “Putting Victims First. For A Change.”

  1. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    You done messed up, A-A-Ron.

  2. VaNavVet Avatar
    VaNavVet

    The voters of the 7th district most likely voted for someone who would actually represent their best interests rather than the election denier that just vacated the seat,

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I wonder why Kerry Dougherty did not ask Sen. Rouse for an explanation of his vote. She seems to have no compunction about asking other public officials for comments.

  4. WayneS Avatar

    LIS Virginia lists the final senate vote on the combined bill as 36-4, with Rouse voting YEA, on February 20,2023.

    https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?231+vot+SV0620HB1943+HB1943

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Apparently several Senators had changes of heart on this bill. On the Senate bill (989), Lucas voted yes and Rouse, along with nine other Senators, voted no. On the identical House bill (1943) which came along in the Senate later, Rouse was in the “yes” column, while Lucas, and three others, voted “no”.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Maybe some of them do listen to their constituents.

        I’m sure the people Ms. Lucas represents were as unhappy with her initial vote as those represented by Mr. Rouse were with his.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, as long a victim understands that a jury, except for a certain Sou. Carolina jury, might not be smart enough to get it right. A bird in the hand…

  6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Senator Rouse would seemingly fit in well with the D.C. City Council. Despite complaining about criminals (felons) with guns, it passed a bill revising the criminal code that substantially reduced the sentence for felons convicted of possessing a firearm, which, of course, they are not permitted to do.

    The D.C. law is so far off base that Biden has refused to veto the Senate and House resolution disapproving of the law.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Apparently, even Joe Biden has sufficient powers of observation to see what happened to Lori Lightfoot in Chicago. Muriel Bowser saw the light. She vetoed the inane bill only to see it overridden by her city council.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      [DC City Council] passed a bill revising the criminal code that substantially reduced the sentence for felons convicted of possessing a firearm…

      …thereby forfeiting their right to be taken seriously when they push for more “common sense” gun control laws.

Leave a Reply