Public School Systems on Fire

Virginia’s public education system…. Er, sorry, that’s just a dumpster fire.

I’m normally reluctant to post material from anonymous sources, but I’m making an exception in this case. The author of this post is not asking us to accept anything on his (or her) say-so. He (or she) points to Virginia Department of Education documents that can be readily found online. Much of this material has been reported on Bacon’s Rebellion, but the author pulls together multiple strands into a coherent whole. The impact is powerful. — JAB

For months, the Virginia Department of Education has feigned ignorance about what might be behind all the fuss over critical race theory infiltrating the Commonwealth’s public schools.

In article after article, State Superintendent James Lane’s spokesperson repeated the talking point that nowhere in the Standards of Learning — the curriculum standards that all Virginia public schools must follow — is there a requirement to teach critical race theory, or to incorporate critical race theory when presenting state-mandated academic content.

By and large, education reporters and editorial writers in the state have bought this hook, line and sinker.

It is true that the Standards of Learning and the associated curriculum outlines available on the VDOE website make no mention of critical race theory.

The only hint on the official departmental website that critical race theory might drive policy is in a memo to school districts issued by Lane three years ago in the wake of Governor Ralph Northam’s blackface scandal.

The memo includes Lane’s summer reading list for district leaders to help them examine “issues associated with racial inequities in education.”

Lane’s list includes Robin DiAngelo’s much-mocked (even among progressives) “White Fragility.” Our oh-so-woke state superintendent also recommended “Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education” (Taylor, Gillborn and Ladson-Billings) as a summer must-read for school district administrators.
Interesting, but not enough for left-leaning reporters looking for an explicit CRT smoking gun.

But the Virginia Department of Education has another website.

The ironically named (given the shocking declines in student achievement since Lane was appointed by Governor Ralph Northam) “Virginia is for Learners” website is where the truth can be found about how VDOE’s critical race theory-inspired equity initiatives have transformed a department that once championed the idea that all students benefit from high standards.

A click-through of the Virginia Learners website reveals that under Lane, VDOE now views achievement gaps in reading and mathematics and other inequitable outcomes as consequences of “dynamic and ever-changing systemic racism,” as opposed to the result of complex socio-economic issues and decades of entrenched venality and incompetence in school districts responsible for educating most minority students. The entire agenda is all there in plain view.

For example, the keynote speaker for VDOE’s 2020 EdEquity Virtual Summit was Bettina Love, a fringe academic the Biden administration disowned last month after initially including her Abolitionist Teaching Network as a recommended resource for school districts.

Rather than holding schools accountable for preparing minority students to meet high (or even minimum) standards, VDOE this year proposed eliminating Advanced Diplomas and barring students from taking advanced math courses before the 11th grade in order to achieve the appearance of “equitable outcomes.” Lane subsequently disowned these equity-inspired proposals in the wake of outcry from parents in politically critical suburban counties.

In the forefront of VDOE’s crusade against systemic racism is Leah Dozier Walker, Lane’s ethically challenged director of equity and community engagement.

Walker is easily found on YouTube proclaiming the core tenets of critical race theory: that American was founded on racism, and that all of today’s educational disparities are the result systemic racism and the baked-in expectation that children of color must conform to “white” cultural norms.

VDOE and school districts have tried to hide all of this from the public, but occasionally, sloppy administrators have let their CRT linen show.

For example, last month a Fairfax County elementary school had to scrub its website after parents discovered “unapproved links” to content suggesting that white parents are responsible for “what’s wrong with our public schools.”
The push-back against CRT — despite the poo-pooing of most of the state’s news media — is producing results.

In addition to VDOE’s retreat from abolishing advanced diplomas and restricting access to advanced math courses, VDOE’s equity director took advantage “exceptional employee healthcare benefits” to treat herself to a “self-care sabbatical” to escape the “stresses of work, racism, and politics.”

Groups such as Parents Defending Education and Fight for Schools have aggressively employed Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act to compel school districts and VDOE to surrender records that reveal the extent to which CRT has infected K-12 policy in the commonwealth and the cost to taxpayers of feeding the rapidly growing equity-diversity complex.

When will the commonwealth’s fourth-estate watchdogs show an equal level of curiosity about an issue roiling communities from the Cumberland Gap to the Eastern Shore? Don’t hold your breath


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

52 responses to “Public School Systems on Fire”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I am accused of cynicism from time to time, not without reason and I came by it honestly. But this all along has struck me as being not about education and all about pandering to a certain segment of voters. We need to test this hard with the voters in coming weeks, and I would advise the Republicans and others worried about this to cast a wide net. I think plenty of Americans who might normally lean Democratic do not want to go down this path. I am willing to bet few at the top have actually read any of the books behind this push, and I’m sure the Democratic rank and file has not.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The easiest test is to let it run its course, ya know, like your party is doing with covid… it’ll work itself out.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The only thing powerful about this piece is the smell… 😉

    The right is bound and determined that there are conspiracies… these days and by dang they’re not going to be talked out of it!

    All of this is about elections. No question they got the far right crowd!

    Question is how many Dems in suburban areas are buying it and want to put the GOP in charge of public education?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      We will find out. I can predict YOUR vote with confidence.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        And I yours!

        But at least you do admit what this is really about!

        It’s the same old GOP vote strategy… They can’t seem to win on their own ideas…so they play boogeyman relentlessly.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          My wife has examined many of these docs and been appalled. I read Kendi. We all know about the 1619 project. This is totally a real movement, Larry.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Good. Proof of the pudding, ya know.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Does your wife say that they are actually teaching CRT in the schools? The teachers I know say it’s a bunch of hooey.

            What this is about at the core is the fact that economically disadvantaged kids often do poorly in SOME, not all, public (and private) schools.

            Kids of poorly educated parents do not learn the same way that kids of well-educated parents learn.

            The concern is that if schools are more focused on educating the “easy” kids of educated parents that the kids of lesser educated parents – their needs are not prioritized and they fall behind and never catch up – graduate, have kids, repeat the cycle.

            The thing is – this happens even at schools like RPS where the majority of the kids are economically disadvantaged – but it also happens at school system like Henrico in the schools that serve low income neighborhoods adjacent to Richmond.

            These kids can be reached but it generally takes a lot more Title 1 teachers than the Feds will pay for and these kinds of specialized educators are more expensive and more scarce and they generally have their pick of where to teach and many of them simply don’t want to go to a school where they would be overwhelmed, and then blamed when they simply can’t reach all the kids with needs by themselves.

          3. tmtfairfax Avatar
            tmtfairfax

            So wrong. American public schools devote many more resources to low-income and non-English-speaking kids than to other students. The former have smaller class sizes, more specialized teachers and aides per capita, more psychologists and counselors.

            To take full advantage of these resources, there must be a corresponding commitment to use them. Many kids and their families do. But many don’t. And if they don’t, spending more and more produces nothing.

            Society, any society, functions based on social contracts among members of society. Some people pay sizable sums of their income to provide services to the many. Each of the many must then make good use of these services. Those who do, most often have better lives than those who don’t.

            We don’t have an unlimited obligation to those who refuse to uphold their end of the bargain.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            That’s not true across the board and money alone spent on the wrong things is not the answer.

            How come in the US – we cannot accomplish what every other developed country seems to?

            How come only in this country is it about race and single parents myths?

  3. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    A recent hypocritically hilarious posting from BR’s contrarian, oppositional, partisan (all non-Liberals must be far-right and are idiots”) resident troll states,

    “I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a single well reasoned argument from you on addressing issues of the day and how to go forward”.

    I assume then that these comments are prime examples of such reasoned argument.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    In a few weeks we should be receiving teen cell phone video footage of CRT in the classroom.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Good.

  5. Publius Avatar

    So…looks like Larry and Kathleen are for school choice, right? I mean, let’s teach in the way the kids can learn, right?
    But…you will never have “equity” as defined by Marxists.
    Want to improve overall results? Quit subsidizing illegitimacy. Kids in a two parent home do better – all races, all (two) sexes.
    Then, to really torque Larry et al…allow some of the school choice schools to be organized as Christian…watch the minority parents sign their kids up…and watch the scores improve. You’re with me, aren’t you Larry – I mean let’s do what works!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I don’t think you read well Publius.

      As many here know, I have no problem what-so-ever with public funds spent on private schools – as long as they meet the same demographic rules and academic performance as public schools do.

      I have serious doubts that many will do better but again, if they produce good results, I’m all for it.

      There are a LOT of one-parent households Publius (30%) and many of those kids do just fine. A lot depends on the education level of the single parent and their income. If they are well educated and have a good-paying job, odds are the kids will do well.

      It’s much more about the education level of the parent and their income than one-parent. That’s just a canard from simplistic thinkers who don’t really know the data, IMHO.

      1. Publius Avatar

        Larry – you can’t do anything about income level of parents short of pulling everyone down through Marxism. And there seems to be an assortment of college educated marrying college educated. People in wealthier neighborhoods generally make more and generally are better educated. You can’t “fix” that – short of totalitarian destruction. So, if you will be starting from behind, follow the success path. Graduate from high school, get a job, get married, have kids, repeat generationally.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Publius – what exactly are you saying?

          No one is advocating marxism.

          I’m talking about how to educate children whose parents are poorly educated and poor.

          And you are blathering about single parent and other nonsense – again.

          How do you educate kids who have parents who are themselves poorly educated and financially poor?

          Aren’t those the kids that you and fellow Conservatives castigate the schools for not education and that you claim a private school can?

          Ya’ll do one thing well. You talk in circles and contradict yourself when it comes to telling others how to fix the education issues for economically disadvantaged.

          More than 1/3 of ALL kids live in one parent households. The ones that live with an well educated parent who earns good money are NOT classified as economically disadvantaged advocating marriage is silly , why, if the kid IS learning and getting a good education to start with.

          Over and Over, you guys are just plain confused about the issue and your recommendations are your basic simplistic right-wing canards.

          1. Publius Avatar

            Larry – you are talking Marxism whenever you say equity. Code for “equality” of results. Will never happen. Different people are different.
            And you continue to blather that single parent doesn’t matter. It does. First best thing – quit doing it!
            Next, introduce school choice with different curricula and match up kids where they can best succeed. Home environment matters.
            Equality of opportunity and a level playing field with the same rules applied is the best that can be done. Then Larry, you go try to help someone wanting to succeed. But throwing money at the problem only makes it worse. I believe a specifically organized on Christian principles school choice option will be over-subscribed and will exceed most other schools. Why not try?

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I don’t think he wants to.

      3. Kathleen Smith Avatar
        Kathleen Smith

        I have no problem with public funded school choice. Don’t get the Marxism part. My point is – schools should not hide behind many variables and spin their data. It is not helping kids of any color or economic background. Just figure out what needs to be taught, teach it, and assess to make sure it was learned.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      School choice is already here and operative. You as a parent have any number of choices available to you for your child’s education. You as a taxpayer, do not have a choice to not support the public education system, however. That is the choice you truly seek and it is not forthcoming.

      1. Publius Avatar

        No…school choice is not readily available. For rich people, yes. For parents willing to homeschool, yes, but that has its own costs.
        When I say school choice, I mean a public system that is not one size fits all – but the teachers’ unions hate it because it could introduce accountability, and the Marxists oppose it because it will further the lie of “equity.”

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Like I said, I have no problem what-so-ever if those schools actually have transparency and accountability.

          If those schools can do a better job with economically disadvantaged, I’m all for it but then ya’ll lose the one-parent excuse…eh?

          1. Publius Avatar

            Why are you so in love with one parent? We want all to achieve. So if someone from a one parent home achieves, yay! But it would be easier not to have that hurdle. Why can’t YOU acknowledge that?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I’m not in love with one parent. I just know it’s not an uncommon thing that some folks use as a illicit canard.

            What you don’t understand Publius, is that someone can have TWO parents and they are both terrible.

            You’re just clinging to a canard here.

            One parent households are COMMON not only in the US but most all other developed countries – and kids in those countries get decent educations – better than American kids.

            It’s just a flimsy excuse for the naysayers.

          3. Publius Avatar

            Larry – you just refuse to admit the truth. It is not an “excuse.” It is highly correlated with many bad outcomes to the point where real (your favorite word) SCIENCE! says it is causative. Nonetheless, it can be overcome, many people have, but it is foolish, in the vast majority of cases, to choose it.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            No,it’s not the “truth”. It’s willful ignorance of the facts. There is a big difference between a poorly educated parent working for minimum wages and a college-educated parent who makes a good income.

            People don’t “choose” to have kids then split up. Many well-educated people who have good incomes – find out that even after having their kids -they are not compatible any more. They change.

            But they both usually love their kids – the difference is when the parents are living in poverty and have run-ins with the law, and home life is chaotic and changing, etc..and that’s what leads to bad outcomes for the kids.

            It’s not race. It’s economic status that often is determined by education.

            A poorly educated person is going to have trouble getting and holding a decent job, pay their bills, pay the rent, own a car, get health care, etc… and if they have kids ( a bad choice I agree) then the kids will also get the brunt of it.

            The more we deal with the facts and reality and the less we deal with ignorant canards the better.

          5. Publius Avatar

            Larry – what are you arguing about?
            If you are trying to say income level matters, yes, it does. So does education level of parents.
            Is it hard to be poor? Yes. Try having your car towed and be unable to pay the ransom to get it back, lose your job. Or go uninsured and not have the funds to pay for the fine and the much more expensive insurance.
            Which all leads back to avoid being a single parent, and by that I am talking about having a baby from a sperm donor father. But I’ll also add that divorce is a negative. Just because we have it, doesn’t mean it is good. I think the stats show that the allowing of no fault divorce has been a negative for the kids. Maybe, we, as society, should expect if you bring a child into the world, you two who combined sperm and an egg, it’s on you.
            An idea so crazy…it might work!

      2. killerhertz Avatar
        killerhertz

        How is there choice when you are forced to pay if you choose to opt out?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Sorry, you are responsible for paying your taxes and this has nothing to do with whether or not you use the public school system for the education of any children.

  6. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    Another good one, Jim. Sunlight and exposure is the only thing which will contain the CRT cancer.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I have faith that Jim didn’t take this from some campaign and has some confidence in the author. But I wish the author had signed it.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Wasn’t it Gillispie who says that anonymous are scum and cowards?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Among others. For one, how can I possibly trust anyone with “the” in their name? Alexander, et al, the Great, Attila the Hun, Ivan the Terrible… good company you keep there Bubba.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Indeed…!!

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Steve THE Gillispie ?

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      f I don’t blame the author for wanting to remain anonymous. I would want do the same thing if I wrote something as weak as this.

      For starters, he/she dredges up the old charge that DOE is proposing to bar students from taking advanced math courses until the 11th grade. DOE can be faulted for poor communication and clumsy wording, but that is not the proposal, as Lane made clear in this interview (maybe the author somehow missed this one):

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/virginia-advanced-math-classes-equity/2021/04/26/41f3dbd0-a6a3-11eb-bca5-048b2759a489_story.html

      Then he/she charged that DOE wants to get rid of the Advanced Diploma. The source: a Tucker Carlson segment of YouTube. Not your most authoritative or trustworthy source.

      Then we get a reference to the “tenants” of CRT.

      We are supposed to outraged that the VDOE diversity director took a “self-care sabbatical”. I agree it sounds loony and it is a legitimate criticism. But not in this context. If she took several weeks off with medical leave, then she must have been utilizing short-term disability, which is subject to a lot of abuse by state employees. The criticism should be directed not just at her, but also at the doctor who signed off on it and the contractor who monitors the program.

      Finally, like many commenters on this blog, he/she throws around the phrase “critical race theory” as if it is perfectly obvious the components of that bundle of ideas is the work of the devil. Is she/he willing to say that race was not one of the primary obsessions of Virginia society during the 1900s or that the effects of racist policies are not affecting segments of the state’s population today? Along these lines, I admit that some of the proponents of CRT throw around the term “systemic racism” too freely, as well. As one conservative commentator (Ross Douthat) lamented, it is getting so that neither side knows what the other side is talking about.

      1. “Tenants” vs. “tenets” — my failure as a proof reader. I have corrected the typo.

      2. However, the author is correct in stating that VDOE proposed eliminating advanced classes — as in, tracked classes — before the 11th grade. There has been a lot of terminological confusion over exactly what VDOE had in mind, and Superintendent Lane was less than forthcoming.

        As for the “advanced diploma,” Tucker Carlson may or may not be any more reliable as a source than the Washington Post, which muffed the reporting on “advances” math classes, but it is a fact that VDOE proposed consolidating the standard diploma and advanced diploma. https://wset.com/news/local/vdoe-exploring-options-to-consolidate-standard-and-advanced-diplomas

  7. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    You hit on something I have always said. Inequities in education are as much about income as race. Why have we been following subgroup performance over the past two decades? Subgroups like economically disadvantaged and various racial groups. If we focus only on race, we miss the point. Focusing on race may ignore white poor kids. Also, our standards were supposed to level the playing field. So why did we muck it up with all kinds of other quality indicators like growth, student engagement, absenteeism? Bottom line – increased test scores are now decreasing because there are ways to spin the data. Pitiful. Didn’t start with Lane. Started with Staples.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Give credit to VDOE and many school systems, they KNOW that this is a problem with teaching economically-disadvantaged kids of any race and they also know there is equity at issue.

    What I don’t hear from the critics beyond hyperbole and rhetoric is what is a better approach.

    But I like this idea:

    https://www.askideas.com/media/64/If-a-child-cant-learn-the-way-we-teach-maybe-we-should-teach-the-way-they-learn.-%E2%80%95-Ignacio-Estrada.jpg

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Absolutely! You have to access prior knowledge and then find similarities and differences the individual child understands. This like when your mom needs something from the store, or you know when you touch a hot stove, it is not like that, it is more like…. This is critical. Every child can be reached. You just have to unlock the damn door. Sometimes it is a screen door, other times it is a fortress door, very complex. Not all kids have the same door!

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        What a breath of fresh air! We sure get more than enough of the fetid type here in BR!

        Kids of parents who themselves do not have a very good education – don’t learn the same way that kids of educated parents do, and especially so if the education-limited parent(s) are mired in poverty as a direct result of their literacy deficits.

        Good schools and school systems know this, but it takes a different style of teacher to reach these kids – better and those teachers are much fewer in numbers and have their choice where to teach or not.

        It can and is done, but it’s not at all widely institutionalized in many school systems.

        The CRT thing is just pure politics.

        There is no optimistic way forward coming from Conservatives. It’s the same old same old FUD – Fear, uncertainty and dread to get votes.

        1. Only one problem with Ms. Smith’s approach – which is how teachers want to teach, and indeed how I was taught so many years ago: as soon as the teacher looks for those differences in learning style, background, strengths and weaknesses, etc., that teacher will be reprimanded and likely fired. THAT’S what needs to be fixed, it has cost us so many good teachers already.

          1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
            Kathleen Smith

            Teaching is teaching no matter what the content. I agree.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      “Surry Solar would provide low-cost, clean power generation in an amount sufficient to power approximately 6,044 homes each year. The electricity generated would be roughly equivalent to 36.7 million pounds of coal burned or 33,275 tons of greenhouse gas emissions removed.”

      And maintain the enslaved status of thousands of Chinese Muslims. Always missing from the press releases…..(along with the carbon emitted by the coal furnaces and other parts of the panel manufacturing process, and the ships bringing it all here.)

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Do you care?

        1. If you two could stay on topic it would be a relief to those of us who have to click through to see updated comments. BR is where I go for intelligent discussion with mostly proper grammar. For this sort of post I can just go to facebook.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Then go there.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            GAWD!

Leave a Reply