Protect Taxpaying Virginians From Coming Inflation

Time for a refresher course on the Weimar Republic?

by Steve Haner

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. 

One of big financial winners with the May 1 Virginia minimum wage increase is the state itself, because the entire raise is subject to a 5% state income tax. With its low standard deduction and personal exemption amounts, Virginia squeezes income tax out of even its lowest wage workers.

In light of the massive tax increases Virginians have seen due the Governor Ralph Northam’s recent policy changes, some of the heaviest falling on the state’s businesses, it is clear the state is on a sound financial footing. Another major surplus of more than $500 million looms. The initial 2019 promise made by the legislature to continue efforts for tax reform, abandoned by both parties after the 2019 election, should be revived.

The recommended focus remains the same as the Thomas Jefferson Institute position two years ago:

  • Virginia needs to substantially increase the standard deduction it offers to all taxpayers, with the goal of matching the amount offered on their federal taxes. That would be an increase from $9,000 tax free income for a couple filing jointly to $25,100 for that same couple, removing more than $16,000 from taxable income. An individual’s standard deduction is $12,550.
  • Virginia needs to index its tax code to inflation, again mirroring federal practice. Failure to do so, and allowing tax rates to increase due to inflation, is itself a form of tax increase. This is even more important now because the massive federal deficit spending on individual cash benefits, and other federal actions to overheat the economy, are likely to produce the kind of inflation many of us remember from the 1970s.

Complaints that the state cannot afford this should be hooted down, although it may need to be phased in, starting with a standard deduction increase to $6,000 for an individual and $12,000 per couple. State General Fund tax revenues are up about 30% in just four years, and the explosion from the tax increases and super-heated economy is just starting. If the Biden Administration gets even part of the tax package it wants through Congress, Virginia will quickly conform to any of the changes that produce additional revenue for the state. Most of them will.

The next Governor and 2022 General Assembly should act immediately to protect Virginia families and the Virginia economy from what is coming. Shielding a higher portion of every Virginia family’s income from income tax is easy to explain and provides a level tax benefit to rich and poor. As a portion of income, it is of far greater benefit to the lower income workers.

In 2019, Virginians were asked about doubling the standard deduction as a method to return some of the coming state tax bonanza due to the 2017 federal tax bill. By wide and bipartisan margins they endorsed the idea, but the General Assembly took only a small step and raised the deduction 50%. A major increase in the standard deduction will be just as popular today, if not more so.

The Thomas Jefferson Institute also recommended changes to the corporation income tax in 2019, which again were roundly ignored by leaders of both parties. It was clear that the federal rules changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 would produce an avalanche of new state corporate taxes unless we made state-level adjustments. Fixing that is of lower priority than the other two goals, a meaningful standard deduction and annual inflation adjustments.

Much of Virginia’s business income is reported and taxed on individual returns, since many businesses are not structured as corporations. An increase in the standard deduction is of direct benefit to those unincorporated business owners. For corporations, the higher standard deduction is of benefit to employees and stockholders but not the business entity.

The General Assembly has now decided to increase the state’s fuel taxes annually to keep up with inflation in future years. It has voted to raise the minimum wage annually due to match inflation. It is long past time to give the same protection to Virginia’s taxpayers. The current chair of the House Finance Committee in the General Assembly, Del. Vivian Watts, D-Annandale, has introduced an indexing bill already, but so far has been unsuccessful.

Many Democrats share the desire to reduce income taxes on Virginia families by working up from the bottom but prefer to do it with a mechanism called the Earned Income Tax Credit. Recent General Assemblies have also considered and rejected efforts to make that tax credit “refundable,” meaning that taxpayers who qualify could actually receive an annual check from the state. The proposal is likely to surface again.

That approach does nothing to reduce the tax burden on middle income Virginians because the EITC phases out quickly as income rises. And it involves the state taking the taxes out of paychecks and then returning them at a later time, rather than simply not taxing it in the first place. EITC becomes just another government entitlement, more bureaucracy.

Many Democrats also oppose the idea of a higher standard deduction because the benefit is nearly universal, reaching even higher income families if they do not take itemized deductions. If the federal tax changes President Joe Biden wants are enacted, the higher state standard deduction will make only a small dent in higher tax bills coming their way, state and federal.

Finally, matching the federal standard deduction brings Virginia into line with a number of other states competing with Virginia for new jobs and residents.  The District of Columbia and South Carolina match the federal amount, and North Carolina comes close. For most low income Virginia workers and many retirees, there would be zero income tax, the same as in Florida, Texas, or Tennessee


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Protect Taxpaying Virginians From Coming Inflation”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “This is even more important now because the massive federal deficit spending on individual cash benefits, and other federal actions to overheat the economy, are likely to produce the kind of inflation many of us remember from the 1970s.”

    Having learned nothing from the Trump era, your solution is to enact more massive tax cuts which will… wait for it… further overheat the economy creating even greater inflationary pressures. Tax cuts (and other stimuli) should be saved for recession and taxes should be increased during booms to reduce inflationary pressures and pay down the deficit/debt. That should be the recommendations coming out of such think tanks.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The General Assembly has a potential billion dollar surplus, supplemented with $7 billion in federal stimulus to the governments, and billions more direct to various businesses, individuals and charities, and you want to raise taxes? We can’t consider giving lower income workers a break in the middle of this? Hard core, man!

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I’m just saying that tax breaks will have the opposite effect from what you are concerned about. They will tend to increase inflationary pressures. I am good with increasing taxes on some to offset cuts on others so there is no net increase in stimulus or perhaps a decrease.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Increasing a minimum wage creates inflation too. Oh and you’d be placing those new “living wage” makers in a difference tax bracket, keeping them exactly where you want them. Grievance ready and looking for more Government intervention.

          “I am good with increasing taxes on some to offset cuts on others so there is no net increase in stimulus or perhaps a decrease.”

          That doesn’t work and it never has.

      2. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        It appears he wants to argue to raise the minimum wage for those whose plight he “cares” about while then keeping them right where they were with higher taxes.

        No matter how many times it’s repeated a “tax and spend” fiscal policy isn’t any better then “reduce and reward”.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Their solution is a full universal income. Until the last two years that would have been a laughable accusation, but no more…

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            They’ve given everyone a taste with the plus up unemployment benefits.

    2. PassTheBuckBureaucrat Avatar
      PassTheBuckBureaucrat

      Taxation is an dead weight loss. Taxation is the forced redistribution of wealth, based on politcal, rather than economic, priorities along with sigificant administrative overhead waste. It causes cost push inflation.

      The only way to reduce inflation is to create more value per dollar. Taxation increases the costs of creating economic value.

      Disqus Must Be Destroyed!

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Taxes pay for things like defense, education, public safety, roads, GPS/NOAA satellites, etc.

        When you pay for these things, they also provide jobs that are part of the economy also and yes, decisions about what to spend taxes on are political but very single development country on the face of the earth – taxes to benefit citizens and significant metrics that result are literacy which powers productivity and longevity which also affects productivity.

        3rd world countries have terrible economies and if one believes the low tax/no tax theory, 3rd world should be the best economies. Clearly they are not.

        Taxation per se does not inherently cause inflation, too much money in the economy does that and if you’re borrowing money to pay for tax cuts , that’s a cause.

        1. PassTheBuckBureaucrat Avatar
          PassTheBuckBureaucrat

          “Last Post” Larry
          His command of facts, quite scary
          Not so much how rational
          More so, how counterfactual

          Diqus Must Be Destroyed

        2. PassTheBuckBureaucrat Avatar
          PassTheBuckBureaucrat

          “Last Post” Larry
          His command of facts, quite scary
          Not so much how rational
          More so, how counterfactual

          Diqus Must Be Destroyed

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Virginia needs to substantially increase the standard deduction it offers to all taxpayers, with the goal of matching the amount offered on their federal taxes. ”

    The Virginia top marginal income tax rate is 5.75% while the federal top marginal income tax rate is 37%. Matching the federal deduction makes absolutely no sense.

  3. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Protect government spending at all costs. Makes no difference about whether a program is effective or duplicated. Fund it. As far as think tanks are concerned, since they try to influence public policy, they should be taxed.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    If you want to REALLY “help” low income families AND middle income taxpayers:

    1. – give them a credit for child care
    2. – Provide Universal Pre-K

    Mom/Dad can find full time jobs and kid will grow up better educated than their parents and able to become a net taxpayer themselves and JOBs will be created for child care and PreK!

    The problem with many Conservatives is that they have MANY “ideas” but when push comes to shove – they bail 100%.

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      And ten years from now, people will be looking for another remedy. Unless John Calvin was right about double predestination, we all have free will and can make decisions that affect not only us but also people around us, including one’s children. Children coming from low-income families can and do make good decisions each and every day. How much has the United States spent on social programs since LBJ’s Great Society? The War on Poverty was less successful than the War on Drugs. Most government programs are designed and maintained for the benefit of those running them.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        If you’re REALLY serious about this then advocate for the Govt to get rid of Medicare as well as the subsidy for employer-provided health insurance and see what happens to poverty.

        You got yours – screw others. Right?

        Everyone thinks they deserve their govt benefit but others do not deserve theirs.

        Get rid of the health insurance subsidies and the govt rules that require coverage of pre-existing conditions and see how poverty works.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Coming inflation”. Meh, kinda like predicting the market crash. It’s going to happen. Never as to the degree, and never at the time predicted, but everyone wants to say they saw it coming.

    Sunrise May 20 at 5:53AM

  6. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    We need to benchmark other states, but my observation is:
    Virginia tax code is extremely tax-friendly to those below about $90K income, reasonably tax friendly to wealthy taxpayers, and we slam the middle class relatively hard, including retirees.

    Va. Dems want to hand out free money to those below $90K. I’d be quite sure Maryland hits lower and higher incomes for their “fair share”, but I have heard MD say they are not happy with their tax code re: they would like to be more generous to lower incomes. Virginia is already generous there, I am thinking.

    Anyhow, I hear the Dems above advocating for much higher taxes, but the word of caution is our Virginia system is rigged to hit the middle class including retirees (me) hard. So be careful, or else some other party gets voted in power. Or we simply take @TooManyTaxes (TMT) advice and go to NC. Tennessee hot too. You got low-tax Pa, if you want to go back North, where many of us imported from.

    No oppressive car tax either, any of those places.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      The car taxes ARE “oppressive” but I point out this is not the State but the localities who COULD lower those taxes and yet TJ and Steve are pretty much silent on that and instead focused on the State.

      If you take 500 million and divide it by 2.5 million (Va taxpayers), you’ll get about $200. Not chump change for sure but not exactly a bonanza either!

      For me, BEFORE we talk about lowering taxes , I’d like to see:

      1. – how VRS is doing – are we in good shape?
      2. – our rainy day fund balance
      3. – pay back the unemployment trust fund
      4. – Child-care for working parents
      5. – Universal Pre-K
      6. – possible vouchers for low income kids to go to community college.

      We need the State to be on a sound financial footing and we need to invest in the things that helps people become full-time workers and taxpayers.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Virginia does not tax social security and it provides an additional 12,000 deduction for those over 65 until 50K of income then it phases out.

      In addition, some counties and cities either exempt or defer some property taxes on those over 65, disabled and veterans.

      But they are not as generous with tax credits for kids and even low income folks end up paying at the state level even as they are getting refunds at the Federal level.

      The problem that Steve and TJ have on conformity is that at the Fed level – the Trump tax cuts do not pay for themselves, they add to the deficit and debt and if Virginia were to fully conform, it too would lose revenues and it cannot run a deficit.

      Any kind of tax-cut in Virginia needs to show how much revenuue is lost per dollar reduction of taxes and neither TJ nor Steve show that calculation.

      Sow how much of a tax cut does TJ and Steve want and how much will that impact revenues from what I can see. If you’re gonna advocate for something – be specific – not just ideological.

      Gotta do more than just blindly advocate for tax cuts!

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        Key words: deduction for older folks *phases out* after income reaches $50K (or somewhere around $90K for Married/Joint). This is exactly why I say under $90K, we are very, very generous.

        As far as social security, who gets it? If you can, you don’t take until 70. So $60k exclusion is not (fully) experienced by me. How about make it $60k exclusion of SS or IRA withdrawal income?

        Property tax exemption over Age 65? What planet, I mean locality, is that?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          here is how the tax is calculated
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b2a10595d103c3c85a2c91b439258afc3331448b505c67c970fa7d50e4eea9cc.jpg

          Sometimes, folks start out thinking ALL the taxable is taxed at the highest rate, nope.

Leave a Reply