by Kerry Dougherty

Two local prosecutors just earned an A in both Fearmongering 101 and Grandstanding 101.

Ramon Fatehi of Norfolk and Stephanie Morales of Portsmouth used the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe V Wade to summon the press and draw attention to, well, themselves.

The duo pronounced themselves “horrified” that the highest court would allow states to pass their own abortion laws — let’s give them each an F in Federalism 101 — and used the court decision to declare that they would not prosecute abortion crimes if the General Assembly passes new laws.

“Prosecuting those cases is directly contrary to my responsibility to keep people here in Norfolk safe and alive and I simply will not — I won’t allow the Republicans’ extremist agenda to put blood on my hands,” Fatehi told The Virginian-Pilot. “I will not aid and abet their endangering of people who are pregnant and who seek to end their pregnancies.”

Love the way this woke prosector used the idiotic “people who are pregnant” descriptor when he could have said “women.” Guess he’s seeking the men-can-have-babies vote in the next election. And his mention of keeping Norfolkians “alive” is rich in irony, given the topic.

In other words, these two commonwealth’s attorneys are announcing in advance that they won’t be doing their jobs, which is to enforce the laws of the commonwealth. Not just the ones they like.

Good to know. “People who vote” should take notice.

Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced last week that he’d support a reasonable 15-week limit on abortions in Virginia, a more liberal law than exists in almost any Western nation. Democrats, of course, prefer the Kathy Tran/Ralph Northam style-abortion-for-any-reason-until-the-moment-of-birth law.

While Democrats maintain a single-vote majority in the state senate, Democratic State Sen. Joe Morrissey of Richmond has indicated he’d support a more restrictive law and could be the deciding vote in 2023.

Prosecutors who announce in advance that they won’t prosecute certain crimes are begging to be replaced with commonwealth’s attorneys who respect all laws.

Vote accordingly.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Prosecutors Who Won’t Do Their Jobs”

  1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
    Virginia Gentleman

    Yes – please do vote accordingly. Vote if you believe that the decision should be left up to the Woman and her Doctor or by the government. Please do vote accordingly.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      No, whether the woman and doctor can decide to kill the child, or the child also has a right to a chance to life. Vote on that question, please.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Abortion illegal for any reason will result in dead women. Ectopic pregnancies kill women. Rapists and pedophiles don’t derserve to add to the gene pool.

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          And just think, President Obama could have prevented all of this but, given his parentage, this cannot be discussed nor can he be criticized.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You mean nominating Garland.

          2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            You know exactly what I mean. From what I’ve seen of Garland’s ethical standards, I question his ability to retain his law license.

          3. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            President Obama coulda had a third and more terms despite his parentage. There, discussed. Coulda prevented Dobbs is mere speculation. Time to let go of your fantasy.

          4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            Your reply is childish. You can’t answer on the merits.

      2. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        The majority of Americans have made their feelings known and did not support the overturning of Roe. Next the GOP minority will try to ban abortion nationwide but so much for Federalism.

    2. VaNavVet Avatar
      VaNavVet

      Kerry meant that in 2023 it will be said that the Justices (G. and K.) lied and women died.

      1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
        Virginia Gentleman

        Unfortunately that is the likely outcome.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    This has become a problem on both the right and the left. Some sheriffs were making noise about not enforcing gun laws claiming that their counties would be 2A sanctuary areas. Steve Descano (Fairfax County CA) said he would stop prosecuting marijuana laws. Now, we have at least a couple of Commonwealth’s Attorneys that claim they will not enforce laws that haven’t even been written yet.

    It seems unfair that duly passed legislation will be enforced in some jurisdictions and not others based on what individual sheriffs and/or commonwealth attorneys personally decide.

    The only person who should veto a proposed law is the governor.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      How about nullification of 10 million votes by 147 legislators, 4 of whom are Virginians. Duly passed legislation was discarded in favor of a professional football theory and rumors—not to mention unlawful ideas, known to be bunk.

  3. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Democrats like to mostly peacefully kill babies in the womb or pervert them in kindergarten with their mostly illogical ideas.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar
      VaNavVet

      That is sure painting with a broad brush. You do know that there are pro-abortion Republicans? Why bother posting such absurd statements.

Leave a Reply