Progressive Legislators Declare “Profound Solidarity” with Criminals

from the Liberty Unyielding blog

Killings and violence have risen in the U.S. over the last decade, as some government officials have come to sympathize more with criminals than their victims. The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus recently said it is “in profound solidarity” with Virginia’s prison population, and that its members “work to dismantle the unjust criminal system.” They said the criminal-justice system has the “role of dehumanizing, abusing and punishing Black America.”

Thirty-two of Virginia’s 140 state legislators belong to the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus, including the speaker of Virginia’s House of Delegates, Don Scott; the president pro tempore of the state Senate, Louise Lucas; the head of the House Appropriations Committee; and the head of the Senate Rules Committee.

On February 14, the VLBC issued a statement that began:

The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus (VLBC) remains in profound solidarity with the 122,500 Virginians who are actively trapped in our state’s criminal justice system, nearly half of whom are Black. When slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment, it was qualified with “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” With that, mass incarceration was born and the criminal justice system absorbed the role of dehumanizing, abusing and punishing Black America.

The Black Caucus includes only Democratic legislators. In 2022, it excluded a black Republican legislator who attempted to join.

Although the Black Caucus complains that “nearly half” of Virginia’s prisoners are black, it ignores that their victims are disproportionately black, too. Most crimes against black people are black-on-black, according to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. “In Virginia, Black people are eight times more likely than white people to die of gun homicide,” noted the mayor of Richmond. According to FBI data, 89 percent of blacks who were murdered in 2018 were killed by black offenders. Seventy percent of gun homicide victims in Virginia are black, according to PolitiFact. Nearly half of U.S. homicide victims in 2019 were black. Incarceration is aimed mostly at violent offenders. Most state prison inmates are there for “violent offenses,” according to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics.

There are fewer than 24,000 people in Virginia’s state prisons, so it is not clear what the VLBC was referring to when it claimed “122,500 Virginians” are “trapped in our state’s criminal justice system.” Virginia’s prison population has fallen a lot since 2019, and Virginia recently announced plans to close four state prisons in 2024.

The VLBC’s claims of “mass incarceration” ignore the fact that — as criminology professor Justin Nix notes — “Given its level of serious crime, America has ordinary levels of incarceration.” As criminology professor Peter Moskos points out, “If America arrested only murderers — nobody else in jail or prison — if we caught them all and each served 20 years, we’d have ~400,000 criminals in prison. Our incarceration rate of 120 (per 100k) would still be higher than the EU average (and twice as high as the Netherlands).”

Crime has risen somewhat in Virginia since Democrats took over Virginia’s legislature in 2019, which might reflect the softer-on-crime policies they enacted. After they took control of the legislature, the Democrats abolished the death penalty, and passed laws allowing some inmates to get released earlier from prison. They have also picked judges who have softer approaches to criminal justice, such as “restorative justice.” The legislature picks judges in Virginia.

Democrats also passed legislation that had the effect of making prosecutions of criminals more costly. They passed a law that eliminated the requirement that juries sentence the offenders they convict. Virginia law had previously required that juries sentence offenders convicted by a jury. Because juries were more likely to impose harsh sentences than a judge, defendants tried to avoid jury trials as a result. Instead, defendants tended to choose bench trials, which are cheaper, quicker, and easier to conduct. But now, defendants can request a jury trial, yet be sentenced by a judge. After Democrats changed the law to curb jury sentencing, many more offenders chose jury trials, perhaps because juries are more likely to find a defendant not guilty.

The increased number of jury trials created big problems for some prosecutors and courthouses, making it harder to prosecute criminals. As a crime victim advocate in eastern Virginia explained in February 2022:

Our dockets are over-run with jury trials now thanks to the GA allowing the offenders to request a jury trial and then be sentenced by the Judge. I’m in a rural area and we have a jury trial set every other week for the foreseeable future. These are multiday jury trials. [Her] jurisdiction is having to stack 2 jury trials just in case one resolves itself. This means all must prepare for two trials, prep witnesses and victims. Then must tell one of those that are prepped, sorry your case is in 2nd on the docket and will not be heard for months. This is traumatizing all over again [for crime victims]….

The early-release legislation enacted by Democrats in November 2020 may have increased the crime rate somewhat, by shortening criminals’ sentences. In 1998, the National Bureau of Economic Research said longer sentences “reduce crime” through deterrence, citing research in the Journal of Law & Economics. A 2014 study in the American Economic Journal found that early releases of prison inmates increased Italy’s crime rate.

The Democrats’ changes to Virginia’s criminal laws in 2020 were not that radical, because progressive legislation often had to be substantially amended to pass a closely-divided legislature. For example, an early-release bill had to be amended to exclude most violent offenders to get the few remaining moderate Democrats to vote for it.

The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus would have liked much more radical changes that would have released far more inmates, but it could not pass them back in 2020, because Democrats back then only had narrow control of the legislature, and moderate Democrats like Lynwood Lewis sometimes voted against progressive proposals to release inmates early. Those moderate Democrats are no longer in the legislature, so they will not be a check on radical de-carceration legislation the next time the Democrats control both the legislature and the executive branch. Right now, Virginia has a Republican governor who is generally opposed to releasing inmates early, but that could easily change after the 2025 election.

Virginia had one of America’s lower homicide rates a decade ago, but now, it has a middling homicide rate, according to the Centers for Disease Control — lower than the rate in neighboring Maryland, North Carolina, and Tennessee, but slightly higher than in West Virginia, which had a higher homicide rate than Virginia back in 2014. Virginia still has a relatively low rate of robbery, property crimes, and violent crimes in general.

Republished with permission from Liberty Unyielding.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

30 responses to “Progressive Legislators Declare “Profound Solidarity” with Criminals”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Whoever wrote that press release should be fired. That preamble was unneccessary and stupidly worded. One can celebrate the defeat of efforts to increase penalties, etc., without saying the group is in “profound solidarity” with all the offenders in jail and prison, many of whom committed serious crimes.

    1. When slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment, it was qualified with “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” With that, mass incarceration was born and the criminal justice system absorbed the role of dehumanizing, abusing and punishing Black America.

      The ending of the preamble is as egregious as the beginning. Working to improve our criminal justice system is a force for good, but asserting that the criminal justice system’s purpose is racist dehumanizing, abusing and punishing black America is itself racist nonsense not to mention profoundly counter productive.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I stand with Oliver. In fact, I’ll cover the first year.

    “Clarence Thomas is arguably the most consequential justice on the court right now, and he’s never really seemed to like the job. He’s said it’s not worth doing ‘for the grief.’ So what if he could keep the luxury perks that he clearly enjoys without having to endure all of that grief?” Oliver asked. “We have a special offer for you tonight. We are prepared to offer you $1 million a year for the rest of your life if you simply agree to leave the Supreme Court immediately and never come back.”

  3. The press release simply put in writing what everyone knew…… no mistake, no exaggeration.

  4. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    “The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus (VLBC) remains in profound solidarity with the 122,500 Virginians who are actively trapped in our state’s criminal justice system…”. Pretty much says it all. Convicted, incarcerated criminals and democrat legislators, one and the same.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      I know a “sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” and pockets full of ill-gotten Ukrainian money who could help to balance the White – Black ratio in prison.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        hmmm….. ” FBI informant charged with lying about Joe and Hunter Biden’s ties to Ukrainian energy company”

        wow!

        1. Wonder why Steele wasn’t charged, or the the FBI Lawyer who lied on a FISA warrant to spy on a US citizen wasn’t charged? Oh that’s right.. I remember – those wanted to get Trump.

          1. Not Steele nor Clinesmith. And don’t forget CIA Brennan’s role in all this… no charges, no arrest, no consequences.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            CIA role? real stuff or more Trump/GOP conspiracy theories? Gonna have CIA/Hunter BIden hearings?

            I don’t give credence to what Trump is saying for the most part – it’s one conspiracy theory and lie after another and the GOP don’t seem much better. Hunter is no saint but I suspect he’s no worse than Trump’s Sons overall. Biden is nothing like Trump in any way, shape or form IMO.

  5. DJRippert Avatar

    More liberal gaslighting.

    “The Black Caucus includes only Democratic legislators. In 2022, it excluded a black Republican legislator who attempted to join.”

    https://www.wavy.com/news/politics/virginia-politics/virginia-black-caucus-votes-not-to-accept-black-gop-member-a-c-cordoza/

    So, the Black Legislative Caucus is really the Liberal Black Legislative Caucus or the Democratic Black Legislative Caucus.

    “If you don’t vote for me, you ain’t Black.”

    Looks like there are ever more non-Black Black people out there.

    “Biden now claims the support of just 63% of Black voters, a precipitous decline from the 87% he carried in 2020, according to the Roper Center. He trails among Hispanic voters by 5 percentage points, 39%-34%; in 2020 he had swamped Trump among that demographic group 2 to 1, 65%-32%.”

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/01/01/biden-trump-poll-odds-black-hispanic-young-voters/72072111007/

    The liberal gaslighting is fading fast.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I stand with Oliver. In fact, I’ll cover the first year.

    “Clarence Thomas is arguably the most consequential justice on the court right now, and he’s never really seemed to like the job. He’s said it’s not worth doing ‘for the grief.’ So what if he could keep the luxury perks that he clearly enjoys without having to endure all of that grief?” Oliver asked. “We have a special offer for you tonight. We are prepared to offer you $1 million a year for the rest of your life if you simply agree to leave the Supreme Court immediately and never come back.”

    1. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      Bribery of the Judicial Branch….a pillar of Marxism, endorsed by the progressive liberal left.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It’s not bribery. It’s a “golden parachute”.

        It is virtually impossible to bribe a judge. Not that you cannot give them things and money in exchange for their favors, but that doing so is not illegal based on previous SCOTUS rulings not the least of which was in the McDonnell case.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Ahhh … the McDonnell case, whereby a mindless partisan hack (i.e., Eric Holder) decided to punish a potential political rival to his Democratic overseers with a completely spurious claim of fraud.

          Unanimously reversed by the US Supreme Court.

          Even Sonja “the Wise Latina” Sotomayer couldn’t stomach Holder’s idiocy.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            so you’re okay with what McDonnell did and for other Virginia politicos to do it also?

            Sounds like you might want it both ways?

            We want other Virginia elected to model what McDonnell did?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Law of unintended consequences.

        2. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          Oliver is a “limey” and look at what mess Britain is.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yer point being?
            Unless you’re admitting then that he has first hand knowledge.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        All Clarence Thomas’ “friends” are Marxist?! Who knew…?

    2. Oliver could do the country more good a lot cheaper if he offered demented old Joe an ice cream cone and a little girl’s hair to sniff if he’d resign. Of course he’d have to get shed of Kamala first. The million bucks a year, a Venn diagram and a ride out of town on a yellow school bus instead of an RV might do the trick there.

  7. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    The whole democratic party is one big criminal cartel. Lotta of republicans have been bought off too.

  8. Prison statistics back to the mid 19th century are hard to find. What data is available shows very low incarceration rates for anyone prior to and following the enactment of the 13th amendment. Although increasing, incarceration rates were still very low in the 1920s and increased gradually from then until the latter 20th century when they exploded. They do seem to have run around half black, other minority and immigrant. Predominately poor is the overwhelming characteristic.

    Incarceration rates started picking up rapidly in the ’70s and accelerated even more during the ’80s. High rates of black involvement with the justice system, probation, parole, prison, are a modern phenomenon.

    The assertion by the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus that the 13th Amendment that abolished slavery transformed our justice system into a tool to dehumanize and abuse black America is unsupported. Wonder if they also think that the passage of the Civil Rights Act caused the increase in incarceration that followed in the ’70s and ’80s? No good honky deed goes unreviled.

    https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/hcsus5084.pdf

    Virginia has one of the lower rates of black to white incarceration in the country. That beats the heck out of New Jersey with the highest rate in the country. It likely also more closely reflects underlying rates of criminal behavior.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c54701bdadf06d634616486d0cc671ba235229a7a65158d329d3fa4630222a87.jpg

    https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2023/09/27/updated_race_data/

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      There you go, again … confusing the issue (and Virginia’s Black Legislative Caucus) with facts.

    2. Incarceration rates started picking up rapidly in the ’70s and accelerated even more during the ’80s.

      So, there is a closer correlation with LBJ’s “Great Society” and “The War on Poverty” than there is with ratification of the 13th Amendment.

      1. Yes there is, but I was being snarky, the correlation is actually with Nixon. His administration was explicit, passing laws that let them bust civil rights agitators and us dirty hippies. Then incarceration really stepped up under Reagan. The trend is flat from 1850-1920s, increases gently from there to the 1970s where it tips sharply up and then explodes in the 1980s and beyond. Remember, Dems like Hillary, Bill and Biden among others in the ’90s were big on jailing “predators”, longer sentences, reduced parole and “3 strikes” laws.

        If I was in a Caucus that was objecting to abuse and dehumanization of black people I’d be looking a whole lot closer to the present than the 13th Amendment in 1865 and specifically at living Dems as the proximate cause. There will be an opportunity to express displeasure at the voting booth in the near future.

        From what few statistics I could find (a couple of hours down that rabbit hole, but I found them – see link in my original post) there was very little incarceration of anyone in the mid 19th century, and no material increase after the 13th Amendment was adopted.

        It would be interesting to see what the Caucus has as documentation, if any, for their assertion. If they are sure the 13th Amendment was just a vehicle to dehumanize and abuse black people do they think it should be repealed?

  9. Our dockets are over-run with jury trials now thanks to the GA allowing the offenders to request a jury trial and then be sentenced by the Judge.

    I’m curious what the “crime victim advocate in eastern Virginia” wants to do about jury trials.

    The last time I checked (just a few minutes ago) the 6th Amendment was still a part of the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, as with the other 9 amendments which comprise the Bill of Rights, that amendment applies at the state level.

    And even if it didn’t, Section 8 of the Constitution of Virginia contains almost identical wording regarding a person’s “right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury…”

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Agree. Is it a bad thing for someone to want to be judged by a jury of their peers especially if they feel the criminal justice system is biased against them?

  10. Our dockets are over-run with jury trials now thanks to the GA allowing the offenders to request a jury trial and then be sentenced by the Judge.

    I’m curious what the “crime victim advocate in eastern Virginia” wants to do about jury trials.

    The last time I checked (just a few minutes ago) the 6th Amendment was still a part of the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, as with the other 9 amendments which comprise the Bill of Rights, that amendment applies at the state level.

    And even if it didn’t, Section 8 of the Constitution of Virginia contains almost identical wording regarding a person’s “right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury…”

Leave a Reply