Preserving the Routes of Abandoned Railroad Lines

One of the most torturous aspects of building a new road or rail line, especially in urbanized areas, is acquiring the right of way. Urban land is expensive, and the acquisition process can be lengthy when landowners resist selling. It is difficult to imagine a replay of the 1950s-era acquisition of rights of way for interstate highways, which were routed through neighborhoods of the poor and politically powerless.

That’s why it’s so urgent, when we have rights of way for potential transportation corridors, that we protect them. But it seems that rights of way for old, abandoned railroad lines around Virginia are being allowed to lapse. Indeed, it doesn’t appear that anyone in Virginia even maintains a master list of abandoned railroad lines.

That’s what I found out in an interview with Kevin Page, Virginia’s director of rail transportation, during the course of researching my recent column, “Midlothian Leviathan.” I didn’t use any material from the interview in that column, but Page made a number of observations that are worth recounting in the blog.

One of the questions I asked: Has anyone conducted a survey of deactivated or under-utilized rail lines in Virginia? Such lines, it seemed to me, could serve as potential routes for local passenger rail service. No one conducts a statewide survey, said Page, although local Metropolitan Planning Organization officials may undertake local studies of their own.

The subject is more complicated than it might seem. “Sometimes abandoned rail lines can be difficult to resurrect,” Page says. It depends on the terms of the abandonment. Sometimes the land can revert to the owner of the land before the railroad acquired it.

During a period of downsizing and restructuring a quarter century ago, freight railroad companies abandoned a lot of unprofitable routes. A handful have been converted to jogging/bicycle lanes. Many lie fallow. It would seem to be a horrendous waste to allow them to revert to former owners — or, more likely, the descendents of former owners — who can’t do anything economically useful with their fragments. Even if passenger rail doesn’t look profitable today, you never know when circumstances might change. We could well be kicking ourselves ten or twenty years from now for having let the rights of way lapse.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Preserving the Routes of Abandoned Railroad Lines”

  1. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    And then there are the places that deliberately dismantled rail lines and stations in order to prevent development.

    I thought it was a mistake to convert the rail line to Warrenton to a bike trail, and the station to a restaurant.

  2. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Why not a rails-to-trails (basically: rails to flat, wide gravel bike/jogging paths) program, as is being done in PA (on the system I have in mind, one would be able to cycle from Pittsburg to DC)? See http://www.railtrails.org/whoweare/index.html
    or
    http://www.atatrail.org/.

  3. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    There’s another way of looking at this.

    Say.. you’re a CEO of Norfolk Southern or CSX and you own a slew of legacy rights-of-way and in a world were “more” in terms of mobility… roads or rail if often advocated so one would think those right-of-way valuable to the companies that own them…

    and instead.. not only do they not turn them into roads or rail (freight or passenger), nor do they even attempt to sell/lease those rights-of-way but instead – abandon them… and let them become fair game for rail-to-trailer types… or even other entrepreneurs or possibly even governments, MPOs, developers..

    So my question is.. what do the CEOs that own all those rail rights-of-way know.. that the rest of us do not know?

  4. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    We need “TRAILS TO RAIL.”

    Convert the W&OD Trail back to rail.

    Light rail or BRT would serve far more than the joggers and cyclists.

  5. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I agree with anon 9:14.

    Kaine wants to preserve how many acres? in large tracts… and we already have State and Federal parks throughout the state.

    Why not connect them up with trail systems for young and old.. bikers and hikers…

    so… who is in charge of doing this? I know we’ve got a bunch of folks trumpheting the Virginia Birding Trails…

    p.s. we have thoroughly enjoyed Pennsylvania’s rail-to-trails and I’m quite sure also that their local businesses have enjoyed our presence there also. Hint. Hint.

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Anon 9:14 here again… if you don’t like all the NOVA traffic, leave NOVA. Or impress upon your employer the benefits of telecommuting (hey, even Capital One is starting to *require* that their employees work a day — or two? — from home each week). But provide decent outdoor destinations within each state, not just out West.

  7. E M Risse Avatar
    E M Risse

    Here again the persuit of Mobility and Access starts with the settlement patterns that will make citizens happy and safe, not with transport options.

    EMR

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Anon 9:14 again. As it turns out, I saw my CapOne friend last night. Asked him whether he and his team work 1 or 2 days from home. He set me straight: they work 3 days a week from home.

Leave a Reply