Potomac Yard Metro: a Financing Model for Mass Transit

Image credit: North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan
Image credit: North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan. (Click for larger image)

by James A. Bacon

The state will help finance a new Metro station in Alexandria through a $50 million loan from the Virginia Transportation Infrastructure Bank approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board earlier this week. The loan is a key piece of financing for the station, which is expected to cost between $209 million and $268  million to build. In turn, the Metro station is a key piece of infrastructure to advance development of between 9.2 million and 13.1 million square feet of residential, office, retail and hotel space in the Potomac Yard.

While the Metro project doesn’t pass the Bacon litmus test for 100% user-pays financing, it does better than most  mass transit projects Virginia has underwritten, and it would open up 300 acres for high-density, high-value development only five miles from the core of Washington, D.C.

The Potomac Yard, to be built on an old CSX railroad marshaling yard south of Ronald Reagan National Airport, could be Northern Virginia’s most important urban infill project of the early 21st century. Plans call for the creation of between 4,300 and 7,100 residential units, 3.2 million and 4.2 million square feet of office space, nearly 800,000 square feet of retail and 740 hotel rooms. We’re not talking about development that might happen… some day. There is a strong, demonstrated demand for the kind of walkable urbanism planned at Potomac Yard.

From what I can tell from perusing public documents, the City of Alexandria is approaching this project the right way. The land use plan calls for creating a balanced mix of uses in a walkable environment with the goal of maximizing transportation infrastructure by distributing peak traffic over longer periods, maximizing internal trips and maximizing transit use. The plan also would put most parking underground, reducing the need for parking spaces by creating opportunities for shared parking, such as office buildings using parking during the day and residences during the night. Highest density development will be located around the Metro station.

I will say this: $200 million+ strikes me as an extraordinary amount of money to build a single Metro station. There are complicated trade-offs to be made with the station siting. A final decision and cost have yet to be determined. The problem is that the station must work within narrow confines around the existing rail line. Depending upon the design alternative selected, that entails building pedestrian bridges, retaining walls and/or new Metrorail bridges. The complexity of the construction staging is rated moderate to high, and considerable construction would take place along live tracks.

Complexity comes with the territory in in-fill projects. The key question is whether the project creates sufficient value to justify the higher cost. And there’s really only one way to tell: Are developers willing to absorb the cost of constructing the Metro station, or would doing so price their office, residential and retail space out of the market?

We’ll never know the answer because Alexandria isn’t loading the full cost of the Metro station construction upon the developers who stand to benefit through higher rents and leases on their properties. According to the Potomac Yard Metrorail Station Environmental Impact Statement, the project cost including interest will total $496.6 million. In 2010, the original idea was for developers to contribute $74 million directly, another $194 million through revenues generated through a special tax district, and the rest through regular taxes paid, which Alexandria would use to support municipal debt. But financing plans have evolved since then. Now the City of Alexandria is seeking $67 million from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. And the loan from the Virginia Transportation Infrastructure Bank (VTIB) lock in an interest rate of 2.17 percent over 30 years, reducing much of the interest expense.

In a presentation to the CTB, Assistant Transportation Secretary Nick Donohue described the VTIB loan’s complex debt structure. Repayment is secured by a combination of revenue from the special tax district and moral obligation of the City of Alexandria. Not all details have been finalized. “Upon CTB approval,” states the presentation, “additional specific loan terms will be determined as project, schedule and related documents are finalized.”

Bacon’s bottom line: There are still big unknowns to this project. We don’t know how much the Metro Station will cost. A final design hasn’t been selected, and almost every mass transit project known to man seems to undergo mission creep and cost escalation. Further, we don’t know the final terms of the VTIB loan. With those important caveats, it appears that this project comes closer to to paying its own way than any Virginia mass transit project I can recall.

There are no federal dollars. There likely will be state dollars, but they will come from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, which means that down-state taxpayers will not be subsidizing the project. The commitment of VTIB funds represents a small interest rate subsidy and there is a small risk that the money may not be paid, so in theory state taxpayers could be on the hook for some portion if things turn sour.

But this project differs from every other Virginia mass transit project in that developers will contribute a $74 million (2010 estimate) through direct contributions, $194 million (2010 estimate) through special tax district contributions, and millions of dollars more through payment of regular taxes used to service City of Alexandria municipal bonds. That’s a far greater contribution than will come, say, from developers/property owners of the Silver line or property owners along the Norfolk light rail line.

This is a preliminary analysis based upon a cursory examination of public documents. I invite closer scrutiny by others. But my impression is that, when it comes to paying for mass transit, this is probably the best deal that Virginia taxpayers have ever seen. The Alexandria Metro station should serve as a mass transit-financing model for the rest of the state.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Potomac Yard Metro: a Financing Model for Mass Transit”

  1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
    Tysons Engineer

    Apples to oranges. One is an infill station, the others are actual linear projects that are far costlier. If the Blue/Yellow line didnt exist already, this project would also not be able to find only developer possible funding.

    The Silver Line however will ultimately pay back more than just the funds provided for the actual project in the form of the already skyrocketing revenues coming along the corridor from new development that was made possible by the transit system. While only a portion of that tax revenue specifically goes to the Silver Lines transit district funding (whatever additional percentage specific for it) the remaining taxes still do go to the jurisdictions which is tenfold more than that particular tax. Those developments likely would not have occurred without the transit line.

    1. Fair enough — the Silver Line project included both rail and Metro stations. The Potomac Yard project covers only one Metro station. That is Apples to Oranges.

      As for your observation that the Silver Line ultimately will pay for itself through higher real estate tax revenues, that strikes me as a statement of faith. I’d like to see hard numbers. It’s critical to recognize that all those extra people living along the Silver Line need government services that need to be paid for somehow. If not property taxes diverted to pay for the Silver Line, where will that money come from?

      1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
        Tysons Engineer

        High rise development, and urban development in general, attracts DINKs at a far greater rate than suburban development. Most urban areas are net revenue providers to their surrounding suburban areas (especially commercial obviously) which also has grown along the new Silver Line. Ignore the vacancy rate issue of the filtering of older out-dated offices, new Class A is renting pretty well with the exception of in Rosslyn, and that constitutes several additional million dollars per tower.

        I submit a couple quick studies

        http://thetysonscorner.com/revenue-versus-cost-is-tysons-a-winner/

        as well as

        http://thetysonscorner.com/visualizing-tysons-tax-values-per-acre/

        and comparing to pre silverline (note much of the construction from 2008 to 2014 was in anticipation of the Silverline after agreement had been reached). I am continuing to do year by year on the tax revenue in Tysons, looking for to the 2015 report.

        http://thetysonscorner.com/assessed-values-of-tysons-2000-vs-2014/

        1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
          Tysons Engineer

          Should note

          DINK = dual income no kids (the coveted revenue demographic)

          Also the fact that between Education and Transportation and health care, you have about 70% of the funds that jurisdictions spend (atleast Fairfax). Guess who costs less in each of those categories, urbanites, especially without kids. So you get both a huge spike in revenue from hyper density but also a huge per capita decrease in jurisdiction cost from those same kinds (assuming these is not some 1970s public housing of course, which typically never gets proposed along major transit lines, let alone new ones)

        2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
          TooManyTaxes

          Interestingly, Fairfax County Public Schools have indicated they need to take a second look at the number of students that will come from high-rise developments. They are worried they have underestimated the number and that, as a result, haven’t asked for sufficient proffers. Of course, that in turn, will mean higher revenue demands on the public schools.

          The Tysons Partnership is also worried that police protection in Tysons is not sufficient, as the crime rate is up noticeably.

          Tysons will neither be hell nor heaven.

          The ultimate test of whether Tysons is a benefit is whether the real estate tax rate can be reduced because of the added revenues coming from Tysons. That won’t likely happen until commercial real estate takes off. Foust’s office is indicating commercial will be flat again this year. We are not out of the woods yet. Nor are we on the path to doom.

          1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
            Tysons Engineer

            They under-estimated, but that doesn’t mean that the number is anywhere close to an area like McLean for instance per capita.

            Its still going to orders less. Arlington, as developed as it has become for families, is still 30-40% less per capita than its suburban regions. Either way, the towers still pay WAY more than they take, even you TMT can’t deny that.

            Our building of 600 residents (very affluent ones btw) has approximately 30-40 school aged children, only about 10 are in highschool (the most costly). The remaining lets say, 350 units that don’t have children more than pay past what the cost of those 30-40 do… not to mention, we all still pay taxes you know. My taxes are about 7.5k per year… you think I come anywhere near that amount in taking? Some of my neighbors pay above 10k per year, they surely don’t. And that’s just RE, not to mention sales/income/etc

            In total my building pays around 2 million per year in RE taxes. There is no chance in heck we use up 2 million in county services per year.

            You need to come to terms with the real numbers TMT.

          2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
            TooManyTaxes

            TE why are you so defensive? I have long supported development at the four rail stations in Tysons. It provides additional choice in housing and will likely attract good companies.

            But Tysons is far from a panacea for the County. For example, the County is planning on devoting the entire C&I tax revenue for 20 years more or less to help build transportation infrastructure. I don’t mind that, but I suspect taxpayers in other parts of the county won’t like it.

            Tysons has traditionally contributed about 10% of the real estate tax revenues for the County. After the needed infrastructure is paid for (30 years or so), I suspect Tysons will contribute somewhat more in real estate taxes. But I seriously doubt that Tysons will generate so much in real estate taxes that rates can be cut.

            The County has passed its salad days. Growth in high-paying jobs is flat at best. Job growth is at the low-end service sector. And the county is aging. Demands for services can easily outstrip growth in tax revenue. Are we better off financially with Tysons, after the infrastructure is paid for? Most likely. But Tysons will never provide a panacea of tax revenues.

            But what’s wrong with seeing Tysons as another choice for residents and businesses?

            As far as individual tax revenue is concerned, if you have kids in public schools, you are being subsidized. If you don’t, you may or may not be subsidized. Areas in the north county and places like Clifton likely subsidize the rest of the county.

  2. So-called ‘infill’ is not such a cost advantage as you might think, since the existing line is across the railroad tracks from the development, and the tracks need re-routing to accommodate a station. Current right-of-way is also constrained by nearby wetlands. As with many projects, retrofit here is more difficult than new construction because of the extra effort needed to work around existing operations without a loss in service.

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      Might you be aware of why it’s taken so long for this entire mixed use project to be built to completion? I have been out of the development game in Virginia for many years, but recall this project (or a long ago iteration of it) being the Talk of the Town as far back as the early 1990’s. Yet now completion of this monster still seems to drag on forever. What is that history here?

      Perhaps part of the reasons that the end game here keeps slipping over yet more horizons are the matters you just mentioned . In any case, some projects, particularly those of grand ambition to be built on “invented or resurrected ground” with special locations and hidden problems generate a great deal of more hype, buzz, and expectations than practical considerations allow market-wise.

      Thus they seem to take on their own unique personality, struggling in fits and starts, at times nearly forever, or at best find solid footing decades after the original projections of long ago owners. Somebody then far later comes along to win but leave in their wave a string of broken promises, dreams, and lost fortunes.

      1. Still working on the details to why it took so long. But as for the transparency of financial planning, I like the status report presented in October on the City of Alexandria website :
        http://alexandriava.gov/uploadedFiles/2014-10-23_PYMIG%20meeting(2).pdf

        I read on Wikipedia that the RF&P proposed shutting down the yard in the 1980s, it was officially decommissioned in 1988, then declared a SuperFund site with environmental cleanup declared complete in 1997.

        The development ownership changed hands several times. The initial planning approval process generated lots of proffers. Between the cost of remediation, proffers, and recessions for the dot com bust and 9/11, I think there were a few bankruptcies or sales involved. Then the financial collapse of 2007/8. But it seems that there’s been a lot of steady progress on building out the property since then.

        1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
          Reed Fawell 3rd

          Thank you. I appreciate what you’re doing and will delve into it as well.

  3. lots of moving parts – as pointed out. And, obviously one or more folks with a plan that ecompasses more than this one element. Multiple elements interrelated with each other in ways not obvious to the general public.

    so .. what I’m getting at – is the fact that elected and appointed officials when they want to accomplish something – whether it be HOT lanes or the Silver Line or a METRO station – actually seek to avoid a full and rich public process.

    And the reason they do is because the “public” has degenerated into a plethora of interests groups of which one or more are guaranteed to oppose a proposal … tying it up into delays or even killing the project – so the folks who do these proposals – see a completely open and transparent process as a roadmap to failure.

    I actually hate to say it. I’m a strong believer in a fully transparent full-blown public process but the reality is the way that politics works these days is that almost no project would get strong and obvious public approval and most will see one or more opposition groups dead set on derailing it.

    We’re at a turning point with respect to how the public can participate meaningfully without turning every issue into a litmus test of “left” or “right” political side-choosing.

    It used to be just at the Congress level – but it’s now infiltrated the General Assembly – and we’re seeing local elections predicated on the candidate is a “liberal” or not.

    The irony is exquisite. The Dems would NEVER be able to pass a gas tax in Virginia; the screaming meemies on the right would go ape-crap.. so what happens ? the right passes the tax increase.

    the same thing is now going on in a GOP-dominated Congress with GOP Congressmen are openly coming out and advocated a 12 cent increase in the Federal gas tax – something that had the Dems openly advocated it would have cost them even more seats in the elections.

    Finally, I must tweak Mr. Bacon is judging transportation projects. I do not think I’ve ever heard any Conservative talk about is a given road or highway actually paid for itself…and yet that’s the standard put on transit.

    Europe and Japan consider transit to be like public schools and public safety, law enforcement, etc… ask Don…

    but in this country transit and rail are “subsidized”.

    so now we’re saying that SOME projects … MIGHT be “ok” as long as they are not subsidized “too much”?

    😉

  4. I have to wonder what secrets they will find under a 100+ year old CSX railroad marshaling yard. I also wonder how deep they go when they clean up a major super fund site.

    And for you tech types, here is an interesting website. A live plane tracker with soon to be near real time noise tracking for Dulles and Reagan. Will wonders never cease.

    http://www.metwashairports.com/reagan/1271.htm

    1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
      Tysons Engineer

      In a location like Potomac Yard where they are near assured to find marine clay? You’d be surprised how slow liquids actually permeate. I’d be surprised if they have to go more than 10′ below original source. Of course if they hit some strata that has looser soils like a loam or sand (that would be shocking) it could permeate much much faster and deeper.

    2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      How many ways can we find to worry ourselves into yet more hysteria? And why? Might hysteria over small things make it easier to avoid large problems. And earn tons and tons of big government money to accomplish less and less.

      1. Tysons Engineer Avatar
        Tysons Engineer

        Well I mean, a superfund site in the midwest is the complete opposite in that regard. It would get into the aquifer very quickly if it were not addressed.

        Very quickly by geological terms is still multi-year/decade

        Also, you don’t have to get into the aquifer for it to be bad. Being in the Vadose (saturated zone) ain’t great either, that ends up being extracted up/pushed up during storm events and can pose problems if for instance, there is a playground above it or any area where people might be gather frankly.

        1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
          Reed Fawell 3rd

          Yes, I appreciate the need for much of the Superfund work, and don’t mean to make light of the problems and cost of solutions. And I certainty cannot claim any expertize at all on the subject. At the same time I’ve heard some horror stories of way over the top expenditures from attorneys who worked for decades in the field on behalf of property interests and whose clients had a strong interest in cleaning up too.

          In any case it’d be interesting to know the total costs to date and projected to clean up this “urban rail yard” and how all that complicated all sorts of matters, and added great speculation and complexity into an already complex and risky real estate project.

    3. Darrell – always find your posts worth reading.. and I too am “jazzed” about how technology is moving so fast and providing so much of benefit.

      but I do look at odd things sometimes and when I ran the webtracker it was hard to miss the “terms of use” agreement – and I cursorily scanned it – and duly noted who wrote it and what country they are from and in this case, it’s company from Australia – at the same time we are worried about losing jobs in Hampton.. and kids across Va are not getting sufficient education to successfully compete for 21st century jobs – and this is yet another example.

      We talk a big game of economic development and how we have to wean ourselves off of govt jobs.. and I guess you might say this is a “govt” job but the point is – it’s state-of-the-art technology that requires wide and deep skillsets to develop – and in an economy in the US where we are talking about wage stagnation and people who have stopped looking for jobs, etc, etc… seeing folks from other countries taking these jobs when we need more jobs, is depressing.

      sure, we can blame this also on the POTUS but really it’s not like we don’t have a large labor pool waiting to be employed… we have the folks who want jobs but they don’t have the skills and what happens when the POTUS says we need to put more rigor into education and thinks free community college for those with a C+ would be a way to incentivize kids to perform better in K12 if they have a attainable goal they can reach.

      and how do citizens react? Do they support upping our game in education? Do they support NCLB, COmmon Core or even Virginia SOLS? nope.. that’s teaching to the test.. and all that rot.

      Nope. they want to blame someone .. for the current economic condition – but who is responsible really for the current situation where our own citizens cannot compete against foreign citizens for USA jobs?

      so the superfund issue ? that’s nothing compared to the fact that US citizens are losing jobs to other countries because we cannot or will not do what is necessary to really compete for global jobs.

      end of rant.

  5. all in all – though – it’s a DANG COOL app… showing all the planes in the DC airspace in real time…!!!!

  6. oops.. NOT real time

  7. I was wondering if someone was going to catch the Australian source. If you want to see really crazy flying check out the NYC version of this app.

  8. […] Funding the Potomac Yard Metro Station – Is Alexandria, Virginia going about it the right way? (Bacon’s Rebellion) […]

Leave a Reply