Population Changes in the Commonwealth Since the 2020 Census

by James C. Sherlock

The Bureau of the Census has issued its estimates of the population changes in Virginia and its 133 jurisdictions since the 2020 census.

They are always of interest, but perhaps more so since 2020-2022 spanned the COVID years.

The categories of change calculated by the Census Bureau are total change, natural change (births minus deaths) and migration. They provided the raw numbers.

In the attached spreadsheet, I let Excel calculate the percentages, which I find more meaningful. Some are surprising given that it was only a two-year period, but perhaps not, since it spanned the COVID years.

We’ll examine them.

Cumulative population changes. The Commonwealth added 52,235 people, almost 28,000 in natural change and the rest in net migration. Beneath those totals lie some more dramatic changes.

Though the net natural change was positive, almost three times as many jurisdictions lost population through natural change as gained. That speaks to young people leaving many of them.

The biggest natural gains were in Northern Virginia.

In net migration,

  • almost 30,000 domestic residents left the state.
  • almost 53,000 international residents arrived.

In raw numbers, Fairfax County was the biggest net loser of population at almost -12,000. Then Norfolk, Arlington County, Alexandria and Virginia Beach in order lost between 5,000 and nearly 4,000 people.

We will look at additional data behind those numbers that show dramatic changes in some jurisdictions.

Net losers and gainers. The biggest losers by percentage of 2020 population: Emporia and Buchanan County both (-4.9%), Bath County (-3.7%), Northampton County (-3.1%), Manassas Park City (-3.0%), Dickenson County (-2.9%) and Charlottesville, Allegheny County and Alexandria, all -2.5%.

Charlottesville and Alexandria surprise me a little. Alexandria lost almost 3,500 people. Charlottesville nearly 1,200 (not including the statues). The rest unfortunately do not surprise.

The biggest gainers: New Kent County (8.9%), Louisa County (6.7%), Goochland County (5.6%), Orange County (5%), Spotsylvania County (4.7%), Suffolk City (4.5%), and King George County (4.3%).

New Kent County has been growing for years, but 9% — more than 2,000 people — in two years is pretty explosive.

Louisa County is attracting new residents to settle near its back-to-nature rural cooperatives. It must be Lake Anna.

Natural change. Births exceeded deaths among Virginia residents by almost 28,000.

Net Migration. Migration was responsible for a net gain to Virginia of about 23,000 people.

But that included a net gain of nearly 53,000 from international migration and a net loss of about 30,000 from domestic migration.

The biggest percentage losers to net migration were Alexandria (-4.4%), Charlottesville (-3.7%), Arlington County (-3.2%), Manassas Park (-3%), Norfolk (-2.9%) and Harrisonburg (-2.9%).

Biggest net migration percentage winners were, in order from the highest, New Kent County, Louisa County, Goochland County, Northumberland County, Middlesex County, Orange County, Isle of Wight County, Highland County, James City County, Powhatan County, Spotsylvania County, and Clark County.

All were above +4%

Domestic Migration. The biggest percentage losers to net domestic migration were, starting with the biggest losses, Alexandria (-6.1%), Charlottesville (-4.7%), Arlington County (-4.7%), Manassas Park (-4.3%), Harrisonburg (-3.8%), Fairfax County (-3.6%), and Norfolk (-3.5%).

In two years.

International Migration. From the Census Bureau:

Net international migration for the United States includes the international migration of both U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born populations.

Specifically, it includes: (a) the net international migration of the non-U.S. born, (b) the net migration of U.S. born to and from the United States, (c) the net migration between the United States and Puerto Rico, and (d) the net movement of the Armed Forces population between the United States and overseas.

Among Virginia jurisdictions, none had more than five net international departures.

Net international arrival gains by percentage of 2020 population were led by Fairfax City at +2.1%. Ten more jurisdictions, mostly urban, had at least 1% gains from international arrivals.

Fairfax County population increased +1.4% from international net arrivals. But, being Fairfax County, that was more than 16,000 people.

Demographic changes. We can compare domestic and international arrivals and departures as a proxy to get from population changes to demographic changes from the data available.

Some interesting outcomes from those proxies:

Gainers without international migration gains.

  • New Kent County +8.7% domestic, none international.
  • Northumberland County gained +6.6% from domestic migration, nothing from international migration.
  • Highland County +4.4 % domestic, none international.
  • Powhatan County +4.3% domestic and none international.
  • Clarke County +4.1% and none.

Biggest demographic net changes.

One notable trend is that the eleven jurisdictions with the highest percentages of international migration gains also suffered losses to domestic migration.

The biggest net demographic changes from 2020 to 2022 combining domestic losses and international gains from immigration were:

  • Alexandria: domestic migration -6.1%, international migration +1.7%
  • Arlington County: domestic -4.7%, international + 1.5%
  • Charlottesville: domestic -4.7%; international +1%
  • Manassas:  domestic -3.8%; international +1.4%
  • Harrisonburg: domestic -3.8%, international +1.3%

Bottom line.

The COVID years found people on the move. Some changes turned out as we might have expected. Many did not.

Life is like that.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “Population Changes in the Commonwealth Since the 2020 Census”

  1. Nathan Avatar

    “Charlottesville and Alexandria surprise me a little. Alexandria lost almost 3,500 people. Charlottesville nearly 1,200 (not including the statues).”

    Very funny!

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Alexandria grew by 13.9% in the 10 years ended 2020. Charlottesville grew by 7.1% over the same period.

      As a long time Northern Virginian I know that fast growth means traffic problems, high housing prices and seemingly endless tax hikes.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Fast growth also means shoddy construction, based on what I’ve seen. Not a big deal for the buyer that intends to sell in a few years.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Fair point. Desperate people make desperate decisions.

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I wonder where the outflow migration went to? Florida, Texas, NC, West by god stole from Virginny?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      You need to move this down one in the article chain…

      1. Nathan Avatar

        Yup. I messed up on that one.

  3. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Using percentages to compare areas of very different sizes can be misleading.

    For example, Highland County and Fairfax County. Highland County has about 2,200 people, Fairfax County well over 1 million. Fairfax County has more than 500x the population of Highland County.

    Adding fewer than 100 people and a dog would generate a 4% increase in Highland County. Fairfax County lost almost 6 times as many people as live in Highland County, and gained around 8 times as many as total Highland County residents for a net 1.4% in migration. Fairfax County in migration gained about twice as many people as the entire population of Highland County, even with its 4%, almost 3x larger, percentage increase.

    Same goes for all the low population, mostly rural, areas compared to high population mostly urban/suburban areas. Percentage changes, while important to localities, can obscure more than they disclose when used to compare localities with different population sizes.

  4. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Question, Was Charlottesville’s loss offset by an increase in Albemarle County that surrounds it?

    C’ville itself is physically constrained and may be essentially full while the surrounding county is less densely populated. The ongoing dysfunction of C’ville city government may also prompt people to be voting with their feet as well as being priced out of the city.

    Sorry, for some reason I cannot access your attached spreadsheet.

    Edit: Ah, got it. Nice spreadsheet. Albemarle gained about twice as many people as Charlottesville lost, meaning a net gain for the area. Since the county has more than twice the population of the city the increase is 2.1% while the city decrease is 3.7%. Likely no surprise at Charlottesville when viewed in context with the surrounding county. The metro area grew, as would be expected as it continues to thrive.

  5. Sherlock’s data is consistent with UVa demographer Hamilton Lombard’s observation that the exurban counties in the Richmond metro commutershed are the fastest growing localities in Virginia right now. Most are starting from a low population base so a modest influx of newcomers has a disproportionately high percentage impact. As I recall, Lombard says that much of the domestic migration within Virginia consists largely of people moving from Northern Virginia to Central Virginia, primarily the Richmond metro.

    Once upon a time, Richmond was the business/economic hub of Virginia. Then for decades — 1980s through the 2010s — it was supplanted by Northern Virginia. But NoVa seems to have lost its mojo, and growth has slowed. Hampton Roads remains stuck in the mud. Richmond is hardly a boom town. It’s plodding along in the middle of the pack among major U.S. metros. But that’s enough in slow-growth Virginia to make it a growth leader.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      I have a son who does higher end finish carpentry in the Richmond and C’ville areas. It is mostly remodeling for in migrating people from both Northern Virginia but more escaping from further north where both real estate and living costs are even higher. His experience seems consistent with the data.

      The growth of the Richmond exurbs makes a great deal of sense too. Louisa had fewer than 20k people when I moved there in the late ’70s. It’s got 37k now. Seems like with Spottsy it’s the D.C./NOVA area pushing south with lots of Louisa’s growth being around Lake Anna. But pushing out from Richmond to Bumpass in eastern Louisa has had significant growth too. Rt 33 has had a vigorous rush hour to and from Richmond for a long time. There’s one Skinnerian commune that’s been around for years, so that’s not much impact.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Eastern Goochland County is growing rapidly as well.

        If I wanted built-in floor to ceiling bookcases on a wall in my house, with one of those rolling/sliding ladder set-ups, could your son build it for me?

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          It’s funny, I’d have expected it to be more east and south, like New Kent. Moving west gets sun in your eyes both morning and evening. For that reason Richmond’s west focused growth has been puzzling to me for a long time.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          It’s funny, I’d have expected it to be more east and south, like New Kent. Moving west gets sun in your eyes both morning and evening. For that reason Richmond’s west focused growth has been puzzling to me for a long time.

  6. Nathan Avatar

    Interesting fact about Richmond. According to the report below, it has the highest percentage of registered sex offenders in the country.

    Not only that, it’s WAY ahead of the pack. Richmond is reported to have 28.03 sex offenders per 1,000 people. That’s hard to believe, given the percentages nationally. Is this real, or a reporting glitch?

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b8abff0011e7f1a7da128849e66fe45c24b7bdb090ab0b552b262b5586190330.png

    https://www.safewise.com/blog/safest-cities-to-raise-a-child/#Sex_offenders

    I’m inclined to think this report is wrong, but one would think someone in Richmond government would try to get it corrected.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      I think there must be something wrong. Using the 28.03/1,000 number, and the population of Richmond given in the report (233,350) there are 6,541 sex offenders in Richmond. I find that hard to believe given that there are only around 15,000 people in the state registry (“only” being a means of comparison, not an opinion).

      Interestingly, the population of the “Greater Richmond Area” is about 1,315,000 people. 6,541 offenders among that number comes to 4.98 per 1,000. Still very high, but much closer to the numbers seen in other cities.

      I suppose it is possible those who prepared the study used the wrong population numbers.

      1. Nathan Avatar

        I think I may have figured out the issue. The sex offenders included appears to have thousands of sex offenders with the following address:

        Department Of Corrections, 6900 Atmore Drive

        Read more: http://www.city-data.com/so/so-Richmond-Virginia.html

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          That is the Virginia Department of Corrections headquarters. DoC does offer “residential” programs. 🙂 Suppose that is the address used for all of ’em who are currently “residing” with the state?

          If the HQ was just a few feet west on the other side of Chippenham Parkway it would have been Chesterfield County with the huge spike instead of the city.

          1. Nathan Avatar

            As I said before, I would think someone representing Richmond would want to get this corrected. It does not reflect reality, and makes the city look really bad.

            Other crime statistics for Richmond may also be wrong. I focused on sex offenders because that number was so unbelievably high it caught my attention.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Dunno, Richmond’s got plenty of weirdos, but 1 in 34 seems a little high, except for the Fan.:)

            Wonder if the stats are screwy for every locality that has a state prison or regional jail? Maybe they’re all listed as living at 6900 Ardmore in Richmond.

          3. Nathan Avatar

            At the city-data.com Richmond report it lists the 6,577 offenders. My use of “find” in Chrome shows there are 4,405 entries with Department of Corrections included.

            It may well include greater Richmond as well. I did some spot checking and found Chesterfield zips etc.

            All in all, this information should not be trusted.

            Hence the disclaimer:

            City-data.com makes no representation, implied or expressed, that all information placed on this web site is accurate or timely. City-data.com and its owners accept no responsibility or liability for damages of any kind resulting from reliance on this information or lack thereof…”

            Read more: http://www.city-data.com/so/so-Richmond-Virginia.html

      2. Nathan Avatar

        The source of the data used for the report was city-data.com. See link below.

        According to our research of Virginia and other state lists, there were 6,577 registered sex offenders living in Richmond as of June 28, 2023. The ratio of all residents to sex offenders in Richmond is 34 to 1.”

        Read more: http://www.city-data.com/so/so-Richmond-Virginia.html

      3. Nathan Avatar

        I don’t know how much visibility the report gets, but it was referenced as authoritative by ABC News.

        The report further ranks Richmond as 3rd worst in the country out of 430. Not a good look. See below.

        America’s 10 most dangerous cities for families

        In our analysis of over 430 cities, these 10 cities had the highest rates for violent crime, property crime, and sex offenders.

        Rank City State

        1 St Louis Missouri
        2 Memphis Tennessee
        3 Richmond Virginia

        https://www.safewise.com/blog/safest-cities-to-raise-a-child/#Sex_offenders

  7. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    Fairfax County had a change in population of -1.04%; however, the change due to international migration was +1.4%. I wonder what part of the +1.4% was due to illegal immigrants.

Leave a Reply