Whoops, wrong kind of orc.

by James A. Bacon

Is California-style organized retail theft coming to Virginia? I have been making the argument, based upon admittedly anecdotal evidence, that it might be. While one must be careful extrapolating from individual incidents, which might be outliers, it struck me that the type of retail crime being reported in Virginia was undergoing a phase change. We’re seeing crimes the likes of which we’d never seen before. Furthermore, I suggested that the trend may be aided and abetted by several progressive commonwealth attorneys in Virginia declining to prosecute crimes that offend their social-justice sensibilities, as has been the case in California.

In a column this morning, Dick Hall-Sizemore counters that some of what we’re seeing — the recycling of “frequent flier” petty larcenists through the criminal-justice system — has been around for years. I thank Dick for presenting an argument based on facts. Others attack my argument by attacking me. Bacon, you see, is one of those conservative curmudgeons pining for the good ol’ days when crime barely existed, therefore his observations can be dispensed with no need for further argument!

But it turns out that others are seeing a trend. Yesterday Attorney General Jason Miyares convened a working group to take a look at Organized Retail Crime (ORC) in Virginia. Retailers are reporting that pilferage is a growing problem. Thieves are getting more brazen, and they find a ready outlet for their goods as illegal resellers — in the old days, they were called “fences” — who exploit online marketplaces.

“We saw in Fairfax last month, over 20,000 eyeglasses frames were stolen just in Fairfax,” Miyares said, as reported by Virginia Public Media. “Arlington detectives recovered over 89,000 stolen goods from just T.J. Maxx alone.”

Not surprisingly, VPM found someone to pooh-pooh the work group. “This is just AG Miyares just latching on to the latest aspect of the crime wave hysteria,” said Brad Haywood at Justice Forward Virginia. “I don’t think there’s any basis in fact for the claim that organized shoplifting has suddenly become some massive social problem that requires its own work group. It just seems to be complete fantasy.”

Haywood suspects that the work group is a pretext for harsh new laws. But the limited news accounts provide no indication of that. VPM mentions the work group priority is tracking and recording organized retail crime.

As Miyares spokesperson Victoria LaCivita explained to Bacon’s Rebellion, Virginia has no process in place to document the extent of retail crime. The problem is bigger than the smash-and-grab robbers who get arrested and make it into the news, she said. It’s about the third parties who sell stolen merchandise and consumers who purchase counterfeit or stolen products.

As much as $69 billion worth of products were stolen from retailers in 2019 nationally, about 1.5% of total retail sales, according to “The Impact of Organized Retail Crime and Product Theft in the United States,” a paper prepared for the Retail Industry Leaders Association and the Buy Safe America Coalition. Two-thirds of asset-protection managers at leading retailers reported a “moderate to considerable increase” in organized retail crime, while 80% believed theft will get worse in the future.

A 2020 National Retail Federation (NRF) survey found that three in four ORC  victims reported an increase in the previous year. Thirty-one percent saw a “significant” increase, and 44% a “slight increase.” 

The Retail Industry Leaders paper portrays retail theft as “pervasive” across America, not just in major metropolitan areas like San Francisco where sensational cases caught on video have captured national attention.

Retail theft doesn’t affect store owners only. Retailers pass the cost of theft and store security on to consumers — when they don’t shut down stores entirely, as some have in San Francisco. Also, Miyares told WDBJ yesterday, retail crime can be a gateway to other criminal activity.

“A lot of times people will groom young victims to do some of these smash-and-grab situations, and often if you find an organized retail crime ring, you also see that they are involved in a lot of other nefarious activities, trafficking in narcotics, trafficking in people,” he said.

Why is this happening?

“Retailers believe that the increase in ORC-related incidents is a direct result of changing laws and penalties for shoplifting,” says the NRF survey. Many states have increased the threshold of how much theft constitutes a felony, which has had “the unintended consequence of allowing criminals to steal more without being afraid of stronger penalties.”

The NRF study listed the Washington, D.C. metro as 8th in a list of cities/metro areas most affected by organized crime. That reflected criminal activity before the election of progressive prosecutors in Fairfax, Loudoun and Arlington counties. It will be interesting to see how  ORC trends in those localities compare with localities elsewhere in Virginia. All other things being equal, economic logic would suggest that organized criminals, being rational actors, would focus their activities where they are least likely to suffer consequences for their crimes.

Hopefully, the new task force will shed some light on that question.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

43 responses to “Plundering ORCs”

  1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    It’s already here. Just ask the FCPD officers and detectives who work from the Tysons Corner Mall.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    It’s a new kind of crime. organized players using cell phones.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/33a45ea5b80e781bed7a8a6ad73d7ae67ab0fe0ffa24a18dee4eae89f0c82642.jpg

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8c75a2d6553613275a8e5ad7a77c04aa005363b49547cd230fe712f59f2d2e1f.jpg

    But JAB’s question:

    ” That reflected criminal activity before the election of progressive prosecutors in Fairfax, Loudoun and Arlington counties. It will be interesting to see if how ORC trends in those localities compare with localities elsewhere in Virginia. All other things being equal, economic logic would suggest that organized criminals, being rational actors, would focus their activities where they are least likely to suffer consequences for their crimes.”

    is more what-a-bout-ism….

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Another JAB piece that puts forth an argument with “admittedly” no facts to support it.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      and really, it’s a police issue in the first place.

      it’s become a familiar narrative – bring up something anecdotal then engage in rampant what-a-bout-ism.

      it’s what Conservatives do these days – from FOX to BR.

      1. killerhertz Avatar
        killerhertz

        Police rarely stop crimes in progress. They primarily collect revenue via traffic fines and hunt down criminals after the fact.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          well, you can’t get to a prosecution until the police do their thing.

          So blaming the prosecutors for not prosecuting cases not brought to them is kinda fruitless.

          You want to prosecute these organized thefts ? Gotta arrest them first.

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      What are you talking about? Jim is reporting on the fact that the attorney general has put together a working group on organized retail crime. He then quotes from various surveys that measure the opinions of experts in the area such as:

      ” Two-thirds of asset-protection managers at leading retailers reported a “moderate to considerable increase” in organized retail crime, while 80% believed theft will get worse in the future.”

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        In what way do these claims support JAB’s argument that “…the trend may be aided and abetted by several progressive commonwealth attorneys in Virginia declining to prosecute crimes that offend their social-justice sensibilities”…??

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        and what exactly will the AG do to address it?

        what CAN he do? Grandstand…..

        and you’re missing JABs “point” that woke prosecutors won’t prosecute which is total what-a-bout-ism BS. The big problem is what police will do or can do.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          He can report out the findings of the working group and put pressure on the legislature to act.

          AGs have strong Bully Pulpits.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            what can the legislature do?

            this looks like a police problem, no?

            once the police catch the scum, they can be prosecuted…. but you gotta catch them first and they hit and then run before the police can respond.

            where is this a ‘woke’ problem?

  4. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    EBay is the perfect fence.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Yep – a lot of stuff on Ebay has questionable provenance.

      But also FB marketplace and Craigslist.

  5. Crosswalks to Nowhere Avatar
    Crosswalks to Nowhere

    Nobody joins in to steal from retail stores in mass if times are good, and they believe in our institutions. Companies are raising prices beyond inflation because nobody is stopping them. Why shop with those price gougers then? Well the market is so heavily consolidated that you have no choice but to be gouged. Why doesn’t somebody do some good ol trust busting? Because the last federal judge who went after monopolies and trusts was buried in 1976. Judge Richard McLaren.

    1. Wow! Crosswalks, your comment is Exhibit A in what is wrong with our country — rhetoric that says lawbreakers aren’t criminals but victims of social injustice… that the real criminals are the businessmen… and that prices that went spiraling out of control in the past year and a half are not the result of politicians’ reckless fiscal and monetary policy but the sudden appearance of monopoly power and corporate greed.

      1. Crosswalks to Nowhere Avatar
        Crosswalks to Nowhere

        Large scale retail thievery is a symptom of institutional failures. Yes it’s a crime that people deserve to go to jail over. What i’m getting at is that it’s happening more often because people are getting screwed over more now than ever. Billionaires got wealthier than ever during the lockdowns, while all we got was a few checks in the mail. Monopoly power and corporate greed didn’t appear suddenly, neither did large spending packages. It’s never reckless spending when 40 billion goes to ukraine, or no bid contracts went to Halliburton in the early GWOT days. Why is it reckless when anything gets spent on average americans? Who got paid first during covid relief programs? Large corporations did, while anything smaller than a khols was told they weren’t essential.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        This whole article is Exhibit B.

  6. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Back in the days of yore when I was in B school the wisdom was that employee theft cost businesses more than retail shoplifting. More went out the back door than the front. Be nice to have statistics that reported shrinkage by type of perp.

    With retail shoplifters businesses don’t have the insult to injury of paying the people who are stealing from them.

    I do think you’re onto something, retail shoplifting seems to be on a roll.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I have several comments, mostly interrelated:

    1. The national retail folks say that retail theft is “pervasive” across the country. So, to the extent that it is occurring in Virginia, it is part of a national trend, rather than Virginia becoming more like California.
    2. If it really is Organized Retail Crime, involving organized systems of thieves, fences, and folks who buy from fences, that is probably more complex than the frequent flyers.
    3. It would be advisable for someone to study this issue and determine its parameters in Virginia.
    4. I do think Miyares is grandstanding, trying to show his “top cop” bona fides and continuing the movement of the AG’s office from its basic function of providing legal services to state agencies.

    5. The best entity to study this issue would be the Virginia State Crime Commission. It has the professional staff that has experience to conduct serious research and develop policy recommendations. Miyares’ task force will be mainly about having public meetings and generating headlines.
    6. In 2018, there was a consensus that the felony threshold for grand larceny should be increased from $250 to $500. The bill passed 98-2 in the House and 39-1 in the Senate. Two years later, the Democrats doubled the threshold to $1,000. I thought at the time that was a mistake. Of course, Jim has been talking about merchandise hauls worth in the thousands, so it wouldn’t have mattered if the threshold were $500 or $1,000.
    7. You continue to blame the Northern Virginia “progressive” prosecutors. Why not wait until law enforcement has been able to arrest some of the key players in an ORC and see how the prosecutors proceed before you start assigning blame?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      “4. I do think Miyares is grandstanding, trying to show his “top cop” bona fides and continuing the movement of the AG’s office from its basic function of providing legal services to state agencies.”

      Did you feel the same way when the person you voted into office acted in the same manner?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Yes

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Using your posts and comments on this blog, that statement can be labeled as false.

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      1. Aa national trend that is unevenly distributed. The use of social media to organize those who commit organized retail crime is pervasive. Lax prosecution in California makes that state an outlier. Do we have the same lax prosecution in some parts of Virginia that put Virginia among the outliers. That’s the question.

      2. Definitely. The “frequent flier” post may have shown some anecdotal movement toward more lax prosecution or it may not have shown that.

      3. Agree. I think that’s what Miyares is trying to do.

      4. Oh yeah, to some extent. I suspect ole Jason has bigger aspirations than being just the state’s Attorney General. However, who else would have called together this working group? The governor? The head of the state police?

      5. I don’t know enough to know much about the Virginia State Crime Commission. You seem to know a lot about the state government so I’ll take your word for it.

      6. The slippery slope argument isn’t always wrong. Just like some people claim that smoking pot leads to harder drug use perhaps simple shoplifting under $1,000 leads to organized retail crime.

      7. Because Descano makes idiotic statements about how he won’t prosecute abortion law violations NO MATTER WHAT THE LAW SAYS. He also refused to prosecute marijuana possession when it was still illegal. He’s a Soros lackey. This editorial pretty much sums up the feelings many in Fairfax County have about Descano:

      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/soros-prosecutors-are-murdering-criminal-justice-reform

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I agree that Descanos should be quiet. However, other CAs have declined to prosecute marijuana possession cases. Norfolk

        https://www.wtkr.com/2019/01/07/norfolk-commonwealths-attorney-says-he-wont-prosecute-simple-marijuana-charges/

        and Portsmouth, for example.

        https://www.pilotonline.com/news/crime/vp-nw-prosecutorial-discretion-law-20201022-4xjnmoidqngijbrrgq7uzfrsei-story.html

        Most surprising, perhaps, is Don Caldwell, the conservative Republican prosecutor for Roanoke County. His office stopped prosecuting most marijuana possession cases around 2016. The difference between him and the others is that he did not make a big announcement. He just stopped doing it and created no big fuss.

        https://roanoke.com/news/local/nearly-a-half-century-later-marijuana-martyr-sees-hope-in-virginia/article_c4ed13fc-e0ce-11eb-a3fd-5716a35f654a.html
        (You have to read pretty far into this article to get to the part about Caldwell.)

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I agree that Descanos should be quiet. However, other CAs have declined to prosecute marijuana possession cases. Norfolk

        https://www.wtkr.com/2019/01/07/norfolk-commonwealths-attorney-says-he-wont-prosecute-simple-marijuana-charges/

        and Portsmouth, for example.

        https://www.pilotonline.com/news/crime/vp-nw-prosecutorial-discretion-law-20201022-4xjnmoidqngijbrrgq7uzfrsei-story.html

        Most surprising, perhaps, is Don Caldwell, the conservative Republican prosecutor for Roanoke County. His office stopped prosecuting most marijuana possession cases around 2016. The difference between him and the others is that he did not make a big announcement. He just stopped doing it and created no big fuss.

        https://roanoke.com/news/local/nearly-a-half-century-later-marijuana-martyr-sees-hope-in-virginia/article_c4ed13fc-e0ce-11eb-a3fd-5716a35f654a.html
        (You have to read pretty far into this article to get to the part about Caldwell.)

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” Lax prosecution in California makes that state an outlier.”

        can you provide something that confirms that California is not prosecuting ?

        And you have ONE anecdotal thing about NoVa.
        Can you provide evidence that they don’t prosecute these cases in general?

        This is plain old what-a-bout-ism… no?

    3. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      6. Inflation is bringing the threshold down month by month. Another few years of it and the value will be back close to $500 in 2018 dollars.

    4. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Too much rationality on these pages is likely to cause headaches.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    It’s a new kind of crime. organized players using cell phones.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/33a45ea5b80e781bed7a8a6ad73d7ae67ab0fe0ffa24a18dee4eae89f0c82642.jpg

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8c75a2d6553613275a8e5ad7a77c04aa005363b49547cd230fe712f59f2d2e1f.jpg

    But JAB’s question:

    ” That reflected criminal activity before the election of progressive prosecutors in Fairfax, Loudoun and Arlington counties. It will be interesting to see if how ORC trends in those localities compare with localities elsewhere in Virginia. All other things being equal, economic logic would suggest that organized criminals, being rational actors, would focus their activities where they are least likely to suffer consequences for their crimes.”

    is more what-a-bout-ism….

  9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Why is this happening?

    “Retailers believe that the increase in ORC-related incidents is a direct result of changing laws and penalties for shoplifting,” says the NRF survey.”

    Some actual data from the NRF 2020 survey JAB references about shoplifting – attached. 2019 “Apprehensions” and “Prosecutions” are up only slightly compared to 2018 but are down dramatically from 2017 and prior years. 2019 Dollars per incident are half of 2018 figures and 1/3rd of the 2016 high figure.

    Seems like the actual data does not support the rhetorical claim… https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fe938669a236503189fc7e4aff12d40dfebdd4811dcb5d55bd92dfbd0e08d2e4.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e112387b30bea7f827c71de6a4c4b984f49b32c4f3dbae462ba94636cbdb30ed.jpg

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Looks like prosecutions are tracking apprehensions…

      Normally for solo shop-lifting store security can stop the person , call the cops, etc… but with a an organized “team” of shoplifters – the stores would have to have much larger security teams – not something the cops can do unless the store security recognizes the threat and calls police and they show up en masse.

      There is no question this is a problem, however, attributing it to “woke” prosecutions is a joke and yet another partisan poke by Conservatives.

      Not just in Virginia and no, Va is not like California or a half dozen other states:

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cc6bb01aedd4322ab1747db52824c5c6f5fe401ae51ef9badeee6e70d838cf82.jpg

      I wonder if the Virginia AG would support facial recognition and license plate readers at retail stores and parking lots?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Now, are those all supposed to Democrat controlled states? I know the JABs of the world have their list of Democrat controlled cities they like to blame for everything, but Missouri, Kansas?

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Damn! Facts. Well, it was a good storyline…

      “But why do you shoplift the Mini-Mart?”
      “Because that’s where the Ding-Dongs are.”

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Comparing Virginia to California is not exactly accurate either.

    Texas, Florida, New York, North Carolina… etc

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/98a0e34d54f4c1292fac4f4450c36cb652eea98b3bbcb54cbbee7d097f4e49ba.jpg

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      But it compares well with Tennessee…

  11. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Anybody else but me see this general breakdown in lawful behavior covering both organized retail theft and mass shootings? Now comes Tulsa, an unhappy surgery patient shooting his doc and three others because the back surgery left him in pain. We do seem to be heading into Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of….” territory. Oh, and DC juries shrugging at somebody who lies to the FBI, with the forewoman saying gee, what else do you expect?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      He lawfully bought the AR-15 a couple of hours before he used it.

      is that a “decline” in lawful behavior per se?

      and… once again – only in America… the rest of the world seems to not suffering this “decline”.

      yes, the Durham thing ended with a whimper… pitiful , years and millions spent on one thing – whether or not someone lied. and we then disavow our jury system of justice??? yep.

      All this is America the great….. eh?

    2. Crosswalks to Nowhere Avatar
      Crosswalks to Nowhere

      It’s the symptoms of institutional corruption/failure.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So, this guy in Tulsa is the first to kill his doctor?
      Wanna bet?

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, let’s face it. Bank robbery requires intelligence… or AR-15s.

    https://www.statista.com/graphic/1/191235/reported-robbery-rate-in-the-us-since-1990.jpg

  13. By way of legislative background. Sen. George L. Barker, D-Alexandria, submitted SB 341, which passed the Senate but was blocked in a House committee in the 2022 session. The bill:

    “Establishes requirements for high-volume third-party sellers, defined in the bill as participants in an online marketplace that have entered into at least 200 discrete sales or transactions for 12 continuous months during the past 24 months resulting in accumulation of an aggregate total of $5,000 or more in gross revenues. The bill requires an online marketplace to (i) require high-volume third-party sellers to provide identifying and contact information to the online marketplace; (ii) verify the information provided by a high-volume third-party seller within 10 days of receipt; and (iii) require that high-volume third-party sellers make certain conspicuous disclosures to consumers on their product listing pages, with certain limited exceptions. The bill provides that the Attorney General has the exclusive authority to enforce its provisions and that any violation of its provisions is a prohibited practice under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act.”

Leave a Reply