Phonics Make a Comeback

by James A. Bacon

Students at Chimborazo Elementary School. Photo credit: Richmond Times-Dispatch

by James A. Bacon

There are glimmers of hope for Virginia’s public education system. Last week, Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order ordering the Virginia Department of Education to create new guidelines limiting the use of cell phones in schools. Meanwhile an amendment to the Virginia Literacy Act effectively bans the use of a failed teaching method for reading known as “three-cueing” this fall.

The three-cueing technique, based on educational theories developed in the 1960s, downplays phonics in favor of deducing an unfamiliar word from its semantic, syntactic, and graphophonic contexts. A 2019 survey cited by the Richmond Times-Dispatch found that 65% of college education professors teach it as an instruction technique and 75% of K-2 and elementary special education teachers use it.

The education profession is prone to intellectual fads based upon novel academic theories such as three-cueing. But critics contend there is little social scientific evidence to support three-cuing. The tried-and-true method of teaching students to sound out words — phonics — is much more effective.

“Prior to really digging into the science of reading, a lot of cueing happened,” Lisa Coons, Virginia’s state superintendent of public instruction told the RTD. It was more of a guessing game, and we were working to use pictures and cues and other words around it to try and figure out what the word said.

“Reading is not a natural process. Listening, speaking, all of those kinds of things are natural, intuitive human abilities that we learn and we can mimic,” she said. “Reading actually is not natural so it’s going to take instruction, and it’s going to take instruction in both hearing and sounds. When I learn to process sounds to letters, letters to words, I also have to understand what I’m reading. That’s a complex process.”

Richmond Public Schools, long an educational disaster zone, began adopting elements of the Virginia Literacy Act, enacted in 2022, as long as five years ago. Elementary school assessments show that the city’s mostly minority school children have made significant reading gains in the wake of the disastrous K-12 school shutdowns and ensuing chaos when schools reopened.

Reports the RTD:

The district this year surpassed its pre-pandemic reading levels on the PALS state assessment. In 2021, 41.4% of K-2 students passed the assessment. Last spring, the pass rate increased to 58.6%. This spring, 65.4% of K-2 students passed, slightly ahead of the 2019 pre-pandemic pass rate of 64.8%.

The two groups that saw the largest increases in pass rates were Black students and economically disadvantaged students.

“Not only do our kids know letters and sounds, but they’ve been reading — truly reading decodable texts — since the first month of school which is giving them much more practice in becoming a reader than just isolating it to letter names and sounds,” said Megan Crowe, the head literacy coach at Chimborazo Elementary School.

Bacon’s bottom line. Virginia’s public education system has two broad options at this juncture in its history. It can double down on the intersectional-oppression paradigm that attributes educational disparities to systemic racism or it can focus on what works. Systemic racism isn’t the problem in our schools. Flawed educational theories pushed by “progressive” educators are the problem. Railing against White privilege does not teach a single child how to read. Phonics does.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

32 responses to “Phonics Make a Comeback”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    One of the points of PALS is to test some specific things to help identify if a child has a deficit in one or more reading skills, so they KNOW where to target the help.

    PALS is a diagnostic assessment tool

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/baa97f5bb6ca3e64af2b0497ad97d71af65a263c4ada3364cc66cc4c601a5d8c.png
    As such, after the child's assessment is done and the shortfalls known, a
    plan has to be developed to get the child back up on grade level and that plan is often devised by a professional reading specialist, not some legislator!

    As such, I'd put more faith in the educators than I would in the legislators deciding what tools are appropriate and what not.

    If you ask many educators, PHONICs is not the only nor the best for some kids… it depends on the kid and their problems and what do for THAT kid.

    On a school-wide scale, especially for schools with lots of economically disadvantaged kids, Phonics as a general approach for MOST kids might well be the right path but again, I'd put more stock in educators and the DOE that legislators dictating what should be done or not.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Here are the specific things measured in a PALS assessment:

    " PALS measures children’s knowledge of several important literacy fundamentals:

    phonological awareness,
    alphabet recognition,
    concept of word,
    knowledge of letter sounds and spelling.

    It provides a direct means of matching literacy instruction to specific literacy needs and provides a means for identifying those children who are relatively behind in their acquisition of these fundamental literacy skills."

    Obviously, the person(s) administering the test as well as analyzing the testing results and actually delivering the rendering remedial help – all need to have the knowledge and expertise to be able to understand the terms identified in the PALS assessment if they are going to be able to actually help that child.

    https://www.cde.state.co.us/accountability/pals_assessment_instrument_description_2018#:~:text=difficulties%2C%20diagnose%20students'%20knowledge%20of,of%20letter%20sounds%20and%20spelling .

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    banning things seems to be very popular nowadays. kinda anticompetitive, doncha thin?

  4. WayneS Avatar

    Good news! Thanks.

  5. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    My daughter probably never sounded out a word in her life. But my son struggled with reading until we successfully fought FCPS to give him instructions in phonics. After that, reading clicked, and he had no reading problems going forward.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    One of the points of PALS is to test some specific things to help identify if a child has a deficit in one or more reading skills, so they KNOW where to target the help.

    PALS is a diagnostic assessment tool

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/baa97f5bb6ca3e64af2b0497ad97d71af65a263c4ada3364cc66cc4c601a5d8c.png
    As such, after the child's assessment is done and the shortfalls known, a
    plan has to be developed to get the child back up on grade level and that plan is often devised by a professional reading specialist, not some legislator!

    As such, I'd put more faith in the educators than I would in the legislators deciding what tools are appropriate and what not.

    If you ask many educators, PHONICs is not the only nor the best for some kids… it depends on the kid and their problems and what do for THAT kid.

    On a school-wide scale, especially for schools with lots of economically disadvantaged kids, Phonics as a general approach for MOST kids might well be the right path but again, I'd put more stock in educators and the DOE that legislators dictating what should be done or not.

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    This debate was fully joined and very heated when my wife got her master's in reading during the 1980s. Nothing new here. Bottom line is phonics is usually the best method, but individuals are different and some respond better to different approaches. To ban one or the other is not wise. There came a time in her career, when phonics fell out of favor in Virginia, when she hid a pile of textbooks in her closet and ignored an order to turn them all in. 🙂

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Pretty sure your wife and I and maybe you would AGREE that making phonics part of the culture war and " intersectional-oppression paradigm that attributes educational disparities to systemic racism' is not "wise" either… 😉

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Pretty sure your wife and I and maybe you would AGREE that making phonics part of the culture war and " intersectional-oppression paradigm that attributes educational disparities to systemic racism' is not "wise" either… 😉

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Give a blogger a hammer and every problem is a nail.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          responding to the blog post – “phonics, good, other is bad” .. make those educators do what we think is right!
          yes.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    It is not clear why this amendment to the Virginia Literacy Act was needed. The Act, passed in 2022, requires school to use "evidence-based literacy instruction." That term was defined in "educationese" language, but was widely understood to mean phonics. The state Dept. of Education has been busy implementing this requirement. Last summer, it issued its "Approved Core Instructional Program Guide" to be used by schools, beginning with the 2024-2025 school year. The guide lists numerous commercially-available programs that schools can choose from. The guide evaluates each program and the first two sets of criteria used in its evaluation relate to phonics. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/51586/638384919755270000

    One key question that has not been addressed as far as I know is the extent to which the various schools of education are shifting to teaching prospective elementary school teachers how to teach phonics.

    Another key question concerns current K-3 teachers. Are they being trained to use phonics to teach their students how to read?

    Setting policy can be easy; it is the implementation that can be hard.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      It's ironic in some respects that some of the "allure" of charter/choice schools is that they don't have to follow the
      same "rules" as public schools in accomplishing their mission. Would the same legislators dictate to these "choice" schools that they also had to teach according to what the legislators decreed?

      I bet not.

  9. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    My wife the Spec Ed teacher says nothing comes close to phonics for teaching reading. Glad to see Virginia has got its head out of the sand.

    However, she thinks that all kids learn differently and that it is wrong to outlaw the use of a technique that may be the most effective approach to teaching a particular kid. Making that decision is what the teacher is there for.

    If testing does not confirm that a teacher is overwhelmingly making good choices of teaching techniques, that is a deciding factor in determining continued employment. It is likely their successor will get the message and do better.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      There, their, they’re… and many others. It cannot be a poor spell-checker that allows so many mistakes in online stories and even comments. It’s poor writing skills combined with ignoring the assistance from our devices.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Hey, I used there and their correctly. Homonyms can be confusing, especially when they're contractions:)

        Sometimes ignoring the "assistance" from our devices creates more problems than it solves. I have to check everything before sending txts on my phone. The autocorrect there is more often, and sometimes bizarrely, wrong than right.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I HATE touchscreens. It’s the way I hold my fingers and nine times out of ten pick up the suggested word immediately to the right of the word I want. Hate ‘em, hate ‘em, hate ‘em. Three button mouse and very clickity-clackity keys.

          But, does make for some funny stuff.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I HATE touchscreens. It’s the way I hold my fingers and nine times out of ten pick up the suggested word immediately to the right of the word I want. Hate ‘em, hate ‘em, hate ‘em. Three button mouse and very clickity-clackity keys.

          But, does make for some funny stuff.

          1. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            We have apparently solved most of the heartbreak of butt dialing. Just how much progress do you feel entitled to you silly end user?

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            We have apparently solved most of the heartbreak of butt dialing. Just how much progress do you feel entitled to you silly end user?

          3. WayneS Avatar

            My fingers tend to want to hit low and to the left. And I apparently don't have adjustable sights because I've been unable to correct it…

          4. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Some time ago in remarks to a conference on technology I commented that when I started computing nobody envisioned we'd be interacting with computers using rodents or via sharp sticks, or that we'd quickly "advance" to discarding the rodent and stick and be reduced to poking at computer screens with our fingers.

            When programming GUIs I pretty quickly developed some standard routines that were frequently used. One allowed easy pouring text in as a question with buttons labeled "Yes", "No" or "Quit", followed by "Are you sure?" for yes or no answers with "Yes" and "No" buttons to confirm.

            That made it pretty quick and consistent with "Yes" and "No" buttons consistently placed every time.

            The code looked something like this:

            Q1 move "this text" to Questiontext
            ____ call YNQform
            _____ perform YNQanswer of ohgood, nah:
            _________________________fuggetaboutit
            return

            One finger was all the input it needed and the buttons were big.

          5. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            We have apparently solved most of the heartbreak of butt dialing. Just how much progress do you feel entitled to you silly end user?

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I envision my daughter’s cohort when they reach our age… squinty beady eyes with glasses like watchmakers with the swappable lenses.

            It’s their damned fault anyway. I’d be content with a 80-column alphanumeric CRT and a rotary phone.

          7. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            So much stuff requires an "app" these days. Can't do it on your Windows laptop (except maybe with an emulator), you have to do it on your smartphone…which requires dealing with the touchscreen.

          8. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Case in point.. Want to find gas prices at Sheetz? You can't find them on the website, but they are in the app:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aa4f0ef1c5e8a23507730858095b8b91791e1ea7b3bc1492fb8befa226089e25.png

          9. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            One thing REALLY has improved and I credit EVs, not smartphones. Batteries!
            In the early 2000s I bought a razor with lithium batteries. I was thrilled. A whole week on a single charge. Seven full shaves plus random beard trimming.
            Bought a new razor, just a cheap one, a Wahl, while awaiting delivery of new blades for my old one. USB charging. No special charger. Okay that’s nice.

            Twenty-two, count ‘em — 22, shaves so far on the first charge! Green light is still on.

          10. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Battery charger technology is also greatly improved these days…but it amazes me that in this day and age you can still buy a $2000 riding mower and it’s missing the $20 voltage regulator that keeps it from overcharging and eventually killing the battery.

            I added such a voltage regulator (plugs right in, just need to ground it with a washer and ring terminal) to my riding mower, which is still using the same battery I bought for it back in 2017. I measured as high as 16V prior to installing the regulator, now it’s never above 14.4V. That and keeping it on a charger over the winter has allowed me to use the same battery for 7 years.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            16V! Yikes. That’ll kill a flood fill in a month. 14.4 is safe for Gel, AGM, and lithium. 14.8 is a maximum for AGM & lithium and will kill a gel. An equalizing charge for flood fill is 15.5. Supposedly, it will remix the electrolyte and you need to add distilled water afterwards.

          12. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Yes, that’s one reason why riding mower batteries usually need to be replaced every year or two. Overcharged all summer and then left to go flat over the winter.

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Absolutely. Different kids in the same class will learn differently. Some kids don't need phonics. My daughter was one of them. But we had to fight like crazy to get FCPS to include my son in phonics instruction when it was clear he needed that. (FCPS has special reading teachers to help in the early grades.) I'd say ideology was the problem back then. Hopefully, parents and teachers can work together to identify how best to teach early learners irrespective of which methods are used.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    The experts are all in agreement.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVWODdciZ88
    FWIW, this was a “car song” when on long trips.

Leave a Reply