Pharrell to Fund a Micro-School in Norfolk

Pharrell Williams

by James A. Bacon

Music superstar and Virginia Beach native Pharrell Williams is not satisfied  with the education provided by public schools today. But instead of signaling his virtue through Tweets, he’s doing something about it. His philanthropy YELLOW is funding the launch of a micro-school in Norfolk’s Ghent neighborhood that will deliver a personalized, hands-on alternative to traditional learning for lower-income children.

The school, YELLOWHAB, will provide a tuition-free education to an estimated 40 to 50 kids in its inaugural year. The philosophy behind the schools rejects the traditional classroom setting and standard grade systems, and will introduce a problem-solving-based curriculum tailored to students’ individualized strengths and differences.

“There are lesson plans. When we say ‘non-traditional’ it doesn’t mean we’re throwing everything out. Some things work,” YELLOW Executive Director Mike McGalliard told said WVEC News. “The best educational examples that we’re borrowing from are examples of project-based learning.”

Pharrell, best known for his infectious song, “Happy,” believes that every kid learns in a unique way that is not always accommodated in one-size-fits-all school programs. “Labels are so detrimental to children. They can carry them much of their lives. So Pharrell wanted to approach differently, and say, ‘Let’s access children differently, find their strengths and look for those differences,’” McGalliard said.

Children selected by lottery will be placed in groups of 10, called crews.

The school is partnering with the Walton Family Foundation, the YMCA on Granby, and the American Heart Association.

Bacon’s bottom line. I applaud Pharrell’s philanthropy and his willingness to experiment with new teaching methods. The educational system — both public and private schools — has been stuck in a regimented model devised by 19th-century Prussians that moves children in lockstep through the same courses at the same time at the same pace. Moreover, the nation’s inner-city public schools are hobbled by bureaucracy, red tape, low expectations, and, increasingly, a dogma that, by stamping poor Black children as victims of an omnipresent racism, deprives them of any sense of agency or control over their destinies.

I don’t know what Pharrell’s views are on those particular subjects, but it is promising that he recognizes the individuality of every child. I have every hope that the school will set high expectations.

Some of the methods sound like they were concocted in a West Coast education-school seminar, so I have no idea if they will prove effective. But if we don’t try new things, we can never advance. We learn both from victories and failures. I can think of no one better than Pharrell to push a project like this forward.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

16 responses to “Pharrell to Fund a Micro-School in Norfolk”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I applaud the innovative thinking and who knows something new might be learned.

    But I think we should also look at the existing best public schools in the world – the one’s we end up ranking 25th against for ideas.

    And I think Matt Hurtts observations(which James W seems to echo at times) that “connections” between teachers, kids and parents can make a difference.

    Finally, as Matt has pointed out , it’s cheap to help a kid overcome their difficulties – including being in low-income circumstance – it’s CHEAP to provide additional resources to them – when they are kids – than all the money spent on them when they become adults who are under-educated and become literally wards of the state (taxpayers).

    30K a year is the going rate for entitlements or prison for the “kids” who grow up without a 21-century education.

    Europe and Asia, can do it and their kids get jobs from companies that choose to locate where there are educated work forces.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      “And I think Matt Hurtts observations(which James W seems to echo at times) that “connections” between teachers, kids and parents can make a difference.”

      No doubt.

      But what do you do when the parents are dead, gone, meth addicts or not interested in connecting?

      Top performing students in Virginia do just fine. Even average performers seem to do pretty well. It’s the bottom 10 – 25% that are the worry. Their parents, by and large, are not connected.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        DJ – We’ve educated orphans as well as kids of military as well as farmers early-on who themselves had no education and needed their kids to do farm work.

        We’ve enslaved people then inflicted Jim Crow on them for decades, denied them access to voting, good jobs, and even education, then abused them with the criminal justice system so dad was in prison and mom – uneducated and on welfare – and deny there is generational impacts? Really?

        We broke it. We fix it. Yes, it’s harder to educated economically-disadvantaged kids whose parents are under-educated, even ignorant and poverty-stricken as a result – but what the hell is the alternative ? to watch those kids grow up to be the same while the rest of us point fingers about race and such?

        We KNOW some models for educating economically disadvantaged kids DO WORK – Even the right wing types in BR trumpet it on every other days when they’re not disparaging racial stereotypes.

        Ever week Sherlock and Bacon talk on and on about how bad Richmond Schools are – and they are – but when do they talk about how equally bad some of the Henrico schools are with similar demographics?

        Tell me how Henrico can fix it’s bad schools at the same time you’re blathering about RPS.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Another smoke bomb. Detonated to obscure.

          “Tell me how Henrico can fix it’s bad schools at the same time you’re blathering about RPS.”

          I give up … where was I blathering about the RPS?

          “We KNOW some models for educating economically disadvantaged kids DO WORK … ”

          Really? What models are those?

          You should write a letter to the DC school system, a system that spends at the very tippy top of the nation in dollars per student while continuing to achieve wretched educational outcomes. Or, send your thought to may high school, West Potomac High School, which can manage only a 63% math proficiency for Black students.

          We’ve spent more money (on a per student basis) for education in the country for the last six years (2020). Are things improving?

          In fact, inflation adjusted spending on public education (per student) has increased 280% since 1960.

          Fun facts ….

          https://reason.org/commentary/inflation-adjusted-k-12-education-spending-per-student-has-increased-by-280-percent-since-1960/

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Good for Pharrell Williams, actually trying to improve the education of children rather than blathering on about Critical Race Theory.

    I’ve said for years on this blog that people learn in different ways. Take foreign language. Some learn most by speaking, some learn most by listening, some learn most by writing. A single teacher in front of a class of 30 students can’t simultaneously focus on all three learning styles. However, computer assisted teaching could simultaneously teach different children in three different ways.

    I hope Pharrell Williams pays attention to well designed, computer based teaching techniques in his new school. “Remote learning” got a well deserved black eye during the pandemic. People should remember that a teacher speaking into a camera and microphone is not well designed, computer based teaching. At best, it was a badly conceived band-aid necessitated by the pandemic. At worst, it was a cop out by teachers who would rather work from home.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      people DO learn in different ways and that means that education -whether private or public has to provide those different ways – as opposed to one school doing it one way and another one doing it another way – and neither one of them reports results or is held accountable for their approach and performance.

      With that in mind, I’d support ANY school – public or private as long as they transparently report their results and are held accountable – in the same way we currently operate public schools.

      Without transparency and accountability, we’d not only NOT know what we know right now about our public schools – but we’d not know the performances of other schools that merely claim to do better.

      And I agree about the “speaking into the camera” – totally but public schools were never prepared to truly teach remotely even though, as DJ knows, remote teacher done right is possible and successful.

      In that regard, private, non-traditional schools DO have the opportunity to do what the public schools have largely failed at and I’m surprised that no private schools did accomplish it better.

  3. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Larry, I’m confused about your ongoing suggestions that low-income kids get no extra resources. Both the feds (under Title 1) and the Commonwealth provide extra money for schools where a significant number of lower-income students reside. Moreover, a number of school systems, including Fairfax County, have developed a program to push the money where the low-income kids are located, rather than just to schools. So a school with some Title 1 kids will get extra money for those students even though the school itself is not Title 1. Further, Fairfax County, and other jurisdictions, provide additional local funding for these programs. Schools with low-income students have smaller class sizes, more supplemental teachers and aides, as well as more counselors and psychologists.

    So the resources are there. Kids and their parent need to take advantage of the added help. People have free will and often make bad choices. At some point, one has to live with the consequences of bad choices.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      TMT – the resources are NOT there. There are SOME resources, but not near enough. For instance, these kids need universal Pre-K and Moms need childcare so these kids have more time with professionals.

      Look at the SOLs at these schools with larger numbers of low-income kids. Look at the education and skill level of the teachers compared to teachers in high-income neighborhood schools.

      You talk about “bad choices”. The kids did not make them yet you are willing to consign them to a low-income future themselves – AND – YOU are going to pay the costs! What kind of sense is that?

      You don’t want to spend what is necessary to get these kids properly educated, but you apparently ARE willing to pay for their food, housing and health care?

      what kind of sense does that make guy?

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        More money, more money, more money …

        You have no idea what level of “resources” (liberal code-word for money) is being spent on needy children in Fairfax County. All you know is that it’s never enough.

        What do you think an appropriate per student per year funding level should be in the City of Washington, DC to provide an appropriate education?

        https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/high-public-school-spending-dc-hasnt-produced-desired-outcomes

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          More money – yes. but far, far less, than we spend on entitlements and prison.

          Penny-wise and pound foolish.

          How much money? How about how much Chesapeake Schools spend?

          ‘It’s more than money and as I have said over and over:

          1. – the ONLY REASON we know the public school performance is mandated transparency

          2. – despite all those who claim that non-public schools would do better – nary a one calls for the same level of transparency

          3. – I’d be fine with taxpayer funding of ANY Competitive schools as long as they accept all demographics AND provide the same level of transparency for their performance.

          But the critics of public schools have no such advocacy. Instead, it’s hammer the public schools and make excuses for why competitors should not also have the same level of transparency.

          Time to MAN UP. If you really care about education – you actually do – otherwise, just more silly conservative weaseling…

      2. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Yes, at some point, I am willing to allow people who make bad decisions to live with their consequences. This includes parents and students who make bad decisions about education. When society makes extra resources available to low-income families (and it does), there exists a corresponding obligation to make the best use of them. Many families do. But those who don’t, despite many years of availability, simply must live with their choices.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          the resources are not for low income families – it’s for the kids so they can escape that destiny.

          Do you object to additional funds for autistic kids or kids who need additional help in math or have English as a second language?

          What would you expect from the parents of Autistic kids as a requirement for helping their kids?

      3. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        Yes, at some point, I am willing to allow people who make bad decisions to live with their consequences. This includes parents and students who make bad decisions about education. When society makes extra resources available to low-income families (and it does), there exists a corresponding obligation to make the best use of them. Many families do. But those who don’t, despite many years of availability, simply must live with their choices.

  4. StarboardLift Avatar
    StarboardLift

    Similarities to LeBron James’ Promise School https://ipromise.school/ which has had measurable success. Making a difference in the lives of a few hundred kids now is terrific–not everything needs to be a universal fix to be worthwhile.

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Good luck to the Yellowhab School. I wish them all the best. I am skeptical of the project based learning approach. My experience with that mode of learning is this: the best practice of PBL is a supplement to the traditional approach. Don’t get me wrong, PBL has value. But Total emersion in PBL will waste valuable time needed to cover a wide range of topics, concepts, and skills. Data on student learning demonstrates that PBL does not move the outcome needle in a significant manner. When paired with standardized testing measurements you can find significant gaps in mastery of concepts and skills. Of course you could throw out the end of course mastery test and substitute a “portfolio” of PBL products to show achievement. But that is a subjective measurement at best. PBL might make those kids “Happy” but what about actually knowing something?

  6. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Can’t fault anyone for putting their money where their mouth is!
    I hope they have success.

Leave a Reply