Petersburg Public Schools Cheat Children of Their Futures

by James C. Sherlock

We like to think of ourselves as civilized people.

Virginia and America are at an advanced stage of social and cultural development.

Aren’t we?

For the children of Petersburg, we are not. We continue to let them quite publicly and measurably be cheated of their futures by their public schools.

Queue the excuses for bad schools. Whatever list you can come up with, it’s not good enough. We are not civilized if we, as a state, continue to let it happen to children with no other option.

Virginia is unique in that our state constitution explicitly gives local school divisions control of their schools.

Virginia passed a law in 2013 that created a body to take over schools failing to receive accreditation or what is now accreditation with conditions for three consecutive years. It was found unconstitutional.

I don’t know why the constitution was written without some provision for dealing with failed schools and school divisions after long-term failure.

But it was, and it was a mistake. We need to change the constitution to give the children of Petersburg and in other failing schools a chance in life.

That goal is, and must be, worth the effort it will take to accomplish it.

If Petersburg is not the worst school division in Virginia, some other locality is truly cursed.

Accreditation. Look at the nine school quality indicators.

  • They are based on English, Math and Science SOLs and chronic absenteeism;
  • For high schools, they are also based upon Graduation and Completion Index (GCI), Dropout Rate and College, Career and Civic Readiness Index.

All six Petersburg schools are accredited with conditions. Proving only that it is not currently possible to be denied accreditation.

Accreditation Denied: Schools that fail to adopt or fully implement required corrective actions to address Level Three school-quality indicators.

SOLs.

Pass rates of Petersburg division schools as a group in 2022-23:

  • English reading: 45% (decreased from 46% in 2021-22) — State: 73%
  • English writing: 29% (decreased from 34% in 2021-22) — State: 65%
  • Math: 37% (increased from 31% in 2021-22) — State: 69%
  • Science: 33% (unchanged) — State: 67%
  • Note: Recently Arrived English Language Learners Exempted from State Reading Assessments: 0. State: 4.460

Chronic Absenteeism.

Quality measures for attendance that were suspended during COVID were reinstated by the Board of Education in April of this year. A VDOE official said at the time:

Approximately 28% of schools in Virginia will be accredited with conditions based on their chronic absenteeism performance level.

That includes all six Petersburg schools, with an average of 43% chronic absenteeism in 2022-23. Enrollment was 4,272, 86% Black.

High schools Dropout and Graduation Rate…

  • Petersburg High School dropout rate: 7.1% — state high schools: 5.4%
  • Petersburg High School on-time graduation rate: 88.7% — state: 91.9

Teacher Quality. The Petersburg teacher quality, licensing and educational attainment metrics are horrible.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No one can make enough good teachers work in Petersburg schools. In charter and private schools in that city, perhaps. But there aren’t any in Petersburg.

I have suggested before that Petersburg Schools ask Success Academy to mentor them. Success Academy offers such mentorships pro bono, but that has not happened.

For the Catholic kids, there is the well-regarded St. Joseph’s Catholic school, but that is it.  And, of course, Virginia does not offer vouchers for poor kids to attend.

Petersburg’s Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) targets in math, English and science are double or more the pass rates that their students achieved in 2022-23. With that Division’s teacher issues, it is hard to identify how they will get there, even with help.

Virginia State University. Virginia State University, north of the Appomattox River in Ettrick is growing dramatically. It announced on September 1 that it has established a program to help address the Petersburg teacher shortage.

VSU’s College of Education has established a program under which five VSU undergraduate students are participating in a hybrid program for the 2023-2024 school year. They are teaching in Petersburg schools and will be paid like long-term substitutes while keeping up with their classwork.

We’ll see how that works out.

Partnership for Petersburg (PFP). The Governor and the Mayor of Petersburg’s PFP program has a significant education component. See page 2 of the linked document.

One of the accomplishments: “Fifty tutors began providing tutoring services in March of 2023 to the students in the Petersburg City public school system.” I assume but do not know that those tutors are mostly from VSU.

In another, they partnered with the YMCA to provide before-and after- school care at the four Petersburg elementary schools.

As part of this partnership initiative, a College Partnership Lab School is under consideration at VSU.

Lab schools are a workaround by the Youngkin administration put in place to overcome Virginia school divisions’ reluctance to establish charter schools. VSU apparently did not have its application ready to qualify for one of the 13 state planning grants announced in March. If they establish one, I hope it is in Petersburg.

Limits of State Authority. The most aggressive authority available to the Board of Education is spelled out in 8VAC20-131-400. Application of the school quality indicator performance levels to actions D. 6.

In accordance with the Standards of Quality at § 22.1-253.13:3 A of the Code of Virginia, if the board determines that a school division has failed or refused, and continues to fail or refuse, to comply with any of the Standards of Quality, including the requirement for local school boards to maintain schools designated as “Accredited” as provided in § 22.1-253.13:3 A of the Code of Virginia, the board may petition the circuit court having jurisdiction in the school division to mandate or otherwise enforce compliance with such standard, including the development or implementation of any required corrective action plan that a local school board has failed or refused to develop or implement in a timely manner.

Bottom line.

A lot of people, including VSU and the Governor, are working to help Petersburg and its schools.

Despite all of the help, we must acknowledge that the Petersburg School Board is still in charge. I have seen no indication that it has the leadership, will, or resources to comply with a corrective action plan that will work in its schools.

I understand and support the PFP initiative, but in the best interests of the children it is time for the state Board of Education to execute its authority and petition the circuit court to oversee the Petersburg school board.

If that school board cannot get the job done, it appears to me that a circuit court judge order can only “otherwise enforce” the order if there is an alternative to the local school board.

Because of the constitution, there is not.

We need to change the Virginia constitution, not only for the children of Petersburg, but for children all over the state denied an education by their public schools.

They don’t get another chance at childhood.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Petersburg Public Schools Cheat Children of Their Futures”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    The children in Petersburg (my home) have been short-changed for two and 1/2 decades. Amen to charter schools in this city. By the way, the Catholic diocese offers tax credit scholarships and some kids are going to Cristo Rey High School. They don’t have to be Catholic.

    I say hurray to school choice and marketing for better success.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    I’m totally on board with any alternative school provided:

    1. it’s limited to the kids with terrible SOL scores
    2. That school is held to the very same standards for SOLs and
    reporting of scores.

    I’m totally against schools like Petersburg being used as an excuse to stand-up alternative schools for kids who do well on SOLs.

    Target the problem – honestly and forthrightly, and find out if non-public schools can actually do what the public schools cannot as claimed.

    Do it!

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      “Alternative school provided it’s limited to kids with terrible SOL scores”.

      You should think that through from beginning to end.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I have. If public schools can’t get the job done and folks advocate for “other” schools on a claimed premise that they will fix the problem, let’s do it.

        Let’s get the kids the public schools are “failing” into these other schools and let them fix it.

        Let’s not continue to blame public schools and use it as a cynical back door way to build “academies” for kids who already do well in public schools. Let’s target the actual problem.

        The current politics is not really about actually helping these kids IMO.

        Maybe you can “explain” your “thinking” from beginning to end? 😉

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Another flaming straw man.

          Charter schools are public schools that take all the kids that they can by lottery of those who apply. No restrictions. No favorites. Except in Loudoun County.

          Now you want to craft a restriction.

          Why?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Not a restriction. We hammer the public schools for “failing” these kids. A charter school that is not specifically designed to teach these kids is not likely going to actually going to help the kids that the public schools have failed especially if it’s going to have kids that already do well academically.

            You’d want and need a school that specifically targets kids who were not getting what they needed in the public schools…

            IF you mix the at-risk kids with kids that aer not at-risk , how could you really target the needs of the at-risk kids any better than what the public schools do?

            And if you make it by lottery, you more or less guarantee it will not have ALL the kids who do have those needs….like for more and better reading specialists or policies that deal more effectively with absenteeism, etc…

            Right now, I feel like we’re using the at-risk kids as politial pawns to justify de-facto “academies” that really are not specifically designed to serve their specific needs.

            If you really want public support , people have to believe you really want to help these kids
            and not just just use it as an excuse to create de-facto “academies” for lottery winners.

            The at-risk kids are the ones being claimed to be “failed” by public schools. We need schools explicitly designed to address the needs of the at-risk kids.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            “If you mix the at risk kids with kids who are not as risk”. “If you make selection by lottery “ “ How could you target the needs of the kids any better than the (other) public schools do?”

            You even ignore the fact that charter schools are public schools.

            Earth to Larry, what you pose as questions are exactly how the best charter schools function. I have written many times about their pedagogy and methods of optimization of learning environments.

            You ignore what Success Academy and others have done for nearly two decades in the toughest sections of NYC and other tough jurisdictions. With enormous success.

            You consistently offer a proposition that ignores nationwide evidence as if it has never happened.

            After which, you and I have had this same discussion a dozen times. I won’t respond again. I wish you the best.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I commend you for your persistent advocacy on behalf of the children of Petersburg.

    There definitely is a weakness in the Virginia policy–if a school system is consistently failing, the school board is ultimately accountable. However, in Virginia, the school board is ultimately in charge, no matter how bad the schools are.

    Nevertheless, there is a solution–a political one. The terms of three Petersburg school board members expire next year. If Governor Youngkin truly is interested in helping Petersburg and if he really believes that charter schools could be the answer, he could have his PAC recruit three candidates who advocate the establishment of charter schools to run for those seats in next year’s elections. Furthermore, the PAC could provide funding for those candidacies. (It wouldn’t take much.) He could have done that in 2022 when four seats, a majority, were up for election. The time for rhetoric and wringing of hands is past; positive action is needed.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      What if the only people who show up for school board elections in Petersburg are teachers and Democrat loyalists- which is what happens. What do we tell the children? Tough luck?

      We have to have recourse to help kids in dysfunctional jurisdictions.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I like your idea Mr. Dick. Something must be done besides families changing zip codes.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      No! Instead of changing a single school system using the very voters who are impacted by that school board, we must re-write our Constitution and wrench the right away from all voters in the entire Commonwealth… smh..

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Considering the effects on children, your care for voters in Petersburg is without nuance.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Forgive me, but I don’t view our right to representation as a nuanced thing.

  4. Capt. Sherlock,

    You quoted the statute that offers one constitutional path to fixing the Petersburg schools: The Board of Education can sue. Unfortunately, the Board’s record of fecklessness as to Petersburg runs back at least to 2004: https://crankytaxpayer.wordpress.com/2022/09/05/petersburg-paradigm-of-vboe-fecklessness/

    Indeed, in the present situation, the Board could not hope to prevail under the statute. It would have to tell the judge what Petersburg must do to fix its schools and the Board manifestly does not know. It just keeps demanding paper shuffling, meetings, and plans that no rational person could expect to improve the situation.

    So I suggest the barrier to a solution is not the constitution, it is the ignorance and fecklessness of the Board of Education.

    BTW: There are people in Virginia who do know how to improve education. For example: https://crankytaxpayer.wordpress.com/2022/09/05/cip-lights-the-way/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Even Matt Hurt has said he did not think CIP would work in the urban school districts.

      You cite ignorance and fecklessness of the State DOE itself as a “barrier”

      Isn’t that something that Youngkin has some ability to change?

      I also note that you have not agreed that lottery charters schools are the answer.
      Do you support lottery charters and think they would help Petersburg kids?

      Petersburg is the worst district but it is by far not the only district with awful schools. Henrico and Chesterfield have schools in their districts that perform just as poorly as does
      Fairfax and Loudoun and other school districts in Virginia also have badly performing schools.

      CIP will fix it ?

      Seems like if CIP is the answer, the State DOE would take that ball and run with it, no?

    2. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Thanks Cranky!!

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I agree with Sherlock and Cranky that the loss of these generations of young minds in Petersburg and elsewhere is a tragedy for our whole society. But it is a self-inflicted wound and until the Democratic Party and the lefty teacher’s unions funding it are willing to speak truth to their voting base, my lily-white, establishment, privileged self might as well just stand by and stay out of Dodge. Larry is a perfect spokesman for the failed status quo.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Actually, Larry is totally on board with alternative schools that specifically target the kids in need vice setting up what is a de-facto “academy” that allows kids who are not in need to take slots away from kids in real need via a lottery,

        Cranky has written long and hard over the years about Richmond and Petersburg with ample justification but I believe this is the first time I’ve seen him actually advocate for something – CIP.

        It’s not about the Democratic Party or the teacher “unions”. That’s an excuse and a diversion from the real issue which is actually setting up a school like Success Academies that actually does target the kids in need that public schools have failed (and includes kids in Henrico and Chesterfield).

        Whats going on is basically political stunting and gas lighting not unlike some other issues that are primarily designed for low info voters in elections.

        If Youngkin were to propose today, standing up “Success” type schools specifically for at-risk kids.. he’s got my support and a lot of other support from Dems, independents and even some GOP.

        But it’s not a serious thing. It’s just more feckless posturing by the cynical… the conservative version of virtue signaling..

        It costs about 4 million dollars to set up and run an elementary school with several hundred kids .. Let’s see a budget proposal from the folks blathering about this.

        Don’t focus on Larry personally, focus on the issue… if one is really serious and not into personally impugning folks with opinions.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          My parents lived for years in Colonial Heights, the white flight suburb of Petersburg that wouldn’t have existed but for the desire to flee starting in the ’50s. THAT was school choice in its rawest form, and yet you would still give parents (black and white) who want an alternative only that one choice, to flee. You could not be more wrong headed, Larry, and that is saying something.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            focus on the issue guy. Is Success Academices wrong headed? If you’re gonna argue
            about those “poor” kids in Petersburg, how cynical is it to say “choice” can be anyone even if
            it squeezes out the at-risk kids? Just totally insincere and downright corrupt in my view.

            Don’t write article about those “poor” kids in Petersburg if what you really want is de-facto academies for kids that are not in need!

            so when we say “wrong headed”… get it actually straight and honest Steve!

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “Is Success Academices wrong headed?”

            It might be for some districts which is why it should not be forced on all districts by the state.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Success Academies is not nirvana.. it has some issues but what I do like is that it actually targets at-risk kids and is not a “choice” academy that is open to any/all which would make it little different than ordinary public schools. A “success” type school would need to have more reading specialists, more help for the learning disabled and other specialists that cater to economically disadvantaged kids. I would need to perform way better on the SOLs for economically disadvantaged kids than public schools do.

          4. Not Today Avatar

            It also doesn’t work where student populations are too small to support alternatives. That is/was the pushback in rural areas, white and black, in my former state.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            right, especially in rural areas but Petersburg, RIchmond, Henrico and Chesterfield are larger more urbanized districts where neighborhood demographics produce larger numbers of economically disadvantaged kids who the SOL numbers show they do poorly at and need more help on basic skills like reading. The Federal title program was designed to do just that but for some of these schools, there simply is not sufficient numbers of specialists… and so you have more than half the kids essentially failing 3rd grade Reading SOLs. Once that happens, without remediation, those kids are essentially doomed to a life of poverty often just like their parents.

          6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “…and yet you would still give parents (black and white) who want an alternative only that one choice, to flee…”

            The authority and power to set up an alternative already exists and is in their hands – where it should be.

  5. There are two items in the Virginia Constitution, Article VIII, Section 5 – Powers and Duties of the Board of Education, which I think could be used to improve Petersburg’s schools, even against the will of their school board, in a constitutional manner.

    Here are the two items:

    The powers and duties of the Board of Education shall be as follows:

    (a) Subject to such criteria and conditions as the General Assembly may prescribe, the Board shall divide the Commonwealth into school divisions of such geographical area and school-age population as will promote the realization of the prescribed standards of quality, and shall periodically review the adequacy of existing school divisions for this purpose.

    (c) It shall certify to the school board of each division a list of qualified persons for the office of division superintendent of schools, one of whom shall be selected to fill the post by the division school board. In the event a division school board fails to select a division superintendent within the time prescribed by law, the Board of Education shall appoint him.

    It would take some potentially controversial outside-the-box thinking/planning, and some bold and potentially controversial actions. It would most likely also require at least one change to the Code of Virginia, but as they say, desperate times call for desperate measures…

Leave a Reply