Padilla Reinstated

Luis Padilla, the Cargill employee in Harrisonburg who was fired for posting a sign — “Please Vote for Marriage on November 7th” — in his pickup truck, has been given his job back. According to DNR Online:

The company is … expected to issue a new policy on employee expression on Monday that will allow Padilla to display the sign that led to his dismissal. “We haven’t seen the actual policy yet,” Wesley Carter, manager of Cargill’s Timberville plant said in the joint announcement, “but we are confident that under it, Mr. Padilla’s sign would not have been a problem.

“This was all a big misunderstanding,” Carter said in the statement. “After reviewing all of the facts surrounding this case, we are satisfied that Mr. Padilla did everything in his power to comply with our requests and that there was no insubordination on his part.”

Cargill did the right thing. I’ll probably vote against the marriage amendment, but that doesn’t mean I think that Padilla should have been fired for expressing his pro-amendment views in the way he did.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Padilla Reinstated”

  1. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Thanks for picking this up, Jim.

    Good move. Cargill saved itself a ton of money.

  2. Liberal Intolerance, eh, Mr. Bowden?

  3. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Jamie: The Intolerance of Tolerance got Padilla fired.

    Jim Bacon: Funny, how my first posting brought some outrage, Jim. But, there is no outrage at your report. Hmm.

  4. lontlont Avatar

    I’m still not sure I understand what the full story is. Every legit source has hinted that more was going on but has been quite light on the details.

  5. Anonymous Avatar

    I wonder if Mr. Bowden is of the school that believes that a private employer has the right in Virginia to fire a gay employee because they disagree with the “gay lifestyle.”

    If so, then I’m sure he stands squarely behind this employer for firing this employee and would never have called for his reinstatement..

  6. Bill Garnett Avatar
    Bill Garnett

    “I disagree with what you have to say but will fight to the death to protect your right to say it.”

    Now, if only the Marshall committee had given full and appropriate debate to the Marriage Amendment rather than a hearing that was adroitly and suddenly called just as the Legislature convened and was spirited off to a full vote in the also Republican controlled House of Delegates, where to vote against marriage would have looked like voting against mom, flag, and apple pie – gee, the tyranny of the majority.

  7. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Anon: I’ve had Liberals tell me that I would be fired in a heartbeat from their firm for saying that homosexual behavior is sinful. So much for the intolerance of Tolerance and Diversity. Glad I don’t work in such a hostile environment.

    I can see a couple of employment problems with homosexuals.

    Open homosexuality makes one unfit for military service – that is what the Uniform Code of Military Justice used to say. Dunno if that has been changed.

    Homosexuals should not work around youth – especially older adolescents – as the Boy Scouts and the Roman Catholic Church can attest.

    Otherwise, I can’t think of a reason why a homosexual should lose their employment because of their perverted sexual behavior – as long they don’t break the law. I’ll keep thinking…

  8. James,

    Equating the pedophilia the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts have been fighting with homosexuality is uninformed, ignorant, and hateful.

    It’s saying the same thing as calling a serial rapist a health straight man.

    Their sexuality has nothing to do with their sickness. If you think that, then you are a scared little man, to be sure.

  9. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Tsk, tsk, Jamie with the names again for the messenger. The message you should, but can’t suppress, is that the homosexual child abuse in the Boy Scouts and Catholic Church is the problem. Not my mentioning it as a problem.

  10. Anonymous Avatar

    Oh…and where is the employment at will doctrine in Virginia now?

  11. Anonymous Avatar

    JAB –

    Just to make sure that all blog readers understand what you have just said –

    homosexuality = pedophilia
    pedophiles = homosexuals

  12. James,

    wanting to have sex with young children is not homo or hetero sexual. It is a sad mental condition.

    You should look up a few more facts, yourself.

  13. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Anon: Alas, alack, I will speak for myself. Anonymous bloggers don’t speak for me.

    Homosexuals have a marginal propensity to commit sex crimes against children – especially late adolescent boys- far in greater than their per cent of the population.

    Check the data on Priest abuse.

  14. do you actually read an ENTIRE article, or do you just cherry pick the facts that you like and then form your thoughts around them regardless of the relavence if they are not taken with the full context.

    A larger percentage of pedophiles became priests because they were pushed in that direction after they exhibited unhealthy sexual tendencies or desires.

    It was thought that if you removed all temptation (i.e. a Catholic priest’s celibacy), then you wouldn’t have said desires or tendancies). They were wrong. Just like you are now.

    They then bottled up those unhealthy desires until they finally lashed out at the nearest possible victims.

    Don’t distort or misreport the facts, James. There is an underlying reason that the data is skewed that you are ignoring or are ignorant of, yourself.

  15. To further YOUR analysis, since more Catholic priests are pedophiles, then more Catholics are pedophiles. Are you going down that road, also?

    Also, check the data on Episcopal priests, who aren’t celibate. Plenty of gay ones. I have yet to find a confirmed case of pedophilia in that population.

    Pathetic attempt to distort the facts.

  16. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Jamie: My rational empiricism is better than what you impute. I didn’t enjoy stats, but I learned and then taught them.

    The issue is the marginal propensity of homosexuals to engage in pediophilia.

    If 1% of the population (or 4%) commits 35% of the crimes, then a person responsible for the care of young men – like the Boy Scout leaders or Church leaders – should use considerable caution in employing homosexuals.

    So, this is hate speech, huh?

  17. please cite your source backing up your thought that 35% of sexual crimes against children are committed by homosexuals.

    Somehow it sounds like you are cherry-picking your facts (again).

  18. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Jamie: I’ve already confessed to being a lousy archivist.

    The APA reported this Summer a study of foster care children for 6 or so states that showed a low incidence of child sex abuse – about 40 cases out of thousands of children. 35% were homosexual abuse.

    I’ve seen other studies – probably cited by Warren Throckmorton – that have that 35% number.

    I read that the number for the Catholic priests was over 60% of the cases as homosexual child abuse. And, of course, 100% of the Boy Scout cases are homosexual.

    If I ever stumble on the original sources again, I’ll post them with Jim Bacon’s forbearance on this tedious topic. It gets boring.

    So, do you have data on what per cent of child sexual abuse are homosexual?

  19. I did find one APA Policy statement that states:

    “There is no scientific basis for concluding that lesbian mothers or gay fathers are unfit parents on the basis of their sexual orientation (Armesto, 2002; Patterson, 2000; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). On the contrary, results of research suggest that lesbian and gay parents are as likely as heterosexual parents to provide supportive and healthy environments for their children.”

    This seems to be on point, and since your mysterious paper published by the APA can’t seem to be located, this will have to serve as their official opinion on the subject. It is, after all, a public statement of their policy.

    It can be found in full at http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/parents.html

    But if you’re bored…

  20. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Re: Homosexual foster care sexual abuse.

    http://www.familyresearchinst.org/
    FRI_SPECRPT_foster-parent-molestation.
    html

    or different article…

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news
    /1439170/posts

  21. wait a minute, you consider an article you found in the FREE REPUBLIC, published by the FAMILY RESEARCH INSTITUE (whose website is down, but a google cached page of their old homepage showed this:

    “The Family Research Institute was founded in 1982 with one overriding mission: to generate empirical research on issues that threaten the traditional family, particularly homosexuality, AIDS, sexual social policy, and drug abuse.”

    1st question: If you are “generating empirical research”, how can you already know what your conclusions are???

    My article came from the American Psychiatric Association, the literal source for information on the human mind in our country.

    Your article came from a right-wing hate-monger publication who skews their research to fit their agenda.

    and you call this “data”?

    A sad attempt, James. You have no unbiased, verifiable evidence to back up what you tout as fact.

    Par for the course, for your point of view, I’m afraid.

  22. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Jamie: Nice try to hit the messenger in the article. If you bother to read it you will see all of their citations from other sources. I can post the whole article if necessary.

    So, again, what data do you have on the per cent of sexual abuse against children committed by homosexuals?

  23. James,

    The website referencing the whole article is down.

    And I repeat, I don’t think YOU have any CREDIBLE data. Do you think those two organizations are going to take a fair and balanced look at the data and report accordingly? Are you that simple? Of course you’re not. The data that is cited is pulled in a manner to skew the information in their direction.

    Find data from an honest, unbiased source. Like, you know, the actual APA article they referenced. What are its conclusions? Skip the Free Republic and Family Research Institute. What does the APA have to say about their own study? In full?

  24. I finally found a link that works.

    The Free Republic article? One of it’s keyword tags? FUDGEPACKERS. Not only are they distorting facts, but they are bigoted hate-mongers.

    And this was found on the article from the Family Research Report Link that the Free Republic Article was based on:

    “Editor’s Note: Since FRI’s Chairman, Dr.Paul Cameron, was personally involved in these matters, this report is written as a first person account”.

    IT’S NOT EVEN A RESEARCH PAPER!

    It’s a personal article from a hopelessly discredited author.

    This was found on the UC-Davis website.

    “On December 2, 1983, the American Psychological Association sent Paul Cameron a letter informing him that he had been dropped from membership. Early in 1984, all members of the American Psychological Association received official written notice that “Paul Cameron (Nebraska) was dropped from membership for a violation of the Preamble to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists” by the APA Board of Directors.5 Cameron has posted an elaborate argument about his expulsion from APA on his website, claiming that he resigned from APA before he was dropped from membership. Like most organizations, however, APA does not allow a member to resign when they are being investigated.”

    HE WAS KICKED OUT OF THE APA.

    James, you have seriously not gotten your story straight on this one. Stop purporting what are, at best, slanted thoughts, as facts simply because they have shock value and you like them.

  25. After reading through that entire article twice, there is not a single reference to a paper written by the APA as you contended earlier. This man took newspaper articles and used them as “data” for his “research”.

    So either you didn’t remember what you read, or you miscontrued the facts to make a sham article sound like a medical study.

    Either way, you should be ashamed that you are parading this snake oil around as “fact”.

    I’m done with this. You have no data to support what you said. Because there IS no data to support what you said that has been presented by a credible source.

    “tsk tsk” as you like to say?

  26. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Jamie, what per cent of the child sex abusers are homosexual?

  27. James,

    There is no known, reliable, scientific data on the subject, so I have no earthly idea.

    Your “data” is no more reliable than me polling my friends and finding out that Jim Webb is going to win with 100% of the vote on Tuesday. Get it? It’s BIASED.

    You touted BIASED UN-SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION as FACT and you got called on it. Admit it.

  28. The Family Research Institute got their website back up tonight.

    James, they don’t cite the APA, they say that they are wrong, along with the NASW (Nat’l Association of Social Workers). And they then go on to cite Paul Cameron no less than 7 times.

    “In 1995 the major professional associations told the U.S. Supreme Court ( Romer) that tradition was completely wrong about homosexuals being inclined to child molestation. The APA, the American Psychiatric Association, and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) categorically declared ìthere is no evidence of any positive correlation between homosexual orientation and child molestation.î Likewise, the National Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers and the American Association of University Professors told the Court that the belief that gay teachers in the classroom would recruit ìstudents to homosexualityî because ìthey are more likely than heterosexual men to molest childrenî ìis without foundation in fact.î (quoted by Cameron, Cameron, & Landess, 1996, p. 385). “

    YOUR ARTICLE PROVED MY POINT.

    This isn’t research. It’s hate-mongering, and you paraded it around like a respectable organization backed it up.

    And I apologize if it seems like I’m harping on these articles that you referred back to. I’ve just never come across something quite like them before.

  29. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    When I have time I’ll try to find that APA article from this year on foster family child sex abuse.

    I find your assertion that there is no data on homosexual child abuse rates remarkable.

  30. don’t try to twist my very clear, unambiguous statement:

    You have provided no evidence, even though you have asserted slanted propoganda as “fact”.

    “Fact” that mirrors almost exactly what is printed in the links you provided, but can be found nowhere in the publications of the APA that I could find.

    All publications and policy statements made by the APA are on their website, sorted by date of publication, even. Unless they’re hiding it for some sinister reason, it doesn’t exist. Maybe it’s part of some agenda, I don’t know…

    This is not the first time you asserted this particular “data” as a “fact”. You need to go back and clarify your statements to such and note that the information you collected was collected by a wholly discredited and unethical psychologist for his own propaganda and personal gain.

  31. A source that I did find:

    From the psychology department of the University of California – Davis. Dr. Gregory Herek, an accepted research psychologist. But probably not someone you’d like. From his conclusion section:

    “The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so.”

    And he cites all of his sources. And they are not a lexis-nexis search for newspaper articles.

    Actual research James. Actual research.

  32. This is from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    Their conclusion: Laws against same-sex marriage actually HURT CHILDREN.

    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/118/1/349

    Also, sorry, the other link was

    psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

  33. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Here is a complete article for folks to read rather than let others interpret.

    http://www.familyresearchinst.org/
    FRI_SPECRPT_foster-parent-molestation-
    illinois.html

    Homosexual Child Molestations By Foster Parents: Illinois, 1997-2002

    Abstract: Do those who engage in homosexuality disproportionately sexually abuse foster or adoptive children as reported by child protective services? Illinois child services reported sexual abuse for 1997 through 2002. 270 parents committed “substantiated” sexual offenses against foster or subsidized adoptive children: 67 (69%) of 97 mother and 148 (86%) of 173 father perpetrators sexually abused girls; 30 (31%) mother and 25 (14%) of father perpetrators sexually abused boys (i.e., 92 [34%] of the perpetrators homosexually abused their charges). 15 of these parents both physically and sexually abused charges: daughters by 8 mothers and 4 fathers, sons by 3 mothers (i.e., same-sex perpetrators were involved in 53%). Thus, homosexual practitioners were proportionately more apt to sexually abuse foster or adoptive children.

    In a general population random sample of 3,714 adults from five metropolitan areas, Cameron, Proctor, Coburn, Larson, Forde, & Cameron (1986) listed 6 (0.2%) reported “serious sexual advances” (p., 329) against them by a foster parent [3 homosexual against girls; 3 heterosexual: 1 against a boy, 2 against girls] – that is, 6 (0.59%) of 1,021 “serious sexual advances” reported by various caretakers. One woman also reported that his advance led to “sexual contact” with a male foster parent – that is, 0.27% of 369 “sexual contacts” reported with various caretakers/relatives. Of these 6 sexual interactions, all of which would presumably have been actionable, 3 were homosexual. On their face, t hese results seem to validate traditional concerns about sexual recruitment of children by homosexuals (Levitt & Klassen, 1974). In 1987, the National Association of Social Workers [NASW] ignored this finding and without proffering any evidence to the contrary, passed a resolution decrying “resistance to using single parents, …including lesbian and gay parents, as potential foster care and adoption resources.”

    In what appears to be the second empirical study bearing on the issue, 14 years of news stories about foster parent molestation of charges in the 50 largest circulation newspapers in the English-speaking world was reviewed (Cameron, 2003). 12 (57%) of the 21 male and 3 of the 4 female perpetrators (e.g., 15 [60%] of the 25 perpetrators) in these stories homosexually molested their charges.

    Two studies – one from a sample of victims, the other from a sample of stories about victims and perpetrators — indicated that perhaps half of foster parent molestations were upon members of the same sex. Would about the same fraction of homosexual molestations obtain if the data was collected and reported by child protective services?

    Method

    Responding to a Freedom of Information Act Request, the Illinois Department of Children & Family Services provided a complete list of “substantiated physical or sexual abuse” by perpetrator’s sex as well as the sex of victim(s) for 1997 through 2002. Marital status of parent perpetrators is not recorded in Illinois and number of children abused per perpetrator or whether multiple perpetrators violated the same child was not available. Behavior is potentially observable, thus ‘objective’ unlike an individual’s feelings or subject to dispute as a psychiatrist’s diagnosis. As Ross, Essien, Williams, & Fenandez-Esquer (2003) noted “sexual behavior is not always adequately represented by self-labeling of sexual identity” (p. 113), and because of this most recent population surveys have indexed behavior rather than reported ‘identity’ (e.g., Spira, Bajos & the ACSF group, 1994; Wellings, Field, Johnson, Wadsworth, 1994; Anderson, Wilson, Barker, Doll, Jones, & Holtgrave, 1999). Since the meaning of a homosexual is “sexual relations between persons of the same sex” (1992 New Illustrated Webster’s Dictionary ), and in the 1996 Centers for Disease Control [CDC] national sexuality survey ‘homosexual’ was defined as someone who had sex with their sex irrespective of age of partner (Anderson, et al., 1999), it seemed sensible to use “ homosexual” behaviorally and descriptively – referring to those who have sex with their sex — irrespective of age of partner.

    Considering those who sexually interact with the underage as ‘pedophiles’ is not particularly useful. Bell & Weinberg (1978) asked 671 homosexual men and 288 homosexual women from a quasi-random sample in San Francisco about the proportions of their homosexual partners who “were 16 or younger when you were 21 or older” (p. 311). Of the men, 77% said “none,” 23% said “half or less,” and none said “more than half;” of the women, 94% said “none,” 3.8% said “half or less,” and none said “more than half.” While, 156 (23%) of the men and 11 (4%) of the women admitted to having had some sex with children, none was a “pedophile” in the sense of only having had sex with or could only have sex with children.

    Results

    There were 963 offenders whose kind of abuse and sex of victim(s) were known (2 mothers physically abused children of unspecified sex, an offender of unknown sex abused child[ren] of unknown sex in an unspecified way). Substantiated sexual abuse was reported for 270 parents: 67 (69%) of 97 mothers and 148 (86%) of 173 fathers sexually abused girls; 30 mothers and 25 fathers sexually abused boys (i.e., 92 [34%] homosexually abused their charges). Substantiated physical abuse was found for 708 parents: 268 (49%) of 544 mothers and 68 (41%) of 164 fathers physically abused daughters; 276 mothers and 96 fathers physically abused sons (i.e., 52%of perpetrators abused boys). 15 parents both physically and sexually abused charges: daughters by 8 mothers and 4 fathers, and sons by 3 mothers (i.e., when both forms of abuse were substantiated, same-sex perpetrators were involved in 53%).

    On average, yearly there were 60,093 children in 4,300 foster- or adoption-subsidized homes in Illinois. For the 6-year period, 966 parents engaged in “substantiated” abuse after an investigation was conducted. Assuming one perpetrator per home, per year, children were sexually abused in about 1% (45/4,300) and physically abused in about 3% (118/4,300). Physical abuse occurred in 6% of the homes where sexual abuse occurred, sexual abuse occurred in 2% of homes where physical abuse occurred.

    Discussion

    Illinois is the sixth largest state with about 12 million inhabitants and is slightly more urban than the U.S. as a whole. The Illinois rates, which do not include neglect, appear similar to the national average of 6.1% for “child abuse and neglect” reported by the U.S. Health and Human Services (Branigin, 2003).

    Estimates of the proportion of adults who have engaged in homosexual sex in the past 12 months vary. The 1996 National Household Survey of Drug Abuse/CDC study (www.icpsr.umich.edu/samhda) estimated that 1.2% of those aged 18 to 59 reported sex with a member of their sex [no age specified] in the past 12 months, other estimates put the number at around 2-3% (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994).

    Ottawa, Canada was among the first jurisdictions to aggressively recruit homosexual foster parents. As of October 24, 2002, 9 of 278 Ottawa’s approved foster homes included known homosexuals, and two of these homes had not yet been given a foster-child (Brooks, 2002), i.e., less than 3% of Ottawa’s placements were homosexual. Thus, those who engage in sex with their own sex appear to be employed as foster- and adoptive-parents in proportions at or below their presence in the general population.

    The proportion of molestations of foster children that were homosexual in the general population survey by Cameron, et al . (1986) was 50%, while the proportion of molestations of foster children that were homosexual in 14 years of newspaper stories about foster parent molestations was 60% (Cameron, 2003). The Illinois material collected and reported by that state’s child protective services — 34% homosexual — was lower than either of the two published estimates. The prior 2 estimates were based upon small numbers of data points – 6 in Cameron, et al ., 1986 and 25 in Cameron, 2003. It is therefore tempting to believe that the 270 data points reported from Illinois results in an estimate closer to the ‘real, underlying proportion’ – but further studies will be required to be more certain as to which estimate is closest. Nonetheless, the disproportionality of the homosexual footprint was evident in each dataset. These three methods, though differing in their estimates of homosexual molestation, tend to cross-validate each other. As such, support for abandoning the tradition of excluding homosexuals as foster parents as recommended by the NASW was not found.

    References

    Anderson, J.E., Wilson, R. W., Barker, P., Doll, L., Jones, T.S., & Holtgrave, D. (1999) Prevalence of sexual and drug-related HIV risk behaviors in the U.S. adult population: results of the 1996 national household survey on drug abuse. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 21, 148-156.

    Bell, A. P. & Weinberg, M. S. (1978) Homosexualities: a study of diversity among men and women . New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Branigin, W. (2003) Officials assess county child welfare system. Washington Post , 7/10/03, p. TO3.

    Brooks, M. (2002) CAS seeks gay foster parents: Move reflects changing face of Canadian family. Ottawa Citizen , 10/24/02, p. Al.

    Cameron, P., Proctor, K., Coburn, W., Larson, H., Forde, N., & Cameron, K. (1986) Child molestation and homosexuality. Psychological Reports , 38, 327-337.

    Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., Michaels, S. (1994) The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States . Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.

    Levitt, E.E., & Klassen, A.D., Jr. (1974). Public Attitudes toward homosexuality: part of the 1970 national survey by the Institute for Sex Research. Journal of Homosexuality , 1, 29-43.

    Ross, M. W., Essien, E. J., Williams, M. L., & Fernandez-Esquer, M. E. (2003) Concordance between sexual behavior and sexual identity in street outreach samples of four racial/ethnic groups. Sexually Transmitted Disease 30,110-113.

    Spira, A., Bajos, N. & the ACSF group. (1994) Sexual behaviour and AIDS . Aldershot: Avebury.

    Wellings, K., Field, .J, Johnson, A. M., Wadsworth, J. (1994) Sexual behaviour in Britain: the national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London: Penguin.

    Note: IllinoisLeader.com filed the freedom of information act (FOIA) request.

  34. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    The geniuses at the APA -often cited to support homosexual ‘marriage’ – came up with this gem that adult-child sex held no harm. Way to go, Shrinks.

    http://www.ipce.info/library_3/rbt/
    metaana.htm

    ABSTRACT

    Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

  35. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Was Dr. Tim Dailey kicked out a medical association?

    Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
    Timothy J. Dailey, Ph.D.

    Scandals involving the sexual abuse of under-age boys by homosexual priests have rocked the Roman Catholic Church. At the same time, defenders of homosexuality argue that youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts should be forced to include homosexuals among their adult leaders. Similarly, the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a homosexual activist organization that targets schools, has spearheaded the formation of “Gay-Straight Alliances” among students. GLSEN encourages homosexual teachers–even in the youngest grades–to be open about their sexuality, as a way of providing role models to “gay” students. In addition, laws or policies banning employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation” usually make no exception for those who work with children or youth.

    Many parents have become concerned that children may be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even “recruited” into adopting a homosexual identity and lifestyle. Gay activists dismiss such concerns–in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

    However, despite efforts by homosexual activists to distance the gay lifestyle from pedophilia, there remains a disturbing connection between the two. This is because, by definition, male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. While many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. In this paper we will consider the following evidence linking homosexuality to pedophilia:

    Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

    Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

    The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

    Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

    Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

    Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

    MALE HOMOSEXUALS COMMIT A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF CHILD SEX ABUSE CASES

    Homosexual apologists admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offenses. After all, they argue, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.

    The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.

    Men Account for Almost All Sexual Abuse of Children Cases

    An essay on adult sex offenders in the book Sexual Offending Against Children reported: “It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offences. Indeed, with 3,000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!” 1

    Kee MacFarlane, et al., writing in Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment report: “The large majority of sexual perpetrators appear to be males (Herman & Hirschman, 1981; Lindholm & Willey, 1983).” 2

    A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: “In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male.” 3

    A study in the Journal of Sex Research states that “pedophilia does not exist, or is extremely rare, in women.” 4

    A Significant Percentage of Child Sexual Abuse Victims are Boys

    According to the Journal of Child Psychiatry: “It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about 9 to 1, but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably…The majority of community studies suggest a . . . ratio . . . in the order of 2 to 4 girls to 1 boy.” 5 The study adds that “some authors now believe that boys may be sexually abused as commonly as girls (Groth, 1978; O’Brien, 1980).” 6

    A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that “approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males.” 7

    Sexual Abuse of Boys is Underreported

    The actual percentage of child sexual abuse victims who are boys very likely exceeds the above estimates. Many researchers echo the view of the Journal of Child Psychiatry study, which refers to the “under-reporting of the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in boys.” 8

    Dr. Robert Johnson, in Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, reports: “The vast majority of cases of male sexual molestation is not reported. As a result, these young men keep both the incidents and their feelings to themselves.” 9

    The Department of Justice report on child sexual exploitation explains why the percentage of boy victims is underestimated: “Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity…They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behavior and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization…No matter what the investigator does, most adolescent boys will deny they were victims.” 10

    The Journal of Child Psychiatry adds: “Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated…This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report.” 11

    Homosexuals Comprise Less than 3 Percent of the Population

    Relying upon three large data sets: the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. census, a recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. 12

    A study of the sexual behavior of men in the United States based on the National Survey of Men (a nationally representative sample comprised of 3,321 men aged twenty to thirty-nine, published in Family Planning Perspectives), found that “2 percent of sexually active men aged twenty to thirty-nine . . . had had any same-gender sexual activity during the last ten years. Approximately 1 percent of the men (1.3 percent among whites and 0.2 percent among blacks) reported having had exclusively homosexual activity. 13

    J. Gordon Muir, writing in The Wall Street Journal, discusses a number of studies that have found that homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. 14

    In a survey of studies on homosexuals in different populations, the Archives of Sexual Behavior reported a random sample of Hawaii State residents interviewed by telephone. The study found “just about 3 percent of males and 1.2 percent of females as having engaged in same-sex or bisexual activity.” 15 However, this relatively higher number is attributed to the fact that the study was not limited to exclusive homosexuals, but included all those who at some time in their lives engaged in same-sex activities. 16

    Homosexual Pedophiles are Vastly Overrepresented in Child Sex Abuse Cases

    Homosexual pedophiles sexually molest children at a far greater rate compared to the percentage of homosexuals in the general population. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found, as we have noted above, that “approximately one-third of [child sex offenders] had victimized boys and two-thirds had victimized girls.” The authors then make a prescient observation: “Interestingly, this ratio differs substantially from the ratio of gynephiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature females) to androphiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature males), which is at least 20 to 1.” 17

    In other words, although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.

    Similarly, the Archives of Sexual Behavior also noted that homosexual pedophiles are significantly overrepresented in child sex offence cases:

    The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2 to 4 percent of men attracted to adults prefer men (ACSF Investigators, 1992; Billy et al., 1993; Fay et al., 1989; Johnson et al., 1992); in contrast, around 25 to 40 percent of men attracted to children prefer boys (Blanchard et al., 1999; Gebhard et al., 1965; Mohr et al., 1964). Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 6 to 20 times higher among pedophiles.”18

    The stark imbalance between homosexual and heterosexual child molestations was confirmed in the Archives of Sexual Behavior study itself, which divided 260 pedophile participants into three groups: “152 heterosexual pedophiles (men with offenses or self-reported attractions involving girls only), 43 bisexual pedophiles (boys and girls), and 65 homosexual pedophiles (boys only).” 19 In other words, 25 percent of the offenders were homosexual pedophiles–or 41 percent if those who molest girls as well as boys are included.

    Other studies report an unusually high percentage of child molestations by homosexual pedophiles:

    A study on pedophilia in the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa reported: “According to the literature, findings of a two-to-one ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles have been documented.” 20

    The Journal of Sex Research reports a study that included “199 offenders against female children and 96 offenders against male children…This would indicate a proportional prevalence of 32 percent of homosexual offenders against children.” 21

    A study of male child sex offenders in Child Abuse and Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further 28 percent chose males as well as females as victims, thus indicating that 42 percent of male pedophiles engaged in homosexual molestation. 22

    ARE MEN WHO MOLEST BOYS REALLY ‘HOMOSEXUALS’?

    Gay Apologists Insist on a Simplistic Stereotype of Pedophilia

    Central to the attempts to separate homosexuality from pedophilia is the claim that pedophiles cannot, by definition, be considered homosexuals. Relying upon a questionable methodology 23, the gay advocacy organization Human Rights Campaign published a “Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation and Child Abuse,” that states: “A sexual abuser who molests a child of the same sex is usually not considered homosexual.” 24

    The basis for this claim is the view that pedophiles who molest boys cannot be considered homosexual if that individual has at any time been married or sexually involved with women.

    ‘Homosexual Pedophiles’: A Clinical Term

    The fact is, however, that the terms “homosexual” and “pedophile” are not mutually exclusive: they describe two intersecting types of sexual attraction. Webster’s Dictionary defines “homosexual” as someone who is sexually attracted to persons of the same sex. “Pedophile” is defined as “an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.” The former definition refers to the gender of the desired sexual object, while the latter refers to the age of the desired sexual object.

    A male “homosexual pedophile,” then, is defined as someone who is generally (but not exclusively, see below) sexually attracted to boys, while a female “homosexual pedophile” is sexually attracted to girls. 25

    The term “homosexual pedophile” was first used in the early 20th century by the Viennese psychiatrist Dr. Richard von Krafft-Ebing, who pioneered the systematic study of sexual deviance. Krafft-Ebing described pedophiles as heterosexually, homosexually or bisexually oriented. 26 This division has been accepted by pedophiles themselves, 27 and is well attested in the literature:

    A study of child molesters in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that “a homosexual and a heterosexual subgroup can be delineated among these offenders.” 28

    The Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy published a study on the same topic, which discussed “the proportional prevalences of heterosexual and homosexual pedophilia.” 29 The study commented on a study that found that “the percentage of the homosexual pedophiles would be 45.8.” Even adjusted downward for exhibitionists, “this would still indicate a much higher percentage (34 percent) of homosexuals among pedophiles than among men who prefer physically mature partners.” 30

    In a review of studies on pedophilia, the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa concluded: “The findings of previous studies report that pedophiles can be divided into heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles according to their erotic preference. …This was confirmed in this recent study.” 31 The article classified homosexual pedophilia into three types: the socially inadequate homosexual pedophile, the intrusive homosexual pedophile, and the undifferentiated homosexual pedophile. 32

    A study of pedophiles in Behavior Research and Therapy concluded: “The second, and perhaps the most important observation we made, is that a homosexual and a heterosexual subgroup can be delineated among these offenders…Categorizing them in this way revealed important differences in the pattern of their sexual preferences.” 33

    The International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology refers to homosexual pedophiles as a “distinct group.” The victims of homosexual pedophiles “were more likely to be strangers, that they were more likely to have engaged in paraphiliac behavior separate from that involved in the offence, and that they were more likely to have past convictions for sexual offences…Other studies [showed a] greater risk of reoffending than those who had offended against girls” and that the “recidivism rate for male-victim offenders is approximately twice that for female-victim offenders.” 34

    Homosexuals and Homosexual Pedophiles Engage in a Wide Variety of Sexual Behavior that Belies Simplistic Categories

    Despite this evidence, in their efforts to divorce homosexuality from pedophilia, homosexual apologists insist on a rigid, narrow definition of the terms “homosexual” and “pedophile” that permits no overlap of the terms. They deny that homosexuals are attracted in inordinate numbers to boys. They also claim that pedophiles cannot be classified as “homosexual” if at any time they have had sexual relations with women.

    However, such a narrow definition does not do justice to the complex nature of pedophilia. Researchers have long been aware that pedophiles exhibit a wide variety of sexual attractions and behavior–often to draw attention away from their primary lust for boys. A study on sex offenders in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology notes that “the reason child sexual abusers are successful at remaining undetected is because they do not fit a stereotype.” 35

    THE DATA INDICATES THAT BOTH HOMOSEXUALITY AND PEDOPHILIA ARE INTERSECTING CATEGORIES THAT ADMIT TO A WIDE VARIETY OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR.

    Homosexual Males are Sexually Attracted to Underage Boys

    A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, “all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories,” which included males as young as age fifteen. 36 In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young, the authors report data showing that 73 percent of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger.” 37

    Conversely, Homosexual Pedophiles are Often Attracted to Adult Males

    A study of sex offenders against male children in Behavior Research and Therapy found that male homosexual pedophiles are sexually attracted to “males of all ages.” Compared to non-offenders, the offenders showed “greater arousal” to slides of nude males as old as twenty-four: “As a group, the child molesters responsed [sp] with moderate sexual arousa…to the nude males of all ages.” 38

    A study of Canadians imprisoned for pedophilia in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that 30 percent of the adult male offenders engaged in homosexual acts with adult males. 39

    Many pedophiles, in fact, consider themselves to be homosexual. A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” 40

    Fr. John Harvey, founder and director of Courage, a support ministry for Catholics who struggle with same-sex attraction, explains that “the pedophile differs from the ordinary homosexual in that the former admires boyishness in the object of his affections, while the latter admires manliness.” 41 However, the categories are not completely separate:

    While granting that the majority of homosexuals are not aroused by young boys, the distinction between homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia is not quite absolute. In some cases the interest oscillates between young adolescents and adults, in others between boys and adolescents; in exceptional cases a man may be interested in boys at one time and adults at another. 42

    Many Pedophiles are Attracted to Women, Marry, and Have Children

    Gay activists insist that pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality because pedophiles are only sexually interested in children, whereas homosexuals only have sexual relations with adults. We have already seen that this stereotypical view is not correct with regard to homosexuals. There is also abundant evidence demonstrating that, while primarily interested in children, pedophiles nevertheless exhibit a wide variety of sexual behaviors, including relationships with women:

    A study in Child Abuse and Neglect found that 48 percent of the offenders either were married or had been married at some time. 43

    The Journal of Interpersonal Violence studied the sexual preferences of male pedophiles who sexually abused children. When they compared the sexual response of the pedophiles with the control group, they found, unexpectedly: “Surprisingly, the two groups did not differ in their response to the nude female stimuli.” 44

    A study in the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa reported that “most of the middle-aged pedophiles have had significant adult sexual activity.” 45 Fifty-eight percent of the pedophiles in one study had at least one child, while other research indicated that “more than two-thirds of the married pedophiles in their sample had children, with an average of two to three children per subject.” 46

    A report by the Department of Justice addressed the devious stratagems of pedophiles, who will go to great lengths to conceal their true desires: “Preferential sex offenders may be ‘pillars of the community’ and are often described as ‘nice guys.’ They almost always have a means of access to children (for example, through marriage, neighborhood, or occupation.)” 47

    Thus, the evidence shows that homosexual pedophiles cannot be narrowly defined as individuals who are solely attracted to underage boys. In fact there is considerable overlap between homosexuality and pedophilia.

    PEDOPHILIA IN GAY CULTURE

    The Historical Connection between Pedophilia and the Gay Rights Movement

    David Thorstad is a homosexual activist and historian of the gay rights movement. 48 He is a former president of New York’s Gay Activists Alliance (gaa), a prototype activist group founded in December 1969. The gaa at its inception opposed age of consent laws, which prohibited adults from having sex with children. 49 Thorstad is also a pedophile and founding member of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).

    Thorstad argues that there is a natural and undeniable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. He expresses bitterness that the gay rights movement has, in his view, abandoned pedophilia. Thorstad writes: “Boy-lovers were involved in the gay movement from the beginning, and their presence was tolerated. Gay youth groups encouraged adults to attend their dances…There was a mood of tolerance, even joy at discovering the myriad of lifestyles within the gay and lesbian subculture.” 50

    The inaugural issue of the Gay Community News in 1979 published a “Statement to the Gay Liberation Movement on the Issue of Man/Boy Love,” which challenged the movement to return to a vision of sexual liberation. It argued that “the ultimate goal of gay liberation is the achievement of sexual freedom for all–not just equal rights for ‘lesbian and gay men,’ but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children.”

    In the early years there was some reluctance to accept pedophilia, primarily among feminist and lesbian activist groups. In March 1979 the Lesbian Feminist Liberation (lfl) accusing “so-called Man/Boy Lovers” of “attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults…Feminists easily recognize this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children.” The coalition went on record as opposing “the sexual abuse of children by heterosexual or homosexual persons.” 51

    Despite this opposition, Thorstad claims that by 1985 homosexual pedophiles had won acceptance within the gay movement. He cites Jim Kepner, then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: “A point I’ve been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we’d better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We’d better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay today.” 52

    In 1985 NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New York’s council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations as well as the International Gay Association–now the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). In the mid-1990’s ILGA’s association with NAMBLA and other pedophile groups cost the organization it’s status as a Non-Governmental Organization in the United Nations.

    ILGA’s renewed attempt to gain admittance to the UN was rejected again in April 2000 because the organization “did not document that it had purged pedophile groups such as [NAMBLA].” The Washington Times reports that Ishtiag H. Anrabi, Pakistani delegate to the UN Economic and Social Council, expressed concern that ILGA was continuing to be secretive about ties with pedophile groups: “For more than a year, the ILGA has refused to provide documentation or allow review of its membership list to demonstrate that pedophilia groups have been expelled.” 53

    Pedophile Themes Abound in Gay Literature

    The late “beat” poet Allen Ginsberg illustrates the seamless connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. Many know Ginsberg as an illustrious “out” homosexual poet: fewer are aware that he was also a pedophile.

    Biographer Raymond-Jean Frontain refers to Ginsberg’s publications in both NAMBLA Bulletin and NAMBLA Journal. He discusses how Ginsberg’s biographers failed to discuss his poems that contained pederastic themes:

    Although both Shumacher and Barry Miles (Ginsberg’s initial biographer) frankly discuss Ginsberg’s sexual politics, neither refers to his involvement with the controversial North American Man/Boy Love Association…I reread Collected Poems and Ginsberg’s two subsequent collections, surprised by the pattern of references to anal intercourse and to pederasty that emerged. 54

    Ginsberg was one of the first of a growing number of homosexual writers who cater to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Mary Eberstadt, writing in the Weekly Standard, documents how the taboo against sex with children continues to erode–with the impetus coming from homosexual writers. 55

    Revealingly, the examples she provides of pedophilia in current literature come from gay fiction. Eberstadt cites the Village Voice, which states that “Gay fiction is rich with idyllic accounts of ‘intergenerational relationships,’ as such affairs are respectfully called these days.” 56 Other examples of pedophilia-themed gay fiction include:

    In the introduction of the “mainstream” homosexual anthology Penguin Book on International Gay Writing, David Leavitt notes matter-of-factly that “Another ‘forbidden’ topic from which European writers seem less likely to shrink is the love of older men for young boys.” Leavitt praises one book with a pedophilic theme included in the anthology as a “coolly assured narrative [which] compels the reader to imagine the world from a perspective he might ordinarily condemn.” 57

    Several texts included in another anthology, The Gay Canon: Great Books Every Gay Man Should Read, feature scenes of man-boy sex. One such book is praised as “an operatic adventure into the realms of love, personality, ambition and art . . . a pure joy to read.” The protagonist is “a pedophile’s dream: the mind of a man in the body of a boy.” 58 Another novel which includes graphic descriptions of sexual violence against boys is said to “[tear] straight to the heart of one of the greatest sources, community-wide, of 1990’s gay angst: What to do with men who love boys?” 59

    Yet another anthology of homosexual fiction, A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition, published by Yale University Press, includes “a longish chapter on ‘Boys and Boyhood’ which is a seemingly definitive account of pro-pedophile literary works.” 60 The author appears more concerned with the feelings and emotions of the man than with his boy victim. He explores the question of “whether or not you regard [having sex with boys] as a way of retreating from life or, on the contrary, as a way of engaging with it at its most honest and least corrupted level.” 61

    A significant percentage of books that have appeared on the Gay Men’s Press fiction bestseller list contain pedophilia themes, including:

    Some Boys: described as a “memoir of a lover of boys” that “evokes the author’s young friends across four decades.” 62

    For a Lost Soldier: the story of a sexual relationship between a soldier and an eleven-year-old boy, set during World War II. 63

    A Good Start, Considering: yet another story about an eleven-year-old boy (!) who suffers sexual abuse but is rescued by a teenager who “offers him love and affection” 64

    Terre Haute: billed as “A poetic novel of sexual awakening in the American Midwest, tracing an adolescent’s journey from introspection to perilous desire.”

    Shiva and Arun: the story of two Indian adolescents who “discover early on the joys of sex.”

    Teardrops on My Drum: barefoot kids in 1920’s Liverpool search for “adventure, love and sex.”

    Pro-pedophilia Publications

    Recent years have seen the appearance of publications that lend a scholarly veneer to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Such publications attempt to make the case for “intergenerational intimacy.” The nation’s largest gay publisher, Alyson Publications, which distributes Daddy’s Roommate and other homosexual books that promote homosexuality to children, publishes books advocating man-boy sex, including:

    Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which contains detailed information on how to engage in sexual relations with young boys. 65

    The Age Taboo, another defense of pedophilia which claims: “Boy-lovers…are not child molesters. The child abusers are . . . parents who force their staid morality onto the young people in their custody.” 66

    The Journal of Homosexuality and Pedophilia

    The Journal of Homosexuality is viewed as the premier “mainstream” English-language publication of the gay movement. One prominent editor is John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University who also serves on the editorial board of the Dutch pedophile journal Paidika. It is therefore not surprising to see pedophilia promoted on its pages.

    In 1990 the Journal of Homosexuality published a series of essays on pedophilia that were eventually published as Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives, edited by pedophile Edward Brongersma. None of the essays offered any substantive criticism of pedophilia: most blatantly promoted man-boy love as the natural right of homosexuals.

    In 1999 Helmut Graupner, wrote an article on pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality, in which he claims: “Man/boy and woman/girl relations without doubt are same-sex relations and they do constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life.” Graupner argues that, as such, consensual sexual relations between adult homosexuals and youths as young as fourteen qualifies as a “gay rights issue.” 67

    The fascination with pedophilia continues to be a cause of concern even within the gay community. Lesbian columnist Paula Martinac, writing in the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade, states:

    [S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her ‘out.’ It’s not pedophilia, this thinking goes–pedophilia refers only to little kids. Instead, adult-youth sex is viewed as an important aspect of gay culture, with a history dating back to ‘Greek love’ of ancient times. This romanticized version of adult-youth sexual relations has been a staple of gay literature and has made appearances, too, in gay-themed films. 68

    Martinac adds that “When some gay men venerate adult-youth sex as affirming while simultaneously declaring ‘We’re not pedophiles,’ they send an inconsistent message to society…The lesbian and gay community will never be successful in fighting the pedophile stereotype until we all stop condoning sex with young people.” 69

    VICTIM’S TURNED VICTIMIZERS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF HOMOSEXUAL CHILD ABUSE

    The steadfast denial of the disturbing ties with pedophilia within the homosexual movement is no purely academic matter. Perhaps the most tragic aspect of the homosexual-pedophile connection is the fact that men who sexually molest boys all too often lead their victims into homosexuality and pedophilia. The evidence indicates that a high percentage of homosexuals and pedophiles were themselves sexually abused as children:

    The Archives of Sexual Behavior reports: “One of the most salient findings of this study is that 46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.” 70

    A study of 279 homosexual/bisexual men with AIDS and control patients discussed in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported: “More than half of both case and control patients reported a sexual act with a male by age 16 years, approximately 20 percent by age 10 years.” 71

    Noted child sex abuse expert David Finkelhor found that “boys victimized by older men were over four times more likely to be currently engaged in homosexual activity than were non-victims. The finding applied to nearly half the boys who had had such an experience..Further, the adolescents themselves often linked their homosexuality to their sexual victimization experiences.” 72

    A study in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology found: “In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent (of the pedophile sample) reported that they had engaged ‘very often’ in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred ‘sometimes’.” 73

    A National Institute of Justice report states that “the odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than for people…who experienced no victimization as children.” 74

    A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59 percent of male child sex offenders had been “victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.” 75

    The Journal of Child Psychiatry noted that “there is a tendency among boy victims to recapitulate their own victimization, only this time with themselves in the role of perpetrator and someone else the victim.” 76

    The circle of abuse is the tragic legacy of the attempts by homosexuals to legitimize having sex with boys. For too many boys it is already too late to protect them from those who took advantage of their need for love and attention. All too many later perpetrate the abuse by themselves engaging in the sexual abuse of boys. Only by exposing the lies, insincere denials, and deceptions–including those wrapped in scholastic garb–of those who prey sexually on children, can we hope to build a wall of protection around the helpless children among us.

    Notes

    1. Dawn Fisher, “Adult Sex Offenders: Who are They? Why and How Do They Do It?” in Tony Morrison, et al., eds., Sexual Offending Against Children (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 11.

    2. Kee MacFarlane, et al., Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment (New York: The Guilford Press, 1986), p. 9.

    3. John Briere, et al., eds., The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1996), pp. 52, 53.

    4. Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” Journal of Sex Research 26 (February 1989): 198. See also Freund (1992): “In females, pedophilia is either very rare, or virtually nonexistent,” p. 34.

    5. Bill Watkins & Arnon Bentovim, “The Sexual Abuse of Male Children and Adolescents: A Review of Current Research,” Journal of Child Psychiatry 33 (1992); in Byrgen Finkelman, Sexual Abuse (New York: Garland Publishing, 1995), p. 300.

    6. Ibid.

    7. Kurt Freund, et al., “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 10 (1984): 197. “The proportional prevalence of offenders against male children in this group of 457 offenders against children was 36 percent.” See also, Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” “Approximately one-third of these individuals had victimized boys and two-thirds had victimized girls. This finding is consistent with the proportions reported in two earlier studies,” p. 107.

    8. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 215.

    9. Robert L. Johnson, “Long-term Effects of Sexual Abuse in Boys,” Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality (September 1988): 38.

    10. “Understanding and Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation,” (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 1997), p. 12.

    11. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 302.

    12. Dan Black, et al., “Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources,” Demography 37 (May 2000): 150.

    13. John O. G. Billy, et al., “The Sexual Behavior of Men in the United States,” Family Planning Perspectives 25 (March/April 1993): 58.

    14. J. Gordon Muir, “Homosexuals and the 10 percent Fallacy,” Wall Street Journal (March 31, 1993).

    15. Milton Diamond, “Homosexuality and Bisexuality in Different Populations,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 22 (1993): 300.

    16. Ibid. Significantly, a number of studies that were surveyed, and which skewed the overall percentages of homosexuals upwards, included such vague definers as those having had “any homosexual body contact.” In contrast, one study that was limited to self-identifying homosexuals found that less than 2 percent of the male respondents considered their “sexual orientation” to be homosexual, p. 293.

    17. Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” p. 107. In this and previous studies, Freund claims that homosexuals are no more likely than heterosexuals to be attracted to children (p. 115). However, Silverthorn, et al., mentions the limitations of studies by Freund and others: “Studies of homosexual male preferences are also limited…The Freund et al. (1973) study was possibly compromised because the homosexual men used in the study were selected to be sexually attracted to adults, but not teenaged, males. The Bailey et al. (1994) study was limited in that it did not present participants with objective stimuli but simply asked participants to report what age of sexual partner they preferred . . . the Jankowiak et al. (1992) study . . . was limited in two ways: the homosexual male participants had a limited age range of ‘middle-aged professionals’ and the stimuli presented to participants were also of a limited age range (‘university to middle-aged’).” Silverthorn attempted to correct these deficiencies, and in his study found that homosexuals “preferred younger partners than those who preferred female partners”–including those as young as fifteen. Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, “Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 29 (February 2000): 67–76.

    18. Ray Blanchard, et al., “Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 29 (2000): 464.

    19. Ibid., p. 471.

    20. John M. W. Bradford, et al., “The Heterogeneity/Homogeneity of Pedophilia,” Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa 13 (1988): 225. Elsewhere the study notes: “Researchers have variously estimated the incidence of homosexual pedophilia between 19 percent and 33 percent of reported molestations,” p. 218.

    21. Freund, “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” p. 197.

    22. Michele Elliott, “Chld Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us,” Child Abuse and Neglect 19 (1995): 581.

    23. The fact sheet discusses a study by Carole Jenny, et al., which claims that only 2 of 269 child molesters could be identified as gay or lesbian. Carole Jenny, et al., “Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?” Pediatrics 94 (July 1994): 41–44. However, the Jenny study utilized an atypical research technique: the reported child molesters themselves were not interviewed. Instead, the researchers relied upon the subjective opinions of “informants” who accompanied the child victim to the medical clinic. The qualifications for such “informants” to determine the sexual behavior of the accused molester were not established. However, once it is “determined” beforehand that pedophiles who molest boys cannot be considered gay or homosexual if they have had sexual relations with women, it is a foregone conclusion that few if any of the pedophiles –who often have girlfriends, are married, and have children — will be labeled homosexual. The Jenny study used this narrow profile despite the fact that the study itself found that 22 percent of the perpetrators were of the same sex as the victim. In these cases the molesters clearly engaged in homosexual sexual molestation.

    24. “Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation and Child Abuse,” Human Rights Campaign (2001): available at: http://hrc.grassroots.com/family/soandchildabusefact/. The fact sheet discusses a study by Carole Jenny, et al., which claims that only 2 of 269 child molesters could be identified as gay or lesbian. Carole Jenny, et al., “Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?” pp. 41–44. However, the Jenny study utilized an atypical research technique. The reported child molesters themselves were not interviewed; instead, the researchers relied upon the subjective opinions of “informants” who accompanied the child victim to the medical clinic.

    25. Note that the well-accepted definition of “child” as someone between infancy and the age of maturation is employed here.

    26. John M. W. Bradford, et al., p. 218.

    27. “[pedophiles] can be of either sex or any [sexual] orientation, i.e., homosexual, heterosexual or bisexual.” Paedophilia: Some Questions and Answers (London: Paedophilic Informational Exchange, 1978); quoted in Seth L. Goldstein, “Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation: Law Enforcement’s Role,” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 53 (January 1984): 23.

    28. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” Behavior Research and Therapy 26 (March 1988): 390.

    29. Kurt Freund, et al., “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” p. 194.

    30. Ibid., p. 197.

    31. Bradford, et al., p. 217.

    32. Ibid., pp. 218, 219.

    33. Ibid., p. 390.

    34. Bickley, p. 56.

    35. Krisin A. Danni, et al., “An Analysis of Predicators of Child Sex Offender Types Using Presentence Investigation Reports,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44 (2000): 491.

    36. Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, “Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women,” p. 70.

    37. Karla Jay and Allen Young, The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gay Men Speak Out about Sexual Experiences and Lifestyles (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275

    38. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” p. 383.

    39. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Early Onset and Deviant Sexuality in Child Molesters,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336.

    40. W. D. Erickson, “Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 17 (1988): 83.

    41. John F. Harvey, O.S.F.S., The Homosexual Person: New Thinking in Pastoral Care (San Francisco: Ignatius Press: 1987): 219

    42. Ibid., p. 221.

    43. Elliott, p. 581.

    44. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” p. 383.

    45. Bradford, p. 219.

    46. Bradford, p. 224.

    47. “Understanding and Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation,” p. 2.

    48. Thorstad is co-author, with John Lauritsen, of The early homosexual rights movement (1864-1935) (New York: Times Change Press, 1974).

    49. David Thorstad, “May/Boy Love and the American Gay Movement” Journal of Homosexuality 20 (1990): 252.

    50. Ibid., p. 253.

    51. Ibid., p. 258.

    52. Ibid., p. 266.

    53. George Archibald, “U.N. Group Keeps Ban on Gay Lobby,” Washington Times (May 1, 2002).

    54. Raymond-Jean Frontain, “The Works of Allen Ginsberg,” Journal of Homosexuality 34 (1997).

    55. Mary Eberstadt, “‘Pedophilia Chic’ Reconsidered” The Weekly Standard 6 (January 8, 2001).

    56. Ibid., p. 21.

    57. Ibid., p. 22.

    58. Ibid.

    59. Ibid.

    60. Ibid., p. 23.

    61. Ibid. Emphasis added by Eberstadt.

    62. Ibid., p. 23.

    63. Ibid.

    64. From the Gay Men’s Press website: http://www.gmppubs.co.uk/cgi-bin/web_store/web_store.cgi

    65. Tom O’Carroll, Paedophilia: The Radical Case (Boston: Alyson Publications, 1982).

    66. Daniel Tsang, editor, The Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power, and Consent (Boston: Alyson Publications ; London : Gay Men’s Press, 1981), p.144.

    67. Helmut Graupner, “Love Versus Abuse: Crossgenerational Sexual Relations of Minors: A Gay Rights Issue?” Journal of Homosexuality 37 (1999): 23, 26.

    68. Paula Martinac, “Mixed Messages on Pedophilia Need to be Clarified, Unified,” Washington Blade (March 15, 2002).

    69. Ibid.

    70. Marie, E. Tomeo, et al., “Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 30 (2001): 539.

    71. Harry W. Haverkos, et al., “The Initiation of Male Homosexual Behavior,” The Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (July 28, 1989): 501.

    72. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 316.

    73. Gary A. Sawle, Jon Kear-Colwell, “Adult Attachment Style and Pedophilia: A Developmental Perspective,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45 (February 2001): 6.

    74. Cathy Spatz Widom, “Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse — Later Criminal Consequences,” Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse Series: NIJ Research in Brief, (March 1995): 1.

    75. Elliott, p. 582.

    76. Watkins, p. 319. Watkins mentions several studies confirming that between 19 percent and 61 percent of male sex abusers had previously been sexually abused themselves.

  36. I’ll get to your articles tonight when I have more time.

    As for Dr. Tim Dailey. Was he ever kicked out of a medical association? OF COURSE NOT! HE’S NOT A MEDICAL DOCTOR! He has his Ph.D in RELIGION. A bit from his bio.

    “Dr. Dailey received his bachelors’ degree in Bible and Theology from Moody Bible Institute, his M.A. in Theological Studies at Wheaton College, and his Ph.D. in Religion from Marquette University. In addition, Dr. Dailey has completed graduate study at the University of Wisconsin; Milwaukee; Jerusalem University College; Jerusalem; and Hebrew University; Jerusalem.”

    http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BY03E02

    Dear Load, James. Before you make a sarcastic comment, at least have your propaganda lined up.

  37. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    So, Jamie, you will attack this PhD Dr Dailey, too, rather than address the article? Or maybe both.

    How about the medical doctors in the APA study saying children who had sex with adults turn out okay?

    Save your breath and time and just let folks read what is written. Everyone can interpret for themselves.

  38. James,

    Present all the bad science you want to present and call it fact if you like.

    I’ve had a good time proving that the statement you made (homosexuals = pedophiles) is complete and utter garbage.

    That said. I’m done. Until you present more bad propoganda as fact, of course…

    You are fun to argue with, though.

  39. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Actually, Jamie, the statement is

    Homosexual Pedophile propensity = 35 x Heterosexual Pedophile propensity

Leave a Reply