Open the Books Digs Up 100 More DEI Employees at UVA

Adam Andrzejewski

by James A. Bacon

Back in March, Adam Andrzejewski and his team at Open the Books, a non-profit dedicated to transparency in government spending, concluded that the University of Virginia is spending $20 million in payroll for 235 employees (including student interns) on work relating to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.

Describing Andrzejewski’s numbers as “wildly inflated,” UVA officials countered with a count of 55 employees earning salaries of $5.3 million.

So, Andrzejewski sent his researchers back for a second look. As it turns out, Open the Books concluded, their initial findings were far off the mark. They were way too low. The organization has identified 100 additional employees across 80 offices and departments who have been sucked into the University’s DEI vortex.

These are employees who, in addition to their primary roles at the university, contribute variously as DEI deans, directors, project leads, coordinators, representatives, fellows, council members, faculty advisors, ex officio members, and even “JEDIs” (Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion personnel), Andrzejewski writes in a column published in City Journal.

The findings reflect the reality that under the flag of “inclusive excellence,” DEI permeates every nook and cranny of UVA. In addition to the formal bureaucracy identifiable by DEI in the names of offices and in titles of employees, significant DEI-related responsibilities have seeped into the day-to-day duties of many faculty and staff with other teaching, research and administrative duties. The networking, committee meetings, memo writing, grant applications, etc. represent a significant drain on productivity. 

“These employees are spread across the university,” says Andrzejewski. “The medical school has more than 20 DEI ‘representatives.’ Engineering has nine DEI ‘directors.’ The architecture school has six JEDI types, not counting the dean, Malo Andre Hutson, who earns $393,600 and named JEDI as a ‘key priority‘ for the school. Not even Virginia’s Division 1 athletic department is immune: Ed Scott, the deputy athletics director, is a DEI ‘diversity council member.’”

Open the Books is still digging. Its latest count does not include 22 employees whose names appear on the UVA website but whose salaries are not listed in 2023 payroll numbers.

UVA has refused to release the documentation behind its claim that the University has only 55 DEI employees. By contrast, Open the Books has been fully transparent, publishing lists of employees, titles and salaries for the public to view and evaluate.

“Though President Ryan and his administration don’t want to disclose its size, UVA’s DEI program is massive,” Andrzejewski concludes. “Every bit of it pulls resources from the university’s educational mission and brings the school further from the Enlightenment values championed by its founder.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

77 responses to “Open the Books Digs Up 100 More DEI Employees at UVA”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Tator, the bluetick hound chased a cat up a tree. Lesson to be learnt about chasing things you cannot catch.

    https://i0.wp.com/www.pilotonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Tater-in-tree-4.jpg?fit=1280%2C9999px&ssl=1

  2. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    I looked at the link Jim provided to the a school, and here is the header paragraph:

    “THE JUSTICE, EQUITY, DIVERSITY + INCLUSION (JEDI) INITIATIVE
    The UVA School of Architecture is committed to cultivating democracy and to the sustained, critical rethinking of our institutional policies, practices and structures. We recognize our own privileges as an institution, and we honor the consequential responsibilities to move our society towards an inclusive future that recognizes and serves all people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, nationality, citizenship status, ability, or socioeconomic standing.”

    It took me back the the Declaration of Independence:

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

    The Declaration is far simpler and straightforward in my view. this was drafted in 1776 (or there about’s), and in todays standards should say all men and women. But what else needs to be said?

    I also wonder what the heck makes a college “privileged”. .? I do agree that we are all privileged just to be here. I count my blessing every day.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Once again, buried in the pretty rhetoric, the equity stinker… “serves all people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, nationality, citizenship status, ability, or socioeconomic standing.”

      That is similar to language VDOE had on their Equity web page, to eliminate differences in outcomes based on, blah, blah, blah, ability, blah blah. Funny how that elimination of ability gets tucked away amidst things we’d all agree are not germane to outcomes. I’d much prefer people whose services I depend on, like docs and airplane pilots, to have high ability.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Once again, buried in the pretty rhetoric, the equity stinker… “serves all people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, nationality, citizenship status, ability, or socioeconomic standing.”

      That is similar to language VDOE had on their Equity web page, to eliminate differences in outcomes based on, blah, blah, blah, ability, blah blah. Funny how that elimination of ability gets tucked away amidst things we’d all agree are not germane to outcomes. I’d much prefer people whose services I depend on, like docs and airplane pilots, to have high ability.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        I think ability, in this context, refers to physical limitations.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          What would make you think that?

          That is not how folks with physical disabilities refer to themselves. If the term used had been “disability” there would be a case for interpreting it that way. But it was not.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            What’s the order of things? Crippled, disabled, handicapped, handicapable, physically challenged, differently capable, etc., etc.,

            Does the ADA ever use the word abilities in the text in contrast to the word disability?

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Considering that ADA is the Americans with Disabilities Act, the answer is no, although I confess I have not gone back and reread the entire text.

            The language describing people with disabilities has evolved just like everything else, for example morticians, to undertakers, to funeral directors.

            It probably started with crippled and evolved from there to handicapped and physically disabled. People in the physically disabled community have a term for the rest of us, TABs, Temporarily Able Bodied.

            Similarly, cognitive language has evolved from *d**t to m*r*n to mentally retarded to the currently fashionable intellectual disability.

            FWIW the Dept of Labor makes a profound distinction between disability and handicap. They say, we understand he has a disability (missing a foot) but show how that is a handicap to his job (clicking a mouse).

            There is little doubt that VDOE and UVa assert Equity to eliminate differences in outcome exactly as they have clearly stated, without regard to ability.

            Our job, should we take it, is to help those whose ability lags due to environmental or cultural factors catch up, not to deny that differences in ability exist and fail them upwards. That is a profound disservice to both the less abled and all of the country.

            The first and vital requirement of rehab is to acknowledge there is a problem. Without that ain’t nuttin’ going to get better, and suppressing ability as a criteria is a delusion.

            FWIW a big piece of my career was designing measures of and reporting on the performance of people with disabilities. We did that so that professionals could design, implement and measure the success of rehab programs that helped people overcome their disabilities or find outcomes where a disability was not a barrier to achievement.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Physical, intellectual, emotional, … any others?
            What of emotional disabilities? Isn’t that a part of “being on the spectrum”? The Good Doctor.

            Ted Bundy might very well have had a good career as a lawyer. Doctor? Maybe not so much.

            Equal outcomes? Or opportunity for equal outcomes? Makes a difference, and yet, you’ve succeed in one by measuring the other.

          4. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            That’s sort of it. Long ago in the dark ages when I got started it was informally crippled, crazy or dumb. Been a long time since anyone has framed it that crudely, but that covers the waterfront.

            The emotional end of things certainly encompasses the infinite range and equally infinite granulation of Autism spectrum disorders along with psychoses, neuroses and general crazyasshititis.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Nevertheless, it is incumbent upon all of us to remove barriers. Your one footed mouse-clicker’s office should never be on the top story of a 4-floor walk up.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Aw, you gonna spoil the whole thing.

      2. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        You are absolutely right, I glossed right over that. Again, vying for equal outcomes……

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          That caught me a couple of years ago when I followed a link to the VDOE equity page. I was reading blissfully along thinking this stuff doesn’t sound so bad, who wouldn’t want to eliminate differences based on race or gender or zip code? Then I tripped over “ability”, whoops, what was that buried inconspicuously there in the middle? Eliminate differences in outcomes based on ability? Really?

          At first I wrote it off as inadvertent, but as the DIE debate has raged on it seems malicious and the essence of the difference between equity and equality.

      3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Does the ability clause also apply to UVA’s men’s and women’s sports teams that play in the ACC? This will get very interesting as the NCAA and major conferences, including the ACC, agreeing to pay student athletes.

        Perhaps, if the WaPo hadn’t lost $77 million last year, it could afford to probe this issue.

      4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Does the ability clause also apply to UVA’s men’s and women’s sports teams that play in the ACC? This will get very interesting as the NCAA and major conferences, including the ACC, agreeing to pay student athletes.

        Perhaps, if the WaPo hadn’t lost $77 million last year, it could afford to probe this issue.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      OTOH, when written, the DoI applied to white males only.

      1. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        It was 1776…..this was not 2024, or 1968, or even 1863.

        But if I need to say more, how many leaders back then embraced equality for anyone?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          No Christian ones. Romans 12:2 don’t ya know. Our entire nation is an abomination in the eyes of the Christian God. Ironic considering Evangelicals “love” it so much.

          Or maybe they don’t given their support for the man who would be King.

          1. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            So your saying in the 1700’s no Christians embraced equality for anyone, until of course our Founding Fathers who took us a gigantic step in the right direction (even if for just white males).

            But what about Muslims, what about non religious, Chinese, did any of them embrace equality back then? How many do now?

          2. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, only white Christians were qualified to become US citizens. Muslims did not make the cut legally until 1944.

          3. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Maybe that was a wise policy…
            If you are a Muslim believing in Jihad and Intifada, then you can’t be tolerated in a religiously pluralistic society…
            What happens to Christians in Muslim countries?

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “Maybe that was a wise policy…”

            Walt says the quiet part out loud…

          5. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            No Troll. I said the obvious part. If we (America – the country you hate) are to have freedom of religion, free exercise and toleration of the other religions, it “might” be a problem to import people whose name means submission and who practice intifada and forced conversions. Are you a Muslim? Does Half Troll have some Arabic meaning similar to Allahu Akbar?

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            yup… give him credit!

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Speeding around the track, racists gotta race, ya know.

          8. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            It’s not the quiet part.
            It’s called anybody not a Marxist tool could acknowledge, except for the Marxist tool part…
            https://www.arabnews.com/node/2516906/pakistan
            Lotta religious tolerance from those guys…

          9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Religious violence in Pakistan,,Walt? That is your justification for openly endorsing denying basic human rights in the US based on religion? Have you discussed this position during your TJC board meetings? Can we expect such policy changes at UVa come September?

          10. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            As usual from the Troll…
            If you are a Muslim subscribing to Intifada, you should not be allowed in this country as you believe all non-Muslims are infidels and must be made to submit.
            First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people does not let the Godless off the hook. They” be coming for you after that. What’s your position on throwing gays off of roofs? Honor killings?

          11. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            In the context of Islam, jihad refers to the struggle or effort to uphold and defend the faith. It can take various forms, including spiritual, moral, and physical efforts.

            Sounds not unlike the Crusades under Catholic leadership.

            A more militant jihad began in the 1970s. Try catching up with societal changes.

          12. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Uh-huh…
            What’s happening to Christians in Muslim countries?
            Been to Bethlehem lately? Or tried being a Christian in Kenya or other Muslim countries? How about being gay?
            If you are a Muslim adhering to all infidels must convert or be slaves (and the rape is OK, lying to advance Islam, honor killings, kill gays, etc), sorry – you should not be allowed in.

          13. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            As of April 2024, there are approximately 1.9 billion Muslims worldwide, which is around 24.9% of the world’s population. This makes Islam the second largest religion in the world, after Christianity, which is 31.1%

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/40f943aad46d531b224abb5c68a265588734855ed6389b9aa289a69520e6cf7d.png

            how many are terrorist? percentages?

          14. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            No, I’m saying the established churches at that time would have taught that a king was ordained by God, hence coronations, and that to rise up against a king was a sin against God.

            It can certainly be argued that the excessive, and sometimes false, grievances in the DoI was to help silence those pulpits. Had many of the priests and ministers come down against the Revolution, it would have failed. As it is, some people fled to Canada because of the Christian view of revolting against a king.

            Fortunately, too, there were some ministers who also believed that it was a Christian duty to resist tyranny. Funny, in America, George III was a tyrant. In the rest of the empire, not so much. In England, he was positively enlightened.

            As for equality of men, uh, slavery, and the “White Man’s Burden”, eh?

          15. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Old School Baptists of the 1760s-1790 resisted the British for one simple reason. They were sick and tired of jail time, public whippings, and seizure of property thanks to the mighty King George III and his agents running Virginia. They had openly rejected the requirement to join the Anglican Church and were not timid as the so called fiery Presbyterians. Thier numbers, influence, and principles attracted the likes of Jefferson, Madison, Henry, Mason, and Washington. Instrumental in the passage of the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom. Oddly not evangelical. They believed that regeneration occurred only by the grace of God without the help of man. Perhaps the most liberal of all the churches sprung from the Great Awakening. Membership by baptism was accepted out of every nation, kindred, and race.

          16. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Good thing they didn’t live in Salem. Baptists weren’t the roots of evangelicals, and it wasn’t big, if at all, in the US at the time. By fiery Presbyterians, you mean anti-slavery? Those Ohio boys really got going by 1850.

          17. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            The Virginia Presbyterians sat on the sidelines during the persecution of the Old School Baptists in the 1700s. They didn’t want to risk the toleration they enjoyed from the colonial government.

          18. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Toleration? And money. Weren’t they in on the Parson’s lawsuit?

          19. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Funny you mention Salem, I just visited there a month ago. Salem witch trials spanned only one year before 1700, 1692-1693 I believe, well before the Revolutionary period.

          20. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Right. Religion? Go figure.

          21. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Obviously a twisted and deadly view even at the time as it was not practiced widely, and it was stopped after a year.

          22. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And the Inquisition? Care to guess the date of the last burnt-at-the-stake infidel as a victim of the Jesuits? Hint: 18XX.

          23. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well.. and not to mention all the lynchings of (less than equal folks) that continued well into the 20th century…

          24. Wahoo'74 Avatar
            Wahoo’74

            “Our entire nation is an abomination.”

            Really?

            You’re dead wrong, but if you truly embrace that belief, shouldn’t you relocate to a more hospitable nation? Where would that be exactly?

          25. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I ain’t a Christian. Why would I believe that? You’re good in the comprehensive reading, eh? Oh, UVa! ‘Splains a lot.

          26. Wahoo'74 Avatar
            Wahoo’74

            You ain’t a Christian. Well, good for you. Religious pluralism is a good thing….hatred of America is not.

            Sorry if you think that’s doctrinaire. Deal with it.

          27. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            See, now, you went and read one comment in a thread, and without context just had to shoot off your, uh, well, your fingertips.

          28. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Just for the record, come November are you going to vote for the man who has labeled KIA, WIA, MIA, and POW as “suckers and losers” and you say love the country?

          29. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            where’s the rest of the thread ?
            😉

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          You are correct. They did not embrace equality.

          So clearly people are misinformed about what America was supposed to be all about?

      2. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        You are confusing the Declaration and the Constitution, but I doubt you care for either one, just like referencing the Bible…

        “…all men are created equal…” is what led to abolition of slavery. Jefferson had as part of his indictment of GIII the slave trade. Those counts were deleted because of…politics! And striving for unanimity.

        Now tell me more about the Bible. I really enjoy having Morning Joe and Mika telling me how to be a good evangelical… Hey, you know Joe, claims he was raised a Baptist? And I don’t know how – as a Christian nationalist – I know so little about it. Maybe Joe and Mika can tell me more – no more OK signs! And what is the current flag that is so dangerous! Triggered! (But Ukraine and Palestine flags, no prob)
        What a joke.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Jefferson would have known the difference between men, man, and mankind. He’d have never fluffed the line about small and giant steps.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Jefferson would have known the difference between men, man, and mankind. He’d have never fluffed the line about small and giant steps.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Apparently, for some time, SCOTUS and courts had trouble interpreting the “text” “equal” ?

    4. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      re: ” The UVA School of Architecture is committed to cultivating democracy and to the sustained, critical rethinking of our institutional policies, practices and structures. We recognize our own privileges as an institution, and we honor the consequential responsibilities to move our society towards an inclusive future that recognizes and serves all people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, nationality, citizenship status, ability, or socioeconomic standing.”

      It took me back the the Declaration of Independence..”

  3. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    The GA can solve this by reducing funding to UVA for this kind of non-academic waste. The Justice, Equity, Diversity + Inclusion statement is pure academic arrogance.

    1. Turbocohen Avatar
      Turbocohen

      Reducing? LOL. GO private and let the board eat cake.

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Holy Moly!!! Call in the trained phalanxes from Heritage’s Project 2025 to root out the Deep State JEDI at UVa. Intolerable and unjustifiable fifth columnists (communists, Marxists).

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Troll fixated on the BOV – danger! And McCarthy fixated on Heritage Project 2025 – oh, the horrors! Cuz Dems never have plans when they win elections. Wasn’t it the original (false) Messiah, BHO, who said elections have consequences and “I won?”
      Maybe people are figuring out that his definition of “fundamental transformation” was not accurately spelled out…you know, like bending the cost curve and “you can keep your plan.”

      By the way, the Open the Books numbers are backed up fully, with data transparency and all people and assumptions known. For the presentation to the UVA BOV, where 55 were claimed, UVA FOIA says it has no documents to back up the number…

      Who is more likely being truthful here?

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        1950s song: Only you can make the world seem bright; only you can turn the dark to light.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Why thank you, but I don’t deserve such credit. Only God does that.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            You are making an outstanding effort to function as god.

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Then you believe in a small god…

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Tator, the bluetick hound chased a cat up a tree. Lesson to be learnt about chasing things you cannot catch.

    https://i0.wp.com/www.pilotonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Tater-in-tree-4.jpg?fit=1280%2C9999px&ssl=1

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Tator did his job. He treed the cat. Tator’s master was supposed to catch up and with his axe and shotgun finish the job.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Tator did his job. He treed the cat. Tator’s master was supposed to catch up and with his axe and shotgun finish the job.

  6. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Here’s a report on what has happened to UCLA Med School since diversity has supplanted merit. Wonder if there is a similar impact at UVa? https://freebeacon.com/campus/a-failed-medical-school-how-racial-preferences-supposedly-outlawed-in-california-have-persisted-at-ucla/

  7. UVAPast Avatar
    UVAPast

    What is the racial makeup of the DEI employees?

  8. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    DEI = discriminatory institutionalized racism targeting mostly white people. The Democrats big LEI is a poorly disguised attempt to solve racial discrimination by primarily disadvantaging White Americans. There, I said it.

  9. Teddy007 Avatar
    Teddy007

    Consdiering how many federal regulations UVA (or any university that accepts federal money) has to comply with. There is no way to get rid of every employee that has at least some job tasks that can be called DEI. Remember, UVA gets almost $500 million in external research grants. Almost all of those has DEI-like strings attached.

    If conservatives were not interested in learning how DEI programs work, then conservatives could use the rules to go after the Asian professors who have all Asian graduate students/post docs.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Sounds like AAPI hate coming from Teddy.
      See how easy that is?
      Let’s look over every (bogus) research grant and check every team. If it doesn’t have the precise right amount of skin color and sexual preference and sexually confused, then the results/findings are automatically suspect as white supremacy, amirite?
      Then, as we get “better” at this version of Marxism, we can actually start grading not in whole numbers as “black” or “white” but we’ll do DNA tests to get precise measurements. Welcome to the Brave New World where 2+2 = 5 and Oceania has always been at war with the enemy du jour! And let’s not forget the 2 Minute hate! What fun! What team building! Who is today’s enemy, Bert Ellis, Glenn Youngkin, Orange Man Bad? Lotta choices…
      (Yes, and I know I referenced two books and the other terms did not come out of BNW. That title was better for the point.)

      1. Teddy007 Avatar
        Teddy007

        I never understand people who think they are being clever by intentionally misunderstand. In the real world, how does it benefit Virginia to have a Chinese primary investigator at UVA who fills his lab up with no one but Chinese grad students and Chinese post-docts. Such blatant discrimination makes it harder for all of the non-Chinese graduate students to succeed. Why not move past the white/black world view and use DEI to have true diversity.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          You said Asian. There are lots of Asians. I think we (people who are actual citizens of America) should be highly suspicious of anyone from China. We used to be able to identify good reason to be suspicious of Russians as enemies of America’s interests. That is the real world case with China, and the stealing of our technology, etc. So, if you were specifically talking about Chinese, filling up their research staffs, on US grants, with Chinese nationals who are going to return to China, you are right. If you have examples, be a whistleblower!

          1. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            DEI would never tolerate a non-Hispanic white primary investigator with all white grad students. Yet, many universities tolerate the black primary investgiator will all black graduate students or the same with Chinese, Korean, or Indian. If conservatives were smarter, they would sue the DEI apparatus to go after the bigots who are not white.

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Discrimination is discrimination. Again, if you have examples, be a whistleblower. Contact Jim Bacon. Tell him research projects to look at.
            And for purposes of the English language and understanding, let’s clarify. Discrimination, by itself, is not a bad thing – when used in the proper context it means to discern, to make a decision based on factors known to you. Making those decisions on the basis of race, however, is illegal. And that is clearly going on. As is religion. And political beliefs. UVA has been breaking the law and has no desire to comply with the law – only the intent to appear to intend to comply.
            UVA needs to get back to education – drop the “and Good” virtue signaling and do what you are supposed to do – help these kids learn how to think. Costs could be at least 1/3rd less.

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    In terms of public school and citizens access to it. Virtually every developed country in the world, as well as most developing countries and even some 3rd world, emulate this. If there is such a thing as a human “right”, this must be a candidate IMO.

    You have almost zero chance of being “equal” as an adult unless you do have a economically-viable education. As a society, we agree to provide it despite some who oppose it.

Leave a Reply