NOTE FOR NMM ON ECONOMIC REALITY

Rather than add this note to the ANATOMY OF A BAD COMMUTE post, EMR will put it here because it is important to understand these issueS. Why is it important?

Because NovaMiddleMan’s idea of economic reality is exactly why those who made bad location decisions are hurting now and will be hurting far more in five years. All those still alive will still be hurting in fifty years if there is not Fundamental Transformation of human settlement patterns and Fundamental Transformation of governance structure.

NovaMiddleMan said:

“Look dude the free market is at work.”

Was this the ‘free market’ that was declared “dead” in Davos last week?

The US of A is a democracy and a clear majority are inclined to think Behavioral Economics is now in control and that a “free market” – which according Adam Smith presumes informed buyers and sellers – has only rarely existed since 1870 outside the minds of those who perpetuated the myth to gain economic and political leverage.

Some think the “popular” backlash against the current stimulus packages is due to belief in “free markets.” Not so, the popular backlash is driven by revolution over what happened to the money that was doled out and wasted in the last stimulus package.

“People make decisions and face consequences.”

But “people” had no idea what the consequences would be.

Tell us how you feel when you are 75 and still have to work ten hours a day and have no health benefits because of the $75-Trillion in unfunded liabilities for those ahead of you in line.

Or do you plan to be one of the few lucky ones at the top of the ziggurat? Watch out for the pitchforks, machetes and pikepoles.

“Here is my perspective. Pardon me for not having as much context. I’m a bit younger than you folks :-p.”

What is that about those who do not understand history having to repeat it?

In this case there are not enough resources left support a second round of mass overconsumption with 6 billion humans all wanting and deserving a slice of the pie.

“Its 2003 and I am one of the young people powering the new economy of Northern Virginia.”

Lets say “overpowering” the resources upon which a market economy depends. It is not your fault NMM, it is all of our faults but some of us have been pointing out the cliff since 1973, many for longer. Nouriel Roubini has come lately to the Common.

“Some people want to get married and have kids. In 2003-2006 there were only a couple choices.”

Choices about getting married or choices about getting married and having children and living the American Dream as portrayed by MainStream Media advertising? (See “A Yard Where Johnny Can Run and Play,” 1 Dec 2003.)

Even for the later there were many choices unless they relied on Autonomobile and shelter advertising and stories in MainStream Media for guidance. Millions of couples made more intelligent choices than those in Bristow and Dale City.

Check out the story about Grace Church in Saturday’s WaPo Real Estate Section. Just for starters, if small groups of your friends got together they could have created real dooryards from the hundreds of similar buildings inside R=10.

Too busy playing video games to understand the real world? Not smart.

“Finding a place under 500k…”

See above.

“… in a good school district …”

As noted in the 3 February WaPo story if one bought when they got married, by the time their children were ready for school the schools were over crowded.

“… with low crime.”

Define “low crime.” Check out the “safest” places by Prof Lucy’s calculations.

“The only choices were the two places mentioned in the article and outer Loudoun.”

Not in “outer” Loudoun (R=30 to R=45) and not “inner” Loudoun (R=20 to R=30 – the same Radius Band and Prince William) either. Both inner and outer Loudoun have different conditions.

For example, dwellings in the same price range as those in Bristow and Dale City were Attached Dwellings in the eastern Loudoun Beta Communities because they were closer to Jobs and Services due to the existence or Reston and Dulles Airport. These places also did not make the Top 12 in commuting times among Census Designated Places.

The bigger issue is this:

In the profiled enclaves between the time they were married and the first child going to school they spent on average 3,375 hours pre Household commuting. If your cohort spent half that time creating functional Dooryards (see Grace Church for example) they could have also evolved safe Clusters and good Neighborhood schools.

OK, no agents make a profit from sweat equity and building safe Clusters and good Neighborhood schools from the inside and so there is no advertising and no MainStream Media stories… But you get the idea.

“This was insane.”

NOW YOU ARE TALKING

“There needed to be a housing correction.”

The question is: what kind of a “correction?”

“Now you can find a place for under 500k in many places.”

Not a place that meets your criteria because the schools are going down and the crime is going up faster than the price is changing.

“Problem solved all through market forces with no planning or nanny stateisims.”

The problem is not solved, it is only now coming into focus for most citizens.

“And I still say show me the demand for eoconoboxes right on top of each other with no cars.”

EMR dos not advocate “econoboxes” nor does he advocate depriving Households of vehicles. See performance measures in original post.

“Right…. Its not what the public wants”

If the full costs were fairly allocated, the public would in fact want (and need) different settlement patterns and the dwellings need not be “econoboxes” nor “on top of each other.”

“P.S. the people who live in the inner areas don’t want what your development plan is anyway. Unless you can provide adequate infrastructure first and show the quality of life for existing residents wont be negatively impacted.”

Here NMM is correct.

These NIMBY-like criteria can be (and should be) met.

The first step is for those in your generation to understand the reality of the existing conditions and the real future options.

EMR


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “NOTE FOR NMM ON ECONOMIC REALITY”

  1. Premise – “people do stupid things because they are misled by the Mainstream Media”.

    so… some folks are smart enough to see that the mainstream media is promoting ownership of dead horses to the ignorant…..

    but most of the great unwashed are, unfortunately ignorant – to the point where their ideas and thought processes are driven by the mainstream media…

    I have to be honest.. I find this a troubling concept.

    If it is true.. then where will fundamental transformation come from?

    Certainly not folks whose view of the world is whatever the mainstream media tells them – right?

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    What is a free market?

    The simplest definition I have been able to come up with for a free market is a market where all costs and benefits of buying and selling accrue to the buyers and sellers exclusively, and no single buyer or seller can individually manipulate the market. It’s really that simple. If those two conditions exist–all costs and benefits are captured in the market and no one can manipulate the market outcome–then an amazing thing happens: Markets make the biggest economic pie possible. That’s not to say that free markets make every single person as well off as possible, but rather the total size of the pie is as big as possible. In a truly free market, as defined here, outside influence can only worsen the outcome (shrink the pie).

    When are markets not free?

    So if free markets are so great, why do we get such bad outcomes? The answer is quite simple, this definition of a free market is often misinterpreted to mean that all markets are free and therefore any outside intervention in markets is unwarranted. The definition of a free market I give here sets out the conditions where a market will operate according to the economic definition of efficiency. If a market violates either of these conditions, then the market fails and is no longer ‘free’ to society and society should (and must?) act. What are the possible market failures? I’ll talk about the big three although I’m sure there are many others I will miss:

    Externalities: If a market fails to capture all of the costs and or benefits of buying or selling something, then the market is failing to make the pie as big as it can. Why? Because those costs or benefits that aren’t captured should be counted from a social perspective. No matter who gets the cost or benefit, for a market to work properly all of those costs/benefits have to be considered. So when my son has an asthma attack on a high ozone day, the costs of his treatment represent real costs to us. But the drivers and factory owners producing the ozone have no incentive to consider my costs. A ‘free’ market would capture my costs in the decisions of the drivers and factory owners and us. Because the rules of the market don’t require it, the market is not free.
    Market Power: Most of you have played the game Monopoly at some point (I’m assuming). The goal of the game is to control all economic decisions. Why? Because it makes the monopolist really well off. Unfortunately, in the real world, such influence over the market has a really bad outcome–it shrinks the size of the economic pie. When a single buyer or seller (or group) can manipulate market prices, then the manipulators gain at the expense of the overall size of the economic pie. Now don’t be confused here: I’m not saying that monopolies are bad because the monopolist gets rich. Markets don’t care who gets rich. The point is more subtle–monopolies are bad because they shrink the pie. That is, the total amount of money available is less than if the market were competitive. This shrinkage represents a cost to society. The market is not free.
    Information Problems: Perhaps most relevant for the current situation, markets are only free if all buyers and sellers in the market are fully informed. Insider trading is bad because it gives certain traders an advantage and imposes a cost on society by restricting competition (shrinking the pie). Other information problems can result in similar market failures. If businesses don’t fully face the risks of their decisions (moral hazard), the pie shrinks.

    Each of these market failures mean the same thing–the market is no longer free, it is costly–or at least costlier to society than it could otherwise be. And that is the point. Markets that fail to capture the full range of costs and benefits and are subject to manipulation are not ‘free’ unless an outside agent acts on behalf of society. That agent is the government. So somewhat ironically, it may very well be the case that a market requires government intervention to be free.

    What role does the government play in a free market system?

    The governments role in the free market system is quite simple: Play referee. For a free market system to work properly, a government is necessary to enforce the rules and hand out penalties where appropriate. “

    Professor Tim Haab

    RH

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    Premise – “people do stupid things because they are misled by the Mainstream Media”.

    Underlying message: “I am the only one disseminating the truth, even most other planners don;t know what they are talking about.”

    RH

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    “informed buyers and sellers – has only rarely existed since 1870 outside the minds of those who perpetuated the myth”

    There are more products and more information than ever. In one sense it is therefore harder to be informed. In another sense new technology makes it easier than ever to search for the truth.

    EMR likes to use the word Myth because it implies thee is some conspiracy perpetuating it, and that HE is the savior providing the REAL TRUTH.

    —————————–

    “Tell us how you feel when you are 75 and still have to work ten hours a day and have no health benefits because of the $75-Trillion in unfunded liabilities for those ahead of you in line.”

    Other countries seem to be able to have a)better health care results and b) lower costs than the U.S.

    What is your point here? That under our system you basically cannot have health care unless it is associated with a group plan at work?

    Or that a national group plan cannot work?

    Or that under private health care you won’t be able to afford it anyway?

    More EMR doom and gloom.

    Get on one of those airplanes you hate, and get your health care in Mexico. Enjoy the sunshine and tequila while you are thare.

    —————————–

    “those who made bad location decisions are hurting now “

    You assume that people made their own decisions, and that having made one (or accepted one handed to them) that there are better economic choices available. And that conditions and jobs won’t change over time.

    Just as we have some functional unemployment we have some functional “bad decisions”. At any given time, some people are in the process of finding new jobs, and some are in the (long, drawn out, and expensive) process of recognizing that they need to move and acting on it.

    If they do move, someone else is going to live wher they did previeously, and unless they have a lesser commute, society will have gained nothing by this transaction.

    In the end, you suggestion that they expend the money and energy to achieve what you think is a better choice amounts to next to nothing.

    Until and unless we believe it is profitable to buy up and tear dwon homes that are in the “wrong places”.

    —————————-

    “In this case there are not enough resources left support a second round of mass overconsumption with 6 billion humans all wanting and deserving a slice of the pie.”

    What has that got to do with where they live? If there isn’t enough there isn’t enough. Americans could do with a lot less, but the others are still going to want a lot more.

    More EMR doom and gloom.

    ——————————

    “Or do you plan to be one of the few lucky ones at the top of the ziggurat? Watch out for the pitchforks, machetes and pikepoles.”

    Doom and gloom for those at the top, too.

    —————————–

    “Nouriel Roubini has come lately to the Common.”

    Count that as another tragedy of the Common.

    —————————

    “Millions of couples made more intelligent choices than those in Bristow and Dale City.”

    You mean like in Portland, which is virtually devoid of children, but has an enormous gay bathhouse?

    ———————————

    “if small groups of your friends got together they could have created real dooryards from the hundreds of similar buildings inside R=10.”

    Yes they could, but at what cost? And what crumbling infrastructure would they have to live with?

    Read some of the blogs of the troubles and risk that urban renewal adventurers have to deal with, and then tell me you would want to do that with kids in the house (with bars and alarms all over it).

    Let’s be honest about what you are advocating entails. And then, you still have to do something with the current “residents” or denizens.

    ———————————

    Check out the “safest” places by Prof Lucy’s calculations.

    EMR has prven over and over again that you can calculate anything you like. I can calculate that F does not equal MA: I just can’t expect to move anything that way.

    ——————————

    “For example, dwellings in the same price range as those in Bristow and Dale City were Attached Dwellings in the eastern Loudoun Beta Communities because they were closer to Jobs and Services due to the existence or Reston and Dulles Airport. These places also did not make the Top 12 in commuting times among Census Designated Places.”

    Well, I guess not. Virginia has abdicated road planning to the car haters since 1986. If these places wee closer to jobs and services, why don’t they have a shorter commute or less travel?

    Because proximity doesn’t mean squat compared to choice.

    Don’t talk to us about dwellings in the same price range unless they are comparable dwellings. How many times in the last six months have we seen stories of a half dozen or more families being displaced because of fires in attached dwellings? You have to learn to address ALL the costs and ALL the risks in order to sell your ideas.

    —————————-

    “OK, no agents make a profit from sweat equity and building safe Clusters and good Neighborhood schools from the inside ….”

    And you don’t see this as a problem with your plan? If you are going to advocate something, you should expect to pay for it.

    —————————-

    “EMR dos not advocate “econoboxes” nor does he advocate depriving Households of vehicles. See performance measures in original post.”

    Nah, he just says we need fewer people consuming less.
    He thinks we should drive less in smaller cars and we should have house which aree the “right size”.

    other than that we should be able to do whatever we want as long as we pay according to the “10x rule”.

    ————————-

    “and show the quality of life for existing residents wont be negatively impacted.”

    This goes to my argument with Larry. We have reached the point where EVERY existing resident thinks that ANY new resident is a negative impact.

    —————————–

    RH

  5. re: ” This goes to my argument with Larry. We have reached the point where EVERY existing resident thinks that ANY new resident is a negative impact.”

    Not True!

    Here’s what we have done.

    We have reached the point where we realize that new residents without an accompanying increase in the infrastructure will lead to two things:

    1. – a decrease in levels of services and quality of life

    2. – opposition to that decrease and policies that encourage it

    People are not opposed to growth.

    They are opposed to the degradation of levels of service and quality of life.

    Density does not equate to inevitable quality of life.

    If the infrastructure is improved as growth occurs, quality of life is not only preserved, but enhanced.

  6. Anonymous Avatar

    Not True!

    Larry, you are not going to convince me on this: I’ve been to too many public meetings.

    I’ve met too may people who will freely admit thattheir agenda is to slam the door behind them.

    If it was just about money, we could set a price and allow any development tha pays the price, and skip the public meetings.

    I’ve seen it too often, and I have met the players, and I have been told to my face.

    I’ll agree that people do not want a decrease in levels of services and quality of life. And what they see is that ANY new resident or ANY new activity amounts to competition they don’t want.

    When you go to the hearings you hear arguments that are just ridiculous.

    —————————

    “If the infrastructure is improved as growth occurs, quality of life is not only preserved, but enhanced.”

    Sorry, I don’t think anyone believes that, except maybe the developers. we have gotten to the point where growth is autmatically bad, developemnt is autmatically bad, and neighboors are unwanted. That is why we have literally thousands of jurisdictions with some kind of growth control ordinances. The burden of proof is entirely on the person or comapnay that wants to build, and the jury has already made up its mind that no level of proof is acceptable. You pay for traffic engineers and soil enginners, and then the experts in the audience at the public hearings just laugh at you. I’ve seen it happen.

    You should see the (anonymous) flyer I got in the mail concrning someone nearby that was building one new house on an existing lot, with by-rights to build. The thing sounded like an invitation to a ku klux klan rally. It was absolutely hysterical about all the bad things this one house on seven acres would do to the neighborhood.

    When I built my Alexandria house one of the neighbors came storming up through the woods (my woods) and demanded to see my building permit. He was positively livid that I would dare to build on my vacant lot next to his home. It had been vacant for so long that he considered it his to view: he even cut firewood there. He simply forgot that someone else actually owned the property. And I was as far from his house as I could get.

    I think the majority of people (except those that do live in urban neighborhoods and like to) do, in fact, beleive that growth inevitably leas to a decline in the quality of life.

    It goes all the way back to Davy Crocketts comment that it was time to move when you could see the smoke from your neighbors fireplace. And now that sentiment is embodied in laws that are based on false economics, and designed to make homes so expensive that only the “best” neighbors can afford them. It is snobbery and greed, plain and simple, and I don’t think there is anything youcan say to convince me otherwise.

    For $120,000 I can sell you 2500 square ft sf homes all day long. But by the time you get permission to set it down somewhere it will cost you twice that, plus the value of the land. And that is one reason home prices got so out of control. It’s only one reason, but it is part of the equation.

    RH

  7. Anonymous Avatar

    For what it’s worth, I think both Ray and Larry are correct to some extent.

    A lot of people are content to remain at the point where life is relatively good for them. I got mine; let’s just freeze things here where we are today. That attitude would certainly include strong resistance to more development.

    But I think more people are opposed to more development because development in NoVA simply is a huge negative to most people. More development in Fairfax County means: more crowded schools and parks; more traffic; more crowds on Metrorail; more pleas from the business community that we all need to dig more deeply into our wallets to pay higher taxes to keep this scheme running; and (to give full credit to Groveton) more money sent to Richmond to subsidize the rest of Virginia.

    Let’s look at HOT lanes on the Beltway. Personally, I don’t oppose the concept and I’m not hear to debate that. But last fall, VDOT and Fluor told a number of organizations there would be one lane on Route 123 closed in each direction for 90 days. Grumble, grumble, but probably acceptable. However, now the 90 days has changed into intermittent closings of one lane in each direction for as long as 30 months.

    Take about the same number of vehicles (unless you believe VDOT can successfully get huge numbers out of their cars and trucks) and put them into 2/3 of the capacity on Route 123. Traffic hell on steroids — for as long as 30 months. And then, of course, the HOT lanes don’t connect into Maryland’s HOT lanes, but end after the Dulles Toll Road connection with the Beltway. More traffic hell for how long?

    Now let’s add whatever traffic hell will occur as a result of construction of the elevated Silver Line.

    The costs are pretty darn clear for residents, commuters, local businesses and through traffic. Where are the matching benefits and who gets them?

    Development is the biggest detriment to darn near everyone in Fairfax County.

    TMT

  8. Anonymous Avatar

    So lets look at the alternatives

    Absolutely no more growth =
    Death to the economy

    Unchecked growth =
    all the problems TMT and Larry and I mention all the time

    So we are left with a hybrid of trying to control growth to meet both of these extremes.

    I give EMR credit it would be alot easier to grow if we would have done it his way from the beginning.

    The reality is we didn’t and now we have to face the consequences of our shortsighted actions with expensive improvements and massive disruptions

    We are still ultimately in control however. Its up to the voters to decide which way they want to go. Loudoun has flipflopped form pro to anti growth for the past three elections.

    Also as Ray and I have argued is it really worth it to attempt to fix Tysons. Maybe it would make more sense to spend billions on another area instead of building a metro line, HOT lanes and a transformation of an extremely complex and complicated area. At some point you reach an aspect of diminishing returns. What would happen if all this money was dumped into Manassass or Fredricksburg or Richmond for example. Richmond actually has existing infrasturcture capacity so why dont we develop more in that area.

    Ultimately, noone is forcing anyone to stay in the region. Its harsh but if the suburban to urban transition is upsetting than feel free to leave.

    A final note you can place the blame at Connolly but can you really blame him. His job was to manage the county. Most managers want a bigger budget which is accomplished in this case through development and growth. Thats exactly what he did and the majority in Fairfax supported it.

    NMM

  9. Anonymous Avatar

    How about this in summary

    Businesses like growth because of more customers but there is a typing point. They hate traffic and congestion so they form things like the NVTA to demand more money be spent on road imporvements

    Residents don’t like growth period. Ray a question for you. Show me a resident that actually likes growth who does not own undeveloped property or is a business owner.
    Is there anyone in the surrounding neighborhoods of Tysons that actually likes or wants what is going to happen. Most people I know don’t even want the metro line anymore.

    NMM

    NMM

  10. Anonymous Avatar

    Last one

    So who are we building HOT lanes and this stuff for. Not the people that live here. Its for the commuters. So why in the heck dont we develop Fredricksburg instead. That would be a lot less expensive and sustainable.

    NMM

  11. E M Risse Avatar

    NMM:

    Thank you. You make sense when you get off your idological hobby horse.

    Riding idological hobby horses is a privilige and luxury that Mass OverConsumption encourages.

    The choice is clear:

    Fundamental Transformation or Collapse.

    Now let us ALL try to figure out what we can learn from what has happened to change what is happening.

    That was the intent of the original ANATOMY OF A BAD COMMUTE post.

    Here are some thoughts on some of the points you made:

    First two points:

    The reason citizens across the globe are migrating to Beta New Urban Regions is that with all their faults, they still provide the best chance to achieve a quality life in the view of most of the 6 billion citizens.

    The first step in the process is to stop tossing idological black and white bricks. The “answer” is clearly not a “free market” it is not “racial purity” it is not “from each …”

    A place to start is understanding human settlement patterns and how they have evolved over the past 13,000 years.

    “…is it really worth it to attempt to fix Tysons.”

    It is if the goal is a Balanced Community with functional station-areas. See All Aboard.

    “It is Maybe it would make more sense to spend billions on another area(s)…”

    Yes, once there is a Wright Plan for the Mid Atlantic that rationally allocates land based on the amount needed to support sustainable New Urban Regions comprised of Balanced Communities — including Balanced But Disaggregated Communities in the Countryside — there will be plenty of opportunity for public and private investment is sustainable settlement patterns.

    “… instead of building a metro line, HOT lanes and a transformation of an extremely complex and complicated area. At some point you reach an aspect of diminishing returns.”

    You are right about the diminishing returns. But that has to be part of the equation in evolving every Balanced Community.

    “What would happen if all this money was dumped [let us not just “dump” money] into Manassass or Fredricksburg…”

    Those who have bothered to look at what we have been writing for two decades, both of those places would be the Core of a Blanced Community.

    EMR

  12. Anonymous Avatar

    “Show me a resident that actually likes growth who does not own undeveloped property or is a business owner.”

    Hear that Larry?

    See our argument on this topic in another thread. larry sasy that people are NOT opposed to growth as long as it pays for itself.

    But, these are the same people that say that growth does NOT pay for itself.

    Translation, they are not opposed to growth except for growth that doesn’t pay for itself, which is all growth.

    —————————-

    So, you agree, it is people with developed property (those who have used their development rights) against those with undeveloped property (those who have preserved their property the longest).

    And the argument is that those with undeveloped property don’t have the right (that is they NO LONGER have the right) to develop if it will adversely affect their neighbors.

    The developed neighbors on the other hand, DO have the right to adversely affect their (undeveloped) neighbors becuase their rights are unfettered, and they have the numbers on their side.

    RH

  13. Anonymous Avatar

    “The choice is clear:

    Fundamental Transformation or Collapse.”

    Or something in between.

    RH

  14. Anonymous Avatar

    “Those who have bothered to look at what we have been writing for two decades, both of those places would be the Core of a Blanced Community.”

    Really?

    I seem to recall us having a major battle in which you called me more or less a fool and idiot and a liar for suggesting that jobs were in fact moving away from the core and into places like Manassas.

    And now you are claiming credit for the idea?

    MY, how times change.

    RH

  15. Anonymous Avatar

    YES REALLY!

    A recent posting by “RH”:

    “Really?

    “I seem to recall us having a major battle in which you called me more or less a fool and idiot and a liar for suggesting that jobs were in fact moving away from the core and into places like Manassas.”

    “And now you are claiming credit for the idea?

    “MY, how times change.”

    Only a paid saboteur could make such a statement.

    First on the substance:

    The quote from Professor Risse about Manassas and Fredericksburg was in response to a statement by NMM:

    NMM said: “What would happen if all this money was dumped [let us not just “dump” money] into Manassas or Fredericksburg…”

    And Dr. Risse said: “Those who have bothered to look at what we have been writing for two decades [know that] both of those places would [should] be the Core of a Balanced Community.”

    That says nothing about “jobs were in fact moving” anywhere.

    I recall a map Risse prepared before Bacons Rebellion Blog was started, and perhaps before Bacons Rebellion Ezine was started that showed a purple oval indicating the logical location of the Core of a Balanced Community in both Manassas and Fredericksburg.

    Years before that I recall a study Risse did of the small enclaves (“service districts”) along VA Route 28 in Fauquier County. He advocated creating a Balance of Jobs and Housing in each one. He also pointed out that in total the service districts already had ‘commercial’ zoning for enough jobs to support something like 400,000 citizens. He said do not put jobs in the service districts without also putting housing and services in the service districts because that just creates a 45 mile radius for scattered housing.

    The “45 mile radius” was a term he used in a study for the Planning District Commission on VRE stations. So I called him and asked:

    “Was the VA Route 28 Corridor Service District study the first time you discussed Balanced enclaves in Fauquier County”

    “No,” he said. Back in the mid 80s, at the request of a committee appointed by a supervisor he gave a talk at the Warrenton Jr. High about the need to create a Balance of jobs, housing and services in every service district. He warned at that time that there needed to be a Balance because otherwise there would just be more scattered urban dwellings.

    If you are as well informed as you pretend, you knew all this and intentionally misrepresented Professor Risse’s comments because you and your sponsors are advocates of scattered urban dwellings.

    Now on the tone and continued attacks:

    You say you recall a “battle royal,” Risse told me months ago that he only recalls one brief exchange and after learning you had badly insulted a gentleman he respected has avoided all contact although he understands that from time to time others have objected to your disrespect and unfounded assaults.

    Many of us who believe that Professor Risse’s years of work are finally going to pay off find your incessant harping not just inappropriate but blatantly deceitful as this case documents.

    A friend told me he had read somewhere you said you were going to stop and “move on.” That is the best idea you have had.

  16. The use of the word “balance” is interesting to me.

    What would anyone be opposed to “balance” as it is described – a “balance” of residential, work, shopping and recreation?

    Who would not want – convenient access to all of these things that would not necessitate, instead, separating the work from the rest – which is pretty much what happens when someone takes a job in NoVa and then commutes to the residential, shopping and recreation.

    In fact.. in places like the Fredericksburg Area – there is strong, strong advocacy for quality of life, good schools, good shopping and plenty of recreational activities.

    In fact, if you talk to folks who choose to live in Stafford and Spotsylvania the answer is virtually universal –

    ” I cannot afford a home near to where I work in NoVa”.

    Think about this also.

    If you want the best schools for your kid – the best schools are in Fairfax – not Stafford and Spotsylvania – neither of which – ever show up on the “best school” lists that several schools in Fairfax do with regularity.

    So the question in my mind – is – how to you build more “more affordable” housing in NoVa without degrading the existing levels of service/quality of life – even further?

  17. Anonymous Avatar

    My “incessant harping” meely points out what I think are obvious and baltant flaws in EMRs “facts” and the reasoning based on them.

    He should accept this as good natured constructive criticism and attempt to correct his weak sales pitch.

    It might help him sell a few of his CD’s and make his ideas much more popular, not to say useful. His many obvious paranoias make this impossible for him, so he falls back on turning this into an adversarial situation by using unwarranted ad hominem attacks.

    RH

    RH

  18. Anonymous Avatar

    “Only a paid saboteur could make such a statement.”

    Anybody who wants can go back and look up the posts from tose days.

    RH

  19. Anonymous Avatar

    “….that showed a purple oval indicating the logical location of the Core of a Balanced Community in both Manassas and Fredericksburg.”

    That didn;t stop you from attacking me when I pointed out that such a thing was already happening, and perhaps we shoud start planning to accomodate it.

    RH

  20. Anonymous Avatar

    “If you are as well informed as you pretend, you knew all this and intentionally misrepresented Professor Risse’s comments because you and your sponsors are advocates of scattered urban dwellings.”

    I don’t pretend anything. I try to post references for the data and studies that I quote from. Ihave no sponsors, which I have explained before, and continuing to make such a reference is a deliberate lie in an attempt to denigrate credentials that I feely admit I don’t have.

    I don’t see that such untruths do anything to improve EMRs credibility.

    RH

  21. Anonymous Avatar

    “you had badly insulted a gentleman he respected has avoided all contact”

    I’m a pretty mild mannered guy. If I badly insulted someoneyou can be pretty sure of two things.

    1) He had it coming.

    2) He was insulted because I had the facts, and he had no way to hide from the truth.

    I’m not certain who he is referring to but it might be the same “gentleman” who calle me a liar and an idiot in a letter to the local paper, or it might be the other “gentleman”, a county supervisor, who suggested that I might want to leave the county.

    I’m not sure I have the verbal skills to properly insult such “gentlemen”.

    RH

  22. Anonymous Avatar

    I guess we are seeing more of the same. TMT

    Homes Sales In Loudoun Jump 31 Percent
    February 11, 2009 – 4:11pm

    DULLES, Va. – Loudoun home sales are picking up as prices continue to fall.

    The number of homes that sold in the county last month rose 31 percent from the previous January, according to new data from the Dulles Area Association of Realtors.

    Countywide, contracts were finalized on 284 homes in January, compared to 216 a year earlier.

    The median sale price in January, though, was down to $287,950, compared to $370,000 in January 2008, according to DAAR.

    Sales throughout the rest of Northern Virginia were also on the upswing last month. Homes sales jumped 40 percent in Fairfax County, Fairfax City, Arlington County, Alexandria City and Falls Church City, according to Rockville-based Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc.

    However, the median home price in these jurisdictions declined 20 percent from January 2008 to $320,000.

    Copyright 2009 Loudoun Times-Mirror. All rights reserved.

    by Staff @ Loudoun Times-Mirror
    DULLES, Va. – Loudoun home sales are picking up as prices continue to fall.

    The number of homes that sold in the county last month rose 31 percent from the previous January, according to new data from the Dulles Area Association of Realtors.

    Countywide, contracts were finalized on 284 homes in January, compared to 216 a year earlier.

    The median sale price in January, though, was down to $287,950, compared to $370,000 in January 2008, according to DAAR.

    Sales throughout the rest of Northern Virginia were also on the upswing last month. Homes sales jumped 40 percent in Fairfax County, Fairfax City, Arlington County, Alexandria City and Falls Church City, according to Rockville-based Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc.

    However, the median home price in these jurisdictions declined 20 percent from January 2008 to $320,000.

    Copyright 2009 Loudoun Times-Mirror. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply