Northam Spending Spree Update: $300 Million for HBCUs

by James A. Bacon

In an effort to “level the playing field,” Governor Ralph Northam is proposing nearly $300 million in additional spending in the next two-year budget at Virginia’s two public historically black universities. Virginia State University would get $150 million more, and Norfolk State University would get $143 million more.

“Virginia’s historically black colleges and universities are tremendously important — but they have not always received the state funding they deserve,” he said in a statement Saturday, as reported by the Virginian-Pilot. “This budget package is about leveling the playing field and investing in these world-class institutions, so all students have equal access to a great higher education.”

Added Northam spokeswoman Alena Yarmosky: “NSU and VSU are receiving a significant level of new funding when compared to many other public 4-year universities in the Commonwealth.”

The bulk of the money would be allocated to one-time capital expenditures.

Northam’s justification for this lavish treatment is that Virginia’s public HBCUs “have not always received the state funding they deserve.” The Virginian-Pilot article makes no mention of any evidence the governor might have cited to back up that assertion.

Wondering what might be the truth of the matter, I took General Fund expenditures for the current biennial budget for each public four-year institution in Virginia and divided that support by in-state enrollment for the 2018-19 school year as found in the State Council for Higher Education in Virginia data portal. (Note: the table above should say that General Fund data comes from the FY 2019 and FY 2020 budgets.)

This exercise shows that Norfolk State University received almost $16,800 in General Fund allocations per student — more than any other institution in Virginia. This number covers state aid to institutions, supplementary aid offered as incentive to hold tuition in line, and financial aid — and perhaps more, I’m not sure.

Virginia State University comes close behind, in the No. 4 slot, at $14,719 per student for the two-year period.

As far as support for ongoing operations are concerned, NSU and VSU fare far better than most other institutions. How much does Governor Northam think they “deserve”? Do they “deserve” to have state support far in excess of what every other institution is getting?

Admittedly, money for operations is not the same as money for capital expenditures. In the time I had available this morning, I could not identify a concise summary of capital spending per institution over a lengthy time frame. Capital expenditures fluctuate year to year depending upon projects in the pipeline, so looking at a single biennial budget can be deceiving.

It is theoretically possible that NSU and VSU have been short-changed over the years, although it is my recollection that every governor since Jim Gilmore has been attentive to the needs of the HBCUs. I have not visited VSU in years, but I did spend some time on the NSU campus a couple of years back, and I can say that the quality of its facilities looks top rate. The buildings are new and well maintained. To be comprehensive, however, we also have to consider what’s “under the hood” — the quality of IT infrastructure, energy infrastructure, and the like, and I have no basis for making an observation about that.

Bacon’s bottom line: As governor, Northam has the responsibility to support his claim that NSU and VSU have been treated unfairly. If the two HBCUs have been short-changed in capital funding, he should show us the data to prove the point. Such data may exist, and I will be happy to publish it, if it does. Until he justifies this $300 million hand-out to the two institutions, however, he will be vulnerable to suggestions that he continues to pay penance for his blackface fiasco with public tax dollars.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Northam Spending Spree Update: $300 Million for HBCUs”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    Geezy Peezy – a one-time capital funding proposal for two colleges that likely have not been equal funded for decades is called a “Spending Spree” replete with a chart showing operating expenses!

    And only after reading down into the narrative do we see this:

    re: ” To be comprehensive, however, we also have to consider what’s “under the hood” — the quality of IT infrastructure, energy infrastructure, and the like, and I have no basis for making an observation about that.”

    I think in order to fairly make the case – We’d need to go back and find out if the HBCUs have always gotten a fair share of funding compared to other higher Ed and if I were a betting person, I’d not be surprised at all to find out that HBCUs as a rule have not been as well funded on Capital infrastructure as other colleges over the decades including that time period when Virginia actually refused to fund public schools during Massive Resistance!

    It might also be useful to compare Virginia colleges right now in terms of square feet of building infrastructure. Is there an equivalent amount of square footage of buildings at the HBCU as UVA or Tech?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      In fact, both VSU and NSU have gotten significant new capital projects in the past few years.

    2. “that likely have not been equal funded for decades…”

      Larry, You base that claim upon what data that is more authoritative to what I presented?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        no – I do not know but I’d not be surprised. given Virginia’s past history ……….

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Most of Northam’s announcement was just PR and spin. By my calculations, about $277 million was for capital projects. One big project for each institution, both of which had been in the pipeline, accounts for most of the costs. A good many years ago, the state was under scrutiny from the feds to increase funding for these schools and there has been a lot of political sensitivity as for as their funding was concerned.

    The real question, and the one that no one is willing to touch, is why the state should continue to operate these two schools and keep pouring money into the facilities. What is the justification today for operating two institutions of higher education with predominately black student bodies? In Norfolk, especially, it seems problematic to continue operating NSU when there is ODU in the same city. At the very least, the two institutions could be combined administratively.

    Both schools have been losing enrollment. NSU peaked at 8,667 in 1994. In 2015, it had declined to 5,105, although in 2019 it had increased to 5,601. VSU peaked in 2012 at 6,208 and has declined since then to 4,365 in 2019.

    Both schools have had administrative weaknesses. Eddie Moore helped put VSU on stronger ground when he was president. Then, after NSU got put on probation several years ago by its accreditation agency for financial issues, they brought Moore in from retirement to help right the ship. He has now retired for a second time.

    Other than nostalgia and alumni sentiment, it is difficult to see any justification for their continued existence since all colleges and universities are closely monitored for any racial discrimination in their admissions. Indeed, all higher ed institutions are seeking diversity in their student bodies.

    1. Excellent points, Dick. Alumni sentiment counts for a lot — especially if those alumni serve in the General Assembly.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Yup, Dick got to the nub of the issue though probably politically incorrect in some places……..

  3. johnrandolphofroanoke Avatar
    johnrandolphofroanoke

    Without state support, HBCU cannot survive in the twenty-first century. Look at what happened to St. Paul’s College in Lawrenceville. Shocking to see the dollar figures going to VPI and UVA. Both schools are nesting on billions of dollars in the form of endowments. HBCU’s are going to have to adapt and modify fast. This old model of higher education dates back to Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois.

    1. After all the bitter complaints coming out of Charlottesville, I was surprised to see how high the per-student UVa figure is. There might be more to the numbers than meets the high — skewed by the high percentage of graduate students, or something like that. (Med school is expensive!)

      1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
        Reed Fawell 3rd

        You might want to check out the three year 2020-223 Alderman Library reconstruction, about which cost is not so easy to find. UVa. has learned its lesson, as it use to brag about its outrageous capital costs. Best I could find was a $152 Million Dollar request to GA for first year (spring of 2020.), presumably with more requested in installments each year. GA approved request with amendment that required $20 million capital contribution from UVA for first year costs.

        PS – wonder if UVA will rename new Alderman library as former UVA President Sullivan wanted him investigated as a bigot and racist?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          The estimated cost of the Alderman renovation was $152.5 million. UVa. said it would issue its own bonds for $20 million of that amount, leaving the state to finance $132.5 million of the cost.

          The 2019 General Assembly authorized this project to go to construction. Under the “pool process”, into which this project falls, the project is now in the detailed planning stage. At the conclusion of that phase, the Dept. of General Services will assign an approved cost, which could be higher or lower than $152.5 million. After completion of the planning and the receipt of a final bid, if that final bid does not exceed the detailed planning estimate by more than five percent, UVa. will be authorized to proceed with construction. In summary, it will be some time before the final cost is known. (There are some other wrinkles in the process that could affect the cost, but I won’t get that far into the weeds here.)

        2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
          Reed Fawell 3rd

          Thanks Dick. That $152 million is a bargain compared to $60,000,000 spent on Rotunda renovation enlarging it to around 45,000 square feet. See below, which likely refers to base building hard cost price of $105,000,000 for Alderman’s 230,000 SF Completed.

          Alderman Library Renovation & Expansion University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

          Located adjacent to the Rotunda, Alderman Library plays a central role in the student experience as the physical and cultural heart of the University of Virginia campus. HBRA Architects and Clark Nexsen have partnered on a complete, 100,000 square foot restoration and a 130,000 square foot expansion that will upgrade the library’s physical features and create a contemporary facility with increased technology and daylighting. The vision for the Alderman Library Renovation & Expansion centers on revitalizing this high profile, historic building as a space for engaged learning and study.

          Originally built in 1938, this is its first major renovation and will transform key aspects of the facility’s program. Additionally, a new connecting bridge from the UVA historic building to the nearby Clemons Library will be created. The design focuses on creating a contemporary structure with state-of-the-art technology and learning spaces. The overall goal is to “produce a building that allows for growth in collections, is responsive to the impact of digital scholarship, is ready for the evolution of knowledge, and accommodates changes over time.” With large collaboration areas, private study carrels, maker spaces, a café, classrooms, offices, and media rooms, among other spaces, the new Alderman Library will be a model of 21st century learning. The use of compact shelving and archival spaces for rare books and maps will allow for engagement with physical books while maximizing the diversity of spaces in which students can study. When complete, the library will house approximately one million volumes with room for growth.

          The renovation of the historic Alderman building emphasizes restoration and preservation. It will restore the exterior masonry, windows, and doors, and maintain interior historic characteristics while replacing outdated systems including mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, equipment, technology, security, and vertical transportation. The addition will be seamlessly integrated with the historic building, and exterior improvements will provide students with a landscaped outdoor environment for study and gathering.
          Size

          230,000 SF
          Completion
          Est. 2022
          Cost $105,000,000

          See https://www.clarknexsen.com/project/alderman-library-renovation-expansion-uva/

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            You are right. The $105 million is for the actual renovation construction. Once you add in the costs of A/E, inspections, furnishings, “miscellaneous” other costs, and contingency, the total estimated cost comes to $152.5 million. Here is the UVa submission to DPB if you are interested: http://publicreports.dpb.virginia.gov/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=OB_DocView&Param1=849a717f-6883-4a70-abea-18e0a908ae69

  4. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    Here is a major flashpoint re Alderman Library renovation:

    CONTRAST THIS from Virginia Magazine:

    “Their objections aren’t sentimental, nor are they based on an aversion to online research. No one, Unsworth included, suggests that digital technology is up to supporting intensive, precise, tenure-track humanities research.

    Associate professor of English John Parker, one of the dissidents and whose research spans from antiquity to the Renaissance, says his concerns relate to the relentless efficiency required to succeed in an academic career. “You are on the clock,” he says. “The basic reality is, you have to publish a book before you come up for tenure. So you’ve got six years or you’re out.”

    He can demonstrate before your eyes the dizzying speed with which a scholar must be able to spread out multiple volumes to cross-reference original sources, translations and commentaries. Then he can swivel to his computer to show why, despite equal proficiency, you can’t replicate the process online, even in the case of something as widely digitized as biblical text.

    “Higher education in the humanities is one of the most cutthroat, competitive industries you can go into,” Parker says. “The entire promotional structure of higher education is based on rate of publication, and rate of publication in the humanities is based on ease of access to the widest range of materials.”

    Library officials and the petitioners don’t agree on the extent to which the renovation will reduce the number of books openly available …”

    WITH THIS, for Dick’s link in above:

    Lone scholarship is no longer viewed as the way to provide the answer to the complex research questions we face today. Instead, interdisciplinary, collaborative and team-based approaches are seen as key. Libraries have collections, tools, and information experts that can facilitate these shifts, and they are, more than ever, a destination place for scholars. They provide the cross disciplinary spaces where scholars can create and innovate, and where students and faculty can gather to learn from each other

    Current trends in research libraries reflect this need for flexible space and up-to-date technology. The Education Advisory Board, a research group that works with provosts to address concerns affecting colleges and universities, cites these changes:
    • Research now “encompasses datasets, visualizations, and other new media.” Whether pursuing data-driven research or offering online learning, the library expects to provide the technology and the expertise to help scholars use these resources.
    • Research data also needs to be shareable: “users are hungry to explore how content connects and interacts over time.” In addition, it needs to be managed and preserved, now that a growing number of federal agencies require data management plans for grant-funded research, especially in STEM fields.
    • Libraries are expected to improve digital literacy by providing highly-technical resources, skills, and tools to both faculty and students.
    • Library users demand flexible space “where students and faculty can access resources to create, tinker, and collaborate on hands-on projects.” These makerspaces have become symbolic of the learning styles of today’s student.

    Faculty, students, and visiting scholars will have access to the technology and spaces they need for 21st century research, teaching, and learning. These include spaces for collaboration, teaching using multi-media and other technologies, and …”

    This controversy helps us to better understand the deep divide of interests and methods of learning and teaching between the tradition Arts and Sciences and the STEM research. And how difficult it is to reconcile the two competing interests that are very important to most undergraduate students paying high prices to get a good education.

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      The crux problem, the core conflict here, is between the critical educational task of true scholarship that preserves accumulated learning and enhances that learning, which in turn is then passed on to students via highly effective teaching of students, as opposed using the library primarily as a tool for faculty entrepreneurship facilitated by research and development done for private profit, thus often funded by outside grants and payments, particularly STEM R&D.

      Hence, note this provision above.

      “In addition, it (research data) needs to be managed and preserved, now that a growing number of federal agencies require data management plans for grant-funded research, especially in STEM fields.”

      In fact, Alderman library is being rebuilt in large part for business reasons so as to better promote the private interests of its senior research faculty and administrators within UVA who manage most all this growing volume of business that the University of Virginia engages in nationally, and aspires to engage in worldwide.

  5. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    One expression of this R&D objective of UVA is found in the April 7 2013 University of Virginia Strategic Planning Initiative. Public University Working Group.

    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/785804/university-of-virginia-planning-group-report.pdf

    For example its guiding principal #6

    “6. Strategic investment in new market-based initiatives – With its greater self-governance, UVA will be challenged to generate additional revenues beyond tuition from traditional residential students. So UVA should develop a culture and invest in the infrastructure required to encourage and support revenue-generating program innovation. All stakeholders, from senior University leaders through deans, department heads, faculty, and staff, should identify market opportunities, particularly in areas of academic strength, and then appropriate faculty and staff should develop and introduce high-quality degree and non-degree programs to meet these opportunities. With cost reductions in other areas, and a new approach to budgeting and revenue sharing, the University should be able to offer entrepreneurial faculty and staff the venture capital required to develop and introduce these programs. Schools and departments will be able to use the revenues generated by these programs to invest in other programs and activities that are critical to the University’s academic mission, but ones that may be unable to generate direct revenues.
    These programs may be offered in Charlottesville, other parts of the state, and/or around the nation and the world.”

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      In my comments above and below, I point up how with UVA, “are we watching a great university lose its heart and its soul, along with the last vestiges of its sacred mission?”

      There are many, many examples of this ongoing decline of UVa ethics and character. For example, its claims to how it spends students’ tuition and fees all on “Instruction and student support, with a 6% devoted to “general overhead’,” as illustrated by its just published and grossly misleading charts that assert this cleverly disguised untruths.

      When the ethics and morality of an institution and its system fall so long and so far as at UVA, these destructive habits, become so chronic and craven, impossible to hide as hidden acts of bad conduct then pile up till a few burst up into public view as scandals, popping up chronically from time to time all over, in all parts of university life, and everything it touches. We’ve seen this again and again, over the past decade at UVA.

      So now today, soon after attempted and botched removal of the Veterans Day gun salute at UVA to our 80,000 war dead never recovered, yet another scandal of alleged lies and deceits pop in Charlottesville.

      This in an incrediable story laid out in detail in today’s Daily Progress. Read it below.

      https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/uva/uva-cpd-at-odds-over-investigation-into-brawl-that-involved/article_d8705ae2-f7e1-55ff-8535-a9463cc7f34b.html

  6. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    With Alderman’s makeover, are we watching a great university lose its heart and its soul, along with the last vestiges of its sacred mission?

    Read again the above comments. Then consider these comments from two Associate professors of the humanities striving for tenure at UVA:

    “Their objections aren’t sentimental, nor are they based on an aversion to online research. No one, Unsworth included, suggests that digital technology is up to supporting intensive, precise, tenure-track humanities research.

    Associate professor of English John Parker, one of the dissidents and whose research spans from antiquity to the Renaissance, says his concerns relate to the relentless efficiency required to succeed in an academic career. “You are on the clock,” he says. “The basic reality is, you have to publish a book before you come up for tenure. So you’ve got six years or you’re out.”

    He can demonstrate before your eyes the dizzying speed with which a scholar must be able to spread out multiple volumes to cross-reference original sources, translations and commentaries. Then he can swivel to his computer to show why, despite equal proficiency, you can’t replicate the process online, even in the case of something as widely digitized as biblical text.”’

    Now, having read the above, ask yourself:

    If this be the challenge of learning that confronts a PhD associate professor in humanities at UVA, consider the even greater challenge that confronts the graduate and undergraduate student there.

    And now, also consider UVA’s written response to these students of Arts and Sciences at UVA, as UVA petitions initially for $160 million dollars of taxpayer money to remake what used to be Adlerman library.

    “Lone scholarship is no longer viewed as the way to provide the answer to the complex research questions we face today…

    • Research data also needs to be shareable: “users are hungry to explore how content connects and interacts over time.” In addition, it needs to be managed and preserved, now that a growing number of federal agencies require data management plans for grant-funded research, especially in STEM fields. …

    • Library users demand flexible space “where students and faculty can access resources to create, tinker, and collaborate on hands-on projects.” These makerspaces have become symbolic of the learning styles of today’s student.”

    So in Alderman Library, students no longer learn from books written by great scholars, they learn instead now from one another in “makerplaces.” Where they make products.

    This is quite a transition. First Mr. Jefferson’s original library housed in the Rotunda is renovated for $60 million into a place to house a world class corporate board room complete with its own underground designer kitchen. All done for pleasure of UVA’s elite leaders, its Board of Visitors.

    And now, adding insult to injury:

    UVA’s Alderman Library is renovated with $130 million of taxpayer dollars for use as an incubator for the research, design and development of commercial product for sale, an innovation center to match the one that has taken over downtown Charlottesville.

    What a loss. What a pity.

    Alderman library use to produce fine and capable well educated human being we called scholars. Now the place is redesigned and rebuilt makes stuff for UVA’s dwindling number of tenured professors and their masters, the administrators, to sell for profit.

    And all of this done at the cost students, parents and taxpayers in Virginia thanks in substantial part to Virginia’s General Assembly.

Leave a Reply