No Sympathy for Drunk Drivers

by Kerry Dougherty

With newspaper reporting being as poor as it is these days, it can be dangerous to weigh in on stories gleaned from dailies.

But what the heck, let’s give it a go today.

Over the weekend the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported on the case of a 24-year-old Chesterfield woman convicted of manslaughter and DUI.

She was sentenced three weeks ago to 20 years in prison, with 13 years suspended.

Why did it take the paper so long to report the story? Who knows. Timeliness is not important these days.

Here’s what we know: Kaylin Stine was driving with a blood alcohol level of .215 on January 30, 2021. That’s more than twice the legal limit. She’d been drinking all day and was headed home after friends begged her to spend the night at their house and when she refused, offered to drive her home.

Nah, she was fine to drive, she told them.

In a video, Stine called that a bad decision.

No, dear. That was about 20 bad decisions. Every drink that day was a mistake. Those two White Claws you picked up at a gas station were two more mistakes. Turning down an offer for a ride home was just one more.

So was switching on the ignition of your Jeep Cherokee.

That wasn’t the end of Stine’s bad decisions. She also was checking her cellphone — while drunk, while driving. That apparently caused her to swerve out of her lane into the path of a Honda CR-V driven by an innocent person, 23-year-old Jordan Barksdale, who died that night.

The hook for the TD news story was a YouTube video in which Stine told her story, ending it by telling people not to drink and drive.

The judge — for reasons I can’t understand and are not explained in the story — allowed the video to be shown at Stine’s sentencing. But Ms. Barksdale’s immediate family left the courtroom without seeing it.

I don’t blame them. This was a craven attempt to get a reduced sentence.

(Stine also approached Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and asked to make a video for them to use to urge people not to drink and drive. MADD wisely turned her down. They clearly didn’t want to be a gimmick her lawyer could use at sentencing to help demonstrate his client’s “remorse.”)

In her video, Stine is quick to point out that her boyfriend is in the National Guard and had been sent to Washington for the January 6th riot. As if that makes a difference. She said she believed he was coming home to surprise her that night and she was checking her phone for his location.

Apparently, she wanted to be all liquored up for the homecoming.

I watched the 3-minute video. You can too. Here it is:

She’s so sorry. Boo hoo. Who wouldn’t be filled with regret?

Ms. Barksdale paid the ultimate price for all of Stine’s bad decisions that night. And she’s just as dead as if Stine had shot her in the head.

On July 11, Judge Jayne Pemberton sentenced Stine to 20 years in prison with 13 years suspended, giving her only seven to serve. Hopefully, the judge also ordered Stine not to drive for the duration of her sentence: 20 years. No way she should be allowed back on the roads when she’s released.

There is no way to tell if the video pulled on the judge’s heartstrings. It didn’t tug on mine.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “No Sympathy for Drunk Drivers”

  1. I was more moved by the video than Kerry was. Not that I think Ms. Stine deserved to have her sentence reduced — she did the crime, so she needs to do the time. The true test of her sincerity will be what she does with the rest of her life. Will she continue to make amends — to society, if not the family — during and after her time in prison?

    I think of how I would react if I were responsible for killing someone while driving drunk. I don’t know if I’d be able to function.

    Reminds me of a recent story of a father who absent-mindedly left his child in the back seat of his car. The child died from overheating. The father was so remorseful that he went into the woods and put a bullet through his brain.

    We all have to accept responsibility for the consequences of our actions.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I don’t think the latter example is “accepting responsibility”. It’s the ultimate dodge.

  2. joelrubin Avatar
    joelrubin

    They should show this video to every person as they get their drivers licenses.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Can’t seem to get to the cited video, but if you were of a specific age then you would have watched “Signal 30” and some four others of similar ilk. You might be able to view the above film at a dark web site such as rotten.com where they preview autopsy films and other pleasant breakfast scenes.

      Saw it.

      Kerry got right — for once — craven attempt at a reduced sentence. And, getting 13 years suspeded shows it worked.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Those are bodies, not actors.

          That was fun! I had forgotten the crispy critter scene. Coach showed that and a couple of similar movies just before summer break in 1968. Coach Paul Duda. SOB. He closed the windows and the room got nice and toasty by the time the first kid dumped his lunch and a half dozen joined in.

          1. They were still showing those movies in 1980 when I went through driver education. Since I was under 18, I (and one of my parents) had to sit through a couple of them in a courtroom before the state would issue me a driver’s license.

  3. Teddy007 Avatar

    There is no way that she goes 20 years without driving.

    1. Yes, but part of her sentence could be that she go 20 years without being able to legally drive.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Too many folks do stupid stuff without really considering the potential consequences until AFTER and in some cases, another person loses their life over your irresponsible behavior.

    Some folks are capable of blowing it off and other’s it affects them the rest of their life.

    It’s hard to tell who is who sometimes… as all of them are usually expressing regrets.

    The length of time it takes for this to make it through the legal system is pretty typical.. and many who are financially able get a good lawyer who slows the process down and does all the things that need to be done to minimize the penalty. If you don’t have the money, you don’t come out as well usually.

    People who screw with their cell phones while driving – risk what happened to this lady. I can’t believe how many folks I see doing it these days – including Moms with kids in the back.

  5. Seven years is actually a pretty stiff sentence for someone convicted of killing other(s) with a motor vehicle.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Uh yep. Weapon of choice for a light sentence. Use a gun, you might get 20 to life; poison, knife, garrot, and it’s LWOP, but a car… and you’re out in 7 with a brand new driver’s license.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Uh yep. Weapon of choice for a light sentence. Use a gun, you might get 20 to life; poison, knife, garrot, and it’s LWOP, but a car… and you’re out in 7 with a brand new driver’s license.

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      That is what I thought. Seems like vehicular homicide is a 1-10 year sentence… not sure how this is different but I guess it is.

      1. She was convicted of aggravated involuntary manslaughter, which calls for a 1-20 year sentence, with one year mandatory.

        Killing another while driving under the influence with “reckless disregard to life” justifies an aggravated involuntary manslaughter charge (Code of Virginia § 18.2-36.1).

        I don’t have a problem with the law, per se, my issue is with the suspension of such a large portion of prison sentences. What’s the point of meting out the maximum sentence if the judge is going to suspend 65% of it?

        1. JavaJane Avatar

          Could be that if she reoffends during the the period of suspension, she would have to serve the remaining 13 years.

    4. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      Really?

      What would you recommend if the fatality were one of your family?

      1. A factual observation does not imply endorsement.

        I did not state, nor did I imply, that I was satisfied with the sentence. As a motorcycle rights activist I am keenly aware of the laughable sentences handed down to most people who carelessly kill others with their cars.

        My personal opinion is that anyone who is convicted of killing another person with a motor vehicle should receive the same sentence as any other convicted killer who used a different deadly weapon to commit a similar crime. Whether it be murder, manslaughter, negligent homicide, or some other class of non-justifiable homicide, a similar conviction should result in a similar sentence.

  6. no sympathy for drunk drivers, but clearly you guys aren’t doing anything about it. 12k people die every year and the number hasn’t changed much. go make a change instead of being angry. if a fatal dui is murder then a dui should be pre-meditated murder
    and millions get a dui every year so…

Leave a Reply